Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (60)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zieliñski, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bednarek, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zieliñski, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bednarek, M.
(Chest. 2001;119:731-736.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Early Detection of COPD in a High-Risk Population Using Spirometric Screening*

Jan Zieliñski, MD, PhD, FCCP; Michal Bednarek, MD, and the Know the Age of Your Lung Study Group{dagger}

* From the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Warsaw, Poland. {dagger} A complete list of investigators of the Know the Age of Your Lung Study Group is located in the Appendix.

Correspondence to: Jan Zieliñski, MD, PhD, FCCP, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Plocka 26, 01–138 Warsaw, Poland; e-mail: j.zielinski{at}igichp.edu.pl


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix 1
 References
 
Study objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of mass spirometry use for the detection of airflow obstruction in a high-risk population.

Design: Free spirometry was offered to smokers who were > 39 years of age with a smoking history of > 10 pack-years. Action was preceded by the dissemination of information on the causes and symptoms of COPD in the local mass media.

Setting: Pulmonary outpatient clinics in 12 large cities of Poland.

Participants: Eleven thousand twenty-seven subjects with the following characteristics were screened: mean (± SD) age, 51.8 ± 12.5 years; men, 57%; current or ex-smokers, 80%; and mean smoking history, 26.1 ± 16.8 pack-years.

Interventions: Smoking history, simple spirometry (FVC and FEV1), and an antismoking advice.

Results: Spirometric signs of airway obstruction were found in 24.3% of the subjects who were screened. Of those subjects, mild obstruction was found in 9.5%, moderate obstruction was found in 9.6%, and severe obstruction was found in 5.2%. In smokers aged >= 40 years who had a smoking history of > 10 pack-years, airway obstruction was found in 30.6%. Airway obstruction was present in 8.3% of smokers < 40 years of age who had a smoking history of < 10 pack-years. Of the 2,200 subjects who had never smoked in their lives, airway obstruction was found in 14.4%.

Conclusions: Mass spirometry in high-risk groups is an effective and easy method for the early detection of COPD.

Key Words: COPD • high-risk group • mass spirometry.


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix 1
 References
 
COPD is the most frequent chronic lung disease in developed countries. Epidemiologic surveys in the United Kingdom,1 France,2 and Poland3 have demonstrated that approximately 10% of the adult population presents with chronic cough and sputum production accompanied with spirometric signs of airflow obstruction. The high prevalence and inexorable progression of the disease result in a high mortality rate. In the United States, COPD, from which > 100,000 persons die each year, is the fourth leading cause of death.4

Contrary to the declining trends in mortality rates observed during the last 2 decades for cardiovascular diseases, the mortality rate for COPD is still rising. The mortality rate from chronic lung diseases (COPD being the prevailing cause) rose by 46.6% between 1979 and 1993.5 COPD is an important cause of sick leaves,6 hospital admissions,7 and doctor office visits.8 In the United States, the estimated direct and indirect costs related to COPD amounted, in 1993, to $23.9 billion.

COPD usually is diagnosed late in its natural course. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which was conducted in the United States from 1988 to 1994, demonstrated that 63.3% of subjects with documented low lung function had no prior or current diagnosis of obstructive lung disease.9 For many years, the early symptoms (ie, chronic cough and sputum production) are usually neglected. Most often, a patient is inclined to seek medical advice when he or she becomes dyspneic. By that time, more than half of the patient’s ventilatory reserves are irreparably lost. Because of the increase in prevalence and mortality of COPD, and its high medical costs, it is important to identify patients and to treat them before they reach the symptomatic and costly stages of the disease.

The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of spirometric screening in the detection of airflow obstruction, the principal sign of COPD, on a high-risk population.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix 1
 References
 
Pulmonary physicians, members of the Know the Age of Your Lung Study Group, performed their investigations in pulmonary outpatient clinics in 12 Polish cities. They prepared written materials for local TV, radio, or newspapers. Materials included information on the causes and symptoms of COPD. In some places, it was thought that the term COPD was unfamiliar, and it was replaced by the better known term emphysema. Information that not all smokers are susceptible to COPD and that spirometry is a simple noninvasive method to detect COPD at an early stage of the disease was also included. Smokers > 39 years of age with a history of > 10 pack-years of smoking were invited for a free spirometry test. However, all people who presented themselves for spirometry, whether younger or nonsmokers, also were accepted.

Spirometry was performed in some places on working days, and in others on Saturdays. Three models of spirometers (Pneumo 2000; ABC Med; Kraków, Poland; and Lungtest 500 or Lungtest 1000; MES; Kraków, Poland) were used in the majority of centers, except in Warsaw where another was used (Alpha or model 2120 spirometer; Vitalograph; Maidenhead, UK). Spirometric measurements were taken by an experienced technician using American Thoracic Society recommendations.10 FVC and FEV1 were measured. The reference values were those of the European Community of Coal and Steel that have been approved by the European Respiratory Society.11 The FEV1/FVC ratio was calculated. The obstructive pattern of ventilatory impairment was classified according to the European Respiratory Society Guidelines12 when FEV1/FVC ratio was < 85% of the predicted normal value. The severity of the airway obstruction was categorized as mild (FEV1, >= 70% of normal), moderate (FEV1, 50 to 69% of normal), and severe (FEV1, < 50% of normal). A restrictive pattern of ventilatory impairment was recognized when FVC was < 80% of normal and the FEV1/FVC was > 100% of normal. A mixed-pattern group (FVC, < 80% of normal; FEV1, >= 70% of normal; FEV1/FVC ratio, 85 to 99% of normal) was distinguished that described spirometry studies showing both restrictive and obstructive ventilatory impairment.

While waiting to undergo spirometry testing, subjects filled out a short questionnaire concerning their smoking habits. The results of spirometry (the absolute values and the percent predicted) were written into a small booklet entitled the Lung Health Identity Card distributed to each subject. The booklet included basic recommendations related to the results of spirometry. One part of the booklet was devoted to smoking habits, including a suggestion to enter the patient’s actual smoking status every 3 months. Also, in the spirometric part of the booklet, there was a place for multiple future entries.

Subjects with normal spirometry levels were informed of the results of their testing and, in addition to the Lung Health Identity Card, were presented with an antismoking booklet containing information about the harmful effects of smoking and advice on how to stop smoking. Physicians participating in the study consulted with subjects presenting with abnormal spirometry, explained the relationship between the results of spirometry and smoking, strongly advised smoking cessation, and suggested a visit to a family physician by writing an appropriate referral letter for the subject.

The demographics of the investigated subjects, the results of the smoking questionnaires, and the spirometric measurements in each cooperating center were entered into a database and were sent to the Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases in Warsaw where they were centrally analyzed using software (Statistica; SAS Institute; Cary, NC).


    Results
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix 1
 References
 
A total number of 11,027 evaluable spirograms and questionnaires were reviewed. Subjects consisted of 57.3% men and 42.7% women, with a mean (± SD) age of 51.8 ± 12.5 years. Eighty percent of subjects were current smokers or ex-smokers with a smoking history of 26.1 ± 16.8 pack-years. Two thousand two hundred subjects declared themselves as lifelong nonsmokers. Exposure to passive smoking was not investigated. One thousand five hundred eighty-four subjects (14.4%) were < 40 years of age. The youngest subject was 13 years old, and the oldest subject was 89 years old. The age group distribution is shown in Figure 1 . The demographic and smoking habit data of different age groups are shown in Table 1 .



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1.. Age distribution of the studied subjects.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1.. Demographic and Smoking Habit Data*

 
Abnormal spirometry levels were found in 35% of all studied subjects. Total ventilatory impairment was found in 24.3% of subjects and was of an obstructive pattern. Signs of mild obstruction were found in 9.5% of all subjects, moderate obstruction was found in 9.6%, and severe obstruction was found in 5.2%. Airflow obstruction was three times as frequent in subjects > 39 years of age (Table 2 ). The detailed results of spirometry in smokers related to age and smoking habits are shown in Table 3 . Again, airflow obstruction was three times as frequent in the older age group than in the younger age group. Among the lifelong nonsmokers, airflow obstruction was found in 14.4% of investigated subjects and was also three times more frequent in the older age group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2.. Results of Spirometry Stratified According to Age Groups

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3.. Results of Spirometry in Smokers Divided into Age and Smoking Habit Severity Groups

 

    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix 1
 References
 
In 1990, COPD ranked sixth among the most common causes of death and is predicted to rank third by the year 2020.13 Cigarette smoking is the major risk factor for COPD, inducing inflammatory changes in the airway and an protease/antiprotease imbalance as well as an oxidant/antioxidant imbalance, leading to irreversible damage to the most peripheral structures of the lung (emphysema).

Approximately 15 to 20% of smokers develop COPD.14 As smoking is a behavior that can be changed, a key issue in avoiding the development of severe forms of COPD would be to identify susceptible smokers at an early stage of the disease and to persuade them to stop smoking. The early diagnosis of COPD at a preclinical phase of the disease may be attempted by spirometric screening of smokers.

The present study showed that voluntary spirometry screening of a high-risk population of smokers gave a very high yield of subjects presenting with spirometric signs of airway obstruction. Interestingly, the percentage of subjects with airway limitation was very close to that in the results of screening performed in the United States and Canada for the Lung Health Study (LHS).15 Spirometric screening was performed in > 73,000 smokers aged 35 to 60 years who were recruited in 10 centers. The percentage of subjects with airway obstruction varied from 21.8 to 35.7% (mean, 25%). Additionally, 5% had severe airway obstruction (FEV1, < 50% of predicted). This makes a total of 30% of subjects with airway obstruction, which is 6% higher than in our study (24.3%). The LHS demonstrated that COPD could be detected in its early stages in smokers. The difference between the studies may be explained by the fact that in the LHS only active smokers were screened while ex-smokers and lifelong nonsmokers also were included in our study in Poland. After the exclusion of lifelong nonsmokers from the Polish group, the difference was reduced to 3%.

It was rather surprising that this difference was so small considering the large difference in the smoking habits between populations. The LHS group (mean age, 48 years) had a history of 40 pack-years of smoking, while the Polish cohort (mean age, 52 years) had a smoking history of 26.1 pack-years. Despite a lower cumulative exposure to tobacco smoke, one fifth of subjects with airflow obstruction in Poland had FEV1 levels < 50% of predicted. This finding may be explained in part by the quality of cigarettes in Poland. Until recent years, 70% of the market was covered by cheap, filterless, high-tar cigarettes. Another factor that could play a role was the high level of environmental air pollution.

The surprisingly high frequency of airflow obstruction in lifelong nonsmokers requires comment. As the invitation for a free spirometry was addressed to smokers, claiming "nonsmoking status" was most probably genuine. Some of the nonsmoking subjects declared long-term high-level exposure to passive smoking. Among the subjects screened, there were couples composed of a heavy smoking husband and a nonsmoking wife. Signs of airflow obstruction usually were found in both.

Another factor that could have played a role in the development of airflow obstruction in lifelong nonsmokers was passive exposure to tobacco smoke and a history of lower respiratory tract infections in early childhood. Almost 25% of studied subjects were born between 1940 and 1949, during the second World War or soon thereafter. Poland was occupied for 5 years of the war. The population suffered from very bad housing conditions, famine, cold, and mass deportations.

Lower respiratory tract infections in early childhood, before the age of 3 years, was found to be responsible for the low lung function in adults.16 17 In one study investigating lung function in young British subjects born in 1946, it was found that bad social conditions and passive smoking in early childhood resulted in lowered spirometric values.18 Recently, Lopuhaä et al19 studied people born around the time of the Dutch famine from 1944 to 1945. They observed an increase in the prevalence of obstructive airways disease in subjects whose mothers were exposed to famine in mid-pregnancy and early pregnancy.

In the controlled clinical trials conducted thus far, attempts to slow down the FEV1 decline in COPD patients with ipratropium bromide20 or inhaled steroids21 22 have been unsuccessful. The only confirmed effective method is smoking cessation. The LHS20 clearly demonstrated that smoking cessation at an early stage of COPD resulted in an improvement of FEV1 during the first year after smoking cessation followed by a plateau and a very slow decline. At the end of the fifth year of follow-up, FEV1 in sustained nonsmokers (22% of those who stopped smoking at entry) was only 73 mL lower than at entry. Thus, the rate of decline of FEV1 after successful smoking cessation was 15 mL/year, which is similar to that seen in healthy nonsmoking populations. Also, Xu et al,23 in a longitudinal study of > 8,000 COPD patients, found that those who stopped smoking ceased to lose pulmonary function at an accelerated rate. Historically, Fletcher and Peto24 were the first to report beneficial effects of smoking cessation on the rate of FEV1 decline in patients with COPD.

As we enter the new millennium, it seems that the only available method to prevent the development of severe forms of COPD is early diagnosis of the disease followed by persistent, concerted actions to persuade newly diagnosed patients to stop smoking. Simple, short antismoking advice reinforced by nicotine replacement therapy yields a 20 to 30% long-term success rate.25 The preliminary results of combination therapy with the antidepressant drug bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy are even more promising.26

The diagnosis of COPD at an early stage and awareness of the health consequences of COPD should be strong motivations for smoking cessation. It can be assumed that one third of subjects with airflow obstruction detected by mass spirometry would stop smoking. This would be a great advance in the control of COPD and would prevent alarming predictions for the future.

The efforts toward the early diagnosis of COPD and toward the prevention of severe forms of the disease may take different forms. In the United States, the National Lung Health Education Program, a project jointly sponsored by several professional societies crossing various medical disciplines and specialties, was created.27 The program is designed to increase the awareness of lung health in patients, health-care practitioners, and health-care organizations. Recently, the group published a consensus statement28 recommending the widespread use of office spirometry by primary-care providers for patients >= 45 years old who smoke cigarettes.

In Poland, the National Program of Early Diagnosis and Prevention of COPD will begin in 2001. The program will start by raising the awareness of the public health authorities, the medical community, and the general public that COPD is a public health issue. Spirometry screening of smokers aged >= 40 years of age will be performed in pulmonary outpatient clinics nationwide. Subjects with airflow limitation will be strongly advised to stop smoking and will be followed up at antismoking clinics. Subjects identified with the low lung function will undergo diagnosis and will be treated appropriately.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4.. Spirometry in 2,200 Lifelong Nonsmokers

 

    Appendix 1
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix 1
 References
 
Members of the Know the Age of Your Lung Study Group and their city affiliation in Poland: M. Czajkowska-Malinowska, MD (Bydgoszcz); Z. Sankowski, MD (Koszalin); A. Kislo, MD (Suwalki); K. Krawczyk, MD (Kraków); W. Skucha, MD (Proszowice); A. Zalewska, MD (Rzeszów); W. Remiszewski, MD (Lublin); T. Kachel, MD (Bystra Slska); B. Cynowska, MD (Gdañsk); M. Jdrzejczak, MD (Chciny); and U. Czechowska, MD (Radom).


    Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank Thomas L. Petty, MD, Master FCCP, of Denver, CO, for his inspiration and interest in the study.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviation: LHS = Lung Health Study

None of the authors have any financial involvement with Boehringer Ingelheim, which supported the study.

Received for publication April 4, 2000. Accepted for publication November 3, 2000.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix 1
 References
 

  1. Strachan, DP (1995) Epidemiology: a British perspective. Calverley, PMA Pride, NB eds. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ,47-67 Chapman & Hall New York, NY.
  2. Racineux, JC, Vidal, JF, Meslier, N (1993) Les maladies respiratoires chroniques lies au tabagisme. Rev Prat 43,1223-1226[Medline]
  3. Krzyzanowski, M, Jedrychowski, W, Wysocki, M (1986) Factors associated with the change in the ventilatory function and the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a 13-year follow-up of the Cracow study: risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 134,1011-1019[ISI][Medline]
  4. Hayert DL, Kochan KD, Murphy SL. National vital statistics: death; final data for 1997. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1999; Publication No. PHS 99–1120
  5. . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1996) CDC surveillance summary: mortality patterns; United States, 1993 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 45,161-164[Medline]
  6. . Department of Social Security. (1983) Sickness and invalidity benefits statistics: 1983. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office London, UK.
  7. Anderson, HR (1994) Epidemiology based needs assessment: lower respiratory disease. Department of Health London, UK.
  8. Pearson, MG, Litter, J, Davies, PDO (1994) An analysis of medical workload by specialty and diagnosis in Mersey: evidence of a specialist to patient mismatch. J R Coll Phys Lond 28,230-234[Medline]
  9. Mannino, DM, Gagnon, RC, Petty, TL, et al (2000) Obstructive lung disease and low lung function in adults in the United States: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Arch Intern Med 160,1683-1689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. . American Thoracic Society. (1995) Standardization of spirometry: 1994 update. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152,1107-1136[ISI][Medline]
  11. Quanier, PH, Tammeling, GJ, Cotes, JE, et al (1993) Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Eur Respir J 6(suppl),5-40[Medline]
  12. Siafakas, NM, Vermeire, P, Pride, NB, et al (1995) Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a consensus statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 8,1398-1420[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  13. Murray, CLJ, Lopez, AD (1997) Alternative projection of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: global burden of disease study. Lancet 394,1498-1504
  14. Burrows, B, Knudson, RJ, Cline, MG (1977) Quantitative relationships between cigarette smoking and ventilatory function. Am Rev Respir Dis 115,195-205[ISI][Medline]
  15. Connett, JE, Bjornson-Benson, WM, Daniels, K (1993) Recruitment of participants in the Lung Health Study: II. Assessment of recruiting strategies: Lung Health Study Research Group. Control Clin Trials 14,38S-51S[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Voter, KZ, Henry, MM, Stewart, PW, et al (1988) Lower respiratory illness in early childhood and lung function and bronchial reactivity in adolescent males. Am Rev Respir Dis 137,302-307[ISI][Medline]
  17. Burrows, B, Knudson, RJ, Lebowitz, MD (1977) The relationship of childhood respiratory illness to adult obstructive airways disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 115,751-760[ISI][Medline]
  18. Colley, JRT, Douglas, JWB, Reid, DD (1973) Respiratory disease in young adults: influence of early childhood respiratory tract illness, social class, air pollution and passive smoking. BMJ 3,195-198
  19. Lopuhaä, CE, Roseboom, TJ, Osmond, C, et al (2000) Atopy, lung function, and obstructive airways disease after prenatal exposure to famine. Thorax 55,555-561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Anthonisen, NR, Connet, JE, Kiley, JP, et al (1994) Effects of smoking intervention and the use an inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator on the rate of decline of FEV1: the Lung Health Study. JAMA 272,1497-1505[Abstract]
  21. Pauwels, RA, Löfdahl, CG, Laitinen, L, et al (1999) Long term treatment with inhaled budesonide in persons with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who continue smoking. N Engl J Med 340,1948-1953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Burge, PS, Calverley, PMA, Jones, PW, et al (2000) Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the ISOLDE trial. BMJ 320,1297-1303[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Xu, X, Dockery, DW, Ware, JH, et al (1992) Effects of cigarette smoking on rate of loss of pulmonary function in adults: a longitudinal assessment. Am Rev Respir Dis 146,1345-1348[ISI][Medline]
  24. Fletcher, C, Peto, R (1977) The natural history of chronic airflow obstruction. BMJ 1,1645-1648
  25. Silagy, C, Mant, D, Fowler, G, et al (1994) Meta-analysis on efficacy of nicotine replacement therapies in smoking cessation. Lancet 343,139-142[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Jorenby, DE, Leischow, SJ, Nides, MA, et al (1999) A controlled trial of sustained-release bupropion, a nicotine patch, or both for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med 340,685-691[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Petty, TL, Weinmann, GG (1997) Building a national strategy for the prevention and management of and research in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: NHLBI workshop summary. JAMA 277,246-253[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  28. Ferguson, GT, Enright, PL, Buist, S, et al (2000) Office spirometry for lung health assessment in adults: a consensus statement from the National Lung Health Education Program. Chest 117,1146-1161[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
R. E. Walter, J. B. Wilk, M. G. Larson, R. S. Vasan, J. F. Keaney Jr, I. Lipinska, G. T. O'Connor, and E. J. Benjamin
Systemic Inflammation and COPD: The Framingham Heart Study
Chest, January 1, 2008; 133(1): 19 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. C.-W. Lau, M. S.-M. Ip, C. K.-W. Lai, K.-L. Choo, K.-S. Tang, L. Y.-C. Yam, and M. Chan-Yeung
Variability of the Prevalence of Undiagnosed Airflow Obstruction in Smokers Using Different Diagnostic Criteria
Chest, January 1, 2008; 133(1): 42 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
Y.-C. Wang, J.-M. Lin, C.-Y. Li, L.-T. Lee, Y.-L. Guo, and F.-C. Sung
Prevalence and Risks of Chronic Airway Obstruction: A Population Cohort Study in Taiwan
Chest, March 1, 2007; 131(3): 705 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
T. L. Petty
Harm from spirometry?
Chest, November 1, 2006; 130(5): 1629 - 1630.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. Pohlig
Smoking cessation counseling: a practice management perspective.
Chest, October 1, 2006; 130(4): 1231 - 1233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J. Zielinski, M. Bednarek, D. Gorecka, G. Viegi, S. S. Hurd, Y. Fukuchi, C. K. W. Lai, P. X. Ran, F. W. S. Ko, S. M. Liu, et al.
Increasing COPD awareness.
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 833 - 852.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J. Vandevoorde, S. Verbanck, D. Schuermans, J. Kartounian, and W. Vincken
Obstructive and restrictive spirometric patterns: fixed cut-offs for FEV1/FEV6 and FEV6
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2006; 27(2): 378 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
R. M. Geijer, A. P. Sachs, A. W Hoes, P. L Salome, J.-W. J Lammers, and T. J. Verheij
Prevalence of undetected persistent airflow obstruction in male smokers 40-65 years old
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2005; 22(5): 485 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. Bohadana, F. Nilsson, and Y. Martinet
Detecting Airflow Obstruction in Smoking Cessation Trials: A Rationale for Routine Spirometry
Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1252 - 1257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Vandevoorde, S. Verbanck, D. Schuermans, J. Kartounian, and W. Vincken
FEV1/FEV6 and FEV6 as an Alternative for FEV1/FVC and FVC in the Spirometric Detection of Airway Obstruction and Restriction
Chest, May 1, 2005; 127(5): 1560 - 1564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
N. Z. Tzovaras, V. N. Kouloumenta, K. I. Gourgoulianis, and J. Buffels
The Economic Impact of Late Detection of COPD in General Practice
Chest, January 1, 2005; 127(1): 412 - 413.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. Viegi, G. Matteelli, A. Angino, A. Scognamiglio, S. Baldacci, J. B. Soriano, and L. Carrozzi
The Proportional Venn Diagram of Obstructive Lung Disease in the Italian General Population
Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1093 - 1101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. Shin, S. Lee, R. D. Abbott, J. H. Kim, S. Y. Lee, K. H. In, and K. Kimm
Respiratory Symptoms and Undiagnosed Airflow Obstruction in Middle-Aged Adults: The Korean Health and Genome Study
Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1234 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Buffels, J. Degryse, J. Heyrman, and M. Decramer
Office Spirometry Significantly Improves Early Detection of COPD in General Practice: The DIDASCO Study
Chest, April 1, 2004; 125(4): 1394 - 1399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. Gorecka, M. Bednarek, A. Nowinski, E. Puscinska, A. Goljan-Geremek, and J. Zielinski
Diagnosis of Airflow Limitation Combined With Smoking Cessation Advice Increases Stop-Smoking Rate
Chest, June 1, 2003; 123(6): 1916 - 1923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S.T. Weiss, D.L. DeMeo, and D.S. Postma
COPD: problems in diagnosis and measurement
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2003; 21(41_suppl): 4S - 12s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
I. Cerveri, A. Corsico, M. C. Zoia, J. Zielinski, and M. Bednarek
COPD Screening in High-Risk Groups
Chest, March 1, 2003; 123(3): 959 - 960.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C.P. van Schayck and N.H. Chavannes
Detection of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2003; 21(39_suppl): 16S - 22s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
C P van Schayck, J M C Loozen, E Wagena, R P Akkermans, and G J Wesseling
Detecting patients at a high risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: cross sectional case finding study
BMJ, June 8, 2002; 324(7350): 1370 - 1370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. I. Gourgoulianis, K. Hristou, P. A. Molyvdas, and J. Zielinski
Detection of COPD in High-Risk Populations
Chest, May 1, 2002; 121(5): 1721 - 1721.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (60)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zieliñski, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bednarek, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zieliñski, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bednarek, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS