Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khamiees, M.
Right arrow Articles by Manthous, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khamiees, M.
Right arrow Articles by Manthous, C. A.
(Chest. 2001;120:1262-1270.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Predictors of Extubation Outcome in Patients Who Have Successfully Completed a Spontaneous Breathing Trial*

Mohammad Khamiees, MD; Priya Raju, MD; Angela DeGirolamo, MD; Yaw Amoateng-Adjepong, MD, PhD and Constantine A. Manthous, MD, FCCP

* From the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Bridgeport Hospital and Yale University School of Medicine, Bridgeport, CT.

Correspondence to: Constantine A. Manthous, MD, FCCP, Bridgeport Hospital, West Tower 6, 267 Grant St, Bridgeport, CT 06610; e-mail: pcmant{at}bpthosp.org


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background: After patients recovering from respiratory failure have successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), clinicians must determine whether an artificial airway is still required. We hypothesized that cough strength and the magnitude of endotracheal secretions affect extubation outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a prospective study of 91 adult patients treated in medical-cardiac ICUs who were recovering from respiratory failure, had successfully completed an SBT, and were about to be extubated. A number of demographic and physiologic parameters were recorded with the patient receiving full ventilatory support and during the SBT, just prior to extubation. Cough strength on command was measured with a semiobjective scale of 0 to 5, and the magnitude of endotracheal secretions was measured as none, mild, moderate, or abundant by a single observer. In addition, patients were asked to cough onto a white card held 1 to 2 cm from the endotracheal tube; if secretions were propelled onto the card, it was termed a positive white card test (WCT) result. All patients were then extubated from T-piece or continuous positive airway pressure breathing trials. If 72 h elapsed and patients did not require reintubation, they were defined as successfully extubated.

Results: Ninety-one patients with a mean (± SE) age of 65.2 ± 1.6 years, ICU admission APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II score of 17.7 ± 0.7, and duration of mechanical ventilation of 5.0 ± 0.5 days were studied over 100 extubations. Sixteen patients could not be extubated, and 2 patients underwent two unsuccessful extubation attempts, for a total of 18 unsuccessful extubations. Age, severity of illness, duration of mechanical ventilation, oxygenation, rapid shallow breathing index, and vital signs during SBTs did not differ between patients with successful extubations vs patients with unsuccessful extubations. The WCT result was highly correlated with cough strength. Patients with weak (grade 0 to 2) coughs were four times as likely to have unsuccessful extubations, compared to those with moderate-to-strong (grade 3 to 5) coughs (risk ratio [RR], 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.8 to 8.9). Patients with moderate-to-abundant secretions were more than eight times as times as likely to have unsuccessful extubations as those with no or mild secretions (RR, 8.7; 95% CI, 2.1 to 35.7). Patients with negative WCT results were three times as likely to have unsuccessful extubations as those with positive WCT results (RR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.3 to 6.7). Poor cough strength and endotracheal secretions were synergistic in predicting extubation failure (Rothman synergy index, 3.7; RR, 31.9; 95% CI, 4.5 to 225.3). Patients with PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen (P:F) ratios of 120 to 200 (receiving mechanical ventilation) were not less likely to be successfully extubated than those with P:F ratios of > 200, but those with hemoglobin levels <= 10 g/dL were more than five times as likely to have unsuccessful extubations as those with hemoglobin levels > 10 g/dL.

Conclusions: After patients recovering from respiratory failure have successfully completed an SBT, factors affecting airway competence, such as cough strength and amount of endotracheal secretions, may be important predictors of extubation outcomes. Also, a majority (89%) of medically ill patients with P:F ratios of 120 to 200 (four of five patients with P:F ratios from 120 to 150), values sometimes used to preclude weaning, were extubated successfully.

Key Words: critical care • critical illness • extubation • mechanical ventilation • weaning


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The process commonly referred to as "weaning" from invasive mechanical ventilation involves first assessing the patient’s ability to breathe without (ie, liberation from) the ventilator and then the ability to continue breathing without an artificial airway (ie, endotracheal extubation). In general, a patient is hypothesized to be ready for liberation after successfully completing a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Numerous studies1 2 3 have examined "weaning parameters" to predict combined liberation and extubation outcomes. A recent study4 suggested that the presence of spontaneous coughing and the magnitude of endotracheal secretions may affect extubation outcomes of brain-injured patients. No prospective study has assessed whether such parameters predict extubation outcomes of other medically ill patients who have successfully completed an SBT. In this study, we hypothesized that for patients who have successfully completed an SBT, extubation outcomes are dependent on "airway competence": the ability to generate a strong cough and expectorate endotracheal secretions. Thus, patients are likely to have unsuccessful extubations if they cannot cough on command and/or if they have abundant secretions. We also hypothesized that patients with a PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen (P:F) ratio of 120 to 200, a value sometimes used to preclude weaning efforts, would be no less likely to have unsuccessful extubations than those with a P:F ratio > 200.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The Investigational Review Board of our hospital waived requiring informed consent for this study. Patients in our medical-cardiac ICUs who were receiving mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube between April 1999 and February 2000 were assessed when they had successfully completed an SBT and when their caregivers were about to allow them to be extubated. In our ICU, weaning is guided by a nonmandatory protocol that is executed by bedside nurses, respiratory therapists, and resident trainees guided by one of four board-certified intensivists. In general, patients who are no longer receiving pressors or inotropes and whose P:F ratio is > 120 are assessed with 2 to 3 min of unassisted breathing through the endotracheal tube with or without continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Patient cooperation is not required to commence SBTs. Patients whose observed respiratory frequency divided by the tidal volume (VT) is < 125 breaths/min/L usually undergo an SBT via a T-piece, CPAP, or pressure support of <= 7 cm H2O for 0.5 to 2 h. Bedside clinicians prematurely terminate SBTs for the following reasons: severe distress despite attempts of bedside personnel to attenuate anxiety nonpharmacologically, increment of heart rate > 20 beats/min or systolic BP > 20 mm Hg, respiratory rate > 35 breaths/min, VT < 300 mL, or pulse oximetry desaturation to < 90% while inspiring 50% oxygen. Patients who successfully complete an SBT are further assessed with an arterial blood gas analysis; if the result is favorable, the patient is considered for a trial of endotracheal extubation. In our ICU, some patients successfully complete the SBT and are not extubated if the clinicians feel they still require an artificial airway. Patients were excluded from this study if they were being extubated to comfort care (withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, no reintubation).

Measurements
The following data were gathered: age, ICU admission APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II score, duration of endotracheal intubation/mechanical ventilation, arterial blood gas levels on full ventilatory support prior to the SBT, rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI; respiratory rate divided by VT), SBT modality, respiratory rate, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure after roughly 30 min of the SBT, arterial blood gas levels during the SBT, and presence of congestive heart failure or gross encephalopathy.

A single observer (M.K.) worked with bedside nurses and respiratory therapists to assess voluntary cough strength on a scale of 0 to 5, and the magnitude of endotracheal secretions from none, mild, moderate, to large. The semiobjective scale of cough strength used by the single observer was as follows: 0 = no cough on command, 1 = audible movement of air through the endotracheal tube but no audible cough, 2 = weakly (barely) audible cough, 3 = clearly audible cough, 4 = stronger cough, and 5 = multiple sequential strong coughs. For the purposes of this study, a more objective measure of cough, termed the white card test (WCT), was created. A single observer (M.K.) placed a white file card 1 to 2 cm from the end of the endotracheal tube and asked patients to cough, up to three to four times, just prior to endotracheal extubation. If any wetness appeared on the card, it was classified as a positive WCT result. The amount of secretions was assessed by this same single observer who classified patients as producing either no, mild, moderate, or abundant endotracheal secretions based on personal observations and collective information from the nursing and respiratory therapists from their assessments within the 4 to 6 h preceding endotracheal extubation. Therapists and the bedside nurses also reported the approximate frequency of endotracheal suctioning during this period prior to extubation.

Patients were then extubated as per the instructions of their attending physicians. Patients who remained extubated at 72 h were classified as having successful extubation. Since this study did not stipulate criteria for reintubation (decisions were made by caregivers), physiologic parameters were recorded prior to reintubation that were thought to have contributed to the decision to reintubate. These reasons were categorized into three general groups: hypoxemia, defined as P:F ratio < 120 or pulse oximetry desaturation on a nonrebreather, high-flow oxygen face mask; hypercapnia, if arterial blood gas analysis revealed acute hypercapnic respiratory failure or sustained respiratory rate >= 35 breaths/min; and failure to maintain an adequate airway for either mental status changes or inadequate expectoration. Patients were followed for this study until discharge from the ICU or until placement of a tracheostomy.

Statistical Analysis
Mean values of selected demographic variables and physiologic parameters of patients who were successfully extubated were compared by nonpaired Student’s t tests to those who could not be extubated. For grouped data, {chi}2 and/or Fisher’s Exact Test were used in comparing differences in proportions between the two groups and in deriving p values. Cough strength and the magnitude of secretions were reclassified as binary variables; patients with absent or barely audible (grade 0 to 2) cough were compared to those with clearly audible, moderate-to-strong (grade 3 to 5) cough, and those with no or mild secretions were compared to those with moderate-to-abundant secretions. Risk ratios (RRs) were computed as the preferred measure of the strength of association between the parameters of interest and extubation outcome. A multiple logistic regression model was subsequently used to adjust for confounders, assess effect modifiers, and identify parameters that independently predicted extubation outcome. The parameters included in the logistic model were determined by the biological plausibility of each variable and/or evidence of an association in the univariate analysis. Where appropriate, threshold levels were defined using standard norms or mean/median values where no such norms exist. Based on the findings of the multiple logistic model, stratified analyses were performed to assess the interplay of the independent predictors and to compute measures of biological interaction on an additive scale using the indexes of Hogan et al5 and Rothman.6 In the absence of any interaction, the combined effects of the factors would be purely additive, yielding a Rothman synergy index (RSI) of one, and a Hogan index (HI) of zero. For synergism, the combined effect would exceed the sum of the net independent effects of the individual factors yielding RSI >1 and HI >0. For antagonism between the factors, the combined effects of the factors would be less than the sum of their net independent effects. Thus, the RSI would be < 1 and the HI would be negative (< 0). Also, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the various parameters were computed. A true-positive test result was defined as one that predicted extubation success and the extubation was successful. A true-negative test result was defined as one that predicted extubation failure and extubation was unsuccessful. A false-positive test result was one that predicted success when the extubation was unsuccessful. A false-negative test result was one that predicted failure and the extubation was successful. A receiver operator characteristic curve was constructed for the continuous variable found to be an independent predictor of outcome. A p value < 0.05 was used to signify statistical significance.


    Results
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ninety-one patients were followed up over 100 separate extubations. The patients ranged in age from 21 to 90 years (mean ± SE, 65.2 ± 1.6 years; Table 1 ). They varied in acuity of illness, with ICU admission APACHE II scores of 3 to 35 (mean, 17.7 ± 0.7) and a median duration of intubation of 3 days (mean, 5.0 ± 0.5 days). The most common acute reasons for initial intubation and mechanical ventilation were airway protection (n = 22), including massive GI hemorrhage, drug overdose, stroke, and status epilepticus; congestive heart failure (n = 17); sepsis (n = 16); pneumonia (n = 15); COPD (n = 11); cardiac arrest (n = 6); and asthma (n = 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Demographics of 91 Patients Studied Before and After 100 Extubations*

 
Extubation Failures
Sixteen patients could not be extubated; two patients could not be extubated twice (for a total of 18 unsuccessful extubations). Eleven patients required reintubation in the first 24 h, 5 patients required reintubation between 24 h and 48 h, 1 patient died between 24 h and 48 h after refusing reintubation, and 1 patient required reintubation between 48 h and 72 h. Parameters associated with failure in these patients are listed in Table 2 . One additional patient required noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation shortly after extubation and required reintubation after 85 h. As per the a priori defined criteria for success, her extubation was classified as successful; results were not substantially different if her extubation was reclassified as unsuccessful.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Parameters Associated With Extubation Failure

 
Univariate Analyses of Extubation Predictors
Table 3 lists the unadjusted RRs for selected factors in predicting extubation failure. Patients with poor cough strength, abundant secretions, and low hemoglobin levels (<= 10 g/dL) were more likely to fail extubation after passing the SBT. Patients with weak or no cough were four times as likely to have unsuccessful extubations compared to those with clearly audible (moderate) or stronger coughs on command (RR, 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 8.9). The results of the WCT were wholly dependent on cough strength and were not influenced by the amount of endotracheal secretions. Patients with a negative WCT result were three times as likely to have unsuccessful extubations compared to those with a positive WCT result (RR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.3 to 6.7).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Unadjusted RRs for Extubation Failure

 
The frequency of endotracheal suctioning, perhaps a much more objective indicator of the amount of endotracheal secretions, was consistent with the graded magnitude of secretions in predicting extubation failure. Patients requiring suctioning every 2 h or less were 16 times as likely to have unsuccessful extubations compared to those requiring less frequent suctioning (RR, 16.0; 95% CI, 2.2 to 116). Similarly, patients with moderate or abundant secretions were almost nine times as likely to have unsuccessful extubations compared to those with scant or no secretions (RR, 8.7; 95% CI, 2.1 to 35.7). As expected, the frequency of suctioning was highly correlated with the magnitude of endotracheal secretions. All but 6 patients (of 49 patients) suctioned at or more frequently than every 2 h were also judged to have moderate-to-abundant secretions, and all but 3 patients (of 49 patients) with less frequent suctioning were judged to have no or mild secretions. There were two patients in whom the frequency of suctioning was not reported.

Patients with lower hemoglobin levels (<= 10 g/dL) were about five times as likely to have unsuccessful extubations compared to those with higher levels (RR, 5.3; 95% CI, 2.1 to 13.6). Nonetheless, 20 of 33 (61%) with such hemoglobin levels were successfully extubated.

Neither the degree of oxygenation as indicated by P:F ratio nor the RSBI was significant in predicting extubation failure in this cohort. Figure 1 shows the dispersion of the P:F ratios (receiving mechanical ventilation) for the study cohort. Seventeen of 19 patients with P:F ratios from 120 to 200 were successfully extubated. There was no significant difference in P:F ratios between successes and failures, and the risk of failure was no greater in patients with P:F ratios from 120 to 200 compared to P:F ratios > 200 (RR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.1 to 2.0).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Dispersions of P:F ratios in patients who had successful extubation vs those who had unsuccessful extubation.

 
Multivariate Analyses of Extubation Predictors
Cough strength, magnitude of secretions, and hemoglobin level emerged as independent predictors of extubation outcome in this cohort (Table 4 ). Age (>= 65 years or >= 75 years), APACHE II (>= 20), duration of intubation (> 4 days or > 7 days), and presence of congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, or COPD were not independently associated with extubation outcomes. Cough strength was weakly affected by the presence of encephalopathy. Poor cough strength and abundant secretions were synergistic in predicting extubation failure (Table 5 ). Patients with weak or no cough on command and with moderate or abundant secretions were 32 times as likely to have unsuccessful extubation compared to those with moderate or stronger cough and scant or no secretions. This was nearly four times the net additive effects of moderate or abundant secretions and poor or absent cough in predicting extubation failure (RSI, 3.7; HI, 0.57). Similar results were obtained using suctioning frequency as the measure of secretions or the WCT result as a measure of cough strength. In fact, whereas 9 of 13 patients (69%) who required endotracheal suctioning at or more frequently than every 2 h and who had a weak cough failed extubation, none of the 38 patients with less frequent suctioning and strong cough had unsuccessful extubation. There was no additional synergistic effect with low (<= 10 g/dL) hemoglobin level.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Adjusted Odds Ratios for Extubation Failure From Multiple Logistic Regression Models Containing Selected Variables for Secretions, Cough Strength, and Hemoglobin Concentration

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Adjusted RRs for Extubation Failure From Stratified Analysis of Cough Strength and Amount of Endotracheal Secretions*

 
Predictive Tests
Table 6 shows the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for extubation success using the measures of secretions, cough strength, and hemoglobin level. The sensitivities ranged from 59% for frequency of suctioning, to 83% for cough strength. The specificities ranged from 50% for the WCT to 94% for the frequency of endotracheal suctioning. All the tests had good positive predictive values, ranging from 88% for the WCT to 98% for the amount of secretions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 6. Predictive Characteristics of Variables Found to be Independently Predictive of Extubation Outcomes

 

    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study identifies factors of "airway competence," namely cough strength and quantity of endotracheal secretions, as important predictors of extubation outcome in a cohort of patients who have already successfully completed an SBT. In this group, there is synergism between poor cough strength and abundant endotracheal secretions in predicting extubation failure. In addition, significant anemia (hemoglobin level <= 10 g/dL) appears to play an independent role in predicting failure. Traditional "weaning" parameters, such as the RSBI and P:F ratio, were not good predictors of extubation outcomes in this cohort of medical patients who had successfully completed an SBT.

That factors of airway competence should play such a decisive role in predicting extubation outcome is not surprising. Sustenance of good gas exchange following endotracheal extubation demands that patients maintain a patent native airway and continue to breathe without the aid of the ventilator. Excessive endotracheal secretions, especially in the absence of a good cough, could lead to bronchial plugging, atelectasis, and/or aspiration pneumonitis, all of which can cause respiratory failure. Also, given that many of these patients have marginal respiratory muscle reserve, respiratory failure unrelated to airway competence could occur as a consequence of increased work of breathing. Previous studies found one or more of these to be the reasons for reintubation in similar patients. Epstein and Ciubotaru7 reviewed the records of 74 medically ill patients who required reintubation in spite of having successfully completed SBTs prior to extubation: respiratory failure (n = 21), congestive heart failure (n = 17), excessive endotracheal secretions (n = 12), upper-airway obstruction (n = 11), and encephalopathy (n = 7) were the principal causes. In such a retrospective study, it is difficult to determine the relative contribution of airway incompetence to the pathogenesis of respiratory failure. A more recent study4 of brain-injured patients examined the effects of a number of clinical factors, including airway parameters, on extubation outcomes; although "many patients were successfully extubated despite poor markers of airway function and clearance," the presence of a spontaneous cough and a lower frequency of endotracheal suctioning on the extubation readiness day were associated with successful extubation. Our study extends the importance of "airway factors" on extubation outcomes to critically ill patients with a variety of medical illnesses. However, our study did not finely grade the degree of encephalopathy, another potential cofactor that could affect readiness for extubation, and the ability to cough on command.

The mechanism by which a low concentration of hemoglobin increased the risk of extubation failure is not clear. In previous studies, some patients with weaning failure experienced insufficient global oxygen delivery8 or myocardial ischemia,9 which anemia may exacerbate. However, we did not collect hemodynamic, oxygen metabolism, or ECG data that would be useful in examining potential mechanisms to explain this observation. Moreover, the pathogenesis of weaning failure may differ significantly from that of extubation failure. Nonetheless, it is noteworthy that 20 of 33 patients (61%) with hemoglobin levels <= 10 g/dL were successfully extubated, and would not have been considered for SBTs or extubation in some major clinical trials.10 11 12 Accordingly, anemia by itself should not be used to preclude patients from consideration for SBTs or endotracheal extubation. Data from a previous, large prospective study13 demonstrated no benefit in arbitrary transfusions to hemoglobin levels > 10 g/dL. Our data do not justify systematic transfusion of patients receiving mechanical ventilation to this level, but a future study should be performed to determine whether patients who initially do not successfully complete SBTs or extubation benefit from a higher concentration of circulating hemoglobin.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effects of oxygenation on extubation outcomes. Although some clinicians and investigators use a P:F ratio of > 150 to commence weaning, many still use a threshold of P:F ratio of > 200. Since our ICU uses a P:F ratio of > 120 as one criteria to begin SBTs, we had the opportunity to scrutinize the effects of oxygenation on extubation outcomes. Note that in our study all patients (19 of whom who had P:F ratios from 120 to 200) had successfully completed the SBT as a requirement for enrollment. Since we did not follow up patients who did not successfully complete their SBTs, our results do not address the effect of the P:F ratio on weaning outcomes. Nonetheless, the successful extubation of 17 of 19 patients with P:F ratios from 120 to 200 suggests that the oxygenation threshold (P:F ratio > 200) used to commence SBTs in some major studies10 14 15 may be unnecessarily stringent. The small sample (n = 5) with a P:F ratio from 120 to 150 precludes drawing definitive conclusions in this particularly hypoxemic subset, although four of five patients were successfully extubated.

Numerous studies1 2 3 have suggested that the RSBI is among the best available predictors of combined liberation/extubation outcomes in patients who have not yet successfully completed an SBT. The fact that the RSBI does not help distinguish extubation outcomes suggests, as one would expect, that it gauges the ability to breathe without the ventilator. In other words, the RSBI primarily predicts SBT outcome, which may have greater weight in determining combined outcomes than whether the artificial airway is still required.

The measures of secretions and cough on command used in this study were somewhat subjective. To the best of our knowledge, there is no validated measure of cough strength or endotracheal secretions in critically ill patients. The use of a single observer was likely to ensure relative consistency in the application of the classification system. Nonetheless, some misclassifications could have occurred. Such misclassification is likely to be random (nondifferential), since patients were classified before extubation and the classification status had no bearing on decisions of extubation or reintubation. Moreover, the use of only two categories in the analyses guarantees that any effect of such random misclassification would bias the results toward the null.16 17 For example, if one assumes that poor cough strength is truly associated with extubation failure, then patients with weak cough wrongly misclassified in the moderate-to-strong cough category would lead to overestimation of extubation failure in that group. Similarly, patients with strong cough wrongly misclassified in the weak cough group would lead to underestimation of extubation failure in that group. The true RR of extubation failure for patients with weak cough compared to those with strong cough would be higher than that reported in the presence of misclassifications. Hence, it is unlikely that the impressive findings of the study can be explained by such misclassifications. Replication of the study findings using the frequency of suctioning and the WCT as second, arguably more objective, measures of the amount of secretions and cough strength supports the important roles of these variables in predicting extubation outcomes. We suspect that many clinicians already integrate these (or similar) airway "parameters" into weaning and extubation decisions, but this is the first study to formally evaluate the predictive utility of these factors in this patient population. This and the study4 of brain-injured patients suggest that cough and secretions affect extubation outcomes. Further studies, preferably using more objective/validated measures and multiple observers, are required to generalize these findings. Finally, the current study is also limited by the fact that neither the decision to extubate nor the decision to reintubate was based on explicit, enforced protocols; physicians caring for the patients ultimately made the decisions. This further hinders the generalizability of this study and supports the need for future confirmatory studies.

If the importance of cough and secretions is confirmed, how could these be used to inform extubation decisions? One could argue that higher mortality associated with extubation failure18 demands that we minimize the number of unsuccessful extubations. No single measure of cough strength or secretions had sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be used, by itself, in making extubation decisions (Table 6) . However, patients with poor cough and moderate-to-abundant secretions were highly (82%) likely to have unsuccessful extubations despite successfully completing an SBT (Table 5) . Those with moderate-to-abundant secretions and good cough appear to represent a group at intermediate risk (19% had unsuccessful extubations), and clinicians should exercise caution in extubating such patients. Those with mild secretions (or who require endotracheal suctioning less frequently than every 2 h) and good cough are very unlikely to have unsuccessful extubations and can be extubated with reasonable confidence after successfully completing an SBT.

In conclusion, this study suggests that for patients who have successfully completed an SBT, the magnitude of the cough on command and the quantity of endotracheal secretions are significant predictors of extubation outcomes. Extubation failure is synergistically enhanced in the presence of abundant endotracheal secretions and absent or weak cough. These factors of airway competence, or "extubation parameters," may be more important than traditional "weaning parameters," including the RSBI and P:F ratio, in predicting extubation outcomes of patients who have successfully completed SBTs. Further studies utilizing a greater number of observers and/or more objective measures of cough and secretions are required. Finally, in such a cohort, many patients with P:F ratio of < 200 (120 to 200) or hemoglobin level of <= 10 g/dL, values traditionally used to preclude weaning, may be extubated successfully.


    Acknowledgements
 
The authors are grateful to the Daniell Family Foundation, whose contribution to our critical care research program supported this study in part. Also, we thank the nursing staff and respiratory therapists of the Bridgeport Hospital ICUs for their continued dedication and support of our research efforts.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: APACHE = acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; CI = confidence interval; CPAP = continuous positive airway pressure; HI = Hogan index; P:F = PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen; RR = risk ratio; RSBI = rapid shallow breathing index; RSI = Rothman synergy index; SBT = spontaneous breathing trial; VT = tidal volume; WCT = white card test

Supported by an unrestricted research grant from the Daniell Family Foundation.

Received for publication September 20, 2000. Accepted for publication February 23, 2001.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Yang, KL, Tobin, MJ (1991) A prospective study of indexes predicting the outcome of trials of weaning from mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 324,1445-1450[Abstract]
  2. Chatila, W, Jacob, B, Guanglione, D, et al (1996) The unassisted respiratory rate: tidal volume ratio accurately predicts weaning outcome. Am J Med 101,61-67[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Jacob, B, Chatila, W, Manthous, CA (1996) The unassisted respiratory rate: tidal volume ratio accurately predicts weaning outcome in post-operative patients. Crit Care Med 25,253-257
  4. Coplin, WM, Pierson, DJ, Cooley, KD, et al (2000) Implications of extubation delay in brain-injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161,1530-1536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hogan, MD, Kupper, LL, Most, BM, et al (1978) Alternatives to Rothman’s approach for assessing synergism (or antagonism) in cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol 108,60-67[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rothman, KJ (1976) The estimation of synergy or antagonism. Am J Epidemiol 103,506-511[Free Full Text]
  7. Epstein, SK, Ciubotaru, RL (1998) Independent effects of etiology of failure and time to reintubation on outcome for patients failing extubation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158,489-493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Jubran, A, Mathru, M, Dries, D, et al (1998) Continuous recordings of mixed venous oxygen saturation during weaning from mechanical ventilation and the ramifications thereof. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158,1763-1769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Srivastava, S, Adjepong, Y, Chatila, W, et al (1999) Myocardial ischemia during weaning in patients with coronary artery disease: an update. Crit Care Med 27,2109-2112[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Esteban, A, Frutos, F, Tobin, MJ, et al (1995) A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 332,345-350[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Esteban, A, Alia, I, Gordo, F, et al (1997) Extubation outcome after spontaneous breathing trials with T-tube or pressure support ventilation: the Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156(2 pt 1),459-465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Esteban, A, Alia, I, Tobin, MJ, et al (1999) Effect of spontaneous breathing trial duration on outcome of attempts to discontinue mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159,512-518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hebert, PC, Wells, G, Blajchman, MA, et al (1999) A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care: Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med 340,409-417[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ely, EW, Baker, AM, Dunagan, DP, et al (1996) Effect of the duration of mechanical ventilation of identifying patients capable of breathing spontaneously. N Engl J Med 335,1864-1869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kollef, MH, Shapiro, SD, Silver, P, et al (1997) A randomized, controlled trial of protocol-directed versus physician-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 25,567-574[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  16. DeKlerk, NH, English, DR, Armstrong, BK (1989) A review of the effects of random measurement error on relative risk estimates in epidemiologic studies. Int J Epidemiol 18,705-712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Copeland, KT, Checkoway, H, McMichael, AJ, et al (1977) Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. Am J Epidemiol 105,488-495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Epstein, SK, Ciubotaru, RL, Wong, JB (1997) Effect of failed extubation on the outcome of mechanical ventilation. Chest 112,186-192[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. Ferrer, M. Valencia, J. M. Nicolas, O. Bernadich, J. R. Badia, and A. Torres
Early Noninvasive Ventilation Averts Extubation Failure in Patients at Risk: A Randomized Trial
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2006; 173(2): 164 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. M. Levy
Pathophysiology of Oxygen Delivery in Respiratory Failure
Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5_suppl_2): 547S - 553S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. R. Ouellette
The Impact of Anemia in Patients With Respiratory Failure
Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5_suppl_2): 576S - 582S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. M. Levy, E. Abraham, M. Zilberberg, and N. R. MacIntyre
A Descriptive Evaluation of Transfusion Practices in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation
Chest, March 1, 2005; 127(3): 928 - 935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Frass, C. Dielacher, M. Linkesch, C. Endler, I. Muchitsch, E. Schuster, and A. Kaye
Influence of Potassium Dichromate on Tracheal Secretions in Critically Ill Patients
Chest, March 1, 2005; 127(3): 936 - 941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. Sadowski, R. E. Dechert, K. P. Bandy, J. Juno, V. Bhatt-Mehta, J. R. Custer, F. W. Moler, and S. L. Bratton
Continuous Quality Improvement: Reducing Unplanned Extubations in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
Pediatrics, September 1, 2004; 114(3): 628 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. A. Manthous, Y. Amoateng-Adjepong, H. E. Fessler, and J. A. Krishnan
Weaning by Protocol
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2004; 170(1): 98 - 100.
[Full Text]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Smina, A. Salam, M. Khamiees, P. Gada, Y. Amoateng-Adjepong, and C. A. Manthous
Cough Peak Flows and Extubation Outcomes
Chest, July 1, 2003; 124(1): 262 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. A. Manthous
The Anarchy of Weaning Techniques
Chest, June 1, 2002; 121(6): 1738 - 1740.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khamiees, M.
Right arrow Articles by Manthous, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khamiees, M.
Right arrow Articles by Manthous, C. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS