Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bakoss, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bakoss, J.
(Chest. 2001;120:1031-1033.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Cough in a Patient With an Infusion Port*

Ching Wong, MD; Nandita Joshi, MD; Senthil Nachimuthu, MD; Gajalakshmi Vaka, MD and John Bakoss, MD, FCCP

* From the Department of Internal Medicine, Lutheran Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY.

Correspondence to: Nandita Joshi, MD, 7201 4th Ave, Apt B-10, Brooklyn, NY 11209; e-mail: nanditajoshi{at}yahoo.com


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
In this case report, we describe a patient with a history of fallopian tube adenocarcinoma who had an infusion port in place for the past 4 years. During the course of her stay in the hospital for pneumonia, she developed a cough that became worse with the infusion of fluids through the port. A portogram done to investigate this problem revealed the presence of a portobronchial fistula. This is the first reported case of a portobronchial fistula. Various possibilities to explain the formation of portobronchial fistula are discussed.

Key Words: chemotherapy • cough • infusion port • portobronchial fistula • portogram


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Long -term central venous access has become an essential part of treatment for patients receiving chemotherapy. Although the use of long-term vascular access devices, particularly infusion ports, has enhanced the lives of oncology patients, it has added a new set of challenges.1 2 In this case, we report an unusual complication related to the long-term use of an infusion port.


    Case Report
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
A 56-year-old Hispanic woman was admitted to the hospital for complaints of stuffy nose and sore throat followed by fever, chills, and cough productive of yellow sputum for 1 week prior to admission. The diagnosis of right lower lobe pneumonia was made by chest radiograph (Fig 1 ).



View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1.. Chest radiograph at presentation shows the right lower lobe infiltrate.

 
The patient had a history of fallopian tube adenocarcinoma (stage III), which had been diagnosed 4 years previous to the hospital admission. The adenocarcinoma was treated with a total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and omentectomy followed by chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin. The patient had two recurrences in the abdomen. Each time, she was treated with chemotherapy consisting of nine courses of paclitaxel and carboplatin. Complete remission was achieved in both instances. The patient had received her last course of chemotherapy 8 months prior to admission.

The patient had had a double-lumen infusion port inserted in the left subclavian vein 4 years previously for chemotherapy. The port was flushed every 2 months with normal saline solution and heparin as part of maintenance care, with the last flushing procedure occurring 2 months before the current admission. Over a period of time, one lumen of the port became blocked and could not be used. The other functioning lumen then was used for IV chemotherapy. The catheter tip had been positioned in the lower third of the superior vena cava since insertion.

The patient’s vital signs on admission to the hospital were as follows: temperature, 101.6°F; pulse rate, 100 beats/min; respiratory rate, 20 breaths/min; and BP, 110/70 mm Hg. A physical examination was significant for the presence of rales in the right base of the lung. Laboratory data on admission to the hospital were as follows: WBC count, 6,400/mm3; hematocrit, 39.8; and platelet count, 163,000/mm3. There were normal levels of electrolytes, normal renal function, and normal results for urinalysis. Cultures of blood, sputum, and urine were negative.

The patient was started on IV fluids (ie, normal saline solution) at 42 mL/h and IV levofloxacin through the port. The fever and cough improved with treatment. Later, the patient described a different, more severe cough associated with dyspnea, while the antibiotic was infusing through the port. As cough is one of the adverse effects of treatment with levofloxacin,3 the antibiotic was changed to cefazolin. The patient still complained of cough during antibiotic infusion. To investigate this problem, normal saline solution was infused via the port at a rapid rate. The patient developed the same symptoms of cough with dyspnea as mentioned earlier. A portogram was done and revealed a leakage of contrast material into the respiratory tract through the right bronchus (Figs 2 -4 ). This confirmed the presence of a portobronchial fistula. Bronchoscopy showed acute and chronic inflammatory changes in the bronchial wall but failed to reveal a visible opening in the respiratory tract.



View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2.. Portogram before the injection of contrast material through the port.

 
The port was surgically removed. The patient did not have any more respiratory complaints and was discharged home. On a follow-up visit 1 month later, the patient had no complaints of cough, and her chest radiograph was negative.


    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
The most common reported long-term complications associated with the use of ports are thrombosis and infection.2 4 Other complications include obstruction, leakages, and rupture of the catheter with subsequent embolization.5 No cases of portobronchial fistula, however, have been reported previously in the literature.

This is the first reported case of a portobronchial fistula. Three possible causes for the formation of the portobronchial fistula are as follows:

1. The superior vena cava lies in close proximity to the right pulmonary hilum,6 the bronchus being part of the pulmonary hilum. The curved catheter tip was in the lower third of the superior vena cava and abutted the vessel wall (Fig 2) . Constant friction between the tip of the catheter and the endothelial lining could have led to the formation of a thrombus1 that fixed the catheter tip to the vessel wall. Blockage in one lumen of this patient’s port could have been related to thrombus formation. Over a period of time, this friction of the catheter against a single spot could have slowly and progressively eroded the vessel wall. Extension of this erosion into the right bronchus could have led to the formation of the fistula. 2. Before use, the catheter is always checked for patency by using a 10-mL syringe to flush the catheter and obtain blood return. Sometimes, the catheter also is used for blood drawing. The suction effect produced during these procedures could have caused the tip of the catheter to adhere to the vessel wall and damage it. A similar effect is seen when the stomach is eroded by nasogastric tube suction. 3. The infusion of highly irritating chemotherapeutic agents over a period of time and constant movement of the shoulder, which in turn would cause movement of the catheter-tip, could have injured the vessel wall.

Our patient had no evidence of bleeding from the site of the fistula. This can be explained by the chronic nature of the causes described above and an associated fibrous reaction around the site.


    Conclusion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
When a patient with a long-term infusion port presents with persistent cough exacerbated with the use of the port, a communication between the port and the respiratory tract should be excluded. A portogram will be helpful in evaluating this possibility. While current literature suggests that the ideal location of the catheter tip is close to the right atrium,2 we recommend that this be reevaluated. This case also raises the possibility of the formation of a fistula between the catheter tip and the adjacent mediastinal structures in a patient with an infusion port.



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3.. Portogram immediately after the initial injection.

 


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4.. Portogram at the end of the injection, showing leakage of contrast material into the right bronchus and trachea.

 

    Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank Eileen Lyons, RN, Nursing Care Coordinator, IV Team, Lutheran Medical Center, State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn, NY.

Received for publication February 15, 2001. Accepted for publication March 13, 2001.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 

  1. Reyman, PE (1993) Chemotherapy: principles of administration. Groenwald, SL Goodman, M Frogge, MHet al eds. Cancer nursing: principles and practice 3rd ed. ,312-327 Jones and Bartlett Boston, MA.
  2. Rauthe, G, Altmann, C (1998) Complications in connection with venous port systems: prevention and therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 24,192-199[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Adverse reactions of levofloxacin. In: Sifton DW, Murray L, Kelly GL, eds. Physician’s desk reference 2001. 55th ed. Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Company, 2001; 2342
  4. Brothers, TE, Von Moll, LK, Niederhuber, JE, et al (1998) Experience with subcutaneous infusion ports in three hundred patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 166,295-301
  5. Lam, AW, Chen, YM, Yang, KY, et al (1999) Disconnection of a venous Port-a-Cath followed by embolization after saline flush: rare case report. Jpn J Clin Oncol 29,643-645[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Williams, PL, Warwick, R, Dyson, M, et al (1989) Gray’s anatomy 37th ed. ,1275 Churchill Livingstone London, UK.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bakoss, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bakoss, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS