|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Lung Biology Center, Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Correspondence to: Dean Sheppard, Lung Biology Center, UCSF Box 0854, San Francisco, CA 94143
Abstract
The integrin
vß6 is restricted to epithelial cells and is
dramatically induced in response to injury and inflammation. Mice
expressing a null mutation of this integrin develop exaggerated
inflammation of the lungs and skin, but are dramatically protected from
bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. This phenotype led to the
identification of a unique role for this integrin in binding to and
activating latent extracellular complexes of the anti-inflammatory,
profibrotic cytokine, transforming growth factor-ß1. This
integrin-mediated activation is tightly spatially restricted and
appears to require direct presentation of the activated cytokine to
receptors on adjacent cells. The process also requires distinct regions
of the ß6-subunit cytoplasmic domain and an intact actin
cytoskeleton, suggesting the existence of additional cellular
mechanisms to regulate this process. If this mechanism is found to be
as important in humans as it is in mice, the integrin and as yet to be
identified pathways for cellular regulation of this process could be
exciting new targets for intervention in fibrotic diseases of the lung
and other epithelial organs.
Key Words:
vß6 integrin pulmonary fibrosis transforming growth factor-ß activation
Pulmonary
epithelial
cells express at least eight distinct integrin
heterodimers.1
Two of these integrins,
3ß1 and
6ß4, recognize the epithelial basement membrane protein, laminin
5, as a ligand. Knockout mice lacking either of these integrins have
defects in epithelial integrity,2
3
4
5
suggesting that these
integrins may function as adhesion receptors and play important roles
in the maintenance of epithelial integrity. However, the other six
integrins expressed on lung epithelial cells recognize ligands that are
not normally present in the epithelium or its basement membrane. In
contrast, many of the ligands for these integrins, including
osteopontin, fibronectin, and tenascin-C, are components of the
provisional matrix that is produced in response to injury and
inflammation.1
These observations suggest that many of the
integrins expressed on lung epithelial cells may be present to regulate
responses of these cells to tissue injury and inflammation, and could
thus participate in the development of inflammatory lung diseases.
My laboratory has had a special interest in the integrin,
vß6, the only integrin that is restricted in its expression to
epithelial cells. This integrin, initially identified from primary
cultures of guinea pig airway epithelial cells,6
is
expressed at only low levels in healthy airway and alveolar epithelial
cells of adults, but is rapidly induced at both sites in response to a
variety of insults.7
8
9
10
The initial ligands identified
for this integrin, fibronectin,11
tenascin-C,12
13
and vitronectin,14
all bind
the integrin through a linear tripeptide sequence,
arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD), which is also the sequence
recognized by several other integrins, including all of the integrins
that share the
v subunit.15
Initial studies of the biological role of the
vß6 integrin
depended on examining the behavioral effects of heterologously
expressing this integrin in cells that did not normally express it.
These studies demonstrated two unique effects of this integrin:
enhanced proliferation in three-dimensional culture16
and
induction of expression of the matrix
metalloproteinase-9.17
Interestingly, both of these
effects appeared to depend on the presence of a unique 11 amino-acid
sequence at the carboxyl terminus of the ß6 subunit.16
Cells transfected to express a mutant version of the integrin
containing a ß6 subunit lacking the last 11 amino acids continued to
bind and spread on
vß6 ligands, but were incapable of
proliferating in either three-dimensional collagen gels or in
vivo in nude mice. These data further supported potential roles
for this integrin in dynamic responses to injury such as epithelial
proliferation or migration through extracellular matricies.
To obtain more direct information about the role of
vß6 in
vivo, we inactivated the ß6 subunit in embryonic stem cells and
generated lines of mice homozygous for this null mutation.
Because the ß6 subunit is only present in a single integrin
heterdimer, these mice are effectively
vß6 knockouts. ß6
knockout mice had a completely unexpected phenotype, demonstrating
functionally significant inflammation in the lungs and
skin.18
Inflammation in the skin was present principally
at sites of low-grade trauma, was characterized morphologically by
large numbers of macrophages infiltrating the dermis, and resulted in
destruction of hair follicles and inflammatory baldness. This response
appears to reflect an interaction between this genetic alteration and
an environmental insult (in this case, low-grade trauma), since the
inflammation and baldness are most prominent in the region where
mothers lift their infants with their teeth, and resolved after
weaning. However, inflammatory baldness generally persists over the
inner thighs, an area subjected to low-grade friction, even in adults.
In addition to inflammation in the skin, ß6 knockout mice develop
progressive and lifelong inflammation in the lungs.18
This
effect also likely requires an environmental insult since it is more
prominent in mice kept in unventilated isolator cages than in those
kept in ventilated cages. In the lung, there is an increase in several
types of inflammatory cells, including macrophages, lymphocytes,
neutrophils, and eosinophils. The lymphocytes are mostly
"activated" as determined by expression of the activation marker,
CD25 (the interleukin-2receptor
subunit). Because this phenotype
was unexpected, and not explained by any known biological effect of
vß6, it was important to determine whether this effect was
actually due to inactivation of the ß6 subunit gene, rather than some
unanticipated effect of unknown adjacent genes on the same
chromosome. To address this issue, we generated a line of mice that
overexpressed the human ß6 subunit under the control of the human
surfactant protein-C promoter that drives expression in alveolar
type-II cells and a subset of bronchiolar epithelial cells. We then
backcrossed these mice to ß6 knockout mice and examined the effects
of this "rescue" transgene on lung inflammation, as assessed by
BAL.19
Surprisingly, expression of the ß6 subunit in
this subset of epithelial cells in the lung periphery was sufficient to
prevent the dramatic increases in macrophages, lymphocytes,
eosinophils, and neutrophils in the airspaces of ß6 knockout mice.
These findings definitively identified the ß6 gene itself as the
critical cause of the exaggerated lung inflammation in ß6 knockout
mice.
Because ß6 knockout mice clearly manifest increased sensitivity to inflammatory stimuli, we naively reasoned that these mice would be a good model of enhanced susceptibility to lung damage that results from inflammatory insults. To test this idea, we first examined whether these mice would have increased susceptibility to bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis,20 a response that has been thought to be a late consequence of bleomycin-induced inflammation. We treated either wild-type or otherwise genetically identical ß6 knockout mice with a single dose of intratracheal bleomycin and examined the degree of fibrosis by assessing lung morphology and measuring lung hydroxyproline content 15, 30, and 60 days later.21 As expected, the degree of bleomycin-induced inflammation was greater in ß6 knockout mice at every time point examined. However, to our great surprise, ß6 knockout mice did not develop exaggerated fibrosis. In fact bleomycin-induced fibrosis was nearly completely absent in ß6 knockout mice at every time point, whereas wild-type mice developed progressively more severe fibrosis throughout the time period examined.
This pattern of enhanced inflammation but dramatically reduced fibrosis
strongly suggested that the cytokine transforming growth factor
(TGF)-ß1 might be downstream in a pathway involving the
integrin
vß6. The reasons to suspect a role for
TGF-ß1 include the dramatic tissue inflammation seen in
TGF-ß1 knockout mice22
and the
well-established central role of TGF-ß in tissue inflammation at
multiple sites, including the lung. Indeed, there is considerable
evidence that antagonists of TGF-ß can prevent bleomycin-induced
pulmonary fibrosis. However, despite multiple efforts, we were never
able to identify any difference in expression of TGF-ß messenger
RNA or protein between wild-type or ß6 knockout mice either at
baseline or at any time after treatment with bleomycin. An alternative
explanation for how TGF-ß might act downstream of
vß6 was
suggested by work done by John Munger, a pulmonary physician scientist
at New York University. Dr. Munger showed that two other integrins
related to
vß6,
vß1, and
vß5, bound to the tripeptide
sequence RGD that is present in the N-terminal portion of the
TGF-ß1 gene product called the latency-associated protein
(LAP).23
We had previously shown that
vß6 recognizes
this same sequence in each of its previously identified ligands
(fibronectin, vitronectin, and tenascin-C). Importantly, it has been
known for some time that the TGF-ß gene product is processed in the
secretory apparatus through cleavage by the endoprotease, furin, and is
assembled prior to secretion into a double homodimer composed of two
copies of LAP and two copies of mature TGF-ß. This complex, called
the small latent complex, is functionally inactive and is unable to
bind to TGF-ß receptors or activate known biological effects of
mature TGF-ß.24
Although these latent complexes can be
easily activated in vitro by denaturing conditions or
proteases, the precise mechanisms controlling activation have been
poorly understood. Dr. Munger hypothesized that integrin binding to the
RGD site(s) in LAP might induce activation of these latent complexes.
However, he was unable to demonstrate such activation mediated by
vß1 or
vß5.
After seeing Dr. Mungers data at the annual meeting of the
American Thoracic Society, we established a collaboration between our
laboratories that allowed us together to demonstrate that
TGF-ß1 LAP was by far the most effective ligand for
vß6 identified to date.21
We therefore examined the
ability of
vß6 to activate latent complexes, using a co-culture
bioassay system combining ß6-expressing cells and mink lung
epithlelial cells stably transfected with a highly TGF-ßsensitive
reporter system composed of a portion of the plasminogen activator
inhibitor-1 promoter driving expression of firefly
luciferase.25
These studies clearly demonstrated that four
different cell lines and two types of primary epithelial cells
expressing
vß6 all induced TGF-ß activity, an effect that could
be equally well inhibited by antibodies to active TGF-ß1
or
vß6. Thus, TGF-ß1 does appear to be directly
downstream of
vß6 as a result of extracellular integrin-mediated
activation of latent complexes.
Given the potent ability of active TGF-ß to induce tissue fibrosis,
it would be attractive to posit a mechanism by which TGF-ß activity
could be spatially restricted, especially in organs with critically
important fine structure, such as the gas exchange regions of the lung.
Since integrins are spatially restricted to discrete regions of the
plasma membrane, integrin-mediated activation could provide such a
mechanism, provided that activated complexes did not dissociate and
allow free diffusion of active TGF-ß away from the cell
surface. To test this hypothesis, we performed co-culture bioassays in
dishes containing microporous inserts, and either cultured
vß6-expressing cells and reporter cells on the same side of the
filter or on opposite sides, to prevent test and reporter cells from
touching each other. Active TGF-ß could freely diffuse across these
filters, but TGF-ß that remained attached to the integrin-expressing
cells could not. For each cell line tested, integrin-induced TGF-ß
activity was dramatically reduced when cells were plated on opposite
sides of the filter, strongly suggesting that this process does provide
a mechanism for spatially restricted activation of TGF-ß (Fig 1) .21
|
vß6 was sufficient to induce activation or whether this process
could be subject to regulation by the integrin-expressing cell. Such an
additional level of regulation would be attractive as a potential
mechanism for fine-tuning both the spatial and temporal pattern of
activation. To address this question, we took advantage of cell lines
we had previously generated that express mutant forms of the ß6
subunit containing a variety of truncations of the cytoplasmic
domain.16
26
27
With this approach, we were able to
identify two mutants that allowed us to separate binding of
TGF-ß1 LAP from activation. Both the full-length integrin
and a mutant lacking the C-terminal 11 amino acids bound LAP and fully
activated latent complexes. In contrast, a more extreme truncation,
lacking the last 18 amino acids, bound LAP perfectly normally but did
not induce activation. Thus, integrin binding is not sufficient to
activate latent TGF-ß, suggesting that cells could potentially
regulate this effect. Experiments utilizing the actin-depolymerizing
agent, cytochalasin D, which completely abolished TGF-ß activation
without affecting the response of the reporter cells to exogenous
active TGF-ß, strongly suggest that the cytoskeleton participates in
this activation process (Fig 2)
.
|
vß6, could activate latent TGF-ß and thereby
negatively regulate lung inflammation and enhance bleomycin-induced
pulmonary fibrosis. However, all of the direct evidence in support of
this hypothesis comes from in vitro experiments, and these
results cannot, by themselves, establish whether such a mechanism is
the sole or even principal explanation for the phenotype of ß6
knockout mice. To examine this issue in a relatively unbiased fashion,
we have utilized mu6500 (Affymetrix; Santa Clara, CA) gene chips to
examine the global pattern of gene expression in wild-type and ß6
knockout 129 strain mice, at baseline and at various times after
treatment with bleomycin. In parallel, in collaboration with John
Allard and Renu Heller at Roche Bioscience (Palo Alto, CA), we also
examined the global pattern of gene expression in another strain of
mice, wild-type C57bl/6 mice.28
With this approach, we
were able to identify a cluster of 66 genes that appeared to be
specifically involved in the fibrotic response to bleomycin, since
these genes were expressed at similar levels at baseline in all strains
of mice, but were induced at considerably higher levels in the two
strains of mice that developed fibrosis than in the ß6 knockout mice,
which did not. Interestingly, a substantial fraction of the genes on
the chip known to be induced by TGF-ß were included in this group.
Furthermore, when we compared the level of expression of approximately
100 genes that we could identify as known TGF-ßresponsive genes
between bleomycin-treated wild-type and ß6 knockout mice and between
bleomycin-treated and vehicle-treated C57bl/6 mice, nearly all of these
genes were expressed at higher levels in bleomycin-treated wild-type
animals. Certainly, these descriptive data do not prove that TGF-ß
activation is responsible for the contribution of
vß6 to in
vivo pulmonary fibrosis, but they do at least provide further
support for this hypothesis.
Thus, we have taken advantage of fortuitous observations in genetically
manipulated mice to identify a mechanism by which an epithelially
restricted integrin can activate latent TGF-ß1 that is
stored in the extracellular space. This process has the potential for
tight spatial and temporal regulation and is thus an attractive
mechanism to restrict this potent profibrotic cytokine to the sites
where it is most needed, thereby limiting the undesirable
consequences of free diffusion. If this mechanism can be shown to
function at other sites and in humans as well as mice,
vß6 itself,
and the as yet to be identified cellular regulators of this process
could be attractive new targets for treatment.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: LAP = latency-associated protein; RGD = arginine- glycine-aspartic acid; TGF = transforming growth factor
References
6 leads to epidermolysis bullosa and neonatal death in mice. Nat Genet 13,370-373[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
3ß1 Integrin is required for normal development of the epidermal basement membrane. J Cell Biol 137,729-742
vß6 and
9ß1 and their known ligands, fibronectin and tenascin, in human airways. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 12,547-556[Abstract]
vß6 as a fibronectin-binding protein. J Biol Chem 267,5790-5796
9ß1,
vß3, and
vß6 on cell proliferative responses to tenascin: roles of the ß subunit extracellular and cytoplasmic domains. J Biol Chem 271,24144-24150
vß6 is critical for keratinocyte migration on both its known ligand, fibronectin, and on vitronectin. J Cell Sci 111,2189-2195[Abstract]
vß6 integrin promotes proliferation of colon carcinoma cells through a unique region of the ß6 cytoplasmic domain. J Cell Biol 127,547-556
vß6 binds and activates latent TGF-ß1: a mechanism for regulating pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. Cell 96,319-328[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
vß1. Mol Biol Cell 9,2627-2638
vß6 to focal contacts. Cell Adhes Commun 2,101-113[ISI][Medline]
vß6 on proliferation in three-dimensional culture. J Biol Chem 271,25976-25980This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Addis-Lieser, J. Kohl, and M. G. Chiaramonte Opposing Regulatory Roles of Complement Factor 5 in the Development of Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1894 - 1902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ulanova, L. Puttagunta, M. Marcet-Palacios, M. Duszyk, U. Steinhoff, F. Duta, M.-K. Kim, Z. K. Indik, A. D. Schreiber, and A. D. Befus Syk tyrosine kinase participates in {beta}1-integrin signaling and inflammatory responses in airway epithelial cells Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): L497 - L507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sun, M. A. Opavsky, D. J. Stewart, M. Rabinovitch, F. Dawood, W.-H. Wen, and P. P. Liu Temporal Response and Localization of Integrins {beta}1 and {beta}3 in the Heart After Myocardial Infarction: Regulation by Cytokines Circulation, February 25, 2003; 107(7): 1046 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |