|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Section of Interventional Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Correspondence to: Rodolfo C. Morice, MD, FCCP, Section of Interventional Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Box 76, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: rmorice{at}mdanderson.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Retrospective study.
Setting: Bronchoscopy unit of a university hospital.
Patients: A total of 60 patients
with bronchogenic carcinoma (n = 43), metastatic tumors affecting the
bronchi (n = 14), or benign bronchial disease (n = 3). Indications
for intervention were hemoptysis (n = 31), symptomatic airway
obstruction (n = 14), and both obstruction and hemoptysis (n = 25).
Hemoptysis was stratified as a volume of > 200 mL/d (n = 6), > 50
to 200 mL/d (n = 23), or
50 mL/d but persistence for > 1 week
(n = 27). The mean (± SD) duration of hemoptysis was
16.5 ± 16.1 days before intervention. Obstruction sites were the
trachea (n = 8), mainstem bronchi (n = 21), and lobar bronchi
(n = 30). In 24 cases, the patient had obstructions at multiple
sites. The mean size of the pretreatment obstruction was
76 ± 24.9%.
Interventions: APC, a noncontact form of electrocoagulation, was performed via flexible bronchoscopy. Sixty patients underwent 70 procedures. Conscious sedation without endotracheal intubation was used in all patients except four, who were mechanically ventilated because of underlying respiratory failure.
Measurements and results: All patients with hemoptysis experienced a resolution of bleeding immediately after APC. Hemoptysis from treated sites did not recur during a mean follow-up duration of 97 ± 91.9 days. Patients with endoluminal airway lesions had an overall decrease in mean obstruction size to 18.4 ± 22.1%. All patients with obstructive lesions, except one who died of sepsis, experienced symptom improvement. In these patients, symptom control was maintained during a median follow-up period of 53 days (range, 18 to 321 days). There were no complications related to the procedure.
Conclusions: APC is effective for the treatment of endoluminal hemoptysis and airway obstruction. The procedure can be performed in an outpatient setting or at the bedside in the ICUs. APC provides a simpler, lower-risk alternative to other interventional endobronchial techniques.
Key Words: airway obstruction argon plasma coagulation bronchial neoplasms bronchoscopy electrocoagulation endobronchial therapy hemoptysis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Technical developments in the past 20 years have generated multiple types of bronchoscopic treatments.6 7 8 9 A significant portion of these techniques, however, have been out of the reach of most clinical bronchoscopists. High equipment costs, scarcities of training resources, cumbersome instrumentation, and operational safety concerns have prevented a more general utilization of these technologic advances.
Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is a form of noncontact electrocoagulation. It offers the simplicity and low cost of an electrocoagulator with the noncontact approach of an Nd-YAG laser. The noncontact feature of APC allows rapid coagulation with minimal manipulation of and mechanical trauma to the target tissue. The term plasma is used to describe an electrically conducting medium produced when the atoms in a gas become ionized. It is sometimes referred to as the fourth state of matter, distinct from the solid, liquid, and gaseous states. APC utilizes electrically conductive argon plasma as a medium to deliver high-frequency current via a flexible probe. The argon plasma flow transfers electricity between the probe and the target tissue (Fig 1 ). The basic APC system is composed of an argon gas source, a computer-controlled high-frequency electrosurgical generator, and the endoscopic probe (Fig 2 ). Tracheobronchial access is obtained by passing the probe through the working channel of the bronchoscope.
|
|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.5 cm; and (5) there was functional lung distal to the
obstruction or relief of postobstructive pneumonia was feasible. All endobronchial APC procedures were performed with a flexible bronchoscope. Except in those patients who required mechanical ventilation because of respiratory failure owing to their underlying disease, all procedures were performed transnasally or transorally in the bronchoscopy suite. Local anesthesia and conscious sedation with IV midazolam and fentanyl were administered before and during the procedure. Oxygen was supplemented via nasal prongs. Pulse oximetry saturation, BP, and pulse were monitored during bronchoscopy. Patients who were receiving mechanical ventilation in the ICUs underwent endobronchial APC procedures at bedside through an oral-tracheal tube. These patients were already receiving continuous sedation with IV propofol and/or midazolam as part of critical-care sedation protocols for patients receiving mechanical ventilation.
Endobronchial APC was performed with an argon plasma coagulator unit (APC 300 and ERBOTOM ICC 200; ERBE USA Inc; Marietta, GA) via a flexible bronchoscope (model BF-1T10; Olympus America Inc; Melville, NY). Energy at 30 to 40 W and argon flow at 1.6 L/min were applied through a 2.3-mm diameter, 220-cm length APC monopolar probe. The probe was inserted through the working channel of the bronchoscope. The target tissue was endoscopically visualized and then coagulated, and the devitalized tissue was mechanically removed with grasping forceps. Patients who had incomplete lesion debulking after one treatment or who developed evidence of endobronchial mucus plugging underwent a second bronchoscopic procedure for removal of devitalized tissue after 48 to 72 h. Additional endobronchial APC treatments were performed on patients who met study entry criteria if they developed recurrent or new airway disease. Patients who had residual or additional disease not amenable to further APC interventions were considered for other forms of local or systemic therapy. Patients who had APC treatments for benign lesions were followed up with surveillance bronchoscopy 3 months after therapy and as clinically indicated.
Patients demographic characteristics, underlying diagnoses, severity and duration of hemoptysis and/or dyspnea, and clinical or roentgenographic manifestations of obstruction or infection were recorded. The location of the airway lesions, the degree of obstruction, the immediate response to therapy, and any complications were documented at the completion of the endobronchial therapy session. The percentage of airway obstruction was estimated by visual comparison between the area of stenosis and the healthy proximal airway. Improvement of dyspnea after APC therapy was classified as excellent if, based on patients estimations, the dyspnea resolved or was at least reversed to the level of the dyspnea present before the onset of the airway obstruction. Improvement was classified as moderate if the dyspnea improved without complete resolution and the improvement was less than it existed before the onset of airway obstruction. After bronchoscopic interventions, patients outcomes were monitored at 24 h and thereafter as clinically indicated (median, 22 days; range, 5 to 67 days).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Indications for APC therapy were hemoptysis (31 patients), symptomatic
endoluminal airway obstruction (14 patients), and both obstruction and
hemoptysis (25 patients) (Table 2
). The onset of hemoptysis occurred at a mean (± SD) of
16.5 ± 16.1 days before endobronchial intervention. Bleeding was
severe (> 200 mL/d) in 6 patients, moderate (> 50 to 200 mL/d) in
23 patients, and mild (
50 mL/d) but persistent for > 1 week in 27
patients (mean onset, 19.3 ± 14.1 days). Endoluminal airway bleeding
was completely controlled in all patients immediately after APC. No
recurrence of hemoptysis from a treated site was noted during a mean
follow-up period of 97 ± 91.9 days. Three patients were treated with
APC for a second episode of hemoptysis that originated from a new
endobronchial site at 53, 87, and 101 days after the initial treatment.
One patient required arterial embolization after APC for management of
bleeding that originated from a peripheral lung mass beyond the reach
of the bronchoscope. Except for two patients who had benign conditions,
all patients with hemoptysis had malignant diseases. Bleeding
from benign lesions occurred in areas of dilated vascular proliferation
and bronchiectasis associated with prior external-beam irradiation.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Proper patient selection for therapy with endobronchial APC is crucial. For patients with hemoptysis, the bleeding source must be endobronchial and within the reach of the bronchoscope for APC to be effective. Patients with severe bleeding and respiratory compromise should be stabilized before any intervention. Endobronchial therapy in these patients is aimed at preventing recurrence once the acute episode of massive hemoptysis has decreased or subsided. The selection of rigid vs flexible bronchoscopy to assess or treat massive hemoptysis most likely reflects the users experience and the clinical circumstances. The rigid bronchoscope allows better suctioning and airway control, while the flexible bronchoscope permits easier access and visualization of distal airways.17 Flexible bronchoscopy was used in all patients enrolled in this study.
The ablation of obstructive airway lesions should be done with the
purpose of regaining significant lung function or relieving
postobstructive pneumonia. In the absence of postobstructive pneumonia,
no benefit from endobronchial therapy will be gained if the lung distal
to the obstruction is nonfunctional, for example in patients with
extensive parenchymal tumor invasion or postradiation fibrosis.
Patients selected for endobronchial APC should have primarily
respiratory rather than systemic symptoms of widespread malignancy.
Airway lesions that are most suitable for treatment with APC are those
measuring
3.5 cm in length. To obtain the best results, these
tumors should protrude within the lumen and not extend beyond the
cartilage of the airway. Ideally, the bronchoscopist would be able to
identify the anatomic boundaries of the tumor and appreciate that the
airway not involved by tumor is well-preserved. Patients who present
with diffuse, concentric malignant infiltration and with significant
distortion of anatomic landmarks are best treated with endobronchial
brachytherapy.18
Furthermore, obstructions caused by
lesions that extrinsically compress the airway are best palliated with
external- beam radiation therapy or endoluminal stents.19
Some patients may require a combination of endobronchial therapies. APC can be used to control bleeding before brachytherapy or to reestablish the adequate opening of an occluded airway for subsequent passage of a catheter for brachytherapy. The electroconductive properties of APC make this technique best suited for the removal of a tumor that may have grown over stents without damage to the stent. The latter use has been reported for APC applications in GI endoscopy.20 Our study also documented the usefulness of APC therapy for hemostasis of bleeding associated with benign vascular proliferation in central bronchiectasis and for the ablation of an endoluminal web.
APC devitalizes tissue gradually by producing temperatures that coagulate and desiccate tissue. As the target surface becomes less electrically conductive, APC will automatically seek adjacent tissue with less electrical resistance. This results in a homogenous but limited depth of penetration (approximately 3 mm). Thus, APC offers uniform coagulation and good protection against airway perforation. When debulking tumors with the APC, the visible surface of the mass is sprayed with the argon beam. This decreases the risk of bleeding and causes a variable degree of tumor shrinkage by dehydration. The tumor is removed through sequential cauterization followed by peeling of tissue as it becomes crusted or coagulated. Tissue is removed with a grasping forceps or suction. The extraction of devitalized tissue in large pieces is desirable to shorten the duration of the procedure. Pieces that do not fit through the working channel of the bronchoscope are removed by simultaneously withdrawing the bronchoscope with the tissue attached to the biopsy forceps.
Although the APC is a noncontact method, the bronchoscopist must hold the tip of the probe close to the target tissue, usually within 3 to 5 mm. Because the current follows the path of least resistance, holding the tip of the probe in proximity to the side of the bronchial wall or the lesion will allow current to flow laterally rather than on a straight path. To prevent trauma to friable tissues, the tip of the probe should be extended past the end of the working channel of the bronchoscope only after the target tissue has been properly identified. During procedures performed with the patient under conscious sedation, the bronchoscopist also should anticipate unexpected movement of the target tissue because of the patients cough. Use of the APC with a therapeutic channel bronchoscope is recommended to facilitate the suction of secretions, blood, and smoke.
The Nd-YAG laser is another noncontact thermal device. It differs from APC in that it can generate higher temperatures capable of tissue vaporization and deeper penetration. In combination with rigid bronchoscopy under general anesthesia, the Nd-YAG laser has been the method used most often for the rapid removal of large tumors.21 Although it offers less penetration, the argon plasma beam has the advantage of not having to follow a straight path like the Nd-YAG laser. Because APC seeks electroconductive areas, it can more easily access targets located laterally, radially, or around anatomic corners. APC also does not generate a direct thermal reaction with airway devices that do not conduct electricity. Thus, the risks of igniting endotracheal tubes or other airway catheters are much lower with APC than with the Nd-YAG laser.22 Similarly, the known risk of Nd-YAG laser-induced retinal injury to the operator and technical personnel 23 does not exist during APC instrumentation.
Despite the safety features of APC, care must be taken to reduce risks
inherent to any thermal device. The APC probe should extend 0.5 to 1.0
cm beyond the tip of the bronchoscope to avoid collateral thermal
damage to the bronchoscope. Supplemental oxygen should be kept at the
minimum safe level. In general, maintaining inspired concentration of
supplemental oxygen at
40%, or intermittently reducing it to this
level, is recommended during APC application. No fires or technical
complications occurred during the interventions reported in this study.
There have been isolated case reports of intestinal wall emphysema and
pneumoperitoneum after APC in GI endoscopy.24
Systemic air
embolisms have also been reported during bronchoscopic Nd-YAG laser
interventions.25
In our patients, we did not observe gas
exchange impairment, bronchopulmonary barotrauma, or clinical
manifestations of gas embolism associated with the introduction of
low-flow, inert argon gas into the airway.
Patient selection for endobronchial tumor ablation with APC requires the understanding that the mere presence of endobronchial disease does not in itself constitute an indication for endobronchial therapy. Standard surgical, medical, and radiation treatments remain the primary therapeutic modalities for patients with bronchopulmonary malignancies. Interventional bronchoscopy must be contemplated in the context of multidisciplinary management of these patients. Procedures such as APC that can be performed in an outpatient setting or at the bedside in the ICUs augment the therapeutic options available to the clinical bronchoscopist. These techniques help to transform the traditional role of the pulmonologist from diagnostic bronchoscopist to active participant in cancer therapy within multidisciplinary programs.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the Mary L.E. McConnell Fund for Lung Research.
Received for publication June 14, 2000. Accepted for publication October 11, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. H. Loewen, M. M. Kelly, and A. Tremblay ELECTROCOAGULATION OF ENDOBRONCHIAL TELANGIECTASIAS Chest Meeting Abstracts, October 1, 2006; 130(4): 290S - 290S. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Reisz Topical Hemostatic Tamponade: Another Tool in the Treatment of Massive Hemoptysis Chest, June 1, 2005; 127(6): 1888 - 1889. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Asimakopoulos, J. Beeson, J. Evans, and M. O. Maiwand Cryosurgery for Malignant Endobronchial Tumors: Analysis of Outcome Chest, June 1, 2005; 127(6): 2007 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Iwamoto, T. Miyazawa, N. Kurimoto, Y. Miyazu, A. Ishida, K. Matsuo, and Y. Watanabe Interventional Bronchoscopy in the Management of Airway Stenosis Due to Tracheobronchial Tuberculosis Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1344 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Kvale, M. Simoff, and U. B. S. Prakash Palliative Care Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1_suppl): 284S - 311S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |