|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From Bellevue Chest Service (Drs. Bashar, Rom, and Condos), Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine and Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York; and Program in Urban Public Health (Dr. Alcabes), Hunter College School of Health Sciences, City University of New York, New York, NY.
Correspondence to: Rany Condos, MD, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Ave, NB 7N24, New York, NY 10016; e-mail: condor01{at}gcrc.med.nyu.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: We conducted a case-control study retrospectively reviewing the records of patients at Bellevue Hospital Center from 1987 to 1997 with a discharge diagnosis of tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus.
Setting: Bellevue Hospital Center is a 1,200-bed, inner-city municipal hospital located in the Lower East Side of New York City.
Patients: Fifty-three identified patients had verified tuberculosis infection and diabetes; of these, 50 charts were available for review. One hundred five control cases were selected from nondiabetic patients with a discharge diagnosis of tuberculosis during the same time period.
Measurements and results: Thirty-six percent (18 cases) of the patients with diabetes and tuberculosis had multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) compared to only 10% (10 cases) in the control group (p < 0.01) Controlling for homelessness, HIV status, and directly observed therapy, the relative risk of MDR-TB was calculated to be 8.6 (confidence interval, 3.1 to 23.6) in the diabetic group compared to the control group.
Conclusions: There was a significant association between diabetes and MDR-TB. Diabetes continues to be a risk factor for tuberculosis and was associated with MDR-TB in our patients.
Key Words: diabetes mellitus multidrug-resistant tuberculosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mortality associated with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is extremely high and in many cases is worse than the mortality from tuberculosis in the prechemotherapy era; this is more true in patients with HIV.3 Though infection-control measures have effectively limited the spread of MDR-TB in New York City, a large reservoir of infection has been created as a result of the many well-documented outbreaks.4
Patients with tuberculosis infection are prone to reactivation; one of the conditions that may predispose to reactivation is diabetes mellitus.5 The relative risk of developing bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis is up to five times higher in diabetics. Convincing data regarding tuberculosis in diabetics are lacking, and information on diabetic status is not routinely obtained on reported cases in New York City. In order to better understand the association of tuberculosis and diabetes in our patients, we conducted a retrospective review of patients with diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis from 1987 to 1997 and compared their clinical features with those of nondiabetic tuberculosis patients. We were particularly interested in the cases of MDR-TB and HIV status in both groups.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Control cases were randomly selected from nondiabetic patients discharged from Bellevue Hospital between from 1987 to 1997 with a discharge diagnosis of tuberculosis. All cases had bacteriologically proven evidence of tuberculosis.
Statistical analysis was done by calculating the relative risk within 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Mantel-Haenszel estimate. Logistic regression analysis was done using statistical software (SAS version 6.12; SAS Institute; Cary, NC). As homelessness and HIV status were believed to be risk factors for acquiring tuberculosis, adjusted relative risks were calculated controlling for these two variables. The data were further adjusted to account for the possible effects of directly observed therapy (DOT).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
There was a significantly greater number of MDR-TB cases in the diabetic group (18 cases, 36%) as compared to the control group (10 cases, 10%). Table 2 gives the odds ratio for having MDR-TB in diabetic patients as compared to nondiabetic control subjects. The crude odds ratio was calculated to be 5.1 (CI, 2.1 to 12.5). As the prevalence of MDR-TB is known to be increased among homeless and HIV-positive individuals, the data were analyzed to control for these two possible confounding factors. Within the subgroup of homeless individuals, the odds of having MDR-TB was 2.7 (CI, 0.8 to 47.1) times greater in the diabetic patients. In domiciled individuals, the odds of having MDR-TB was 14.2 (CI, 2.7 to 73.8) times greater in the diabetic patients. The adjusted odds ratio controlling for homelessness was 5.1 (CI, 2.0 to 13.4). The adjusted relative risk controlling for HIV status was 5.5 (CI, 1.6 to 19.5). The overall adjusted odds ratio controlling for both homelessness and HIV status was 5.3 (CI, 1.9 to 14.7).
|
|
Five-year follow-up data were available for most patients (Table 4 ). There was a greater number of patients in the diabetic group who died with active tuberculosis (7 patients, 14%) as compared to the control group (1 patient, 1%). Other causes of death in both groups were complications related to AIDS noted in two patients from the diabetic group and one patient from the control group. The diabetic group also had three deaths from renal failure, one death from mucormycosis infection, and one death from cardiac arrest.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Homelessness has been associated with the emergence of MDR-TB. Homeless populations are less likely to have access to medical care, and the close contact, overcrowding, and lack of sufficient ventilation that may exist in homeless shelters would foster the spread of tuberculosis infection and the emergence of drug-resistant strains.2 Fifty-four percent of our diabetic patients reported being homeless. However, in our controlled analysis, homelessness was not found to be a confounding variable. Infection with the HIV virus has also been linked with the incidence of MDR-TB.7 In our study, the HIV status for a large percentage of the cases and controls was not available. With the available data, HIV status was also found not to be a confounding variable.
The availability of DOT impacts on the rates of MDR-TB. The lack of DOT can lead to poor compliance and the emergence of resistant organisms. However, patients with an established diagnosis of resistant tuberculosis are more likely to be enrolled in DOT to better supervise their therapy. In New York City, DOT became standard therapy starting in 1992.8 Our study included some patients who received a diagnosis prior to the time DOT became the standard of care at Bellevue Hospital. We tried to account for these possible interactions and adjusted our data, finding no effect. There were 18 cases of MDR-TB in the diabetic patients, and 13 patients were enrolled in DOT and successfully treated. Four patients received a diagnosis prior to DOT and had previous treatment failures. Only 4 of 10 of the MDR-TB patients in the control group were receiving DOT, resulting in the greater odds ratio for MDR-TB in diabetics and DOT. Since diabetes is a risk factor for increased mortality with tuberculosis as well as MDR-TB, DOT should be the required standard of care for these patients.
We evaluated the radiographic presentation of tuberculosis in diabetic patients and found no significant difference from control cases. Both groups had predominantly upper-lobe cystic or cavitary disease. This is in contrast to older studies by Sosman and Steidel,9 who reported that diabetic patients presented more often with lower lobe disease. A more recent study by Perez-Guzman et al,10 who reviewed the radiographs of 192 diabetic patients with tuberculosis, also reported this finding. However, other studies11 suggest that multilobe involvement is the predominant radiographic finding in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Upper-lobe disease predominated, and lower-lobe involvement was infrequent, occurring in < 7% of patients.11
It appears that diabetic patients as a group are more susceptible to having a more aggressive course of tuberculosis disease.12 Despite this observation having been made in the past, there has been no clear explanation as to why they are more susceptible. It is possible that diabetic patients have some degree of impaired GI drug absorption even in the absence of clinical gastroparesis. The hyperglycemic state may additionally interfere with achieving adequate tissue levels of the medications, or interfere with alveolar macrophage or CD4+ cell function. This could be further evaluated by measuring serum levels of antituberculosis medications in diabetic patients as compared to nondiabetic patients.
This study was limited by its small number of subjects and by retrospective data collection. However, it is evident that the pattern of tuberculosis in diabetic patients in our population differed significantly from nondiabetic patients. The diabetic patients were more than five times as likely to have infection with a multidrug resistant strain of tuberculosis. This has important clinical and treatment implications. A greater suspicion for MDR-TB should be entertained in diabetic patients, with treatment consisting of at least four antituberculosis medications until sensitivity patterns are available. If resistance to isoniazid and rifampin is detected, an antituberculosis regimen with at least two new drugs including an injectable drug tailored to the resistance pattern is recommended.13
| Footnotes |
|---|
This research was supported in part by a General Clinical Research Center grant from the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources (M01RR00096) awarded to the New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Received for publication August 21, 2000. Accepted for publication May 18, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Singla, N. Khan, R. Condos, and P. Alcabes Does Diabetes Predispose to the Development of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis? Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1): 308 - 309. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Loddenkemper, D. Sagebiel, and A. Brendel Strategies against multidrug-resistant tuberculosis Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2002; 20(36_suppl): 66S - 77s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |