|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, St. Thomas Hospital and Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Correspondence to: Y. C. Gary Lee, MBChB, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, St. Thomas Hospital, 4220 Harding Road, Nashville, TN 37202; e-mail: ycgarylee{at}hotmail.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: One hundred six lymphocytic pleural fluid samples (lymphocyte count > 50%) were analyzed. These included post-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) effusions (n = 45), malignant effusions (n = 27), miscellaneous exudative effusions (n = 10), and transudative effusions (n = 24). ADA levels were determined using the Giusti method. In 22 randomly selected cases, ADA was measured again on the same sample 6 weeks later.
Results: The ADA level reached the diagnostic cutoff for tuberculosis (40 U/L) in only three cases (2.8%): two lymphomas and one complicated parapneumonic effusion. There was no significant correlation between effusion ADA levels and the total leukocyte (r = 0.08), differential lymphocyte (r = 0.18) or monocyte (r = - 0.18) counts. ADA levels were significantly lower in the transudative effusions (7.2 ± 3.5 U/L) than in post-CABG (16.6 ± 7.2 U/L), malignant (15.3 ± 11.2 U/L), and other exudative (15.4 ± 13.1 U/L) effusions (p < 0.001). ADA measurements were consistent when assayed 6 weeks apart (r = 0.95; p < 0.00001; coefficient of variation, 14%).
Conclusions: ADA levels in nontuberculous lymphocytic effusions seldom exceeded the diagnostic cutoff for TB. Effusion ADA levels cannot be predicted from total or differential leukocyte counts. Post-CABG pleural fluids had ADA levels similar to other nontuberculous lymphocytic effusions. ADA is stable in effusion fluids, and its measurement is reproducible.
Key Words: adenosine deaminase malignancy pleural effusion post-coronary artery bypass tuberculosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, the diagnosis of TB pleural effusion remains a common clinical challenge. At least 50% of the cases of TB pleural effusion present as primary disease without TB involvement of other organs.5 Tuberculin testing is neither specific nor sensitive.6 The effusion is usually a result of delayed hypersensitivity to proteins of the mycobacteria, and the actual bacterial load in the pleural space is often low. As a result, pleural biopsy and pleural fluid culture findings are often negative.4 6
Adenosine deaminase (ADA) has gained increasing popularity as a diagnostic test for tuberculous pleuritis since 1978, especially in countries where the prevalence of TB is high. It carries a high sensitivity (90 to 100%)7 8 9 10 and is inexpensive and easy to measure.6 ADA is an enzyme involved in purine catabolism and is present in abundance in lymphocytes.11 ADA is related to lymphocytic differentiation and proliferation, and ADA activity increases during antigenic response of lymphocytes.12
Although previous reports have demonstrated the usefulness of ADA in pleural effusions, false-positive findings were present in most studies. These studies included pleural fluids of various cell types, including neutrophilic effusions. Most of the false-positive findings reported9 10 13 14 15 were from parapneumonic effusions or empyemas, which are usually neutrophilic predominant. Little is known about the usefulness of ADA measurements in lymphocytic pleural fluids. This is important because in clinical practice, TB is usually suspected only if the pleural fluid is lymphocytic in nature.
We believe that false-positive diagnoses of TB effusion by ADA can be significantly reduced if ADA measurement is limited to lymphocytic pleural fluids. This would exclude most, if not all, of the empyema fluids, and better resemble everyday clinical practice.
We therefore hypothesize that elevated ADA levels are uncommon in nontuberculous lymphocytic pleural effusions. The purpose of this study is to assess the ADA levels in nontuberculous lymphocytic pleural effusions of different etiologies, including post-CABG effusions. We also studied the correlation between the ADA levels and usual hematologic and biochemical parameters in the pleural fluids. In addition, we examined the stability and reproducibility of pleural fluid ADA measurements by comparing the results on the same samples 6 weeks apart.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The diagnoses of the pleural fluid samples are listed in Table 1 . The clinical diagnoses of the pleural effusions were independently verified by at least one qualified pulmonologist (Y.C.L., R.M.R., or R.W.L.). The definitions for the diagnosis of the effusions were the same as previously published.21 22 A post-CABG effusion was one that developed within the first 3 months after coronary artery bypass surgery with or without heart valve replacement with no other identifiable causes (eg, congestive heart failure, chylothorax, or infection). A pleural effusion was categorized as malignant if pleural fluid cytology or pleural biopsy findings were positive for malignancy, or if the patient had known metastatic malignancy with no other explanation for the effusion. All other exudative effusions were included in the miscellaneous exudate group. Exudates and transudates were classified according to the criteria of Light et al.23
|
Total ADA was measured by the colorimetric method of Giusti,24 employing reagents optimized for ammonia measurement by Kaplan.25 The laboratory cutoff for tuberculous pleural effusion is 40 U/L. To confirm the reproducibility of the ADA measurements, 22 samples (21%) were randomly selected from the 106 samples originally assayed and measured again using the same method 6 weeks after the initial ADA quantification.
Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed with statistical software (SigmaStat
V2.03; Jandel Scientific; San Rafael, CA). Results were
expressed as mean ± SD unless otherwise stated. One-way analysis of
variance was used to compare the levels among subgroups, and Tukeys
test was used to perform multiple comparison procedures. If the
log-transformed data did not satisfy the normality and equal variance
tests, Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks was used to
compare the levels among subgroups and Dunns method was used to
perform multiple comparison procedures. Correlation was analyzed with
Pearsons correlation test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The global incidence of TB continues to rise,26 and it remains an important cause of exudative pleural effusions.1 While TB pleuritis often resolves spontaneously, up to 65% of untreated patients will eventually develop active TB.27 Hence, the correct diagnosis for patients with TB pleuritis followed by appropriate antimicrobial therapy is important.
When investigating an effusion of unknown cause, the initial questions are (1) whether it is an exudate or transudate, and (2) what are the cell count differentials. Most TB effusions are lymphocyte predominant and > 50% of total WBC count is conventionally accepted as the practical cutoff for lymphocytic effusion.16 17 18 19 20 Previous studies19 20 have demonstrated that > 90% of TB effusions have a lymphocyte count that exceeds this cutoff.
Lymphocytic effusions are common in clinical practice, and TB should be excluded from other common causes of exudative lymphocytic effusions, such as malignancy, connective tissue disorders, chylothorax, and atypical infections. However, the diagnosis of TB pleural effusion is often difficult. In more than half of the patients, the pleura is the only site of infection, with no other manifestation of TB elsewhere to aid the diagnosis.5 There is no serum marker, and tuberculin skin test is nonspecific and findings can be negative in one third of cases.6 As the mycobacterial load in the pleura is often low,4 pleural fluid culture findings are positive in < 20% of TB pleural effusions,16 and culture takes several weeks. As a result, more invasive procedures, eg, pleural biopsy or thoracoscopy, are often sought.
Pleural fluid ADA now forms part of the routine diagnostic workup for
tuberculous effusions in many countries where TB is endemic. Numerous
reports7
8
9
have attested to its high sensitivity
(> 95% in most series). Unlike interferon-
or polymerase chain
reaction, ADA is inexpensive, quick, and technically easy to measure
(in the United States, the cost of measuring ADA is approximately $15
per sample, with a turnaround time of 2 h).
False-positive findings were frequently reported when ADA was used to diagnose TB pleural effusions7 8 10 15 28 29 ; careful examination of those studies revealed that pleural fluids of any cell type predominance were included. Also, most of the false-positive findings were from pleural fluids of empyemas, which are neutrophilic in nature. Although elevated ADA levels in pleural fluids of nontuberculous lymphocytic effusions have been reported, they were far less common.
To reduce the number of false-positive findings, various strategies including the measurement of ADA isoforms (ADA-1 and ADA-2) had been tried. ADA-2 is produced by monocytes and predominates over ADA-1 in TB effusions. Hence, a high ADA-2 or a low ADA-1:total ADA level would be useful to help exclude neutrophilic effusions such as empyemas. However, in TB effusions, ADA-2 accounts for 88% of the total ADA,30 such that the measurement of either one gives similar results. Valdes et al,9 in a study of 350 effusion samples, found no significant differences in the usefulness of ADA-2 over total ADA, and thus concluded that "the extra labor involved in the estimation of ADA2 would not be justified in clinical practice."
To our knowledge, our study is the first that applied ADA measurement to only lymphocytic effusions. We believe that such practice resembles clinical decision making where TB is most commonly suspected only in lymphocytic effusions. By applying this simple practice, one can easily exclude most of the empyema and parapneumonic pleural fluids. As a result, we found that false-positive findings were rare (< 3%) if we applied ADA to lymphocytic effusions only.
Given its high sensitivity, ADA is a valuable screening tool, whereby a negative result helps to exclude TB effusion. A high ADA level in a lymphocytic effusion strongly favors TB. Our study demonstrated that false-positive findings are rare when nontuberculosis lymphocytic effusions were studied on the whole. There were no false-positive findings in any of the post-CABG effusions or transudative (mainly congestive cardiac failure) effusions studied. False-positive findings were rare in the malignant effusion group in general. However, two of the three lymphoma samples registered levels above the diagnostic cutoff for TB effusions. In clinical practice, effusions from lymphoma can be distinguished from TB effusions with the use of flow cytometry.31
Pleural effusions after CABG are common,2 and their incidence continues to increase as more CABGs are performed each year. Pleural effusions > 1 month after CABG are often characterized by very high lymphocyte counts, but the origin of the lymphocytes remains unknown.2 3 While uncommon, TB effusions developing shortly after CABG have been described.32 To our knowledge, our study is the first to assess the ADA levels in post-CABG effusions, and found that the mean level was similar to other exudative nontuberculous lymphocytic effusions, but was significantly higher than that of transudative lymphocytic effusions.
Why some lymphocytic effusions have higher ADA levels than others remains an intriguing question. Our study showed no correlation between the lymphocyte or monocyte counts and ADA activity. Other studies33 34 also failed to demonstrate any close correlation between monocytes, total lymphocytes, or T-cell subtypes with either total ADA or its isoenzyme levels. The standard ADA determination measures its activity, rather than the amount of enzyme present. One unit of ADA is the enzymatic activity required to produce 1 mol/L of ammonia per minute from adenosine at standard assay conditions. One possible explanation would be that while the quantity of ADA is related to the amount of T lymphocytes present, the ADA activity varies dependent on different pathologic conditions, such that the ADA activity is highest with TB, and also lymphoma. This is supported by the in vitro observation that ADA activity is higher in activated T lymphocytes, eg, following mitogenic and antigenic challenges. Another possible explanation is that the ADA activity depends on how rapidly the T lymphocytes proliferate. Some authors believe that mycobacterial antigenic stimulation leads to the increased production of ADA, which is essential to the accelerated T-cell blastogenesis and accumulation of CD4 subpopulation, commonly seen in tuberculous effusions.
Given the nonspecific presentation of TB pleuritis, the diagnosis is often unsuspected during the initial investigations. Our study demonstrated that the ADA measurement was consistent and reproducible when assayed several weeks apart. This result is of clinical value such that if the initial workup of the lymphocytic effusion failed to yield a definite diagnosis, the pleural fluid sample, if stored properly, can still be used for ADA determination, thus avoiding the need of a repeat thoracentesis.
Our findings further supported the use of ADA in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusions, as we showed that false-positive findings were uncommon in nontuberculous lymphocytic pleural effusions of various etiologies. Also, the ADA measurements in pleural fluids were accurately reproducible.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Support was provided by the Saint Thomas Foundation, Nashville, TN, and a United States-New Zealand Fulbright Graduate Award (Dr. Lee).
Received for publication September 19, 2000. Accepted for publication February 23, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, ADA, and CA-125 as the diagnostic parameters in tuberculous pleuritis. Respir Med 88,139-143[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
. Chest 103,458-465This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. Palomino Nonconventional and new methods in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: feasibility and applicability in the field Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2005; 26(2): 339 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Miller, R. Barnette, and R. W. Light Stability of Adenosine Deaminase During Transportation Chest, December 1, 2004; 126(6): 1933 - 1937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Jimenez Castro, G. Diaz Nuevo, E. Perez-Rodriguez, and R.W. Light Diagnostic value of adenosine deaminase in nontuberculous lymphocytic pleural effusions Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2003; 21(2): 220 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Porcel and M. Vives Adenosine Deaminase Levels in Nontuberculous Lymphocytic Pleural Effusions Chest, April 1, 2002; 121(4): 1379 - 1380. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |