Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piana, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Goldhaber, S. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piana, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Goldhaber, S. Z.
(Chest. 2001;120:1417-1420.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Rescue Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Immediately Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting*

Robert N. Piana, MD; Mark R. Adams, MBBS, PhD; James L. Orford, MBChB; Jeffrey J. Popma, MD; David H. Adams, MD and Samuel Z. Goldhaber, MD, FCCP

* From the Cardiovascular Division (Dr. Piana), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; and the Cardiovascular and Cardiac Surgical Divisions (Drs. M. Adams, Orford, Popma, D. Adams, and Goldhaber), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Correspondence to: Robert N. Piana, MD, Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2311 Pierce Ave, Nashville, TN 37232-8802; e-mail: Robert.Piana{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 
Perioperative graft failure after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) can result in acute myocardial infarction with dire clinical consequences. We report a case of rescue percutaneous coronary intervention immediately after unsuccessful CABG. This approach salvaged the patient from cardiogenic shock and should be recognized as a viable alternative to immediate reoperation for certain patients.

Key Words: angioplasty • catheterization • coronary artery bypass graft • stent


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 
Immediate cardiac surgical "backup" for coronary angioplasty has historically been considered mandatory because procedural complications have necessitated emergency "rescue" coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in as many as 3% of cases. Here, we describe the reverse circumstance of a patient who suffered an acute anterior myocardial infarction immediately after CABG. In this case, rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was required for a complication of CABG.


    Case Report
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 
A 78-year-old woman had several episodes of chest pain at rest and after eating. Results of a modified Bruce protocol exercise treadmill test proved markedly positive, and coronary angiography demonstrated a 70% ostial left main coronary artery stenosis and three-vessel coronary artery disease. She was therefore referred for urgent CABG. Preoperative echocardiography showed normal left ventricular function. She received a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft to the left anterior descending and reverse saphenous vein grafts to the first marginal and to the posterior descending arteries. Intraoperatively, the grafts had good flow and runoff. Concomitant left carotid endarterectomy was performed because of an incidentally discovered 85% left internal carotid artery stenosis. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 54 min, and aortic cross-clamp time was 43 min. Postoperatively, 250 mg of protamine sulfate was administered and the accelerated clotting time was 121 s on arrival in the ICU.

At the time of transfer to the ICU, her systemic arterial pressure fell from 156/63 to 91/48 mm Hg. Initial ECG showed extensive ST-segment elevation consistent with acute anterior and lateral infarction. Thirty minutes later, a follow-up ECG showed loss of R waves and new Q waves in the anterior precordial leads (Fig 1 ), indicating evolution of myocardial infarction.



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1.. Top panel (on arrival in the ICU): marked ST-segment elevation, especially prominent in leads V2 through V6, consistent with an early and massive anterior myocardial infarction. Middle panel (30 min later): anterior and inferior Q waves have evolved, suggesting a completed myocardial infarction. Bottom panel (after PCI): R waves have reappeared in inferior and anterior leads, suggesting persistent viability of myocardium. POD = postoperative day; S/P = status post; POSTOP = postoperative.

 
Emergent coronary angiography showed a 70% stenosis in the LIMA graft at its anastomosis to the left anterior descending artery. Flow in the LIMA graft was delayed and pulsatile, with no effective filling of the left anterior descending artery. There was also a 90% stenosis in the native left anterior descending coronary artery directly underlying the LIMA graft anastomosis. The two vein grafts were widely patent. Heparin, 3,000 IU, was administered, and an accelerated clotting time of 292 s was documented prior to percutaneous coronary intervention. The patient also received aspirin, 325 mg, and clopidogrel, 150 mg, by nasogastric tube. Rescue balloon angioplasty of the LIMA graft lesion resulted in a 30% residual stenosis with a small linear dissection and improved antegrade flow, but without resolution of the ST-segment elevation or hypotension. The stenosis in the native left anterior descending artery was therefore dilated with a 3.0 x 18-mm Duet stent (Guidant Corporation; Temecula, CA), delivered through the left main and positioned spanning the LIMA graft anastomosis. The dissection site in the left internal mammary was then corrected with a 2.5 x 16-mm Nir stent (Boston Scientific Scimed; Maple Grove, MA). Finally, the left main coronary artery stenosis was treated with a 3.0 x 8-mm GFX stent (Medtronic AVE; Santa Rosa, CA) [Fig 2 ].



View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2.. Left: native left coronary injection. There is both "tenting" and a severe stenosis (white arrow) of the left anterior descending artery at the site of the LIMA anastomosis. There is retrograde filling of the LIMA, which also has a severe stenosis (black arrow) just proximal to its anastomosis on the left anterior descending artery. Right: native left coronary injection. After stenting both the left anterior descending artery stenosis (spanning the site of the LIMA anastomosis; white arrow) and the stenosis in the internal mammary (just proximal to its anastomosis; black arrow), there is no residual angiographic stenosis at either site. The tenting of the left anterior descending artery is also straightened.

 
After stenting, anterior ST-segment elevation resolved and R waves reappeared across the precordium (Fig 1) . Peak creatine kinase level after the procedure was 1,367 U/L (normal range, 27 to 218 U/L), with a quantitative creatine kinase-MB fraction of 189 ng/mL (normal range, 0 to 5.0 ng/mL). Follow-up echocardiography showed new akinesis of the left ventricular apex, mild left ventricular dilation, and a calculated ejection fraction of 0.55, which was a significant improvement when compared with the preoperative ejection fraction of 0.40. The patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility 9 days after CABG and PCI. Discharge medications included aspirin, 325 mg qd, and clopidogrel, 75 mg qd. No bleeding complications were encountered.

The patient’s subsequent medical history includes multiple hospital admissions with recurrent chest discomfort within the first 9 months following CABG and PCI (Table 1 ). Thereafter, she has experienced no further episodes of angina pectoris requiring hospitalization or additional cardiac testing. She is active and independent 24 months after the index hospital admission and surgical revascularization.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1.. Clinical Course*

 

    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 
Myocardial infarction may occur in 5 to 10% of patients following CABG and can account for 60 to 70% of postoperative in-hospital deaths.1 2 When perioperative myocardial infarction is manifested by acute ST-segment elevation, rather than by asymptomatic elevation of the cardiac enzymes, sudden graft occlusion is frequently responsible. Early graft failure may also be heralded by hemodynamic instability or sustained ventricular tachycardia.

LIMA grafts achieve improved long-term patency compared to saphenous vein grafts, which have a 10% incidence of closure within 60 days of CABG.3 However, LIMA graft failure can still occur due to injury during harvesting, technical problems with the anastomosis, poor distal runoff in the grafted native vessel, extreme mechanical "kinking" of the graft, or undetected subclavian artery stenosis.2 4 The relative contributions of the aforementioned clinical entities are unclear, but thrombotic stenosis or occlusion of the LIMA graft may be responsible for the acute ischemic complications of CABG in at least a third of all cases.2 The technical challenges for the surgeon may be intensified when "minimally invasive" CABG is performed on a beating heart.5 In our patient, graft failure resulted from severe perianastomotic stenoses.

Rescue PCI for acute myocardial infarction following CABG yielded a gratifying clinical and angiographic result in our patient. This approach of urgent angiography allows immediate identification of the source of ischemia and the development of an optimal treatment strategy.

Rescue PCI for "early" graft failure has generally yielded favorable results.6 7 8 9 10 11 12 In a case series6 of 45 patients, early postoperative balloon coronary angioplasty (without stenting) to relieve anginal symptoms was reported at an average of 49 days after CABG; angioplasty was successful in 95% of native artery lesions (n = 41), 89% of vein graft stenoses (n = 46), and 100% of LIMA graft lesions (n = 11). Other groups7 8 9 have routinely used PCI to manage ischemia or infarction within a month after surgery but have only reported their results in preliminary abstracts. Importantly, patent grafts were observed in 25 to 34% of patients in these three series.7 8 9 This finding suggests that angiographic confirmation should be sought whenever graft occlusion is suspected rather than performing a "blind" reoperation CABG. Our patient differs from the previously reported cases because she underwent rescue PCI within hours of completion of CABG.

Rescue PCI is only one of several possible approaches to acute ischemia following CABG. Compared to emergent reoperation, rescue PCI is less invasive and more expeditious, while still offering the potential for complete revascularization. Thrombolytic therapy risks intractable hemorrhage in the postoperative patient and would not reverse the type of mechanical anastomotic obstruction seen in our patient.13 Conservative medical management would undoubtedly fail to prevent the development of severe pump failure or progression to fatal cardiogenic shock in a patient such as ours presenting with a large territory of infarction, evolution of Q waves, and persistent hypotension. Among the available options, rescue PCI may therefore be the preferred treatment strategy in many patients with acute perioperative graft failure.10 As illustrated by this patient’s subsequent medical course, the immediate success of this life-saving therapeutic intervention does not eliminate the need for close clinical follow-up and treatment of the underlying atherosclerotic process.

Rescue PCI for ischemic complications following CABG requires an integrated approach that involves the general cardiologist, cardiac surgeon, and interventional cardiologist. Patient outcomes may be significantly improved as a result of this close collaboration and this may lead to a new paradigm in which the cardiac catheterization laboratory is routinely available to assist the surgeon when early postoperative ischemia is identified.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: CABG = coronary artery bypass graft; LIMA = left internal mammary artery; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention

Received for publication March 7, 2000. Accepted for publication March 8, 2001.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Chaitman, BR, Alderman, EL, Sheffield, LT, et al (1983) Use of survival analysis to determine the clinical significance of new Q waves after coronary bypass surgery. Circulation 67,302-309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Rasmussen, C, Thiis, JJ, Clemmensen, P, et al (1997) Significance and early management of early graft failure after coronary artery bypass grafting: feasibility and results of acute angiography and re-revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 12,847-852[Abstract]
  3. Bourassa, MG, Fisher, LD, Campeau, L, et al (1985) The long-term fate of bypass grafts: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) and Montreal Heart Institute experiences [abstract]. Circulation 72,V-71
  4. Vajtai, P, Ravichandran, PS, Fessler, CL, et al (1992) Inadequate internal mammary artery graft as a cause of postoperative ischemia: incidence, diagnosis and management. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 6,603-608[Abstract]
  5. Goldstein, JA, Safian, RD, Aliabadi, D, et al (1998) Intraoperative angiography to assess graft patency after minimally invasive coronary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 66,1978-1982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kahn, JK, Rutherford, BD, McConahay, DR, et al (1990) Early postoperative balloon coronary angioplasty for failed coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 66,943-946[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  7. Cutlip, DE, Dauerman, HL, Carrozza, JP (1996) Recurrent ischemia within thirty days of coronary artery bypass surgery: angiographic findings and outcome of percutaneous revascularization [abstract]. Circulation 94(suppl I),I-249
  8. Rasmussen, C, Thiis, JJ, Clemmensen, P, et al (1996) Management of suspected graft failure in coronary artery bypass grafting [abstract]. Circulation 94(suppl I),I-413
  9. Reifart, N, Haase, J, Störger, H, et al (1996) Interventional standby for cardiac surgery [abstract]. Circulation 94(suppl I),I-86
  10. Schieman, G, Cohen, BM, Buchbinder, M (1990) Standby percutaneous coronary angioplasty for coronary artery bypass surgery. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 21,159-161[ISI][Medline]
  11. Dorogy, ME, Highfill, WT, Davis, RC (1993) Use of angioplasty in the management of complicated perioperative infarction following bypass surgery. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 29,279-282[ISI][Medline]
  12. Khurana, S, O’Neill, WW, Sakwa, M, et al (1997) Acute occlusion of a left internal mammary artery graft immediately after redo coronary artery bypass surgery: successful rescue PTCA. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 41,166-169[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  13. Dauerman, HL, Cutlip, DE, Sellke, FW (1996) Intracoronary thrombolysis in the treatment of graft closure immediately after CABG. Ann Thorac Surg 62,280-283[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Thielmann, P. Massoudy, B. R. Jaeger, M. Neuhauser, G. Marggraf, S. Sack, R. Erbel, and H. Jakob
Emergency re-revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention, reoperation, or conservative treatment in patients with acute perioperative graft failure following coronary artery bypass surgery.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 30(1): 117 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piana, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Goldhaber, S. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piana, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Goldhaber, S. Z.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS