(Chest. 2001;119:1910-1912.)
© 2001
American College of Chest Physicians
Successful Bronchoscopic Placement of Tracheobronchial Stents Without Fluoroscopy*
Felix Herth, MD;
Heinrich D. Becker, MD;
Joseph LoCicero, III, MD, FCCP;
Robert Thurer, MD, FCCP and
Armin Ernst, MD, FCCP
*
From the Thoraxklinik (Drs. Herth and Becker), Heidelberg, Germany; the Department of Surgery (Drs. LoCicero and Thurer), Section of Thoracic Surgery, and the Department of Medicine (Dr. Ernst), Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Correspondence to: Armin Ernst, MD, FCCP, Director, Interventional Pulmonology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02215; e-mail: aernst{at}caregroup.harvard.edu
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Background: Tracheobronchial stenting is performed
increasingly often. Fluoroscopic control, which leads to significant
radiation exposure for patients and staff, is recommended for the
placement of metal stents.
Methods: All consecutive
patients referred to two airway centers in need of airway stenting who
received stents (Ultraflex; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA)
underwent placement using endoscopic guidance only. All data were
collected in an ongoing continuous database.
Results:
One hundred stents were placed in 96 patients for central airway
obstruction, and the data were reviewed. Stents were placed in all
locations within the central airways for a variety of indications but
mainly for malignant obstruction. No complications occurred, and all
stents were placed satisfactorily.
Conclusion: At
centers with dedicated airway teams, Ultraflex stents can be quickly
and safely inserted without the need for fluoroscopy. This saves
radiation exposure to patients and to staff and may lead to a more
cost-effective procedure.
Key Words: airway stenosis fluoroscopy tracheobronchial stenting
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Stenting
of the central airways has become a common procedure in centers
treating pulmonary diseases. Various stent models are applied for
endoscopic treatment, of which the silicone stent designed by
Dumon1
is currently the most widely used. This prosthesis
is not exempt from complications, the most important of which are
migration and inflammatory granulation.2
Based on
experience acquired in angiology, new self-expandable metallic
prostheses have made their appearance on the market within the past
several years with good success.3
4
At the moment, the
positioning of these stents is performed mostly under fluoroscopic
control.5
This requires fluoroscopy equipment
and additional staff, and it causes radiation exposure for patients and
the staff. Therefore, in our study we investigated the feasibility of
tracheobronchial stent placement under direct visual control without
using fluoroscopy.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
A prospective data collection was performed from January
1998 to July 1999 in all patients requiring tracheobronchial stenting.
This report includes all consecutive patient who during this period of
time received a stent (Ultraflex; Boston Scientific; Natick,
MA). Thoraxklinik Heidelberg and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical
Center are referral centers for patients with airway problems, and both
facilities operate dedicated multidisciplinary airway teams. Airway
stenting in patients is performed only if the team agrees that this is
the most appropriate option available. Silicone and metal stents are
both in use. Tracheobronchial stenting is commonly part of a
multimodality intervention, which may include laser therapy and other
kinds of therapy. Stents are placed only by operators who are
well-versed in all aspects of therapeutic bronchoscopy.
Description of the Device
The Ultraflex stent is a self-expanding, knitted metallic
meshwork made from a nickel-titanium alloy. This alloy has shape memory
properties. Most commonly, a covered version is used that is coated by
a polyurethane membrane, but for mere external compression or malacia
an uncovered version is also available. For fixation of the covered
stent, the last few millimeters on each end are left uncovered to allow
better integration into the bronchial wall. Ultraflex stents come in a
variety of lengths and diameters. They are mounted on an introducer
catheter that has radiopaque markers (Fig 1
).
Placement Technique
Metallic stent placement is possible both with the rigid
and the flexible bronchoscope.5
For proper stent
selection, the diameter and the length of the stenosis are measured
carefully. Sometimes prior dilatation or endoluminal tumor
resection of the stenotic area is necessary. The diameter is assessed
in relation to the barrel of the endoscope or to the opening of the
branches of a biopsy forceps and by assessing airway sizes by CT scan,
if available. The length of the stenosis is determined on the endoscope
by withdrawing the instrument from the distal to the proximal end of
the stenosis. A guidewire then is introduced, and the stent is placed
over it. With the use of the flexible bronchoscope, the guidewire is
sent through the channel and the scope is then removed in a sleeve-like
fashion. The bronchoscope then is reintroduced next to the guidewire.
With the use of the rigid scope, the guidewire can usually be directly
advanced through the barrel. The distal end of the stent is advanced
beyond the narrowed area until the middle of the stent is located
adjacent to the area in question. During the procedure, the
release of the stent is directly observed through the
bronchoscope, and gradual detachment from the catheter follows under
visual control (Fig 2
).
At both ends of the stent, a thread is filed through the last
loops of the meshwork. By smoothly pulling the thread with a forceps,
the end of the stent tapers like the opening of a purse and can be
pulled upward toward the tip of the endoscope for proximal
repositioning or pushed downward for distal repositioning.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Patients and Indications
Between the two institutions, 96 consecutive patients who
had undergone 100 Ultraflex stent placements were reviewed. There were
60 men and 36 women with a mean age of 59.8 years (age range, 26 to 92
years). The indication for stenting in 90 cases was high-grade airway
stenosis, and in 10 cases it was an tracheoesophageal fistula.
Fifty-two procedures were performed by flexible bronchoscopy, and 48
procedures were performed by rigid bronchoscopy. In 42 cases, the
uncovered type of stent was introduced, and in 58, the covered type was
introduced. All procedures with the flexible bronchoscope were
performed under conscious sedation only.
The etiologies of the airway obstructions necessitating stent placement
are detailed in Table 1
, the most common indications being non-small cell lung cancer and
esophageal cancer. Twenty-one stents were placed for benign
indications.
Site of Placement
The localization of stent placements is shown in Table 2
. The trachea was the most commonly stented region, but even small
airways were successfully treated.
Placement
The extent of the endobronchial lesions and the proper
positioning of all stents were confirmed by direct visualization.
None of the procedures re- quired fluoroscopy to achieve proper
stent placement. There were no complications. None of the patients
required stent replacement or significant repositioning.
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
The Ultraflex stent is a self-expanding metallic
device that is made of a so-called memory metal alloy of nickel and
titanium. Traditionally, tracheobronchial metal stent placement is
performed with fluoroscopic guidance, which requires specialized
radiology equipment and, thus, is associated with higher cost and
greater radiation exposure for patients and staff. This recommendation
by the manufacturer is not based on studies demonstrating added safety
from that approach for tracheobronchial stent placement but may rather
be a carry-over from other medical specialties using stents, such as in
radiology.
The results of our study establish the safety of placement of the
Ultraflex stents under visual control without the need for fluoroscopy.
Insertion of the device with the flexible or rigid bronchoscope under
visual control proved to be relatively simple.
It is necessary to point out that even though this approach simplifies
the placement of this particular stent, a variety of other stent types
are available. Other types, such as silicone stents, may be better
suited to some problems, and decisions about what stent to use can be
made best at dedicated centers with all options available.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that endobronchial placement of the
Ultraflex stents can be successfully and easily performed without the
need for special radiologic facilities and radiation exposure. These
findings apply to centers with dedicated airway teams and a large
experience in placing these airway devices.
Received for publication April 7, 2000.
Accepted for publication December 7, 2000.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Dumon, JF (1990) A dedicated tracheobronchial stent. Chest 97,328-332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Colt, HC, Dumon, JF (1991) Airway obstruction in cancer: the pros and cons of stents. J Respir Dis 12,741-749
-
Miyazawa, T (1999) Therapeutic bronchoscopy: laser-stents. J Jpn Soc Bronchol 21,545-552
-
Becker, HD (1996) Options and results in endobronchial treatment of lung cancer. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 5,165-178
-
Dasgupta, A, Dolmbatch, BL, Abi-Saleh, WJ, et al (1998) Self-expandable metallic airway stent insertion employing flexible bronchoscopy. Chest 114,106-109[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ouellet, M. E. Dunn, B. Lussier, N. Chailleux, and P. Helie
Noninvasive correction of a fractured endoluminal nitinol tracheal stent in a dog.
J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc.,
November 1, 2006;
42(6):
467 - 471.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. N. Chhajed, R. Eberhardt, H. Dienemann, A. Azzola, M. H. Brutsche, M. Tamm, and F. J.F. Herth
Therapeutic bronchoscopy interventions before surgical resection of lung cancer.
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
May 1, 2006;
81(5):
1839 - 1843.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. H. Grewe, K. M. Muller, M. Lindstaedt, A. Germing, A. Muller, A. Mugge, and T. Deneke
Reaction Patterns of the Tracheobronchial Wall to Implanted Noncovered Metal Stents
Chest,
August 1, 2005;
128(2):
986 - 990.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Mayse, J. Greenheck, M. Friedman, and K. L. Kovitz
Successful Bronchoscopic Balloon Dilation of Nonmalignant Tracheobronchial Obstruction Without Fluoroscopy
Chest,
August 1, 2004;
126(2):
634 - 637.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ernst, D. Feller-Kopman, H. D. Becker, and A. C. Mehta
Central Airway Obstruction
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
June 15, 2004;
169(12):
1278 - 1297.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Miyazawa, Y. Miyazu, Y. Iwamoto, A. Ishida, K. Kanoh, H. Sumiyoshi, M. Doi, and N. Kurimoto
Stenting at the Flow-limiting Segment in Tracheobronchial Stenosis due to Lung Cancer
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
May 15, 2004;
169(10):
1096 - 1102.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|