|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
*
From the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Drs. Schuster and Lange), Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; and Alliance Pharmaceutical Corporation (Drs. Tutuncu and Wedel), San Diego, CA.
A list of principal investigators is located in the Appendix.
Correspondence to: Daniel Schuster, MD, 660 S Euclid Ave, University Box 8225, St. Louis, MO 63110; e-mail: schusted{at}msnotes.wustl.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Post hoc review of chest radiographs by three independent observers with correlation to clinical variables.
Setting: Phase II randomized, uncontrolled, prospective, multicenter clinical trial.
Patients: Sixteen adult patients with diffuse bilateral
infiltrates consistent with acute lung injury and a
PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen
(FIO2) ratio < 300 with positive
end-expiratory pressure of 13 cm H2O and
FIO2
0.5.
Interventions: All patients were treated with either a 10-mL/kg or 20-mL/kg loading dose of perflubron followed by maintenance dosing at 3-h intervals to protocol-determined levels.
Results: There was a significant relationship between inhomogeneous radiographic filling during the first 48 h of treatment and the use of the lower loading dose of perflubron. Inhomogeneous radiographic filling (in 5 patients) was associated with a lower high-dose/FIO2 ratio at 24 h compared with the remaining patients. These differences resolved by 48 h. There were no other statistically significant correlations identified.
Conclusions: The radiographic appearance of PLV with perflubron appears to depend on the dose administered. Lower doses can be associated with both inhomogeneous radiographic filling and a transient deterioration in oxygenation during the first 24 to 48 h of treatment.
Key Words: acute lung injury ARDS gas exchange
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Perflubron is also radiopaque (a consequence of the bromine atom), resulting in a unique radiographic appearance.2 3 4 5 6 7 In previous reports,2 3 4 5 6 7 chest radiographs and CT scans demonstrated a symmetrical and gravity-dependent distribution of perflubron. Recently, a phase II clinical trial of PLV with perflubron was conducted in 16 patients. As part of this trial, we observed examples of chest radiographs that were significantly different from previous reports. Accordingly, in the current report, we evaluated the chest radiographs from all 16 patients during the first 48 h of the study.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
300 with a
tidal volume of
10 mL/kg at ideal body weight (IBW), an
end-inspiratory (plateau) pressure of
35 cm
H2O, an inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio of
1:1, and a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 13 cm
H2O. These settings were chosen to ensure the
uniformity of ventilator settings in evaluating the P/F as an entry
criterion. Based on the literature available at the time of the study,
a PEEP of 13 cm H2O also was considered to be
slightly greater than the average expected "lower inflection point"
on the pressure-volume relationship during early ARDS.
|
0.5 with at least 13 cm
H2O PEEP or after 120 h of treatment,
whichever came first.
Radiographic Evaluation
During the treatment phase (up to 5 days), portable chest
radiographs were obtained for each patient within 4 h of
initiating PLV and approximately every 24 h afterward, unless PLV
was discontinued earlier (eg, because of death, adverse
events, achieving oxygenation targets as described above, etc).
Additional radiographs were obtained if needed for clinical reasons, as
determined by the medical team caring for the patient. We limited the
current study, however, to the baseline radiograph and to those
obtained 24 and 48 h after initiating treatment with PLV.
Radiographic filling was judged to be homogeneous if there were no filling defects within the lung parenchyma of the lower and mid-lung fields bilaterally on the anterior-posterior film. Because portions of the upper lobe are above a horizontal plane at the level of the trachea, patients in the low-dose group whose only abnormality was incomplete filling of the upper lobe were still included in the homogeneous group. In contrast, radiographic filling was judged to be inhomogeneous if radiographs showed filling defects in the mid-lung and lower lung fields after initiating PLV. Each radiograph was evaluated by three independent reviewers (DS, AT, and MW), and differences in opinion were resolved by consensus. One patient, who demonstrated homogeneous filling in one lung but no perflubron in the contralateral lung at the 24-h time point because of a mainstem intubation, was excluded from the radiographic analyses, but was not excluded from other analyses.
Each investigator in the trial was asked to decide whether the underlying cause for ARDS was direct (eg, pneumonia, aspiration, lung contusion, toxic inhalation, or near-drowning) or indirect (eg, sepsis syndrome, nonthoracic trauma, cardiopulmonary bypass, or massive blood transfusion).
Statistical Analysis
Categorical variables were analyzed with contingency tables and
analysis of covariance methods. Associations between categorical
variables were tested with two-tailed Fishers Exact Tests (because of
small sample size). Continuous variables were analyzed using one-way
analysis of variance. Supportive analysis of covariance models were run
using the baseline oxygenation variable as the covariate. Within-group
comparisons of means to baseline values were performed with either
Students or Satterwaith t tests. The latter uses lower
degrees of freedom and was used when the assumption of sampling from a
common variance was rejected. Statistical significance was accepted
when the p value was < 0.05. No adjustments were made for
multiplicity testing. All analyses were implemented using a statistical
software package (SAS, version 6.12; SAS Institute; Cary, NC) running
under a commercially available operating system (Windows 95; Microsoft;
Redmond, WA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The distribution of patients with respect to radiographic filling pattern is shown in Table 2 . At 24 h after initiating PLV, all patients in the high-dose group showed a homogeneous filling pattern on the chest radiograph, whereas only two of seven patients showed this pattern in the low-dose group (p = 0.007). By 48 h, the radiographic pattern became homogeneous in three additional patients in the low-dose group, resulting in no statistical difference in patient distribution between the two filling patterns.
|
|
There was no significant relationship between radiographic filling pattern and the underlying risk factor for ARDS (direct or indirect). Likewise, no significant relationship to static respiratory system compliance was identified (based on airway plateau pressures).
The following two case summaries illustrate some of the observations noted above.
Case 1
A 36-year-old woman with a history of chronic pancreatitis was
admitted with acute abdominal pain consistent with recurrent
pancreatitis. An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram was
performed without incident on the day of admission. On the evening of
the third hospital day, the patient developed progressive respiratory
distress and new bilateral radiographic infiltrates (Fig 2
). The following day, she was enrolled into the study and randomized to
the high-dose perflubron group. The loading dose was administered
without difficulty over approximately 90 min. Subsequent chest
radiographs showed progressive symmetrical filling of both lungs (Fig 2)
. Perflubron administration was discontinued per protocol after
72 h. The patient was extubated on the 10th day after the onset of
respiratory distress and was discharged from the hospital 3 days later.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Most preclinical studies of PLV with perflubron (reviewed by Leonard1 ) have reported improved lung physiology. Previous reports2 7 also have shown that the chest radiographic appearance of perflubron is symmetrically and homogeneously distributed, especially in dependent lung segments during PLV. Progressive lung filling (Fig 1) with repeated dosing may indicate additional lung recruitment by the dense perfluorochemical. This typical constellation of findings is exemplified by case 1.
In contrast, Figure 3 shows an asymmetric, nonhomogeneous radiographic filling that was observed during the initial administration phase (ie, during the first 24 to 36 h) in case 2. This unusual radiographic appearance prompted a review of the remaining chest radiographs during the first 48 h of this study.
As shown in Figure 1 and Table 2 , an inhomogeneous radiographic appearance was significantly associated with assignment to the low-dose treatment group, and with worsening oxygenation by the 24 h postinitiation time point. As the radiographic appearance became more homogeneous during the next 24 h of treatment, oxygenation improved (Fig 1) .
In preclinical studies, investigators generally have shown significant dose-dependent improvements in oxygenation with PLV,12 but such improvements have not been reported uniformly.12 13 14 15 16 An additional animal study15 suggests that initial improvements may not be sustained over time. In a recent experimental model of acute lung injury,16 we also reported that oxygenation deteriorated compared with a control (no PLV) group. In that study, we speculated that this effect was the result of perflubron filling of the lung that was no longer atelectatic after applying PEEP to this lung injury model. This effect did not seem to be related to the dose of perflubron used. As can be seen in Figure 1 , oxygenation fell in both treatment groups relative to baseline at the 24-h time point. However, the decrease was greater in the low-dose treatment group, resulting in a significant difference in oxygenation between the two groups at that time. Because the transient worsening of oxygenation in the current study was associated with treatment with the lower dose of the drug, an additional explanation seems warranted.
The differences in radiographic filling pattern seems to be the most likely clue as to probable mechanism, because the deterioration in oxygenation at 24 h was associated with the inhomogeneous filling pattern. With this kind of inhomogeneity, it, obviously, would be difficult to maintain an optimal local ventilation-perfusion matching. However, as filling with perflubron became more homogeneous, perfused alveolar units would be ventilated more uniformly and oxygenation would improve. Because this uniform filling can be achieved more quickly in the higher dose treatment group, oxygenation would not be expected to deteriorate to the same extent.
It is also possible that other factors may have been operative. For instance, the patient in case 2 was treated not only with the lower dose of perflubron, but also had copious secretions from presumed aspiration-induced airway injury. The distal airways of such patients are likely to be obstructed by cellular debris and inflammatory edema. If the perflubron is unable to penetrate this barrier, gas exchange may actually worsen initially during PLV. Only with repeated suctioning and saline solution lavage can these secretions be cleared (Fig 4) , allowing the perflubron to penetrate to distal airways and, ultimately, to restabilize (and eventually improve) gas exchange and hemodynamics. Indeed, once perflubron has penetrated to distal lung units, its physical characteristics actually may allow secretions to rise to a point in the airway where they can be cleared more easily. These physiologic improvements will be associated with the more typical symmetrical and homogeneous radiographic appearance previously reported with perflubron administration (Fig 2) . Despite these features of case 2, no significant association was found between the radiographic filling pattern and the underlying risk factor for ARDS (eg, aspiration).
In conclusion, the radiographic appearance of PLV with perflubron appears to depend on the dose administered. A loading dose of 10 mL/kg followed by repeated filling to a carinal level (as defined in this study protocol) can be associated with both inhomogeneous radiographic filling and a transient deterioration in oxygenation during the first 24 to 48 h of treatment. Thereafter, with continued treatment, filling becomes more homogeneous and oxygenation improves. In the small number of cases reported here, there were no serious adverse events associated with these abnormalities, and they were all adequately treated with adjustments in FIO2, PEEP, tidal volume, and suctioning. In contrast, the radiographic appearance of PLV in patients treated with 20 mL/kg perflubron, followed by repeated filling to a laryngeal level, was always symmetrical and homogeneous, and these patients showed no significant deterioration in gas exchange.
While it is important that the treating physician be prepared to respond to such clinical events, it is also important to note that of the 16 patients who were studied in this particular trial, the 28-day mortality rate was only 6%, which is far lower than the expected 30 to 50% rate for ARDS patients. Thus, there is every reason to believe that PLV with perflubron may be a valuable addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for ARDS, but this supposition will require validation in a larger-scale, controlled, clinical trial, which is currently underway.
| Appendix 1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Drs. Schuster and Lange were investigators in the Perflubron phase II trial described in this manuscript and received reimbursement for the costs of conducting the trial at their center.
Received for publication December 30, 1999. Accepted for publication October 18, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |