|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Division of Infectious Diseases (Drs. Wendel, Chaisson, Sterling, and Ms. Alwood), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Baltimore City Health Department Eastern Chest Clinic (Drs. Gachuhi and Sterling); and Department of International Health (Dr. Bishai), Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Correspondence to: Karen A. Wendel, MD, Division of Infectious Diseases, 1830 E. Monument St, Room 401, Baltimore, MD 21287; e-mail: kwwendel{at}mail.jhmi.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Observational cohort study.
Setting: Public, urban TB clinic.
Patients: HIV-infected persons treated for TB between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 1999, and followed through June 30, 2000.
Intervention: Patients received standard anti-TB therapy. Antiretroviral therapy was provided by primary medical providers. Patients receiving antiretroviral therapy were given nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors alone or highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART; nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in combination with a protease inhibitor or a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor).
Main outcome measure: Paradoxical worsening of TB.
Results: There were 82 TB cases in 76 patients. Paradoxical worsening was identified in 6 of 82 cases (7%; 95% confidence interval, 3 to 15%). Paradoxical worsening occurred in 3 of 28 cases (11%) in patients receiving HAART and in 3 of 44 cases (7%) in patients not receiving antiretroviral therapy (p = 0.67). Cases complicated by paradoxical worsening were more likely to have both pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease at initial diagnosis than cases without paradoxical worsening (83% vs 24%; p = 0.006). TB relapse occurred in 2 of 6 cases (33%) in patients with paradoxical worsening and in 4 of 76 cases (5%) in patients without paradoxical worsening (p = 0.06).
Conclusions: Paradoxical worsening of TB occurred less frequently than in previous reports and was not associated with HAART. Paradoxical worsening also appeared to be associated with an increased risk of TB relapse. Further studies are warranted to better characterize the risk factors for paradoxical worsening and the appropriate duration of anti-TB therapy in patients in whom it occurs.
Key Words: antiretroviral therapy HIV infection lung lymphadenopathy paradoxical worsening tuberculosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients were included if they had a positive serologic test result for HIV-1 infection and a new diagnosis of definite or probable TB treated with standard anti-TB therapy. TB relapses were counted as separate TB episodes. Exclusion criteria included TB diagnosed at death or receipt of < 3 weeks of anti-TB therapy.
Definitions
Definite TB was defined as a clinical illness consistent with TB
accompanied by a culture-positive finding for Mycobacterium
tuberculosis. TB was considered probable if histopathology and
acid-fast staining results were consistent with TB, or the patient had
a clinical history consistent with active TB and symptoms that
responded to anti-TB therapy.7
Paradoxical worsening was
defined as documented worsening of signs or symptoms of TB
(eg, fever, cough, shortness of breath, or adenopathy) or
exacerbation of disease at other extrapulmonary sites during
appropriate anti-TB treatment after an initial response to treatment.
Worsening of pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiograph or chest CT scan
without other etiology was also considered paradoxical worsening.
Clinical or radiographic worsening in the setting of treatment
noncompliance was not considered paradoxical worsening. Treatment
failure was defined as culture findings persistently positive for
M tuberculosis for at least 5 months despite anti-TB
treatment.8
HAART was defined as antiretroviral therapy
that included NRTIs plus either an HIV-1 protease inhibitor or
non-NRTI. Relapse was defined as a new positive culture finding for
M tuberculosis or histopathologic and acid-fast stain
findings compatible with TB after completing a course of anti-TB
treatment with documented negative culture findings.9
Laboratory Techniques
Baseline mycobacterial cultures were performed at local hospital
clinical microbiology laboratories using liquid culture medium (BACTEC
12B; Becton-Dickinson; Sparks, MD) and/or Lowenstein-Jensen medium.
Follow-up cultures were performed at the Maryland Department of Health
and Mental Hygiene Mycobacteriology Laboratory using BACTEC 12B and
Lowenstein-Jensen media. Susceptibility testing was performed using
BACTEC 12B vials and Middlebrook 7H11 agar medium. HIV diagnosis was
established by a positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for HIV-1,
with a confirmatory Western blot. Flow cytometry was used to determine
CD4+ lymphocyte levels.
Restriction fragment length polymorphism (DNA fingerprinting) analysis was performed as previously described.10 Briefly, M tuberculosis isolates were cultivated on Lowenstein-Jensen medium, harvested, and heat-killed. Genomic DNA was isolated, and PvuII-IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis was performed according to a standard method.11 Isolates with six or fewer IS6110 bands were analyzed further with the probe specific for the M tuberculosis polymorphic GC-rich repetitive sequence. A 3.8-kb EcoRI-HindIII fragment from plasmid pTBN12 was used to probe AluI-cleaved genomic DNA.12 13 14 For questionable IS6110 or polymorphic GC-rich repetitive sequence matches, Southern blots were repeated side-by-side on the same gel for direct comparison. Isolates were considered to match only if they produced the same number of bands after testing with the IS6110 or pTBN12 probes.
Treatment and Follow-up
All patients with M tuberculosis isolates susceptible
to first-line anti-TB agents who received directly observed therapy
(DOT) were treated with isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and
ethambutol for 2 months followed by 4 months of twice-weekly isoniazid
and rifampin.9
Treatment was extended if conversion of
sputum culture findings to negative required > 3 months of treatment
or if there was a delay in clinical improvement. Patients with
drug-resistant disease were treated with at least two drugs to which
the organism was susceptible. DOT was provided by the Baltimore City
Health Department staff throughout the entire course of treatment.
Patients who did not receive DOT were treated with the same drugs as
above, but on a daily basis. Rifabutin was used in place of rifampin in
patients receiving an HIV-1 protease inhibitor or non-NRTI.
The time of initiation of antiretroviral therapy in relation to anti-TB therapy varied within the cohort. Of the 38 cases in which patients were receiving antiretroviral therapy, antiretroviral therapy was initiated prior to the diagnosis of TB in 21 cases, antiretroviral and TB treatment were initiated simultaneously in 5 cases, and antiretroviral therapy was initiated after TB treatment in 12 cases. In these 12 cases, the median time to starting antiretroviral therapy was 8 weeks (range 2 weeks to 24 weeks) after initiating TB treatment.
Statistical Analysis
Fishers Exact Test (two tailed) was used to compare
categorical variables. For comparison of continuous variables, the
Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test was used.
Statistical analysis was performed using software (Epi Info Version
6.04; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, GA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Overall, in 28 of 82 cases (34%), patients received HAART and in 10 cases (12%), they received NRTI therapy alone while receiving anti-TB therapy; patients in 44 cases (54%) received no antiretroviral therapy during TB treatment. Data on adherence to antiretroviral therapy were not available. Among those cases in which CD4+ counts were known, the initial median CD4+ level in those who received HAART was 73/µL (n = 21), compared to 130/µL (n = 33) in those who did not receive antiretroviral therapy (p = 0.21; Table 1 ).
|
|
Death during treatment was less common in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy, though the difference was not statistically significant (2 of 24 patients [8%] receiving HAART vs 1 of 10 patients [10%] receiving NRTI vs 12 of 42 patients [29%] receiving no HIV therapy; p = 0.09). Of the 15 deaths, 8 deaths were attributed to TB. These eight patients all received < 2.5 months of anti-TB therapy. The other seven deaths were primarily due to complications of HIV infection and/or injection drug use.
There were six cases of TB relapse; all occurred within 1 year of treatment completion. The DNA fingerprint was available for four of the six relapse isolates, and all four were identical to the original isolate. All relapses occurred in patients who were not receiving antiretroviral therapy. Two TB relapses occurred among the six TB cases complicated by paradoxical worsening (33%) compared to four relapses in the 76 TB cases without paradoxical worsening (5%; p = 0.06). In the two patients with paradoxical worsening who subsequently suffered relapses, the initial episode of TB was notable for worsening lymphadenopathy in the setting of improving pulmonary infiltrates, weight gain, and conversion of sputum acid-fast bacilli cultures to negative. The lymphadenopathy subsequently improved, and both patients completed a standard 6-month course of therapy. These patients did not have evidence of treatment failure. Relapse occurred 6 months and 11 months after completion of initial TB therapy in these two patients, respectively.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All three patients in whom paradoxical worsening of TB developed while receiving HAART were receiving stavudine, lamivudine, and nelfinavir. However, it is unlikely that paradoxical worsening is associated with specific antiretroviral therapy, but rather is due to immune reconstitution regardless of its etiology. This line of reasoning is supported by the three cases of paradoxical worsening that occurred in persons who did not receive antiretroviral therapy. Nevertheless, future studies should assess the risk of paradoxical worsening according to the antiretroviral regimen used.
TB cases complicated by paradoxical worsening tended to be associated with a higher rate of TB relapse than cases not complicated by paradoxical worsening. The reason for this is unclear, but could be related to differences in the bacillary burden or in the host immune response to M tuberculosis. The increased risk of relapse in patients with paradoxical worsening suggests that standard 6-month rifamycin-based treatment may be insufficient in these patients.
The pathogenesis of paradoxical worsening is unclear but is believed to
be related to the development of improved M
tuberculosis-specific immune responses during the course of
anti-TB treatment.15
16
Paradoxical worsening has been
described in both HIV-seronegative17
18
and
HIV-seropositive persons.1
2
3
4
5
6
19
20
21
22
23
Recent
work24
has demonstrated increased proliferation of
peripheral blood mononuclear cells and interferon-
production in
response to M tuberculosis antigens after initiation of
HAART in HIV-infected patients. Antigen-specific CD4 + lymphocyte
responses have also been shown25
26
27
to improve in
HIV-infected persons receiving HAART. This has also been
demonstrated25
28
in paradoxical worsening of other
opportunistic infections, such as Mycobacterium avium
complex disease and cytomegalovirus infection.
There are several limitations of this study. Data collection was conducted by chart review. This may have underestimated the actual occurrence of paradoxical worsening. The number of patients studied was small, and CD4+ lymphocyte data after initiation of anti-TB therapy were limited. This precluded a detailed comparison of the level of immune function in persons with and without paradoxical worsening.
This study identifies several areas for further study. Risk factors for paradoxical worsening need to be better characterized so that interventions can be introduced to decrease its incidence. In addition, if larger studies confirm that the risk of relapse is increased in patients with paradoxical worsening, the optimal duration of TB therapy in these patients will also need to be assessed.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Presented in part at the American Thoracic Society International Conference, April 2328, 1999, San Diego, CA.
Supported by funds from the Baltimore City Health Department, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Cooperative Agreement U30046610), and the National Institutes of Health grants R01 AI 40605, K23 AI 01654, and K24 AI 01637.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R F Miller, S S Dave, J W Tang, P J Shaw, H R Jager, and E G L Wilkins Progressive neuropsychiatric problems following institution of highly active antiretroviral therapy Sex. Transm. Inf., August 1, 2005; 81(4): 351 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R A M Breen, C J Smith, H Bettinson, S Dart, B Bannister, M A Johnson, and M C I Lipman Paradoxical reactions during tuberculosis treatment in patients with and without HIV co-infection Thorax, August 1, 2004; 59(8): 704 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: Treatment of Tuberculosis Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2003; 167(4): 603 - 662. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.D. Iseman Tuberculosis therapy: past, present and future Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2002; 20(36_suppl): 87S - 94s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Tuberculosis and HIV AIDS Clinical Care, February 1, 2002; 2002(201): 6 - 6. [Full Text] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |