Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Medinger, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rohatgi, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Medinger, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rohatgi, P. K.
(Chest. 2001;120:93-101.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Sarcoidosis*

The Value of Exercise Testing

Ann E. Medinger, MD, FCCP; Samir Khouri, MD and Prashant K. Rohatgi, MD, FCCP

* From the Pulmonary Physiology Laboratory, Veterans Affairs Medical Center; and Department of Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Correspondence to: Ann E. Medinger MD, FCCP, 5605 Park St, Chevy Chase, MD 20815


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study objectives: To evaluate exercise testing for the assessment of the extent of pulmonary disease in patients with sarcoidosis.

Design: Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with sarcoidosis referred to the Pulmonary Physiology Laboratory between 1992 and 1997, who completed at least 6 min of progressive bicycle exercise. Resting and exercise pulmonary function measurements were compared to radiographic stage of disease.

Setting: Pulmonary Physiology Laboratory at Washington, DC, Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Patients: Forty-eight outpatient veterans with biopsy specimen-proven sarcoidosis.

Results: Across all radiographic stages of sarcoidosis, total lung capacity, resting diffusing capacity, and exercise gas exchange measurements had a significant variance with radiographic stage. Across the early radiographic stage disease (stages 0 to 2), the change in alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure gradient between rest and exercise, normalized for oxygen uptake, was the most significant measurement in its variation with radiographic stage.

Conclusions: Changes in gas exchange with exercise may be the most sensitive physiologic measurements to assess the extent of disease in early radiographic stages of sarcoidosis.

Key Words: clinical exercise testing • extent of disease • pulmonary function testing • radiographic stage • sarcoidosis


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Sarcoidosis is a condition causing a spectrum of clinical and histopathologic abnormalities, ranging from asymptomatic granulomatous infiltration of the lung with spontaneous remission to severe progressive pulmonary fibrosis and respiratory failure. Our understanding of the disease pathogenesis is limited. The etiology remains unknown. Clinical measurements to differentiate patients with newly diagnosed sarcoidosis whose conditions will resolve spontaneously from patients who will develop progressive inflammation, fibrosis, and respiratory failure are unreliable. It is desirable to initiate treatment before reversible granulomatous inflammation progresses to irreversible fibrosis, but the toxicity of drug therapy for sarcoidosis is significant. It is important to avoid unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic risks while managing patients with this disease.

Sensitive and accurate diagnostic tools are needed to measure the extent of pulmonary parenchymal disease and to detect progressive functional impairment over the course of the disease. The plain chest radiograph is often used for surveillance because of its low cost and ready availability in the community. Pulmonary function measurements are also readily available and relatively inexpensive. In patients with early radiographic stages of sarcoidosis, resting pulmonary function studies have a better correlation with lung parenchymal histology than does the chest radiograph.1 2 Pulmonary parenchymal disease may be present without appearing on the chest radiograph. The diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) has been found to be the most sensitive of the resting physiologic measurements.1 2 Although resting lung function measurements have not been shown to be highly sensitive for detecting lung disease in patients with radiographic stage 0 to 1 sarcoidosis, patients with normal resting pulmonary function have less active inflammation and fibrosis observed on lung biopsy specimens.1

Looking at patients with a variety of interstitial lung diseases and comparing resting and exercise pulmonary physiologic measurements to histologic findings on lung biopsy specimens, Fulmer and Crystal3 found that the measurements correlating best with histopathologic changes in the lung biopsy specimen were the change in oxygen tension ({Delta}PO2) and the change in the alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure gradient between rest and exercise ({Delta}P[A-a]O2).3 Because the lesions of sarcoidosis favor the upper lobes of the lung, physiologic lung function measured during exercise may have a higher sensitivity for detecting the presence and progression of parenchymal pulmonary disease. At rest, the apical regions of the lung contribute relatively little to ventilation and gas exchange. During exercise, apical pulmonary circulation is normally recruited and contributes significantly to the capacity of the lung to increase the rate of gas exchange. Hence, the regional gas exchange abnormalities of sarcoidosis should be more easily detected during exercise than at rest, particularly in early-stage disease. Several other investigators4 5 have measured responses to low-level exercise in patients with sarcoidosis; they have reported a lower frequency of exercise gas exchange abnormalities in sarcoidosis than in patients with other chronic interstitial lung diseases. Using progressive symptom-limited exercise (SLE) testing to evaluate patients with sarcoidosis with normal or mildly abnormal spirometry results, Sietsema and Kraft6 found abnormal exercise measurements with low peak oxygen uptake (O2max) and low anaerobic threshold (AT). They concluded that many of these patients had unsuspected cardiac circulatory impairment.6 Miller and Brown7 studied a similar group of patients with sarcoidosis who had normal spirometry findings, and found that those with abnormal resting DLCO results were more likely to have abnormal exercise gas exchange.7 To further evaluate the use of progressive SLE for assessment of extent of lung disease in patients with sarcoidosis, we studied veterans with sarcoidosis who were referred to the Pulmonary Physiology Laboratory at the Washington, DC, Veterans Affairs Medical Center for progressive SLE testing.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We studied sequential patients with biopsy specimen-proven sarcoidosis who were referred to the Pulmonary Physiology Laboratory for clinical exercise testing between 1992 and 1997, who successfully completed 6 min of a progressive SLE test and had resting pulmonary function, exercise testing, and posteroanterior and lateral chest radiographs performed within a 2-month period. Each pair of chest radiographs was examined and classified by two pulmonologists: stage 0, no radiographic abnormalities; stage 1, bilateral hilar adenopathy without parenchymal abnormalities; stage 2, bilateral hilar adenopathy with interstitial parenchymal infiltrates; stage 3, interstitial parenchymal infiltrates without hilar adenopathy; and stage 4, cicatricial changes.8

Prior to exercise, each patient underwent the following resting pulmonary function measurements: air flow (FEV1/FVC), plethysmographic lung volume (total lung capacity [TLC]), single-breath DLCO, and maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) (6200 Autobox; SensorMedics; Yorba Linda, CA). Measurements were made according to American Thoracic Society standards for equipment and patient performance.9 10 MVV was performed by coaching the individual to hyperventilate as vigorously as possible for 10 s, aiming for a minimum frequency of 80 breaths/min and measuring ventilatory output as liters per minute. Each individual then completed a minimum of 6 min of exercise, pedaling a bicycle ergometer (Ergoline 800; SensorMedics) with progressively increasing work rate (WR), pedaled at 60 revolutions per minute plus or minus 5 revolutions per minute. The WR increment for each ramped exercise test was individualized on the basis of each patient’s pretest activity level (range, 10 to 25 W/min), with the objective of achieving 6 to 12 min of progressive exercise before stopping. Serial exercise measurements included 12-lead ECG (Marquette Max 1; Marquette Electronics; Milwaukee, WI), BP (Hewlett Packard 7000; Hewlett Packard; Andover, MA), WR (Ergoline 800; Sensormedics ), tidal oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions, tidal airflow, and respiratory rate (2900C; SensorMedics).

Arterial blood gas levels were measured at rest, at peak performance, and at 2 min postexercise, from an indwelling radial arterial line; initial hemoglobin and carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) were recorded (analysis on Radiometer 520 Radiometer Medical; Brønshøj, Denmark). The change in oxygen consumption ({Delta}O2) was calculated as the difference in oxygen uptake between peak exercise and resting measurements of oxygen consumption. {Delta}PO2 was calculated as the difference in arterial oxygen tension between peak exercise and resting measurements. To normalize {Delta}PO2 for work performed during exercise, we also calculated {Delta}PO2 as a ratio of the {Delta}O2 ({Delta}PO2/{Delta}O2). An alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure gradient (P[A-a]O2) was calculated for each arterial blood sample using measured respiratory quotients; they were expressed as the difference between peak exercise and resting measurements ({Delta}P[A-a]O2) and normalized for {Delta}O2 achieved during exercise ({Delta}P[A-a]O2/{Delta}O2). Standard exercise calculations included O2max, peak exercise expired minute ventilation, AT, and ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide at AT (VE/VCO2 AT).11 AT was determined by V-slope method, and reported as percentage of predicted O2max.12

Breathing reserve (BR) was calculated as the difference between measured resting MVV and the peak exercise ventilation, expressed as a percentage of MVV and normalized for the achieved oxygen uptake. Heart rate reserve (HRR) was calculated as the difference between peak and resting heart rate, normalized for achieved oxygen uptake. The age-, gender-, and weight-dependent normal predicted O2max was derived from Hansen et al,13 and reported as percentage of predicted O2max. Normal ranges for {Delta}P(A-a)O2/{Delta}O2 and {Delta}PO2/{Delta}O2 were not available to us. Predicted values for resting pulmonary function were derived as follows: TLC from Goldman and Becklake,14 FEV1/FVC from Crapo et al,15 and single-breath DLCO from Miller et al.16 Predicted resting lung volume reference values were adjusted for African American individuals.17 Measured single-breath DLCO was adjusted for abnormal hemoglobin and COHb concentrations.18 The FEV1/FVC percentage was reported as the difference from predicted percentage ({Delta}FEV1/FVC%). The physiologic measurements were analyzed for variation with radiographic stage employing descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for each factor in relation to radiographic stage in the full data set, and analysis of covariance for evaluating single-breath DLCO and exercise gas exchange in relation to radiographic stage in those subjects with complete data sets ({Delta}P[A-a]O2/{Delta}O2 as dependent variable, stage as factor, and percentage of predicted single-breath DLCO as covariate). Exercise gas exchange measurements were also correlated with resting DLCO in patients with complete data sets, using simple linear regression calculations. The statistical package employed was the Microsoft Excel 5.0 Analysis Toolpak program (Gray Matter International; Cambridge, MA) and SAS version 6.12 (SAS Institute; Cary, NC).


    Results
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Forty-eight individuals completed a minimum of 6 min of exercise testing. The mean age of the subjects was 41 years, 17 were white, 24 were African American, 8 were smokers, and 4 of the smokers had initial COHb measurements > 3%. No patient had clinical evidence of heart disease. Seventeen patients were receiving treatment with one or more of the following medications: clonidine, H2-receptor antagonists, ipratropium via metered-dose inhaler (MDI), albuterol via MDI, triamcinolone via MDI, insulin, oral hypoglycemics, amitryptiline, haloperidol, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cisapride, hydrochlorothiazide, colchicine, diphenylhydantoin, and guaifenesin. One patient (stage 2) was receiving propranolol, and one patient (stage 0) was receiving felodipine. Nine of the patients were receiving prednisone at the time of testing (one stage 0 patient with uveitis, six stage 2 patients, and two stage 4 patients). No patient was tested twice in this study; when two sets of data were available for one patient, the most complete data set was entered. Six patients were unable to perform the breathing maneuver required for measuring DLCO. Eleven patients had no peak exercise blood gas measurement because of technical problems with arterial access. Thirty patients had complete data sets (5 patients with stage 0, 4 patients with stage 1, 12 patients with stage 2, 2 patients with stage 3, and 7 patients with stage 4). Table 1 gives results of resting and exercise measurements by radiographic stage. There was no significant association between radiographic stage and {Delta}FEV1/FVC%, O2max, AT, HRR, BR, or VE/VCO2 AT. A significant association was found between all radiographic stages and TLC, DLCO, {Delta}P(A-a)O2, and {Delta}PO2. Across all radiographic stages of sarcoidosis, the most significant association was found between radiographic stage and the {Delta}PO2 with exercise (Table 1) . For patients with radiographic stage 0 to 2 disease, the physiologic measurements most significantly associated with radiographic stage were the {Delta}P(A-a)O2 and {Delta}P(A-a)O2/{Delta}O2 (Table 1) . In this group with less extensive disease by chest radiographic criteria, TLC did not vary significantly with radiographic stage and the DLCO had a weaker association than it had across all radiographic stages. Excluding from analysis the patients with COHb evidence of antecedent smoking did not significantly alter these findings, nor did elimination of the patient receiving calcium channel-blocking medication. The 30 individuals who had complete data sets of both resting and exercise measurements had the same highly significant association of {Delta}P(A-a)O2/{Delta}O2 with radiographic stage as did the whole group (p < 0.000331 for stages 0 to 2; p < 0.000967 for stages 0 to 4). For this group of 30 patients, the R2 coefficient of determination for single-breath DLCO and {Delta}PO2 was 0.52 for all stages and 0.33 for those with stage 0 to 2 disease (Fig 1 ). The R2 coefficient for single-breath DLCO and {Delta}P(A-a)O2 was 0.58 for all radiographic stages and 0.47 for stages 0 to 2 (Fig 2 ). The best correlation of exercise measurements with DLCO was {Delta}P(A-a)O2/{Delta}O2, where R2 was 0.78 for all radiographic stages and 0.66 for stages 0 to 2 (Fig 3 ). Further analysis of the 30 patients with matched data across all stages, considering {Delta}P(A-a)O2/{Delta}O2 as dependent variable, radiographic stage as a factor and percentage of predicted single-breath DLCO as covariate also gave a statistically significant model (p = 0.0001). Both variables together accounted for 71.7% of the variation in {Delta}P(A-a)O2/{Delta}O2. There was no improvement in prediction of exercise gas exchange gained by factoring in the radiographic stage to the percent of DLCO.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1.. Rest and Exercise Physiology in Sarcoidosis: Correlation With Radiographic Stage*

 


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1.. Correlation of the change in arterial oxygen tension between rest and exercise ({Delta}PO2) and the resting single-breath DLCO expressed as the percentage of predicted single-breath DLCO (R2 = 0.52).

 


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2.. Correlation of the {Delta}P(A-a)O2 and the resting single-breath DLCO, expressed as the percentage of predicted value single-breath DLCO (R2 = 0.57).

 


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3.. Correlation of {Delta}P(A-a)O2/{Delta}O2) and the resting single-breath DLCO, expressed as the percentage of predicted single-breath DLCO (R2 = 0.78).

 

    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We do not have a true noninvasive "gold standard" for measuring the extent of disease in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis. The American Thoracic Society, European Thoracic Society, and the World Association of Sarcoidosis and other Granulomatous Disorders have issued a joint statement19 of recommendations for following patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis. They recommend that system review, physical examination, chest radiograph, and spirometry be performed regularly. These will suffice for most patients; however, management of some patients will require lung CT scans and further physiologic measurements, including single-breath DLCO and exercise testing.19 No one measurement is adequate to assess disease extent and activity. Although the chest radiograph is known to be an insensitive marker of disease extent, activity, and progression in sarcoidosis, it has been the least expensive, least invasive, and most accessible histologic correlate we have had. In this study, we have used the chest radiograph as the indicator of extent of sarcoidosis in the lung.

At high levels of exercise performance, the normal individual experiences a fall in mixed venous oxygen tension, decrease in pulmonary capillary transit time, and rise in P(A-a)O2. However, overall ventilation/perfusion matching improves so that both the physiologic shunt fraction and dead space to tidal volume ratio improve. This is achieved through recruitment of normally closed pulmonary vascular channels, increasing pulmonary capillary surface area, increasing the rate of gas exchange commensurate with increased blood flow through the lung, and increased ventilation. Hence, while oxygen consumption rises dramatically during exercise in normal individuals, arterial oxygen tension remains relatively unchanged.

Arterial blood gas levels are a good measure of gas exchange across the lung, and a normal P(A-a)O2 reflects normal ventilation/perfusion function of the lung. Abnormalities in P(A-a)O2 are specific for lung disease or less commonly right-to-left cardiovascular shunt. The patient with interstitial lung disease has fewer pulmonary vascular channels and hence a smaller reserve pulmonary vascular bed is available for recruitment to increase the lung surface area for gas exchange during exercise. Hence, with progressively increasing workload and increased peripheral oxygen uptake, both mixed venous oxygen tension and arterial oxygen tension fall. The degree of fall in arterial oxygen tension depends on both the extent of interstitial lung disease and the amount of work performed. Patients with interstitial lung disease may be found to have a normal peak exercise arterial oxygen tension when they have minimal disease or when they perform a low level of exercise during the test. Studies in patients with sarcoidosis, which have shown a poor correlation of exercise measurements with other measures of disease extent and progression, have tested the patients at low levels of exercise.4 5 Because peak WR with exercise testing is a subjective end point that can be influenced by the coach-technician and the patient’s own willpower, all measurements obtained at peak WR have a subjective element. This may confound their correlation with extent of pulmonary disease. Normalizing peak exercise cardiac and gas exchange measurements for achieved oxygen uptake helps remove this subjective bias.

In normal individuals, the {Delta}O2 with exercise has a constant linear relationship to total work performed (O2/WR). This makes change in oxygen uptake between rest and exercise ({Delta}O2) generally a good measurement of the level of exercise performed. However, both O2max and {Delta}O2 with exercise are determined by multiple factors: gas exchange across the lung, oxygen content of blood, oxygen delivery to tissues, and oxygen uptake in the tissues, in addition to the subjective coaching and patient’s willingness to work hard during the test. The peak WR achieved is influenced by body weight in addition to the above-named factors. Impairment in oxygen flow can alter the slope of O2/WR and affect our ability to normalize the exercise blood gas measurements by using delta O2. Thus, when significant heart, peripheral vascular, or metabolic muscle disease is present, use of the {Delta}O2 to normalize the {Delta}P(A-a)O2 for work achieved during testing may decrease its sensitivity and specificity for measuring extent of lung disease.

In this study, radiographic and physiologic measurements and interpretations were performed independent of each other. To achieve consistency of data analysis, chest images and physiologic measurements were interpreted by one individual or pair of individuals. Analysis of the results shows a significant association of exercise gas exchange with radiographic stage in patients with sarcoidosis who can perform at least 6 min of progressive exercise. The study has the limitations of any retrospective analysis, including the heterogeneity of medications and the antecedent cigarette smoking used by patients. Some substances taken prior to exercise testing can alter exercise test measurements and reduce their validity (such as calcium channel blockers and cigarette smoking). When we eliminated the patients with these factors from the analysis, we found no change in the significance of the associations between physiologic and radiographic measurements.

Although clinical evidence of myocardial involvement is only present in about 5% of patients with sarcoidosis, unsuspected cardiac involvement may be found in as many as 10 to 15% of patients with sarcoidosis.6 19 20 Sarcoidosis patients with chronic respiratory failure commonly develop cor pulmonale. Patients with radiographic stage 0 to 2 disease are less likely than stage 3 to 4 patients to have cardiac impairment from cor pulmonale. Hence, exercise measurements may be a more specific reflection of extent of pulmonary disease in the radiographic stage 0 to 2 patients with sarcoidosis.

In this study, the correlation of exercise gas exchange with radiographic stage was less significant when stage 3 to 4 patients were included in the analysis. Although we had no antecedent clinical evidence of heart disease in any of our patients, 5 of the 48 patients had exercise evidence of an oxygen flow problem (3 stage 2 patients; 2 stage 4 patients). These individuals were younger than average for the whole group, and showed good effort during the test; they achieved a peak heart rate within 15 beats of the maximum predicted or had a very low BR at peak performance with a peak O2 < 84% of predicted. All reached AT at an oxygen uptake < 40% of predicted O2max. All had a low oxygen pulse, and three patients had a low slope of O2/WR. No patients developed arrhythmias or ischemic ECG changes during exercise. One radiographic stage 4 patient stopped the exercise test because of leg pain. In the other stage 4 patient, PO2 fell from 97 to 51 mm Hg at peak exercise, suggesting that cor pulmonale was likely to be present. No significant change in the peak exercise PO2 and no leg pain was noted in the stage 2 patients with exercise evidence of oxygen flow problems. An echocardiogram was normal in one of the stage 2 patients, but no other cardiac imaging was available to further evaluate right heart function or identify myocardial sarcoidosis. When we excluded from the analysis the patients with exercise evidence of an oxygen flow problem, the significance of the association between radiographic stage and physiologic measurements did not change.

Other authors7 have emphasized the value of the single-breath DLCO to measure extent of disease in sarcoidosis. Our measurements confirm the value of single-breath DLCO as a measurement of resting pulmonary function that varies significantly with radiographic stage in sarcoidosis. However, in our patients with radiographic stage 0 to 2 sarcoidosis, we found the stage to be more significantly associated with exercise gas exchange measurements than with single-breath DLCO (p < 0.0005 for {Delta}P[A-a]O2 vs p < 0.039 for DLCO). The exercise gas exchange measurement was even more discriminating among radiographic stages 0 to 2 when normalized for work performed during testing (p < 0.0000493 for {Delta}P[A-a]O2/{Delta}O2). Figures 4 , 5 show the relative changes in percentage of predicted single-breath DLCO and {Delta}P(A-a)O2/{Delta}O2 across radiographic stages 0 to 2. The 95% confidence intervals of the percentage of predicted single-breath DLCO overlap for all radiographic stages. This suggests that the percentage of predicted single-breath DLCO is not able to separate patients with and without radiographic evidence of pulmonary parenchymal disease (Fig 4) . The 95% confidence intervals for {Delta}P(A-a)O2/{Delta}O2 distinguish patients with radiographic evidence of pulmonary parenchymal disease (stage 2) from those without (stages 0 to 1; Fig 5 ). The clinician is most concerned to have a sensitive test for quantifying extent of disease in asymptomatic patients with sarcoidosis who have radiographic stage 0 to 2, so that progression can be detected on sequential measurements. One seeks to withhold treatment from those who are remitting spontaneously but initiate with conviction in those who are progressing. {Delta}P(A-a)O2/{Delta}O2 may be more sensitive than single-breath DLCO for monitoring disease extent and progression in early radiographic stages of sarcoidosis.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4.. For each radiographic stage of sarcoidosis 0 to 2, mean resting single-breath DLCO measurements, given as percentage of the predicted value, are represented by closed diamonds. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for each measurement at each radiographic stage are represented by vertical lines. See text for definition of radiographic stages. The number of patients with measurements at each stage is given in parentheses.

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5.. For each radiographic stage of sarcoidosis 0 to 2, mean exercise gas exchange measurements ({Delta}P[A-a]O2/{Delta}O2) are represented by closed diamonds. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for each measurement at each radiographic stage are represented by vertical lines. See text for definition of radiographic stages. The number of patients with measurements at each stage is given in parentheses.

 
Further assessment of {Delta}P(A-a)O2/{Delta}VO2 is needed. Normal ranges and reproducibility need to be established. These may enable us to use this measurement to detect and quantify lung impairment with greater sensitivity in patients with early radiographic stages of sarcoidosis. Sequential physiologic measurements are most useful in the management of patients with sarcoidosis, and additional study is needed to follow changes in {Delta}P(A-a)O2/{Delta}VO2 over the course of the disease. We need to correlate changes in this measurement with other longitudinal markers of disease extent and activity, with and without treatment. We have found the {Delta}P(A-a)O2/{Delta}VO2 to have a promising correlation with radiographic stage. Further investigation is needed to determine whether we can use it as a reliable marker of the extent of disease in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis.


    Acknowledgements
 
We are grateful to Heather Young for her help with statistical analysis of the data.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: ANOVA = analysis of variance; AT = anaerobic threshold; BR = breathing reserve; COHb = carboxyhemoglobin; DLCO = diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; {Delta}FEV1/FVC% = difference from predicted percentage FEV1/FVC; HRR = heart rate reserve; MDI = metered-dose inhaler; MVV = maximum voluntary ventilation; {Delta}P(A-a)O2 = change in alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure gradient between rest and exercise; {Delta}PO2 = change in oxygen tension; P(A-a)O2 = alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure gradient; SLE = symptom-limited exercise; TLC = total lung capacity; VE/VCO2 AT = ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide at anaerobic threshold; {Delta}O2 = change in oxygen consumption; O2max = peak oxygen uptake; WR = work rate

Received for publication March 22, 2000. Accepted for publication December 28, 2000.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Huang, CT, Heurich, AE (1979) Pulmonary sarcoidosis: radiographic, functional and pathologic correlation. Respiration 37,337-345[ISI][Medline]
  2. Miller, A, Teirstein, AS (1977) The sequence of physiologic changes in pulmonary sarcoidosis: correlation with radiographic stages and response to therapy. Mt Sinai J Med 44,852-865[Medline]
  3. Fulmer, JD, Crystal, RG (1979) Morphologic-physiologic correlates of the severity of fibrosis and degree of cellularity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin Invest 63,665-676
  4. Dunn, TL, Waters, LC (1988) Gas exchange at a given degree of volume restriction is different in sarcoidosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Med 85,221-224[ISI][Medline]
  5. Risk, C, Epler, GR (1984) Exercise alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference in interstitial lung disease. Chest 85,69-74[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Sietsema, DE, Kraft, M (1992) Abnormal oxygen uptake response to exercise in patients with mild sarcoidosis. Chest 102,838-845[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Miller, A, Brown, LK (1995) Cardiorespiratory response to incremental exercise in sarcoidosis patients with normal spirometry. Chest 107,323-329[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Scadding, JG (1961) Prognosis of intrathoracic sarcoidosis in England. BMJ 2,1165-1172
  9. Official statement of the ATS: standardization of spirometry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152:1107–1136
  10. Epidemiology standardization project. Am Rev Respir Dis 1978; 118:62–80
  11. Wasserman, K, Hansen, JE, Sue, DY, et al (1994) Principles of exercise testing and interpretation 2nd ed. Lea and Febiger Malvern, PA.
  12. Beaver, WL, Wasserman, K, Whipp, BJ (1986) A new method for detecting the anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 60,220-227
  13. Hansen, JE, Sue, DY, Wasserman, K (1984) Predicted values for clinical exercise testing. Am Rev Respir Dis 140,1373-1380
  14. Goldman, HI, Becklake, MR (1959) Respiratory function tests. Am Rev Respir Dis 79,457-467
  15. Crapo, RO, Morris, AH, Gardner, RM (1981) Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment that meet ATS recommendations. Am Rev Respir Dis 123,659-664[ISI][Medline]
  16. Miller, A, Thornton, JC, Warshaw, R, et al (1983) Single breath diffusing capacity in a representative sample of the population of Michigan, a large industrial state. Am Rev Respir Dis 127,270-277[ISI][Medline]
  17. Rossiter, CE, Weill, H (1974) Ethnic differences in lung function: evidence for proportional differences. Int J Epidemiol 3,55-61[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kanner, RE Morris, AH eds. Clinical pulmonary function testing: manual of uniform laboratory procedures for the Intermountain area. 1994 Intermountain Thoracic Society Salt Lake City, UT.
  19. Joint Statement of ATS, ERS: statement on sarcoidosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160:736–755
  20. Silverman, K, Hutchins, G, Bulkley, B (1978) Cardiac sarcoid: a clinicopathological study of 84 unselected patients with systemic sarcoidosis. Circulation 58,1204-1211[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
R. P. Baughman, B. K. Sparkman, and E. E. Lower
Six-Minute Walk Test and Health Status Assessment in Sarcoidosis
Chest, July 1, 2007; 132(1): 207 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
M A Spruit, M J Thomeer, R Gosselink, T Troosters, A Kasran, A J T Debrock, M G Demedts, and M Decramer
Skeletal muscle weakness in patients with sarcoidosis and its relationship with exercise intolerance and reduced health status
Thorax, January 1, 2005; 60(1): 32 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Sette, J. A. Neder, L. E. Nery, J. Kavakama, R. T. Rodrigues, M. Terra-Filho, S. Guimaraes, E. Bagatin, and N. Muller
Thin-Section CT Abnormalities and Pulmonary Gas Exchange Impairment in Workers Exposed to Asbestos
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 66 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. Lamberto, H. Nunes, P. Le Toumelin, F. Duperron, D. Valeyre, and C. Clerici
Membrane and Capillary Blood Components of Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide in Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: Relation to Exercise Gas Exchange
Chest, June 1, 2004; 125(6): 2061 - 2068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
X.-G. Sun, J. E. Hansen, N. Garatachea, T. W. Storer, and K. Wasserman
Ventilatory Efficiency during Exercise in Healthy Subjects
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2002; 166(11): 1443 - 1448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. E. Hansen, A. E. Medinger, S. Khouri, and P. K. Rohatgi
Sarcoidosis and Gas Exchange Measures
Chest, March 1, 2002; 121(3): 1004 - 1005.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Medinger, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rohatgi, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Medinger, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rohatgi, P. K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS