|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Divisions of Pediatric Pulmonology (Drs. Nasr and Maxvold), Radiology (Dr. Strouse), and Critical Care (Dr. Moler), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; the Departments of Pediatrics (Dr. Soskolne) and Radiology (Dr. Garver), St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI; and Department of Pediatrics, Medicine, Physiology, and Pharmacology (Dr. Rubin), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Correspondence to: Samya Z. Nasr, MD, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0212
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled investigation of 75 patients with RSV bronchiolitis. The study was conducted at the University of Michigan Medical Center and St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, both in Ann Arbor, MI.
Results: The respiratory rate, wheezing, and retraction difference scores, obtained by subtracting the hospital discharge score from the corresponding hospital admission score, show no difference between the two groups, but the CXR difference scores show that the rhDNase group improved by 0.46 while the placebo group worsened by 0.60 (p < 0.001). Analysis of covariance for the hospital discharge CXR score after adjusting for the hospital admission score for both groups was done. There was a difference in scores between the two groups, with adjusted mean for the study group of 2.03, and 2.76 for the placebo group (p < 0.001). Paired t test statistics in each of the two groups were computed. For the placebo group, the mean increase of 0.60 was significant (p = 0.02), and the mean decrease of 0.46 for the rhDNase group was also significant (p = 0.02). A one-way analysis of covariance with the hospital discharge CXR scores as the dependent variable and the hospital admission score as the covariate showed that there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.01).
Conclusion: In patients with RSV bronchiolitis, there was significant improvement in the CXRs with the use of rhDNase compared to significant worsening in the placebo group. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of rhDNase to treat RSV bronchiolitis.
Key Words: chest radiography clinical score length of stay mucus randomized clinical trial respiratory syncytial virus
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pathophysiologically, bronchiolitis is an infectious inflammation of bronchioles from 75 to 300 µm in diameter.9 This invasion leads to necrosis of the respiratory epithelium and sloughing into the airway lumen. Tissue edema and mucus production occur resulting in thick mucous plugs within the airway lumen.9 This process leads to a disruption of the normal airflow. Some airways become partially or completely occluded, leading to air trapping and hyperinflation or atelectasis.10 Due to lysis of inflammatory cells, DNA is present in large amounts (3 to 14 mg/mL) in the mucous plugs. DNA is a polyanion molecular compound that contributes to the increased viscosity and adhesiveness of lung secretions.11 Recombinant human deoxyribonuclease I (rhDNase) has been used effectively as a mucolytic agent to liquefy the thick mucous plugs in patients with cystic fibrosis.12
We hypothesized that therapy with rhDNase may result in shorter length of hospitalization, improved clinical scores, and improved chest radiographs (CXRs) in hospitalized infants with RSV infection as a result of its mucolytic properties. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed to assess this hypothesis.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients
Patients were eligible for this study if they met the following
conditions: (1)
2 years of age, (2) previously healthy full-term
neonates, and (3) proven RSV infection. All other patient-care
management was decided by the attending physician. All patients in the
two groups received albuterol nebulized treatment as part of the RSV
protocol in the two institutions. No ipratropium bromide was
administered. Written, informed consent was obtained from patients
parent/guardian according to the guidelines of both institutional
review boards. Early discontinuation of therapy was permitted if
desired by parents/guardian or attending physician or if the patient
required intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Clinical Assessment Scoring
Patients were examined twice daily by a pediatric pulmonologist
(S.Z.N. and N.J.M.) or study coordinator; all were blinded to the
patients assignment. The examinations were done once before and once
after administration of the study drug. Each child was evaluated at
each point by the same observer. The clinical assessment scoring
described by Wang et al13
was utilized. A single point was
given to patients with a respiratory rate of 31 to 45 breaths/min,
wheezing at terminal expiration or only with stethoscope, intercostal
retraction, and normal general condition. Two points were given to
patients with a respiratory rate of 45 to 60 breaths/min, wheezing
during the entire expiration or audible on expiration without
stethoscope, tracheosternal retractions, and stable general condition.
Three points were given to patients with a respiratory rate > 60
breaths/min, inspiratory and expiratory wheezing without stethoscope,
severe retraction with nasal flaring, and general condition including
irritability, lethargy, and poor feedings. Oxygen saturation and the
need for supplemental oxygen were also recorded.
CXR Scoring
CXRs were obtained at the time of hospital admission and at
completion of the study or prior to hospital discharge if it occurred
prior to 5 days. Anteroposterior and lateral CXRs were obtained in most
patients (64 of 75 patients). All CXRs were coded and randomized.
Anteroposterior and lateral CXRs of the same patient were kept
together. Two pediatric radiologists (P.J.S. and K.A.G.) reviewed the
CXRs and were blinded to each patients study assignment, identity,
and date of examination (hospital admission vs discharge). A CXR
scoring system was developed based on review of the
literature14
15
and personal experience of the
radiologists. Each examination was graded for perihilar markings,
hyperinflation, atelectasis or focal opacities, and generalized
opacities. Each of these findings was graded on a 0- to 3-point scale,
with 0 representing normal and 3 representing marked abnormality (Table 1
). Hyperinflation was scored separately on the anteroposterior CXR and
on the lateral CXR, with the two scores averaged. The anteroposterior
CXR score was used if no lateral CXR was available. The other three
findings were given a single score based on the radiologists
assessment of both views. The scores for each examination finding (1 to
4) were then summed to generate an examination score. This score ranged
from 0 (all findings normal) to 12 (all findings markedly abnormal).
|
Virology Studies
Specimens for viral isolation and quantitation were obtained
from a nasopharyngeal swab and assayed for antigen detection using
indirect immunofluorescent antibody staining technique with the Bartels
Viral Respiratory Screening and Identification Kit (Bartels
Immunodiagnostic Supplies; Bellevue, WI). Sensitivity for this test is
94%, and specificity is 93%.
Statistical Analysis
The power of the study was 80% to be able to detect a 1-day
difference in hospital length of stay. Data were analyzed using
statistical software (SAS version 6.12; SAS Institute; Cary, NC). The
statistician was unaware of treatment status coding. Two-sample
t tests were used to compare the means of interval scale
measures obtained from the drug and placebo samples at both hospital
admission and discharge.
2 and Fishers Exact
Tests were used to compare frequency distributions obtained from the
two groups. Ratings obtained from the two pediatric radiologists were
analyzed using paired t tests and correlation coefficients.
One-way analyses of covariance models were used to compare interval
scale outcomes obtained at discharge controlling for hospital admission
values.
Measurement of DNA Content
BAL fluid (BALF) was obtained from a subset of six patients with
RSV bronchiolitis that required intubation and mechanical ventilation
for management of their disease. Two patients who did not have RSV
bronchiolitis and were intubated and received mechanical ventilation
following elective surgery served as control subjects. BALF was
obtained through flexible bronchoscopy. The suction catheter was
"wedged" in the lower airway. Samples were obtained within 24
h from intubation and ventilation. BALF was lyophilized and resuspended
to a standard volume of 1 mL. DNA content was measured by
microfluorometry using 33258 Hoechst fluorochrome (Calbiochem; La
Jolla, CA).16
Calf thymus DNA (Sigma Chemical; St. Louis,
MO) was used as a standard. The supernatant was diluted 1:800 with
saline-citrate solution (0.0154 M NaCl-0.015 M
Na3-citrate, pH 7.0). One millimeter of the reagent
solution (33258 Hoechst 1.5 x 10-6 M) was
added to the sample, and fluorescence was measured by
spectrophotofluorometry with an excitation wavelength at 360 nm and
emission at 450 nm. DNA concentration was calculated by comparison with
calf thymus DNA standard (0.25 to 10.0 µg/mL).17
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
When analysis of covariance for the CXR score was done for the two groups on hospital admission and discharge for each of the radiologists and for the average of the two radiologists, there was no statistical significance. However, when we looked at the hospital discharge score after adjusting for the admission score for both groups, there was a difference in scores between the two groups. This difference was also noted when we looked at each radiologists scores separately and for the average of the two radiologists, with adjusted mean for the study group of 2.03 and 2.76 for the placebo group (p < 0.001). This suggests that the study group was somewhat worse on hospital admission compared to the placebo group.
Having observed the significant group difference in CXR difference scores, we computed paired t test statistics in each of the two groups. For the placebo group, we observed that the mean increase of 0.60 was significant (p = 0.02) and that the mean decrease of 0.46 for the rhDNase group was also significant (p = 0.02). A one-way analysis of covariance with the hospital discharge CXR scores as the dependent variable and the hospital admission score as the covariate showed that there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.01)
Because of the observed differences between radiologists, to be sure that the radiologic results described were not an artifact attributable to the process of averaging the ratings, we carried out two sets of separate analyses, each of which used only data from one of the two pediatric radiologists. These analyses, which were parallel to the ones reported for the mean CXR scores, showed the same pattern of significance.
To evaluate our hypothesis and the literature,11 which indicates that the DNA content is increased in the mucus of RSV patients, we analyzed the content of BAL of a subset of six patients with RSV bronchiolitis and two patients who were RSV negative. All patients were intubated and received mechanical ventilation. The DNA content for the RSV group was 194.30 ± 213.48 µg/mL (mean ± SD), with a range of 59.7 to 611.0 µg/mL. The DNA content in the two RSV-negative patients (control group) was 43.8 µg/mL and 95.6 µg/mL, respectively.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The clinical assessment score and oxygen saturation were not statistically significant between the two groups at hospital discharge. These findings are probably due to the short hospital stay. The length of hospital stay between the two groups was not statistically significant as well. One explanation may be that patients with bronchiolitis are usually discharged from the hospital prior to complete resolution of symptoms, once their conditions are clinically stable. It is not known whether a different dosing schedule or frequency of rhDNase administration would result in improved outcomes such as length of hospitalization and clinical score. Additional studies will be required to assess such treatment outcome issues.
The aerosol therapy appeared safe and was easily administered. There were no adverse effects identified in either study group. There was no early withdrawal or termination of the study. The lack of side effects in this study as well as in another study12 when the drug was used for longer periods of time, the safety margin, and the ease of administration of this drug suggest that this drug therapy could be continued beyond 5 days, especially if the patients required longer hospitalization because of severity of illness. There was no airway hyperactivity or bronchospasm noted clinically with the use of the nebulized aerosol treatment in the study subjects.
This is the first study to our knowledge that was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of rhDNase, a mucolytic agent, in treating RSV bronchiolitis. Other treatment modalities have not proven effective to date. Of these, bronchodilators have been studied with conflicting results.3 4 5 Also, anti-inflammatory agents such as glucocorticoids have been studied and shown improvement in some studies6 and no clinical significance has been observed in the majority of studies.7 8 Ribavirin is the only antiviral agent approved for use in treating hospitalized children with RSV infection. Much controversy exists surrounding its use. It has been studied in healthy children and in high-risk groups with conflicting results.18 19 20 21 Moreover, potential side effects, costs, and the difficulty of administration have made its use problematic.
RSV infection is a very costly disease to the health system and economy, with > 90,000 hospitalizations in infants and young children annually. RSV may also lead to long-term problems with reactive airway disease. Thus far, attempts to develop an RSV vaccine have not been fruitful.22 Another approach to reduce hospitalization and long-term problems caused by RSV infection in the high-risk patient population has been to use a polyclonal RSV immune globulin product (RSV-immune globulin IV therapy),23 24 and more recently a humanized RSV monoclonal antibody (palivizumab).25 26 This prophylactic approach has limited success in high-risk patients. Thus far, therapeutic studies in hospitalized patients have not shown improved outcomes. Used for prophylaxis, these agents have high cost relative to benefits observed.27
We conclude that nebulized rhDNase may be an effective therapy for use in treating RSV infection in infants and young children; on the basis of the significant improvement in the CXR, it appears that rhDNase could be efficacious. However, further studies are warranted to confirm the results of this study and to investigate changes in clinical status and length of hospital stay by using this drug. Studies are needed to evaluate the usefulness of starting treatment with rhDNase once symptoms develop (eg, at the primary physicians office or the emergency department) before the patients clinical condition warrants hospitalization. Treating RSV illness earlier may reduce the rate of hospitalization and other morbidities. This study revealed interesting findings that need to be examined further. It should be emphasized that the use of this drug to treat RSV bronchiolitis is not recommended without further studies.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant MO1-RR00042.
Presented in part at the International Conference for the American Thoracic Society, Toronto, Canada, May 8, 2000.
Presented in part at the Pediatric Academic Societies and American Academy of Pediatrics Joint Meeting, Boston, MA, May 12, 2000.
Received for publication June 7, 2000. Accepted for publication January 8, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Boogaard, A. R. Hulsmann, L. van Veen, A. A. P. H. Vaessen-Verberne, Y. N. Yap, A. J. Sprij, G. Brinkhorst, B. Sibbles, T. Hendriks, S. W. W. Feith, et al. Recombinant Human Deoxyribonuclease in Infants With Respiratory Syncytial Virus Bronchiolitis Chest, March 1, 2007; 131(3): 788 - 795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. Bordley, M. Viswanathan, V. J. King, S. F. Sutton, A. M. Jackman, L. Sterling, and K. N. Lohr Diagnosis and Testing in Bronchiolitis: A Systematic Review Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2004; 158(2): 119 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. J. King, M. Viswanathan, W. C. Bordley, A. M. Jackman, S. F. Sutton, K. N. Lohr, and T. S. Carey Pharmacologic Treatment of Bronchiolitis in Infants and Children: A Systematic Review Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2004; 158(2): 127 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. McCarthy and C. B. Hall Respiratory Syncytial Virus: Concerns and Control Pediatr. Rev., September 1, 2003; 24(9): 301 - 309. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mandelberg, G. Tal, M. Witzling, E. Someck, S. Houri, A. Balin, and I. E. Priel Nebulized 3% Hypertonic Saline Solution Treatment in Hospitalized Infants With Viral Bronchiolitis Chest, February 1, 2003; 123(2): 481 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Sarrell, G. Tal, M. Witzling, E. Someck, S. Houri, H. A. Cohen, and A. Mandelberg Nebulized 3% Hypertonic Saline Solution Treatment in Ambulatory Children With Viral Bronchiolitis Decreases Symptoms Chest, December 1, 2002; 122(6): 2015 - 2020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |