|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Internal Medicine (Drs. Stewart, Tuazon, and Duarte), Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr. Olson), University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
Correspondence to: Alexander G. Duarte, MD, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, John Sealy Annex, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555-0561; e-mail: aduarte{at}utmb.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: cesarean section epoprostenol pulmonary hypertension pregnancy
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Case Report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The patient was admitted to labor and delivery and was prescribed bed rest, oxygen, diuretics, and heparin. Fetal heart tones were noted at 150 beats/min, and IM corticosteroids were administered to accelerate fetal lung development. Despite this therapy, the patient continued to report progressive dyspnea, and at 32 weeks gestation the placement of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) demonstrated moderate pulmonary hypertension (Table 1 ). IV epoprostenol therapy was initiated at 4 ng/kg/min, producing an improvement in the hemodynamic profile (Table 1) . At 36 weeks gestation, while receiving IV epoprostenol, the premature rupture of membranes occurred followed by active labor. However, the progression of labor was inadequate, and a cesarean section was scheduled. Preoperatively, a PAC was placed and epidural anesthesia was administered. Subsequently, the cardiac output declined from 7.4 to 4.1 L/min and the epoprostenol infusion was increased to 10 ng/kg/min. The patient remained hemodynamically stable throughout the cesarean section and delivered a healthy male infant weighing 7 lbs with Apgar scores of 5 and 9, respectively, at 1 and 5 min. A bilateral tubal ligation was performed with patient consent. Following extubation, the PAC was maintained for 48 h to assist with IV fluid administration, and the hemodynamic profile remained stable with the patient receiving 10 ng/kg/min epoprostenol. On postoperative day 2, heparin therapy was resumed.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several reports have demonstrated an improvement in hemodynamics and outcome in nonpregnant patients receiving vasodilator and anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of PPH.3 7 Subsequently, several reports have described the use of vasodilator therapy during parturition and postpartum with good outcomes.8 9 The majority of patients in these series had improvements in hemodynamics similar to our patient, leading one to speculate that a favorable short-term response to vasodilator therapy may be predictive of a favorable maternal outcome. Accordingly, we elected to use epoprostenol and heparin for several weeks prior to the expected date of delivery in order to maximize the benefits of this therapy. Furthermore, this therapy was continued in the postpartum period given the increased incidence of complications following labor and delivery. Another important point concerns the safety of the fetus following exposure to IV epoprostenol. Although there is little information on this subject, this report indicates that during the last trimester of pregnancy epoprostenol therapy does not result in any fetal deformities or growth retardation.
Several factors have been implicated as potential risk factors for maternal death, including mode of delivery, type and technique of anesthesia, and manner of maternal monitoring. A recent case series described successful outcomes in seven women with pulmonary hypertension following vaginal delivery.10 In contrast, greater morbidity and mortality has been associated with the performance of a cesarean section.2 To our knowledge, this is one of a small number of reports noting a successful maternal-fetal outcome following cesarean section in a patient with PPH.4 11 12 An explanation for this observation has been offered and may be related to the selection of the anesthetic technique (epidural or general anesthesia), although it is not clear whether one technique is superior in the setting of pulmonary hypertension and parturition.11 Another explanation may lie in the fact that cesarean section is more likely to be performed in patients unable to deliver by the vaginal route who subsequently develop hemodynamic instability. While some authors have disputed the need for a PAC, we advocate its use intraoperatively and during the postpartum period.9 In this report, the epoprostenol infusion was titrated using pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output measurements obtained with a PAC. An important component in the successful management of these patients involves a multidisciplinary team approach with an obstetrician, pulmonary or cardiology specialist, anesthesiologist, and experienced nursing staff.
In summary, PPH is likely to worsen during labor and delivery, resulting in a high maternal mortality rate. Early recognition and treatment with vasodilator and anticoagulation therapy may reduce the likelihood of complications. Elective cesarean section may be performed with intraoperative vasodilator administration. The IV epoprostenol dose not give rise to physical deformities or fetal growth retardation. A multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with PPH during pregnancy is of great importance for a successful maternal-fetal outcome.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication May 18, 2000. Accepted for publication August 28, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Bendayan, M. Hod, G. Oron, A. Sagie, L. Eidelman, D. Shitrit, and M. R. Kramer Pregnancy Outcome in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Prostacyclin Therapy Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2005; 106(5): 1206 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Rubin and D. B. Badesch Evaluation and Management of the Patient with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Ann Intern Med, August 16, 2005; 143(4): 282 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Elliot, P. Stewart, V. J. Webster, G. H. Mills, S. P. Hutchinson, E. S. Howarth, F. A. Bu'Lock, R. A. Lawson, I. J. Armstrong, and D. G. Kiely The use of iloprost in early pregnancy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2005; 26(1): 168 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-R. Chou, P.-H. Kuo, J.-C. Shih, and P.-C. Yang A 31-Year-Old Pregnant Woman With Progressive Exertional Dyspnea and Differential Cyanosis Chest, August 1, 2004; 126(2): 638 - 641. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I Bildirici and J B. Shumway Intravenous and Inhaled Epoprostenol for Primary Pulmonary Hypertension During Pregnancy and Delivery Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2004; 103(5): 1102 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |