|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
1-Antitrypsin Deficiency*
*
From the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy (Dr. Mullins, Mr. Huang, and Mr. Merchant), Baltimore, MD; and Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Dr. Stoller), The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
A complete list of investigators is presented in the Appendix.
Correspondence to: C. Daniel Mullins, PhD, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 6th Floor, 100 N. Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; e-mail: dmullins{at}rx.umaryland.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-antitrypsin deficiency, specific therapy called
IV augmentation therapy has been available since 1989. Such therapy
consists of IV infusion of pooled human plasma
1-antiprotease.
Methods: To assess the
direct medical costs of having
1-antitrypsin deficiency,
the current study surveyed members of the Alpha One Foundation Registry
for Individuals With
1-Antitrypsin Deficiency regarding
their annual expenditures for treatment of this disease. Data regarding
demographic features,
1-antitrypsin status, and
health-resource utilization were collected from a self-administered
questionnaire. Respondents were asked to provide total health-care
expenditures, but costs by specific items of care (eg,
drugs, physician visits, etc) were not available.
Results: Mean annual cost estimates were higher for
PI*ZZ-phenotype individuals ($30,948, n = 292) than for
non-PI*ZZphenotype individuals ($20,673, n = 53; p = 0.049).
Among PI*ZZ-phenotype individuals, self-reported costs of
health-care services were further analyzed for those 288 individuals
whose
1-antiprotease use status was reported. For the
185 current
1-antiprotease users, the mean annual
cost was $40,123 (median, $36,000).
Conclusions:
Annual health-care expenditures by individuals with
1-antitrypsin deficiency are very high, whether or not
they are currently receiving augmentation therapy. Augmentation therapy
adds substantial costs, especially for heavier individuals who are
receiving weekly infusions.
Key Words:
1-antitrypsin deficiency cost registry
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1
-Antitrypsin deficiency is an autosomal codominant condition that
predisposes to early-onset emphysema, chronic liver disease
(ie, hepatitis, cirrhosis, hepatoma), panniculitis, and
vasculitis.1
2
3
Although population-based studies show a
frequency of approximately 1 in 3,500 live births in the United States
and predict a prevalence of 100,000 severely deficient
Americans,4
5
6
7
8
< 10% of affected individuals have been
detected to date.4
Putative reasons for this
underdetection include underrecognition of
1-antitrypsin deficiency by health-care
providers9
and freedom from clinical consequences despite
severe deficiency in some individuals.
For individuals with emphysema because of severe
1-antitrypsin deficiency, specific therapy
called IV augmentation therapy has been available since 1989. Such
therapy consists of IV infusion of pooled human plasma
1-antiprotease. To date, only a single
preparation of pooled human plasma
1-antiprotease has received US Food and Drug
Administration approval (Prolastin; Bayer; West Haven, CT), although
other preparations as well as other treatment strategies are currently
under study. Limitations of the current treatment include the
substantial expense of the drug and the associated infusions, as well
as current inability to produce enough pooled human
1-antiprotease to treat all appropriate
candidates.
Because
1-antitrypsindeficient individuals
may experience several chronic debilitating illnesses and may receive
life-long, costly therapy, the clinical and economic burden of illness
can be high. In a modeled cost-benefit analysis of IV augmentation
therapy, Hay and Robin10
estimated that at 70% efficacy,
the cost per life-year saved with augmentation therapy was $28,000 to
$72,000 (1990 US dollars), and that at 30% efficacy, the cost ranged
from $50,000 to $128,000 per life-year saved based on an assumed yearly
treatment cost of $30,000. A more recent study by Alkins and
OMalley11
showed a lower incremental cost-effectiveness
ratio of $13,971 for severe
1-antitrypsindeficient individuals. The
estimate by Alkins and OMalley11
is more current, uses a
discount rate of 7%, and focuses on survival data from the National
Institutes of Health Registry. Although estimates by both Hay and
Robin10
and Alkins and OMalley11
are useful
in estimating the cost-effectiveness relationship of augmentation
therapy, they may fall short in estimating the economic burden of
1-antitrypsin deficiency because they are
based on models, they fail to consider patient-reported information,
and they do not capture information regarding the full spectrum of
associated conditions related to
1-antitrypsin
deficiency.
To assess the direct medical costs of having
1-antitrypsin deficiency, the current study
surveyed members of the Alpha One Foundation Registry for Individuals
with
1-Antitrypsin Deficiency to assess the
annual expenditures by affected individuals for treating this disease.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-antitrypsin
deficiency includes the cost of treating attributable illnesses and the
cost of augmentation therapy. The cost of
1-antiprotease treatment includes the cost of
the drug and the cost of the infusion. Furthermore, because the dose of
1-antiprotease is weight based, treatment
costs were calculated for three patient types: females (50 kg),
average-weight males (75 kg), and heavier males (100 kg). Drug cost and
administration estimates were based on 1999 Medicare reimbursement
rates for the relevant current procedural terminology (CPT) codes and
estimated costs for Prolastin, assuming a standard reimbursement
rate of 95% of the average wholesale price. The CPT code used for
these calculations was 90780, representing the first hour of
1-antiprotease infusion (listed at $36.73 for
1999). Calculations for the monthly cost of infusion were based
on the same CPT code (90780) for the first hour of infusion, and also
code 90781, which represents each additional hour of infusion therapy
(listed at $18.48 in 1999).
Table 1
presents the estimated reimbursement amount for
1-antiprotease treatment per infusion
with the annual costs based on whether infusion was administered weekly
(at a dose of 60 mg/kg > 1 h) or monthly (at a dose of 250 mg/kg
> 4 h). Reliable estimates were unavailable for several other costs,
including the costs for physician outpatient visits and for
emergency department visits, the cost of skilled nursing facilities,
and the cost of other complications associated with the disease. In the
absence of reliable estimates, the current analysis did not consider
these other costs and so likely underestimates the true costs of health
care associated with having
1-antitrypsin
deficiency.
|
1-antitrypsin deficiency about
their annual health-care expenditures. A description of the survey and
the survey respondents follows.
Data Collection
Data regarding demographic features,
1-antitrypsin status, and health-services
utilization were collected from a questionnaire distributed to all
1-antitrypsindeficient registrants in the
Alpha One Foundation Registry. At the time of this study, the Registry
consisted of 688 individuals who agreed to complete and submit the
questionnaire. These 688 respondents represent a small but incalculable
percentage of the total number of questionnaire recipients, as the
precise number of questionnaires distributed (approximately 12,000) was
not tracked and some individuals may have received more than one form.
The research registry questionnaire (which is available from the Alpha One Foundation, Miami, FL) was designed to query utilization of health-care resources over a 12-month period. Individual respondents completed the survey at various times during the interval from 1997 to 1999 and were asked to provide estimates for the prior 12 months. Estimates included all medical visits (scheduled and unscheduled), medications (whether prescribed or over-the-counter), and all other expenditures for other health-care services (eg, emergency department visits, etc) in the aggregate. Cost estimates for individual types of utilization (eg, office visits, hospitalization) were not reported. All costs were expressed in US dollars for the year in which the survey was completed.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-antitrypsin.12
Self-reported
data on physician visits over the previous 12 months were available
from 629 individuals (91.4% of respondents). Only 17 individuals
reported no doctor visits, while almost one half of patients
(n = 308) reported between one visit and five visits. Approximately
one fourth of patients (n = 174) reported 6 to 10 visits, while
approximately 10% reported 11 to 15 visits (n = 68) or > 15 visits
(n = 62). Patients also provided information on the use of home
oxygen. About one third of patients (n = 235) reported using home
oxygen in the previous 12 months.
|
|
1-antiprotease use status was reported.
For the 185 current
1-antiprotease users, the
mean annual cost was $40,123 (median, $36,000). The mean annual
health-care costs ($39,610) for former
1-antiprotease users (n = 34) was
similar to current users; however, the median cost for former
1-antiprotease users ($12,000) was lower than
for current users. Not surprisingly, the self-reported annual
health-care costs for those who never received
1-antiprotease (n = 69) was lowest (mean,
$3,553; median, $1,000, p < 0.0001; Table 4
).
|
Finally, the presence and number of associated conditions was
classified according to participants self-reports. In the context of
patients self-reported conditions (eg, emphysema, chronic
bronchitis, asthma, chronic liver disease, etc), patients with
self-reported chronic lung disease reported the highest annual
health-care costs (mean, $39,470; median, $15,000; Table 5 ). The annual costs for patients with other associated conditions were
as follows: chronic bronchitis (mean, $36,598; median, $10,000),
emphysema (mean, $33,320; median, $11,051), asthma (mean, $31,376;
median, $6,000), and chronic liver disease (mean, $8,442; median,
$2,750). Individuals reporting four or more associated conditions
incurred higher annual health-care costs (mean, $45,107; median,
$30,000) than those with fewer (ie, one to three) such
conditions (mean, $30,209; median, $6,000), or those with none (mean,
$9,640; median, $700; p = 0.0007; Table 4
). In order to compare
self-reported cost estimates with projections based on Medicare
reimbursement rates, the projected costs for
1-antiprotease were calculated for the 292
PI*ZZ-phenotype individuals using the values presented in Table 1
and stratified by gender and frequency of augmentation therapy. Based
on the reported distribution of weekly vs monthly
1-antiprotease recipients and the gender
distribution (assuming an equal number of 100-kg and 75-kg men), the
mean annual cost of
1-antiprotease therapy was
> $50,000 in men and > $30,000 in women. Moreover, these estimates
are based solely on the cost of infusion therapy and do not incorporate
the costs of disease complications. Comparison of these projected
1-antiprotease costs with health-care
expenditures actually reported by current
1-antiprotease recipients shows that subjects
appear to be underreporting their total costs, either because they
report only out-of-pocket expenses or because they are unaware of how
expensive their treatments actually are.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-antitrypsin deficiency are very high,
whether or not they are currently receiving augmentation therapy; (2)
adding to these high costs of health care, use of IV augmentation
therapy incurs substantial additional costs, especially to heavier
individuals who are receiving weekly infusions; (3) not surprisingly,
other contributors to higher health-care costs are the presence of
self-reported clinical illness associated with having
1-antitrypsin deficiency and receipt of a lung
transplant.
Because this is the first study, to our knowledge, to assess
health-care costs in individuals with
1-antitrypsin deficiency, comparisons with
prior findings are not possible. On the other hand, it is noteworthy to
compare the cost estimates in the current study with drug costs assumed
in the models used by Hay and Robin10
and Alkins and
OMalley11
in assessing the cost-effectiveness of
augmentation therapy. Our estimate of patient annual health-care
expenditures based on self-reported data for individuals receiving
1-antiprotease is similar to assumed cost (Hay
and Robin10
) of $30,000 per patient per year in 1990
dollars (which is equivalent to $44,613 in 1998 dollars based on the
consumer price index for medical care13
). Our estimated
Medicare reimbursement amount for augmentation therapy ($48,356 to
$51,050 for a 75-kg person) is similar to the estimated cost (Alkins
and OMalley11
) of $52,000.
To put the cost of
1-antitrypsin in
perspective, it is important to compare the associated costs with those
of related clinical conditions, eg,
1-antitrypsinreplete COPD. In this regard,
Strauss et al14
estimated the annual cost for patients
with chronic obstructive lung disease in the late 1980s to be between
$6,234 and $7,192 (equivalent to $12,371 to $14,272 in 1998 dollars),
based on whether a patient visited a family practice physician or a
pulmonary specialist. In another study, Bergner et al15
reported that the annual cost of care for patients with chronic
obstructive lung disease was $7,647 in 19811982 dollars, which is
equivalent to $20,014 in 1998 dollars.13
The current estimates of expenditures by patients with
1-antitrypsin deficiency have several
potential shortcomings, some of which are because of the retrospective
nature of this study. First, as a voluntary survey with an unknown
response rate, the study is subject to reporting bias. Indeed, of the
688 eligible registrants, phenotype was reported by only 81.7%
(n = 562). Under the most extreme assumption that all unreported
phenotypes had the PI*ZZ phenotype, the 475 responding
PI*ZZ-phenotype individuals would represent only 79% of the
eligible pool of PI*ZZ-phenotype individuals. Thus, these results
could be biased by failure to include responses by up to 21% of the
eligible PI*ZZ-phenotype individuals. Furthermore, because the 688
respondents in this study represent a small (but unknown) fraction of
all potential registrants, the generalizability of our findings to an
unselected population of PI*ZZ-phenotype individuals is uncertain.
However, in the absence of available data from a large population-based
cohort of individuals with
1-antitrypsin
deficiency, we believe that the similarity of the cohort in the Alpha
One Foundation Registry to that described in the NHLBI registry for
individuals with severe deficiency of
1-antitrypsin (Table 2)
supports the
generalizability of our findings. Another type of reporting bias
relates to our having cost data on only a subset (60.6%) of the 688
registrants.
A further potential source of bias is that respondents may have either imprecisely recorded or inadequately recalled their health-care expenditures. Reasons for this may be recall bias, lack of knowledge of the total cost of care, or simply difficulty recalling or enumerating out-of-pocket costs. As evidence of this potential bias, patient self-reported costs were less than the projected annual Medicare expenditure for augmentation therapy alone. To the extent that respondents may have had incomplete knowledge of health-care expenses covered by their insurance or may have forgotten the expenses, we believe that the responses in this study may generally underestimate the true expenditures. Finally, another limitation of our analysis is our lack of data regarding the types of usual care received by survey respondents (eg, regularly used bronchodilators, vaccinations against influenza, and pneumococcus, etc).
Many unanswered questions remain regarding patient expenditures
and the total costs of treatment for
1-antitrypsin deficiency. For example, because
the survey instrument used in this study did not carefully itemize
expenditures by type (eg, pharmaceuticals other than
1-antiprotease inhibitor,
hospitalization-associated costs, etc), we cannot currently determine
the major cost drivers of
1-antitrypsin
deficiency. To address this gap in current understanding, a
second-generation questionnaire developed to permit a more detailed
analysis by type of expenditure.
| Appendix 1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
University of Florida College of Medicine
Gainesville, FL
James K. Stoller, MD, Co-Director
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, OH
Alan F. Barker, MD
Oregon Health Sciences University
Portland, OR
Frederick deSerres, PhD
National Institutes of Health, NIEHS
Research Triangle Park, NC
Robert J. Fallat, MD
California Pacific Medical Center
San Francisco, CA
Caroline Riely, MD
University of Tennessee, Memphis
Memphis, TN
Robert A. Sandhaus, MD, PhD
Director, Medical Affairs
Boulder, CO
Gordon L. Snider, MD
Boston, MA
Charlie Strange, MD
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, SC
Jeffrey Teckman, MD
Washington University School of Medicine
St. Louis, MO
Gerard M. Turino, MD
Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons
New York, NY
Cathy Valenti
Alpha One Foundation Board of Directors
Meridian, ID
Debbie Waldrop, RN, BSN
University of Texas Health Center, Tyler
Tyler, TX
John W. Walsh
Alpha One Foundation
Miami, FL
Bioethics Consultant Evan DeRenzo, PhD
Center for Ethics/MedStar Health
Rockville, MD
Administration Symma Finn, MA
Alpha One Foundation
Miami, FL
Clinical Resource Centers Richard Helmers, MD
Mayo Clinic
Scottsdale, AZ
Russell R. Dodge, MD
University of Arizona
Tucson, AZ
Robert J. Fallat, MD
California Pacific Medical Center
San Francisco, CA
Carroll E. Cross, MD
University of California at Davis
Sacramento, CA
Marvin Ament, MD
University of California, Los Angeles Center for Health Sci ences
Los Angeles, CA
Donald F. Tierney, MD
University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine
Los Angeles, CA
Jack L. Clausen, MD
University of California, San Diego Medical Center
San Diego, CA
Emmet B. Keeffe, MD
Stanford University Medical Center
Palo Alto, CA
Robert A. Sandhaus, MD, PhD
National Jewish Medical & Research Center
Denver, CO
Ronald J. Sokol, MD
The Childrens Hospital
Denver, CO
Arthur Kotch, MD
Danbury Hospital
Danbury, CT
Stephen Grinton, MD
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
Jacksonville, FL
Mark L. Brantly, MD
University of Florida College of Medicine
Gainesville, FL
Adam Wanner, MD
University of Miami School of Medicine
Miami, FL
Joseph P. McMahon, MD
Indiana University Medical Center
Indianapolis, IN
Jeff Wilson, MD
University of Iowa, College of Medicine
Iowa City, IA
Dermot N. Killian, MD
Mercy Hospital
Portland, ME
Steven Weinberger, MD
Beth Israel Hospital
Boston, MA
Sanjiv Chopra, MD
Beth Israel Hospital
Boston, MA
Frederick Gordon, MD
Lahey Clinic Medical Center
Burlington, MA
William C. Sheehan, MD
Pulmonary Care, P.C.
Fall River, MA
Michael S. Eichenhorn, MD
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, MI
William F. Bria, MD
University of Michigan Medical Center
Ann Arbor, MI
K.P. Ravikrishnan, MD
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, MI
Michael Krowka, MD
Mayo Clinic Rochester
Rochester, MN
Marshall Hertz, MD
University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinic
Minneapolis, MN
Jeffrey Teckman, MD
Washington University School of Medicine
St. Louis, MO
Stephen I. Rennard, MD
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, NE
Henry C. Bodenheimer, Jr., MD
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, NY
Frederick J. Suchy, MD
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, NY
Edward Eden, MD
St. Lukes/Roosevelt Hospital Center
New York, NY
Richard W. Hyde, MD
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, NY
James F. Donohue, MD
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, NC
William F. Balistreri, MD
Childrens Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, OH
James K. Stoller, MD, FCCP
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, OH
Zobair Younossi, MD
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, OH
Kevin D. Mullen, MD
MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, OH
Mark D. Wewers, MD
Ohio State University
Columbus, OH
Alan F. Barker, MD
Oregon Health Sciences University
Portland, OR
Michael K. Porayko, MD
Jefferson Medical College
Philadelphia, PA
Charlie Strange, MD
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, SC
Marc Judson, MD
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, SC
Norman T. Soskel, MD
Memphis Tennessee Clinical Center
Memphis, TN
Caroline Riely, MD
University of Tennessee, Memphis
Memphis, TN
W. John Ryan, MD, FCCP
Dallas Pulmonary Associates
Dallas, TX
James M. Stocks, MD
University of Texas Health Center, Tyler
Tyler, TX
Edward J. Campbell, MD
University of Utah Health Sciences Center
Salt Lake City, UT
Richard E. Kanner, MD
University of Utah Health Sciences Center
Salt Lake City, UT
Robert E. Sandblom, MD
Eastside Specialty Center
Redmond, WA
Ian Waters, MD
Victoria General Hospital
Victoria, British Columbia
Affiliated Research Centers Christine Cannon, RN, PhD
University of Delaware
Newark, DE
William F. Brechue, PhD
Indiana University
Bloomington, IN
| Footnotes |
|---|
Funded by the Alpha One Foundation.
Received for publication March 30, 2000. Accepted for publication October 19, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-Antitrypsin deficiency. Fernandes, J Saudubray, J Berghe, G eds. Inborn metabolic diseases: diagnosis and treatment Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany.
1-antitrypsin deficiency in Italy Gruppo I.D.A. Respir Med 93,169-172
1-antitrypsin deficiency: Roger S. Mitchell lecture. Chest 111(6 Suppl),123S-128S[Medline]
1-antitrypsin deficiency detected by screening of 200,000 infants. N Engl J Med 294,1316-1321[Abstract]
1-antitrypsin deficiency. J Pediatr 92,1006-1010[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
1-Antitrypsin deficiency: high prevalence in the St. Louis area determined by direct population screening. Am Rev Respir Dis 140,961-966[ISI][Medline]
1-antitrpsin deficiency. Presented at the Geneva Human Genetic Programme Division on Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1996
1-antitrypsin deficiency. Cleve Clin J Med 61,461-467[ISI][Medline]
1-antitrypsin replacement therapy in treatment of congenital chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Public Health 81,427-433
1-antitrypsin deficiency? A critical review and cost- effectiveness analysis. Chest 117,875-880
1-antitrypsin deficiency.
1-Antitrypsin Deficiency Registry Study Group. Chest 111,394-403This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. K. Hogarth and G. Rachelefsky Screening and Familial Testing of Patients for {alpha}1-Antitrypsin Deficiency Chest, April 1, 2008; 133(4): 981 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J K Stoller and L S Aboussouan {alpha}1-Antitrypsin deficiency {middle dot} 5: Intravenous augmentation therapy: current understanding Thorax, August 1, 2004; 59(8): 708 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Standards for the Diagnosis and Management of Individuals with Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2003; 168(7): 818 - 900. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Mullins, J. Wang, and J. K. Stoller Major Components of the Direct Medical Costs of {alpha}1-Antitrypsin Deficiency Chest, September 1, 2003; 124(3): 826 - 831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Gildea, K. M. Shermock, M. E. Singer, and J. K. Stoller Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Augmentation Therapy for Severe {alpha}1-Antitrypsin Deficiency Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2003; 167(10): 1387 - 1392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Stoller, R. Fallat, M. D. Schluchter, R. G. O'Brien, J. T. Connor, N. Gross, K. O'Neil, R. Sandhaus, and R. G. Crystal Augmentation Therapy With {alpha}1-Antitrypsin: Patterns of Use and Adverse Events Chest, May 1, 2003; 123(5): 1425 - 1434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Tremblay, E. Vachon, C. Larouche, and Y. Bourbonnais Inhibition of Human Neutrophil Elastase-Induced Acute Lung Injury in Hamsters by Recombinant Human Pre-elafin (Trappin-2) Chest, February 1, 2002; 121(2): 582 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |