Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flaherty, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Flaherty, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, F. J.
(Chest. 2001;120:S76-S77.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Prognostic Value of Fibroblastic Foci in Patients With Usual Interstitial Pneumonia*

Kevin R. Flaherty, MD; Thomas V. Colby, MD, FCCP; William D. Travis, MD, FCCP; Galen B. Toews, MD, FCCP; Andrew Flint, MD; Robert L. Strawderman, III, ScM, ScD; Arvind Jain, MS; Joseph P. Lynch, III, MD, FCCP and Fernando J. Martinez, MD, FCCP

* From the University of Michigan (Drs. Flaherty, Toews, Flint, Strawderman, Lynch, Martinez, and Mr. Jain), Ann Arbor, MI; the Mayo Clinic (Dr. Colby), Scottsdale, AZ; and the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (Dr. Travis), Washington, DC.

Correspondence to: Fernando J. Martinez, MD, FCCP, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, 3916 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0360; e-mail: fmartine{at}umich.edu

Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is a progressive disorder characterized by a poor response to conventional immunosuppressive agents and significant mortality. The histologic hallmark of UIP is fibrosis, typically patchy and subpleural and paraseptal in distribution. Fibroblastic foci (FF) are interposed between areas of dense fibrosis and relatively normal-appearing lung. FF are thought to represent recent sites of injury where active collagen synthesis/fibrosis is occurring.1 We hypothesized that patients with increased FF at the time of open-lung biopsy would have decreased survival.

Three experienced pathologists (T.V.C., W.D.T., A.F.) participated in a review of open-lung biopsy specimens from patients enrolled in our specialized center of research study of pulmonary fibrosis. Patients with a consensus diagnosis of UIP (n = 85), excluding those associated with a collagen vascular illness to ensure a population of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, were subsequently examined (T.V.C. and W.D.T.), and each lobe was given a score of 0 to 3 (absent, 0; mild, 1; moderate, 2; marked, 3) for FF. The interobserver agreement for FF was excellent (weighted {kappa}, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.84). The results of the two observers were then averaged. The mean lobar FF score was 1.78 ± 0.7, and the mean maximum (highest score in a lobe) FF score was 2.11 ± 0.7. Sixty-three patients underwent biopsies of multiple lobes. As expected (and by definition of UIP), all patients had FF identified in at least one lobe, although there was variability in FF scores between lobes; this was not statistically significant (analysis of variance, p = 0.47). In 19 patients, the FF score was congruent, while in 44 patients, the score was discordant in the lobes undergoing biopsy.

A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to assess the effect of FF score (mean of all lobes or maximal lobar score) for each patient on survival. An increased score for maximal FF was not associated with a worse prognosis, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.04 (p = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.58). A similar result was noted when the mean of lobar FF scores was examined (RR, 1.06; p = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.59). This analysis persisted when adjusting for patient age, gender, and smoking history. Interestingly, female sex (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.98) and smoking history (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.93) were associated with improved survival.

We conclude that quantification of FF in a well-characterized cohort of patients with UIP/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis does not aid in predicting survival. It is possible, however, that FF may provide prognostic information when patients with varying types of pulmonary fibrosis (UIP and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia) are evaluated together, as recently demonstrated by Travis et al.2 In addition, multiple biopsy specimens should be obtained due to the heterogeneous distribution of FF.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; FF = fibroblastic foci; RR = relative risk; UIP = usual interstitial pneumonia

References

  1. Katzenstein, ALA, Myers, JL (1998) Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: clinical relevance of pathologic classification. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157,1301-1315[Free Full Text]
  2. Travis, WD, Matsui, K, Moss, J, et al (2000) Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: prognostic significance of cellular and fibrosing patterns. Am J Surg Pathol 24,19-33[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flaherty, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Flaherty, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, F. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS