|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From Eli Lilly and Company (Drs. Yan, Helterbrand, and Wright), Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN; Pfizer Global Research & Development (Dr. Hartman), Ann Arbor, MI; and the Department of Pathology (Dr. Bernard), Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Correspondence to: S. Betty Yan, PhD, Eli Lilly and Company, Drop Code 0522, 307 E McCarty St, Indianapolis, IN 46285; e-mail: yan sau chi Betty{at}Lilly.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Retrospective analysis of a subset of a previously published, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial ("Effects of Ibuprofen on the Physiology and Survival of Patients With Sepsis" [ISS]).
Setting: A multicenter study performed in the United States and Canada (seven sites).
Patients: Seventy hospitalized patients with acute severe sepsis and failure in one or more organs at entry into the ISS trial.
Measurements and Main Results: Blood samples were obtained from all patients at baseline and at 20, 44, 72, and 120 h after the initiation of study drug (ibuprofen or placebo) infusion. Data obtained at these times included platelet count, prothrombin time, and partial thromboplastin time. The results described in this article are based on a subset of the total ISS population for whom additional coagulation assays were performed on the blood samples obtained at baseline and 44 h. These assays included protein C antigen, D-dimer, and fibrinogen levels. A total of 63 of the 70 patients (90%) studied in this report had acquired protein C deficiency at entry to the ISS trial (baseline). The presence and severity of acquired protein C deficiency were associated with poor clinical outcome, including lower survival rate, higher incidence of shock, and fewer ICU-free and ventilator-free days.
Conclusions: Acquired protein C deficiency may be useful in predicting clinical outcome in patients with sepsis. Clinical studies are warranted to determine whether the replacement of protein C in sepsis patients may improve outcome.
Key Words: acquired protein C deficiency protein C septic shock severe sepsis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients with a known or suspected site of serious infection had to
meet all of the following criteria: core temperature,
38.3°C or
< 35.5°C; heart rate,
90 beats/min in the absence of
ß-blocker treatment; and respiratory rate,
20 breaths/min (or
minute ventilation, > 10 L/min if the patient requires mechanical
ventilation). In addition, patients had to exhibit dysfunction of at
least one of the following organ systems: cardiovascular, renal,
ARDS/pulmonary, or CNS.
Investigational treatment consisted of IV ibuprofen (10 mg/kg q6h for eight doses) or placebo given in a similar fashion. Patients were observed for clinical outcomes, with 30-day all-cause mortality as the primary outcome measure. Secondary measures included duration of ICU stay, the presence or absence of mechanical ventilation, and the presence or absence of septic shock. Secondary measures were described in terms of ICU-free days, ventilator-free days, and shock-free days. This methodology has been described previously.17 Organ failure-free days were calculated over the 30-day study period. For each patient, the number of organ failure-free days was calculated as the number of days a patient was both alive and free of a particular organ failure. Definitions of organ failure are shown in Table 1 .17 The study did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect of ibuprofen on ICU-free days, ventilator-free days, shock-free days, or survival.16
|
The results described in this article are based on a subset of the
total ISS population for whom additional coagulation assays were
performed on the blood samples obtained at baseline and at 44 h.
The samples were taken as a subset of the database without regard to
the types of pathogen or any other etiology and included patients
treated with both placebo and ibuprofen. For the purpose of selecting
patients to be included in the coagulation analyses, patients were
categorized into one of the following eight groups based on these
measures: (1) abnormal PTT only; (2) abnormal PT only; (3) abnormal
platelets only; (4) abnormal PT and platelets; (5) abnormal PTT and
platelets; (6) abnormal PT and PTT; (7) PT, PTT, and platelets normal
("all normal"); and (8) PT, PTT, and platelets abnormal ("all
abnormal"). Abnormal values were defined as a platelet count of
< 140,000/mL, PT
13.8 s, and PTT
39 s, which are values that
are generally consistent with normal range boundaries in local hospital
clinical laboratories. Ten patients from each of the groups except for
the all-abnormal group were selected randomly for inclusion in the
coagulation variable analysis. Only six patients in the parent study
exhibited abnormal values for all three measures; therefore, no patient
sample from this group (group 8) was included in this study. The
additional coagulation assays were for protein C antigen, D-dimer, and
fibrinogen levels. For the purpose of this analysis, normal ranges for
these coagulation variables were defined as follows: protein C antigen,
1.79 to 3.87 µg/mL18
; D-dimer, 94 to 260 ng/mL; and
fibrinogen, 190 to 400 mg/dL.
Statistical Methods
Baseline and 44-h summary statistics are presented for each
coagulation measure (ie, levels of protein C antigen,
D-dimer, fibrinogen, and platelets) by 30-day all-cause mortality
status, which was the primary outcome measure for the ISS. To assess
the relationship between baseline and 44-h protein C levels and
mortality, threshold plots were constructed displaying mortality
incidence rates in subpopulations defined by baseline and 44-h protein
C antigen level thresholds. Logistic regression models were used to
assess the relationship of each coagulation measure with 30-day
all-cause mortality. A logistic regression model also was used to
assess the relationship of each coagulation measure to the presence or
absence of shock at baseline and at 44 h.
To assess the relationship between each coagulation measure and ventilator-free days and ICU-free days, nonparametric Spearman rank correlations were calculated and statistical tests for nonzero correlation were performed. To assess correlations among coagulation measures, nonparametric Spearman rank analyses also were conducted.
For all analyses, a two-sided p value of < 0.05 was considered to be evidence of an association. Protein C levels measured at 44 h after study entry were not available for three patients; their baseline measurements were imputed for the logistic regressions, threshold plots, and correlation analyses with ventilator-free days and ICU-free days. Shock assessments measured at 44 h after study entry were unavailable for nine patients. Because each of these patients was in shock at baseline, and because shock status values after baseline were available, it was assumed that all were in shock at 44 h after study entry, and the last observed shock status value was used in the last-observation-carried-forward imputation method for shock status-related analyses.
Similar weighted analyses were performed with patient weighting based on the proportion of patients in the ISS who fell into the same subgroup as the analyzed patient. In general, the conclusions drawn from the unweighted analyses and weighted analyses were consistent. The conclusions from the unweighted analyses are presented below.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.05)
differences between the two treatment groups with respect to platelet
levels, protein C levels, and fibrinogen levels at baseline and at
44 h after entry into the study. In addition, there were no
statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups
in ranked D-dimer levels at baseline and at 44 h.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased baseline D-dimer levels (p = 0.02) and decreased baseline fibrinogen levels (p = 0.03) were associated with the presence of shock at baseline (Table 4) . Lower platelet levels at baseline were associated with fewer ICU-free days (p = 0.047) (Table 5) . Higher D-dimer levels were associated with fewer ICU-free and ventilator-free days; however, significance was achieved only when 44-h levels were compared with ventilator-free days (p = 0.03) (Table 5) . No association was demonstrated between fibrinogen levels and ICU-free or ventilator-free days.
Correlation of Coagulation Markers With Protein C
The correlation between the coagulation markers and protein C
levels was weak or nonexistent (Table 6
). The sole significant positive correlation observed was between the
44-h platelet levels and protein C antigen levels (p = 0.03). A trend
toward a positive association between 44-h fibrinogen levels and
protein C antigen levels also was observed (p = 0.07). At baseline,
there was also little correlation among PT, PTT, and platelet levels,
and protein C levels, especially in the subgroup of patients that had
normal baseline PT, PTT, and platelet levels (Table 2)
. The mean
protein C levels in this subgroup was 1.26 µg/mL. A total of 9 of the
10 patients in this subgroup had baseline protein C levels below the
lower limit of normal.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Findings from this study of the association of protein C levels with mortality and the presence of shock in severe sepsis patients are consistent with those reported by others. Hesselvik et al12 reported that patients with septic shock had lower protein C levels than those without shock on the day following initial hospitalization. Fourrier et al7 found that initial protein C levels were significantly lower in nonsurviving sepsis patients with DIC and documented a significant correlation between protein C levels in nonsurvivors. In a subgroup with sequential measurements, nonsurvivors exhibited a persistent deficiency in protein C activity. Lorente et al5 measured coagulation and fibrinolysis variables in sepsis patients on days 1, 4, and 7 after hospital admission. Their analysis showed that the median protein C level in nonsurvivors was below the lower limit of normal on day 1 after hospital admission. There was no significant difference between survivors and nonsurvivors in protein C measurements at the time of hospital admission. However, serial protein C measurements on subsequent days after hospital admission showed a significant difference between survivors and nonsurvivors. Only survivors exhibited a progressive normalization of protein C levels. The data from our study further support the suggestion from Lorente et al5 and others28 that serial protein C measurements provide better prognostic value than a single measurement in monitoring patients with sepsis. Recent data from Boldt et al25 also suggest that serial protein C measurements may be a helpful molecular marker to differentiate severe sepsis from other causes of critical illness.
Among the four hemostatic markers studied in this report, protein C levels correlated best with the major outcome measures of severe sepsis (ie, mortality, presence of shock, ICU stay, and ventilator dependence). Fibrinogen level was not as consistently associated with the outcome measures, probably because it is known to be an acute-phase reactant.29 The fibrinogen level goes up in the early phase of severe infection, and fibrinogen subsequently is consumed during the severe coagulopathy phase of severe sepsis. In patients with sepsis, fibrinogen has been reported to be higher in nonsurvivors than survivors,5 lower in nonsurvivors than in survivors,13 30 31 32 or not significantly different between survivors and nonsurvivors.2 33 Perhaps the seemingly contradictory data on fibrinogen levels in patients with sepsis are due to differences in sampling time and the acute-phase reactant nature of fibrinogen. Protein C level also was reported by others5 34 to be better associated with sepsis outcome than D-dimer levels or platelet levels. Thrombocytosis rather than thrombocytopenia has been observed in some sepsis patients.35 It is also interesting to point out that in this study, 9 of the 10 patients in the subgroup who had normal baseline values for PT, PTT, and platelets had baseline protein C levels below the lower limit of normal. These data suggest that protein C may be an earlier and more sensitive marker than the more global coagulation markers of PT, PTT, and platelets that are currently more widely used in hospitals. The data from this and other studies5 7 24 25 35 suggest that protein C measurement, in addition to the DIC panel of markers, may offer a better prognostic value in sepsis.
The importance of the protein C pathway in sepsis has been highlighted by findings in animal models. In Escherichia coli-induced septicemia in baboons, antibody blockade of the protein C pathway markedly increased the severity of endotoxin doses at concentrations for both the lethal dose in all exposed subjects and at 10% of the lethal dose.36 Our data reinforce the findings of other clinical and animal investigations that have indicated that endogenous protein C plays an important role in sepsis-associated coagulopathy. Other than the well-known antithrombotic activity of the protein C pathway, there is also evidence that protein C exerts direct anti-inflammatory effects apart from those mediated by thrombin inhibition. These may include the reduction of endotoxin-induced cytokine production by monocytes and activated protein C-endothelial protein C receptor interaction with activated neutrophils.15 37 38 39 PAI-1, an inhibitor for fibrinolysis, also is found to be elevated in sepsis and is positively correlated to mortality in most reported studies.20 Because activated protein C has profibrinolytic activity by neutralizing PAI-1, other investigators5 7 40 41 have suggested the need for randomized, controlled trials of activated protein C in patients with sepsis. Our finding that 90% of patients with severe sepsis have protein C levels less than the lower limit of normal gives further support to this notion. As such, a recombinant form of human activated protein C has been developed and is undergoing clinical study.
In patients with severe sepsis, the mechanism for activating protein C in vivo (protein C converting to activated protein C by thrombin in a complex with thrombomodulin) may be operating suboptimally.42 Indeed, the most recent data from patients with sepsis support this hypothesis.43 Thus activated protein C would be expected to exert a more potent and predictable effect than protein C, the zymogen form. Activated protein C also may be more resistant to neutrophil elastase than is the zymogen form.44
In summary, we have found that lower protein C levels are common in patients with sepsis and are associated with several severely negative clinical outcomes, including increased mortality and occurrence of shock, as well as increased duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay. These findings suggest that protein C levels can be used prognostically and that such agents as protein C, or preferably, activated protein C, may reverse the acquired protein C deficiency in patients with sepsis and improve outcome. A large, placebo-controlled, phase III trial using recombinant human activated protein C in patients with severe sepsis has been undertaken to test whether this experimental drug can improve the 28-day all-cause mortality rate of this disease.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Drs. Yan, Helterbrand, and Wright are employees of Eli Lilly and Company. Dr. Hartman was an employee of Lilly during the collaboration of this study. This study is a scientific collaboration between Lilly and Dr. Bernard.
Funds needed for conducting the coagulation assays at the University of Vermont were provided by Eli Lilly and Co. The ibuprofen clinical trial was supported by grant HL43167 from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health.
Received for publication August 1, 2000. Accepted for publication January 26, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F Wong, M Bernardi, R Balk, B Christman, R Moreau, G Garcia-Tsao, D Patch, G Soriano, J Hoefs, M Navasa, et al. Sepsis in cirrhosis: report on the 7th meeting of the International Ascites Club Gut, May 1, 2005; 54(5): 718 - 725. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Bridges and S. Dukes Cardiovascular Aspects of Septic Shock: Pathophysiology, Monitoring, and Treatment Crit. Care Nurse, April 1, 2005; 25(2): 14 - 40. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Ganopolsky and F. J. Castellino A Protein C Deficiency Exacerbates Inflammatory and Hypotensive Responses in Mice During Polymicrobial Sepsis in a Cecal Ligation and Puncture Model Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2004; 165(4): 1433 - 1446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Gropper Evidence-Based Management of Critically Ill Patients: Analysis and Implementation Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2004; 99(2): 566 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Sajan, S. S. Da-Silva, and R. P. Dellinger Drotrecogin Alfa (Activated) in an Infant with Gram-Negative Septic Shock J Intensive Care Med, January 1, 2004; 19(1): 51 - 55. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Frassica, Y. M. Vinagre, and B. Maas Recombinant Human-Activated Protein C (rhAPC) in Childhood Sepsis J Intensive Care Med, January 1, 2004; 19(1): 56 - 57. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Kerlin, S. B. Yan, B. H. Isermann, J. T. Brandt, R. Sood, B. R. Basson, D. E. Joyce, H. Weiler, and J.-F. Dhainaut Survival advantage associated with heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation in patients with severe sepsis and in mouse endotoxemia Blood, November 1, 2003; 102(9): 3085 - 3092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Ware, X. Fang, and M. A. Matthay Protein C and thrombomodulin in human acute lung injury Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 2003; 285(3): L514 - L521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kleinpell Advances in Treating Patients With Severe Sepsis: Role of Drotrecogin Alfa (Activated) Crit. Care Nurse, June 1, 2003; 23(3): 16 - 29. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Morris Meeting Unmet Needs in Patients With Sepsis: the Role of Drotrecogin Alfa (Activated) Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2003; 12(2): 94 - 97. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. W. Ely, R. M. Kleinpell, and R. E. Goyette Advances in the Understanding of Clinical Manifestations and Therapy of Severe Sepsis: An Update for Critical Care Nurses Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2003; 12(2): 120 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Warkentin, W. C. Aird, and J. H. Rand Platelet-Endothelial Interactions: Sepsis, HIT, and Antiphospholipid Syndrome Hematology, January 1, 2003; 2003(1): 497 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |