|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (Drs. Sonna and Patton, and Mss. Angel and Sharp), Natick, MA; US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (Dr. Knapik), Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD; and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Dr. Lilly), Brigham and Womens Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Correspondence to: Larry A. Sonna, MD, PhD, US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, 42 Kansas St, Natick, MA 01760; e-mail: larry.sonna{at}na.amedd.army.mil
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Observational, retrospective study.
Setting: Fort Jackson, SC, May to July 1998.
Participants: One hundred thirty-seven ethnically diverse US Army recruits undergoing an 8-week Army basic training course.
Measurements and results: Subjects
underwent exercise challenge testing at the end of basic training to
evaluate for EIB (defined as a decrease in FEV1 of
15%, 1 or 10 min after running to peak oxygen uptake on a
treadmill). Those subjects who were unable to run to peak oxygen
uptake, or who were unable to perform two baseline FEV1
maneuvers the results of which were within 5% of each other, were
excluded from analysis. We measured peak oxygen uptake on a treadmill
and the scores achieved on the components of the US Army physical
fitness test (APFT). Of 137 subjects, 121 (58 men and 63 women) met our
inclusion criteria. Eight subjects (7%) had EIB. Subjects who
experienced EIB and unaffected control subjects both showed
statistically significant gains in performance on the APFT events
during basic training. At the end of basic training, peak oxygen uptake
levels and APFT event scores were not significantly different between
subjects with EIB and unaffected control subjects.
Conclusions: Seven percent of the US Army recruits who were tested had EIB, but this did not hinder their physical performance gains during basic training. EIB per se should not be an absolute reason to exclude individuals from employment in jobs with heavy physical demands.
Key Words: asthma athletic performance epidemiology exercise-induced asthma military medicine oxygen uptake physical fitness physical training
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
O2max) levels than healthy
control subjects,11
although this may be attributable to a
less active lifestyle.12
In one report, 5
high school athletes with EIB recorded slower times in a free run test
than did their unaffected peers. Adults with asthma have been reported
to have lower
O2max levels,
anaerobic thresholds, and oxygen pulses than unaffected control
subjects with comparable habitual levels of activity,13
although they can achieve statistically significant improvements in
aerobic fitness in response to training.14
15
However, it
is not known whether there are systematic differences between adults
with EIB and unaffected peers in the physical performance gains that
can be realized during a training program. US Army recruits represent an especially interesting population in which to study EIB and its effect on physical performance. In contrast to some groups in which the prevalence of EIB has been measured, US Army recruits are drawn from an otherwise healthy, ethnically diverse, and geographically dispersed population. Additionally, recruits undergoing basic training represent a large cohort of individuals who by virtue of their enlistment will undergo a closely monitored and strictly enforced training regimen, the outcome of which can be objectively measured using the US Army physical fitness test (APFT), a standardized instrument that has been used extensively since 1984.16 17 18 19 Accordingly, US Army recruits afford a unique opportunity to study the effect of EIB on the physical performance response to training.
The prevalence of EIB among US Army recruits is unknown. The US Army screens all prospective applicants medically prior to enlistment by means of a standardized history and physical examination. Asthma disqualifies a prospective volunteer from enlistment in the US Army,20 although a waiver can be obtained in some circumstances for individuals with a history of childhood asthma who have been asymptomatic since age 12 years.20 21 However, historical information alone can lack both sensitivity and specificity for detecting EIB,6 7 and a subject whose only manifestation of reversible airways obstruction is EIB may not be wheezing at the time of the physical examination at induction. Thus, it is not necessarily surprising that the Air Force, which has a screening policy similar to that of the Army, found a 6% point prevalence of EIB in a study of 100 consecutive hospital personnel.22
The above considerations suggest that, despite initial medical screening, a substantial number of US Army recruits nevertheless might have unrecognized EIB. Therefore, we measured the prevalence of EIB in a cohort of recruits undergoing basic training. Furthermore, we evaluated whether or not unrecognized (and hence untreated) EIB might adversely affect adaptations to physical training by measuring peak oxygen uptake levels and exercise performance (by aerobic endurance and muscular strength and endurance) before and after basic training.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Army recruits undergo a standard history and physical examination prior to enlistment to screen for a variety of medical conditions. The screening questionnaire specifically asks the applicant about a history of asthma, wheezing, or chronic cough. Auscultation of the chest is performed as part of this physical examination. Pulmonary function tests and specialist consultation can be requested at the discretion of the screening medical officer to determine whether a subject has asthma or other exclusionary conditions. Since 1995, the standards of medical fitness for the Army have required that applicants with obstructive airways disease (including asthma, EIB, and asthmatic bronchitis) that has been reliably diagnosed at any age be excluded from enlistment.20 In exceptional circumstances, waivers to this policy may be granted to individuals who have a history of childhood asthma but who have been asymptomatic since age 12 years.21 Individuals with active symptoms of asthma or those who require medication to remain asymptomatic are not permitted to enlist.
Subjects who enrolled in this study underwent measurement of their peak oxygen uptake levels at the beginning and the end of basic training. Screening for EIB was performed at the end of basic training, concurrent with the measurement of peak oxygen uptake levels. The scoring of the spirometry data was performed by an investigator who was not present at the testing site, after all testing had been completed. As a result, the subjects, the personnel who supervised the administration of the APFT (see below), and the study investigators who conducted the on-site data collection were blinded to the EIB status of the subjects (as defined by spirometry) during the data-collection phase of this study.
Subjects were excluded from further data analysis if they failed to achieve peak oxygen uptake levels at the second assessment (which was performed at the end of basic training) or if they were unable to perform two FEV1 maneuvers with results that were within 5% of each other before exercising.
Army Basic Training
Subjects participated in physical training four to six mornings
per week for 1 to 1.5 h, beginning at 5:30 AM.
Training sessions alternated between aerobic and muscle strength
sessions. On aerobic training days, soldiers ran between 0.5 and 3
miles, sometimes performing sprints. To ensure that a training effect
would be achieved in all individuals, soldiers ran in one of four
ability groups, which were established based on quartiles from a 2-mile
timed run that was performed during the first week of basic training.
On muscle strength training days, training consisted of push-ups,
sit-ups, and calisthenic-type exercises. In addition to morning
physical training, trainees participated in many other physical
activities, such as road marches (with and without additional loads,
such as backpacks, weapons, and combat equipment), fitness obstacle
courses, climbing, rappelling, bayonet training, and tactical movement
exercises (under fire and not under fire), culminating in a 3-day field
training exercise.
Peak Oxygen Uptake
Aerobic power was measured by an open-circuit method, using a
continuous uphill treadmill running protocol that was similar to that
used by Patton et al25
and was based on standard
methods.26
27
The initial 5-min warm-up was run at a 0%
grade and at 2.68 m/s (6 miles per hour [mph]) for men and at 2.24
m/s (5 mph) for women. If the heart rate was < 150 beats/min by
minute 5 of the warm-up, the treadmill speed was increased by 0.45 m/s
(0.5 mph) for the remainder of the test. Following the warm-up, the
treadmill grade was increased by 2% every 3 min until volitional
fatigue. The level of oxygen uptake at volitional fatigue was
considered to be the peak oxygen uptake level of the subject.
O2max was considered to have
been achieved if there was an increase in oxygen uptake of < 2
mL/kg/min (or 0.15 L/min) with an increase in treadmill grade prior to
volitional fatigue. Subjects wore a nose clip and were connected to the
oxygen uptake-measuring device via a low-resistance nonrebreathing
valve (Hans Rudolf, Inc; Kansas City, MO) by a mouthpiece. The on-line
oxygen uptake system consisted of an oxygen analyzer (Applied
Electrochemistry S-3A; AEI Technologies; Pittsburgh, PA), a
carbon dioxide analyzer (Beckman LB-2; SensorMedics, Inc; Yorba
Linda, CA), and a flowmeter turbine (KL Engineering Turbine Company;
Northridge, CA) interfaced with a computer (model 9122;
Hewlett-Packard; Palo Alto, CA). A single-lead ECG (model 1511B;
Hewlett-Packard) was monitored by trained personnel during the test to
determine heart rates and to ensure the safety of the subject.
Spirometry
Subjects underwent the measurement of FEV1
just before running on a treadmill, then 1 and 10 min after running on
a treadmill to peak oxygen uptake, using a hand-held anemometric
spirometer (Micro Spirometer; MicroMedical Ltd; Kent, UK). Subjects
were asked to perform up to eight forced expiratory maneuvers before
exercise, and at least two at each time interval after exercise. The
best-effort (highest) FEV1 obtained before
exercise and at 1 and 10 min after exercise was taken to be the
FEV1 for the subject at that time point. The
smaller of the two best-effort postexercise FEV1
values was used to calculate the exercise-induced change in
FEV1 for the subject. The subject was considered
to have EIB when the exercise-induced decrease in
FEV1 was
15%, which is in accordance with
existing guidelines.28
The time points chosen to measure FEV1 after exercise (1 and 10 min) were a compromise between the known biology of EIB (in which, for most subjects, FEV1 begins to fall shortly after the cessation of exercise and reaches a nadir between 5 and 10 min after exercise2 28 ), the time points used by other investigators (which among others, typically include both 1-min and 10-min time points7 8 9 ), and the need to screen a large number of subjects at each testing session. Although some individuals may experience a delayed onset of bronchoconstriction after exercise (with the diagnostic fall in FEV1 not occurring until up to 30 min after exercise), these individuals represent a small minority of those persons with EIB.28 Furthermore, because others8 have shown convincingly that the mean FEV1 of individuals with EIB is fairly constant between 5 and 15 min postexercise, we believed that the error of underestimation that would be introduced by taking measurements at 1 and 10 min postexercise would be small.
Exercise challenge testing was carried out on 6 separate days in early summer at Fort Jackson in a building that had no air conditioning. Testing sessions typically ran from either 5 AM to noon or from noon to 4 PM (and occasionally, both). On testing days, the mean (± SD) ambient temperatures at Fort Jackson ranged from 22.3 ± 1.0°C to 36.7 ± 1.0°C. The mean relative humidity at Columbia, SC (the nearest weather station that records these data) ranged from 32 ± 4% to 86 ± 8%.
APFT
The APFT is a standard assessment of physical fitness that is
administered to all active-duty personnel at least twice per year, to
recruits at the beginning and the end of basic training, and to all
members of the reserve components at least once per year. It consists
of the following three events: (1) a push-up event, in which the
soldier performs as many Army-standard push-ups in 2 min as possible;
(2) a sit-up event, in which the soldier performs as many Army-standard
sit-ups in 2 min as possible; and (3) a timed 2-mile run. The accepted
techniques for performing Army-standard push-ups and sit-ups are
explained and demonstrated to the soldiers just before each event. The
precise wording of the explanations given before each event is standard
throughout the US Army.16
A soldier who does not perform
push-ups or sit-ups to standard during the first 10 repetitions is
stopped, given an explanation of why the performance technique is
incorrect, and, after a rest period, is retested. Any push-up or sit-up
repetition not performed to Army standards is not counted. The 2-mile
run is unassisted and is performed at a pace determined by the subject;
soldiers are not disqualified if they alternate running and walking on
this performance test.
Performance on each event is given an age-adjusted and gender-adjusted
score on a scale of 1 to 100, based on the number of repetitions
performed or the time taken to run 2 miles. A minimum score of 50 in
each event is required to graduate from basic training, but soldiers
are encouraged to achieve a score of
60, which is the standard they
will subsequently be required to meet. In healthy, trained individuals,
the 2-mile run event is known to correlate well with the
O2max of a
subject18
; the sit-up and push-up events are generally
considered to be measures of muscular endurance.18
One
significant advantage of the APFT scoring system is that it accounts
for individuals who are unable to complete a 2-mile run by assigning
them a score of zero for the run event. Additionally, extraordinary
athletes can achieve only a maximum score of 100. These features reduce
the statistical impact of outliers on the overall population without
excluding them from the analysis. The APFT scoring system is based on a
normative scale19
and has been in use since 1984, although
a refinement of the scoring system was introduced shortly after this
study was completed in 1998.17
The APFT was administered by the soldiers basic training units according to Army standards by individuals not otherwise directly involved with this study. The age-adjusted and gender-adjusted APFT scores for each subject were calculated in accordance with the standards in effect at the time.16
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using computer software
(SigmaStat for Windows 2.029
and SPSS for Windows
10.030
; SPSS; Chicago, IL). As a general data analysis
strategy, groups of interest were examined for normality and equal
variance prior to applying any statistical tests. For normally
distributed data, we have reported the mean and SE; otherwise, we have
reported medians and interquartile ranges. Parametric statistics
(paired t tests for paired comparisons, unpaired
t tests for across-group comparisons and one-way analysis of
variance [ANOVA] for multiple group comparisons) were reported to be
used when assumptions of normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and equal
variance were met; otherwise, we used nonparametric statistics
(ie, Wilcoxon test for paired comparisons, Mann-Whitney rank
sum test for unpaired comparisons, and ANOVA on ranks for multiple
comparisons). Differences in categoric variables were compared by the
Pearson
2 test.
Percentage changes in FEV1 from baseline were analyzed using Friedman repeated-measures ANOVA on ranks, followed by the Tukey test. In addition to paired t tests, peak oxygen uptake data were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA using oxygen uptake levels at the beginning and the end of basic training as the within-subjects factor, the presence or absence of EIB as the between-subjects factor, and gender as a covariate.
The APFT performance data were analyzed after subjects had been stratified into categories based on the greatest percentage drop in best-effort, postexercise FEV1. Differences between the strata were evaluated by ANOVA on ranks. Because the number of subjects in each subgroup was not equal, post hoc analysis of the ANOVA on ranks was performed by Dunns test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Excluding those individuals who failed to perform a technically adequate peak oxygen uptake at the time of exercise challenge and those who could not perform two FEV1 maneuvers within 5% of each other at baseline, the median age of the 121 participants (58 men and 63 women) included in the analysis was 21 years (range, 18 to 35 years). Their self-reported ethnic backgrounds were the following: whites, 67; African Americans, 32; Hispanics, 16; Asians, 5; and Native Americans, 1. Their self-reported homes of origin included 36 different states in the United States, the US Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico.
Prevalence of EIB
The distribution of exercise-induced changes in
FEV1 is shown in Figure 1
. EIB was defined as a decrease of
15% in best-effort
FEV1 at either of the time intervals after
exercise when measurements were taken (ie, 1 and 10 min
after the cessation of exercise). Eight subjects (five men and three
women) had evidence of EIB, a point prevalence of 7%. Of these
subjects, three were white, four were African-American, and one was
Hispanic. Five subjects met the criterion for EIB only at the
10-min time interval, two subjects met the criterion at both the 1-min
and 10-min time intervals, and one subject met the criterion only at
the 1-min time interval. In the subjects with EIB, the median
percentage postexercise changes at 1 and 10 min were -10.6%
(interquartile range, -15.8 to +1.5%) and -23.7% (interquartile
range, -29.9 to -15.8%), respectively. These decreases in
FEV1 were statistically significant overall by
repeated-measures ANOVA on ranks (p = 0.002), but post hoc
analysis (by Tukey test) showed that only the decrement at 10 min was
significantly different from the preexercise FEV1
level. By contrast, in unaffected subjects, the median percentage
postexercise changes in FEV1 were +0.3%
(interquartile range, -2.4 to +2.8%) and +0.3% (interquartile range,
-2.2 to +2.5%) and were not statistically significant (p = 0.2).
|
15% in
FEV1 after exercise, in accordance with existing
guidelines, some investigators consider a decrease in
FEV1 of
10% to be sufficient to diagnose the
condition.28
By this less restrictive criterion, 6 women
(9.5%) and 8 men (14%) had EIB, which represents an overall
prevalence of 12%.
Effect of EIB on Aerobic Performance
Changes in peak oxygen uptake that occurred during basic
training are illustrated in Figure 2
. The 53 male subjects unaffected by EIB showed an increase in mean
(± SEM) peak oxygen uptake from 50.6 ± 0.9 to 52.2 ± 0.8
mL/kg/min (p = 0.01 by paired t test). The 60 female
subjects who were unaffected by EIB showed an increase from
39.1 ± 0.6 to 42.3 ± 0.6 mL/kg/min (p < 0.001). In subjects
with EIB, the mean peak oxygen uptake changed from 53.5 ± 3.2 to
52.2 ± 1.8 mL/kg/min in the five men (p = 0.4) and from
41.3 ± 4.8 to 43.9 ± 4.2 mL/kg/min in the three women
(p = 0.1). Differences in mean peak oxygen uptake between unaffected
subjects and subjects with EIB were not statistically significant,
either at the beginning of basic training (men, p = 0.3
[t test]; women, p = 0.5 [t test]) or at
the end (men, p = 1.0; women, p = 0.6). To confirm these findings,
the changes in peak oxygen uptake that occurred in the cohort were
analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA, using the presence or absence of
EIB as the between-subjects factor and gender as a covariate. This
analysis revealed a significant increase in peak oxygen uptake for the
cohort (p = 0.01), with a statistically significant interaction
between gender and increase in peak oxygen uptake (p = 0.02), but not
between the presence or absence of EIB and increase in peak oxygen
uptake (p = 0.2). Gender (p < 0.001), but not EIB (p = 0.4), had
a statistically significant effect on the increase in peak oxygen
uptake levels.
|
O2max. Of the 121 subjects
included in our study, 88 (73%) achieved either a heart rate that was
90% predicted for age, a respiratory exchange ratio
1.1, or a
plateau in
O2 (as defined in
"Materials and Methods") both before and after basic training.
Another 25 subjects (21%) met one or more of these criteria before
basic training but not after basic training, whereas only 5 subjects
(4%) met at least one of these criteria after basic training but not
before. Using a plateau in
O2
as the criterion for
O2max,
only 5 subjects (4%) achieved
O2max both before and after
basic training. Twenty-one subjects (17%) achieved in
O2max before basic training
but not after basic training, whereas 14 subjects (12%) failed to
achieve
O2max before basic
training but did so after basic training. The remaining 81 subjects
(67%) did not achieve a plateau in
O2 either before or after
basic training. Of the eight subjects with EIB, only two (one man and
one woman) achieved a plateau in
O2 before basic training, and
none achieved it after basic training. To further determine whether the postexercise change in FEV1 had an effect on physical performance, we stratified our cohort according to their exercise-induced changes in FEV1. We defined the following three strata: no bronchoconstrictor response (ie, no decrease in FEV1 after exercise); indeterminate response (ie, a decrease in FEV1 of less than 15% after exercise); and EIB (ie, a decrease in FEV1 of 15% or more after exercise). Subjects in all three strata displayed statistically significant gains in median 2-mile run score over the course of basic training (Table 2 ). However, there were no statistically significant differences in 2-mile run scores between the subjects with EIB and the subjects who showed no bronchoconstriction after exercise (Table 2) at either the beginning or the end of basic training. The differences in median scores at the end of basic training correspond to a 12-s per mile difference in run time between subjects with EIB and unaffected subjects. The median and 25th percentile scores achieved by all groups of subjects were substantially higher than the minimum score of 50 required to graduate from basic training.
|
Effect of EIB on Measures of Muscular Endurance
Subjects with EIB and unaffected control subjects showed
significant gains in push-up and sit-up scores over the course of basic
training (Table 2)
. There were no statistically significant differences
in push-up scores between subjects with EIB and unaffected control
subjects either at the beginning or at the end of basic training.
Subjects with EIB performed significantly fewer sit-up repetitions at
the beginning of basic training. However, their fitness gains were such
that no statistically significant difference in sit-up score between
subjects with EIB and unaffected control subjects was evident at the
end of basic training.
In absolute terms, the differences in median APFT push-up and sit-up scores at the end of basic training represent a four-repetition difference in each event (over the course of 2 min) between subjects with EIB and subjects with no bronchoconstrictor response to exercise.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With the exception of one measure of physical performance (ie, sit-ups at the beginning of basic training), the subjects we identified as having EIB showed no evidence of a physical performance disadvantage when compared to unaffected peers. Both the subjects with EIB and their unaffected peers showed statistically significant gains in physical performance on the APFT over the course of basic training, and the scores achieved at the end of basic training were comparable across the groups.
The peak oxygen uptakes achieved by subjects with EIB at the beginning and at the end of basic training were not clinically or statistically different from those of unaffected subjects. These data must be interpreted cautiously, however, due to the low number of subjects with EIB. Although the unaffected subjects showed statistically significant gains in peak oxygen uptake over the course of basic training, subjects with EIB did not. This may have been due to the low number of subjects with EIB in each gender subgroup and, at least among men with EIB, the relatively high peak oxygen uptake already present at baseline. Consistent with this interpretation, the difference between the mean peak oxygen uptake of subjects with EIB and their unaffected peers was < 6% and was not statistically significant.
Our protocol was designed to measure peak oxygen uptake rather than
O2max. Because fewer subjects
achieved a true plateau in oxygen uptake at the end of basic training
than before, it is possible that, although statistically significant,
the observed increases in peak oxygen uptake underestimate the true
gains in
O2max that occurred.
This underestimate could have contributed to the failure of the
subjects with EIB to show a statistically significant gain in peak
oxygen uptake as a result of basic training.
The physical performance findings of this study cannot yet be generalized to all subjects with EIB, because, despite ethnically diverse and geographically dispersed origins in the United States, our subjects represented a select population because of the following: (1) they were young and otherwise healthy enough to meet the Armys physical requirements for entry into the service; (2) they had been able to complete 8 weeks of Army basic training; (3) they were able to perform the physical tasks demanded of them without the need for medication; and (4) they underwent a mandatory and strictly enforced program of physical training. Nevertheless, our findings demonstrate that, even without medical intervention, some individuals with EIB can respond to physical training in a manner comparable to unaffected individuals. This suggests that a diagnosis of EIB, per se, should not be used as an absolute exclusionary criterion for employment in jobs with heavy physical demands. However, a larger, longitudinal study will be needed to establish whether or notindividuals with EIB are at a significant physical performance disadvantage over longer periods of observation and to determine how many subjects with EIB will subsequently manifest other clinical symptoms of asthma.
An important limitation of this study is that the exercise challenge testing was performed under hot and humid environmental conditions. Because EIB is best precipitated by cool, dry air,31 it is likely that some subjects that we identified as "indeterminate" in fact would have been identified as having EIB under more sensitive testing conditions. A few others might have been misclassified as "indeterminate" as a result of the postexercise time points at which we chose to measure FEV1 (ie, 1 and 10 min). Our study, therefore, may have underestimated the actual prevalence of EIB. Furthermore, if EIB does adversely affect performance, such misclassification would tend to lower the average performance scores of the unaffected peers. To investigate whether such a misclassification might have biased our conclusions, we stratified our population by their postexercise change in FEV1 (Table 2) . In this analysis, the physical performance of subjects with EIB at the end of basic training was not clinically or statistically different from that of subjects who showed no bronchoconstrictor response to exercise. Therefore, we believe that, although we may have underestimated the true prevalence of EIB in our population, this source of bias would not have been likely to have affected our conclusions about physical performance.
A substantial strength of our study was that the physical training regimen was carried out in a highly structured environment. The noncompliance of subjects with an exercise regimen and individual differences in motivation to perform can, in principle, be significant sources of variability in a physical performance study that are difficult to control for. These potentially confounding elements were minimized by the circumstances of our subjects, who trained in groups and who had to answer to their drill sergeants for any lapses in their apparent desire to exercise. We believe this "drill sergeant effect" was also apparent in the APFT scores achieved at the end of basic training, which were generally well above the minimum required to graduate (the lowest 25th percentile score recorded on any event in any subgroup was still 8 points above the minimum required).
In summary, we found a 7% prevalence of unrecognized EIB among US Army recruits. In the eight subjects who we identified as having EIB, we found no evidence that this condition impaired their ability to realize performance gains during basic training. Our findings, therefore, suggest that, at least among some young, otherwise healthy, motivated, and physically fit adults, EIB per se need not be an absolute exclusionary criterion for employment in positions that have heavy physical demands or, perhaps, even for entry into military service.
| Footnotes |
|---|
O2max = maximal oxygen uptake Presented at the 1999 Meeting of the American Thoracic Society, San Diego, CA, April 2529, 1999.
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors, and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the US Army or the Department of Defense.
Received for publication July 6, 2000. Accepted for publication December 12, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
O2 rate and exercise-induced asthma in adult asthmatics. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 42,9-13[ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Oguma, L. J. Palmer, E. Birben, L. A. Sonna, K. Asano, and C. M. Lilly Role of Prostanoid DP Receptor Variants in Susceptibility to Asthma N. Engl. J. Med., October 21, 2004; 351(17): 1752 - 1763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Worsnop Asthma and Physical Activity Chest, August 1, 2003; 124(2): 421 - 422. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Ford, G. W. Heath, D. M. Mannino, and S. C. Redd Leisure-Time Physical Activity Patterns Among US Adults With Asthma Chest, August 1, 2003; 124(2): 432 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Sonna, M. A. Sharp, J. J. Knapik, M. Cullivan, K. C. Angel, J. F. Patton, and C. M. Lilly Angiotensin-converting enzyme genotype and physical performance during US Army basic training J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2001; 91(3): 1355 - 1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |