Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fukuda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kudoh, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fukuda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kudoh, S.
(Chest. 2001;120:S41-S43.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Mechanism of Structural Remodeling in Pulmonary Fibrosis*

Yuh Fukuda, MD; Hiroshi Mochimaru, MD; Yasuhiro Terasaki, MD; Masashi Kawamoto, MD and Shoji Kudoh, MD

* From the Department of Pathology and Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

Correspondence to: Yuh Fukuda, MD, Department of Pathology, Nippon Medical School, 1–1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0022, Japan; e-mail: fukuda{at}nms.ac.jp

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia is pathologically classified into acute interstitial pneumonia (AIP), usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP), nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and so on.1 UIP is clinically progressive and has a bad prognosis. AIP is a severe disease, but some patients recover with a suitable therapy. BOOP and NSIP have a generally good prognosis. We analyzed the mechanism of pulmonary structural remodeling in patients with AIP, UIP, BOOP, and NSIP, especially in the process and characteristics of early fibrotic lesions.

Materials and Methods

The lung specimens were obtained by open-lung biopsy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with AIP (n = 2), UIP (n = 4), BOOP (n = 3), and NSIP (n = 4). The methods were light and electron microscopies, and immunohistochemistry for {alpha} smooth-muscle actin ({alpha}SMA), keratin, CD8, I-collagen, III-collagen, IV-collagen, fibronectin, fibronectin receptor (FnR, {alpha}5ß1), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, MMP-2, MMP-9, membrane type-1 MMP, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-2. Gelatin zymography of lung tissue homogenate of the patients with UIP, BOOP, NSIP, and normal control subjects was also performed.

Results

In AIP, alveolar walls were diffusely thickened and homogeneous early fibroses were formed in both interstitium and intra-alveolar space, which were clearly shown by immunohistochemistry for IV-collagen (Table 1 ). Mesenchymal cells in early fibrotic lesions were {alpha}SMA-positive myofibroblasts and were intensely positive for TIMP-2 compared to MMPs. But MMP-1 was relatively intensely stained in these myofibroblasts. Electron microscopy showed that the myofibroblasts located adjacent to fibrin deposition had well-developed rough endoplasmic reticulum and actin microfilaments, and showed no figure of collagen phagocytosis. In AIP, neovascularization was rarely found in intra-alveolar early fibrosis. Regenerating alveolar epithelial cells in AIP were less positive for FnR and covered discontinuously the early fibrotic alveoli.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Summary of the Results*

 
In other three types of interstitial pneumonia, early fibroses were exclusively formed in intra-alveolar spaces.2 UIP showed the mural incorporation-type intra-alveolar fibrosis with little neovascularization. {alpha}SMA-positive myofibroblasts were TIMP-2 predominant compared to MMPs (Table 1) .3 Electron microscopy showed that the myofibroblasts located in intra-alveolar space had well-developed rough endoplasmic reticulum and actin microfilaments, and showed rarely the figure of collagen phagocytosis. Regenerating epithelial cells covering intra-alveolar fibrosis in UIP were squamous metaplastic cells, cytoplasmic hyaline-laden cells, and were less positive for FnR and showed the tendency to detach from the mesenchyme.

Both BOOP and NSIP were CD8-positive T-cell lymphocyte-dominant interstitial pneumonia. Ultrastructure showed alveolar epithelial cells associated with infiltrated lymphocytes were detached and basement membranes were denuded as an early lesion. BOOP3 showed bud-type intra-alveolar fibroses, and NSIP showed both mural incorporation-type and bud-type intra-alveolar fibroses (Table 1) . BOOP and NSIP showed MMP-predominant fibroblasts in intra-alveolar fibroses, which were less positive for {alpha}SMA. Neovascularization in intra-alveolar fibrosis was conspicuous in both BOOP and NSIP. Collagen globules that were known to be the late lesions of intra-alveolar buds4 were observed frequently in the patients with BOOP and NSIP. Ultrastructurally phagocytosed collagen fibrils were predominant in fibroblasts in BOOP and NSIP. Conversely, regenerating epithelial cells covering intra-alveolar fibrosis of BOOP and NSIP were mainly type II alveolar epithelial cells and were positive for FnR and showed good adhesion to mesenchyme.

Gelatin zymography showed the latent MMP-9, latent MMP-2, and active MMP-2 in each case of UIP, BOOP, and NSIP, and control. In BOOP,3 the ratio of active-form MMP-2 to the total of MMP-9 and MMP-2 was significantly larger than control cases. NSIP had a pattern similar to BOOP, but was not statistically significant.

Discussion

In UIP, alveolar structures were finally lost and replaced by the bronchiolar epithelial cells with smooth-muscle hyperplasia, which are called true bronchiolization. Early fibrotic lesion in UIP is characterized by TIMP-2–predominant myofibroblasts and marked damage of alveolar epithelial cells.3 TIMP-2 may inhibit the neovascularization and enhance the extracellular matrix deposition.3 Although endogenous factor(s) to enhance the production of TIMP-2 in myofibroblasts are not known yet, they may correlate to the mechanism of progressive fibrosis in UIP. Only AIP showed mesenchymal cell proliferation in both interstitium and intra-alveolar space. TIMP-2 is predominant in mesenchymal cells in early fibrotic lesions in AIP, but MMP-1 is also detected. In AIP, an unknown big insult for the alveoli might be important in the beginning of the disease, but the later stage of regeneration seems to be similar to the general wound healing. This may be the reason why some patients with AIP recover. In BOOP3 and NSIP, bud-type intra-alveolar fibrosis shrunk and became collagen globule. In NSIP, mural incorporation-type changed to loose fibrosis and alveoli were reconstructed. Although temporally homogeneous fibrosis is reported to be characteristic of BOOP and NSIP,5 it does not mean no old fibrosis. Old fibrosis is only inconspicuous in BOOP and NSIP, because the fibroses in BOOP and NSIP are reversible. The fibrotic lesions of BOOP and NSIP have similar characteristics. The difference is that BOOP shows bud-predominant intra-alveolar fibrosis and NSIP shows mural incorporation-predominant intra-alveolar fibrosis. Both BOOP and NSIP are CD8-positive T-cell lymphocyte-dominant interstitial pneumonia and are similar diseases. In addition, bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis, which is frequently used as an experimental model, is not a UIP but an NSIP pattern, because it has both mural incorporation-type and bud-type intra-alveolar fibroses, and shows a tendency to recover.4

In conclusion, UIP is a TIMP-2–predominant, progressive, and irreversible disease. BOOP and NSIP are MMP predominant, reversible, and similar diseases, although BOOP is bud-predominant interstitial pneumonia and NSIP is mural incorporation-predominant interstitial pneumonia.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: AIP = acute interstitial pneumonia; {alpha}SMA = {alpha} smooth-muscle actin; BOOP = bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia; FnR = fibronectin receptor; MMP = matrix metalloproteinase; NSIP = nonspecific interstitial pneumonia; TIMP = tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase; UIP = usual interstitial pneumonia

References

  1. . Joint statement of ATS and ERS (2000) Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and treatment; international consensus statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161,646-664[Free Full Text]
  2. Basset, F, Ferrans, VJ, Soler, P, et al (1986) Intraluminal fibrosis in interstitial lung disorders. Am J Pathol 122,443-461[Abstract]
  3. Fukuda, Y, Ishizaki, M, Kudoh, S, et al (1998) Localization of matrix metalloproteinases-1, -2 and -9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 in interstitial lung diseases. Lab Invest 78,687-698[ISI][Medline]
  4. Usuki, J, Fukuda, Y (1995) Evolution of three patterns of intra-alveolar fibrosis produced by bleomycin in rats. Pathol Intern 45,552-564[ISI][Medline]
  5. Katzenstein, AL, Fiorelli, RF (1994) Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia/fibrosis: histologic features and clinical significance. Am J Surg Pathol 18,136-147[ISI][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fukuda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kudoh, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fukuda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kudoh, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS