|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Pulmonary and Critical Care Unit (Drs. Roberts and Ginns), Cardiology Division (Drs. Lepore and Semigran), and General Medical Service (Dr. Maroo), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Correspondence to: Leo C. Ginns, MD, FCCP, Pulmonary and Critical Care Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Bigelow 806, Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114; e-mail: lginns{at}partners.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design, setting, and patients: From 1996 to 1999, 23 adult patients (mean ± SEM age, 51 ± 4 years) with pulmonary arterial hypertension without left-heart failure underwent cardiac catheterization in a university teaching hospital while breathing air and then 100% oxygen.
Measurements and results: Treatment with 100% oxygen increased arterial oxygen saturation (91 ± 1% to 99 ± 0.1%, p < 0.05) and PaO2 (64 ± 3 to 309 ± 28 mm Hg, p < 0.05). Treatment with 100% oxygen also decreased mean pulmonary artery pressure (56 ± 3 to 53 ± 2 mm Hg, p < 0.05) and increased cardiac index (2.1 ± 0.1 to 2.5 ± 0.2 L/min/m2, p < 0.05). Calculated mean pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) decreased from 14.1 ± 1.4 to 10.6 ± 1.0 Wood units (p < 0.05). Vasodilatation with 100% oxygen occurred preferentially in the pulmonary circulation (PVR/systemic vascular resistance, 0.53 ± 0.04 to 0.48 ± 0.03; p < 0.05). The magnitude of the PVR response to oxygen therapy was correlated only with decreasing patient age (r = 0.45, p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Treatment with 100% oxygen is a selective pulmonary vasodilator in patients with pulmonary hypertension, regardless of primary diagnosis, baseline oxygenation, or right ventricular function. Development of disease-specific oxygen prescription guidelines warrants consideration.
Key Words: oxygen therapy pulmonary hypertension pulmonary vasodilatation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
25 mm Hg) may
result from either primary disorders of the pulmonary vasculature or
secondary complications of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, valvular
heart disease, hypoxic lung disease, pulmonary thromboemboli,
connective tissue diseases, HIV infection, or drugs such as cocaine and
anorectic agents. Current therapeutic options for pulmonary hypertension are few and include treatment of any underlying systemic disorder, oral and IV vasodilators, and anticoagulation.1 These therapies are limited by medication-induced systemic vasodilatation and by the need for long-term indwelling IV catheters with their associated complications. Despite recent advances in the understanding of both the genetic2 and pathophysiologic3 basis of familial and primary forms of pulmonary hypertension, therapeutic options remain limited and many patients are eventually considered for lung transplantation.
Supplemental oxygen therapy may improve pulmonary hypertension as a pulmonary vasodilator, but as yet it has not been fully evaluated in patients with pulmonary hypertension without hypoxemia. In hypoxemic patients with smoking-related lung disease, long-term oxygen therapy has been shown to improve pulmonary hypertension and increase survival, as well as decrease exertional dyspnea and improve sleep.4 5 6 7 8
The data and the inclusion criteria from the Nocturnal Oxygen Treatment Trial and Medical Research Council trials are applied without change to patients with other pulmonary diseases, such as cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and pulmonary hypertension.9 10 The applicability of these narrow criteria, particularly the minimum oxygen saturation or arterial oxygen tension restrictions, to pulmonary disorders other than smoking-related obstructive lung disease is unknown.
The hemodynamic results of short-term oxygen administration to patients with pulmonary hypertension without smoking-related lung disease have been variable. In a patient with primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) treated with 2 L of supplemental oxygen, the PAP and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) decreased by 50%.11 In a small study of hypoxemic patients with either PPH or systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary hypertension, treatment with 60% oxygen decreased PVR and increased cardiac output only in the patients with systemic sclerosis. Similar nonsignificant trends in PVR and cardiac output were noted in the patients with PPH.12
In contrast, in a series of 14 normoxic patients with PPH and pulmonary hypertension due to connective tissue diseases, treatment with 50% oxygen did not change PVR, increased systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and decreased the thermodilution cardiac output.13 However, changes in the degree of tricuspid regurgitation were not accounted for during thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Most recently, 100% oxygen therapy resulted in marked selective pulmonary vasodilatation in a series of normoxic pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension and various congenital cardiac diseases.14
We hypothesized that maximum supplemental oxygen therapy could have beneficial effects as a preferential pulmonary vasodilator in patients with pulmonary hypertension, including patients who would not meet the current Health Care Finance Administration guidelines for the prescription of long-term oxygen therapy. To assess for a beneficial effect of maximum supplemental oxygen therapy in adult patients with pulmonary hypertension and a range of resting arterial oxygen tensions, right-heart catheterizations were performed and oximetry and hemodynamics were measured with patients breathing air and 100% oxygen.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
25 mm Hg without left-heart failure (pulmonary artery
occlusion pressure [PAOP]
15 mm Hg) were recruited from
primary-care physicians and from referrals for lung transplant
evaluation. Patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease,
mitral or aortic valvular disease, bleeding diathesis, or recent
clinical bleeding, pregnancy, or hemodynamic instability (systolic
arterial pressure of < 85 mm Hg), were excluded. The Massachusetts
General Hospital Subcommittee on Human Studies approved this study, and
written informed consent was obtained prior to beginning the study.
Study Population Characteristics
In the 23 patients comprising the study group, the etiology of
the pulmonary hypertension was PPH (n = 13), portopulmonary
hypertension associated with cirrhosis (n = 4), and other varied
conditions [COPD (n = 2), congenital heart disease (n = 2), CREST
variant of systemic sclerosis (n = 1), and HIV (n = 1)].
Mean ± SEM age of the study patients was 51 ± 4 years, and there
were 15 female and 8 male patients.
All patients underwent spirometry as part of their evaluation, except for three patients presumed by their referring physicians not to have pulmonary disease. Spirometry (n = 20) showed a FEV1 of 2.1 ± 0.2 L (76 ± 4% predicted). The carbon monoxide diffusing capacity was low at 12 ± 2 mL/min/mm Hg (50 ± 6% predicted; n = 16). Twelve of the 23 patients were documented former cigarette smokers with an average of 28 ± 5 pack-years (1 pack-year = one pack of cigarettes daily for 1 year) of smoking.
Echocardiographic LV systolic function (n = 20) was normal (LV ejection fraction, 65 ± 3%). Right ventricular (RV) dilatation (RV dimensions greater than normal range15 ) was noted in all 20 patients, RV hypertrophy (RV free wall > 2 SD above the normal range15 ) was noted in 7 of 20 patients (35%), and diffuse RV hypokinesis was seen in 11 of 20 patients (55%).
Study Protocol
All vasoactive drugs and caffeine were held for 24 h
prior to right-heart catheterization. Resting oxygen consumption
(
O2) was measured with a
metabolic monitor (Deltatrac Metabolic Monitor; SensorMedics; Yorba
Linda, CA). After local anesthesia, all patients underwent
radial and pulmonary arterial catheterization. After a stabilization
period of 10 min, baseline pulmonary and systemic hemodynamic
evaluations were completed with the patient breathing air. Measurements
included heart rate (HR), arterial BP (mean arterial pressure [MAP]
and phasic), right atrial pressure (RAP), RV pressures, PAPs (mean PAP
and phasic), PAOP, radial PaO2, and
simultaneous arterial oxygen saturation
(SaO2) and mixed venous oxygen
saturation (MvO2). One hundred
percent oxygen was administered by tight facemask for at least 5 min,
and hemodynamics and oximetry measurements were repeated.
Data Analysis and Calculations
In order to compensate for variability in PAPs in patients with
pulmonary hypertension,16
values from hemodynamic and
oximetry monitoring are the average of triplicate measurements made 1
min apart. Results are presented as mean ± SEM.
Data were analyzed with a personal computer and software (Statview; Abacus Concepts; Berkeley, CA). Normally distributed data were analyzed for differences in the study population at baseline and postintervention using the Students paired t test. Patients were grouped according to gender, primary diagnosis, smoking history, and echocardiographic RV function; between-group comparisons were done using the unpaired Students t test. Correlation coefficients were obtained by standard linear regression techniques; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
The alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference
[P(A-a)O2] was calculated using the following
equation:
P(A-a)O2 = PaO2-calculated - PaO2-measured,
where the calculated arterial oxygen tension
(PaO2-calculated) was
104.2 - 0.27 x age.17
For comparison, age-adjusted
normal values for P(A-a)O2 were calculated as
follows:
P(A-a)O2 = 2.5 + 0.21 x age.17
Cardiac output
(
O2/[1.36 x hemoglobin
level] x [SaO2 - MvO2])
was calculated by the Fick oxygen method using the measured resting
O2. PVRs
[(PAP - PAOP)/cardiac output] and SVRs [(MAP - RAP)/cardiac
output] were calculated using Fick cardiac outputs, and resistance
values are expressed as Wood units. Cardiac output and stroke volume
were normalized by body surface area (BSA) [weight/height squared] to
calculate cardiac index (cardiac output/BSA) and stroke volume index
(SVI) [stroke volume/BSA].
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Effects of 100% Oxygen Administration
The results of breathing 100% oxygen for all patients are shown
graphically for individual oximetry and hemodynamic measurements. The
mean values on 100% oxygen are shown in Table 2
in comparison to baseline mean values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
20% and "nonresponders"
had a fall in PVR of < 20%. Fifteen patients (68%) were responders
with a mean PVR decrement of 31 ± 1%. In contrast, seven patients
(32%) were nonresponders with a mean PVR decrement of 9 ± 3%. In
one patient, cardiac output measurements while receiving supplemental
oxygen are not available for technical reasons. No significant differences in baseline oximetry, hemodynamics, or demographics were seen, although there was a trend toward lower age in the responders (46 ± 5 years vs 60 ± 4 years, p = 0.07). The responders and nonresponders had similar percentage decrements in mean PAP with 100% oxygen therapy, but the responders had a significantly greater increase in cardiac output with oxygen therapy (30 ± 3% vs 2 ± 3%, p < 0.05). This effect was due to an increase in stroke volume (40 ± 6% vs 10 ± 4%, p < 0.05) as opposed to a decrease in HR (7 ± 2% vs 6 ± 2%, p = not significant [NS]).
Baseline Demographics
Etiology of Pulmonary Hypertension:
Patients with PPH,
portopulmonary hypertension, and all other disorders had similar
responses to breathing 100% oxygen in terms of changes in oximetry and
hemodynamics. No difference was found for the magnitude of decrease in
PVR or the increase in cardiac index and SVI. The only notable finding
was that patients with PPH had a smaller decrement in mean PAP as
compared with all other patients (5 ± 1% vs 10 ± 2%,
respectively; p < 0.05).
Smoking History:
Subgroup analysis by history of cigarette
smoking revealed only that those patients who had been smokers were
older than lifetime nonsmokers (57 ± 4 years vs 42 ± 3 years,
p < 0.05). All other demographic, hemodynamic, oximetry, and
echocardiographic parameters were not different for the former smokers,
including percentage change of cardiac index and PVR after supplemental
oxygen therapy.
Gender:
Female patients had a higher P(A-a)O2 at
rest (32 ± 3 mm Hg vs 18 ± 4 mm Hg, p < 0.05) as compared with
the male patients. No other demographic, hemodynamic, oximetry, and
echocardiographic parameters varied with gender, including percentage
change of cardiac index and PVR after supplemental oxygen therapy.
Baseline Oxygenation
Subgroup analysis by oxygenation (hypoxemic: resting
PaO2 < 60 mm Hg; normoxic: resting
PaO2
60 mm Hg) documented that
hypoxemic patients were older (64 ± 5 years vs 42 ± 4 years,
respectively; p < 0.05). Similarly, even when the
PaO2-calculated was adjusted for age,
hypoxemic patients had a wider P(A-a)O2
(37 ± 3 mm Hg vs 19 ± 3 mm Hg, p < 0.05). The magnitude of
increase in MvO2 was greater in
hypoxemic patients (27 ± 2% vs 18 ± 2%, p < 0.05), as was
the increase in the SaO2 (14 ± 3%
vs 6 ± 1%, p < 0.05). All other demographic, hemodynamic,
oximetry, and echocardiographic parameters were not different based on
oxygenation, including percentage change of cardiac index and PVR after
supplemental oxygen therapy.
Echocardiographic RV Function
RV Hypertrophy:
The subgroup of patients with
echocardiographic RV hypertrophy had a higher baseline oxygen tension
(PaO2, 77 ± 4 mm Hg vs 58 ± 4 mm Hg;
p < 0.05) and narrower P(A-a)O2 (16 ± 5 mm Hg vs
32 ± 3 mm Hg, p < 0.05). All other demographic, hemodynamic,
oximetry, and echocardiographic parameters were not different in the
presence of RV hypertrophy, including percentage change of cardiac
index and PVR after supplemental oxygen therapy.
Diffuse RV Hypokinesis:
The presence of echocardiographic RV
hypokinesis was associated with a greater response to breathing
supplemental oxygen only in terms of MvO2
(25 ± 2% vs 16 ± 2%, p < 0.05) and cardiac index
(31 ± 6% vs 14 ± 5%, p < 0.05). All other demographic,
hemodynamic, oximetry, and echocardiographic parameters were not
different in the presence of RV hypokinesis, including percentage
change of PVR after supplemental oxygen therapy.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Decreasing patient age was the only predictor of the magnitude of the pulmonary vasodilatation, particularly notable because the older patients (a greater proportion of whom had a history of smoking) had a larger P(A-a)O2. While older age may be a marker of more chronic pulmonary hypertension, we are unable to assess the effects of disease chronicity given the inability to determine the disease duration prior to clinical diagnosis. Additionally, decreased PVR and increased cardiac index were not correlated with two of the current Health Care Finance Administration criteria for the prescription of supplemental oxygen therapy (baseline oxygenation and clinically evident RV hypertrophy).
The supraphysiologic arterial oxygen tensions achieved by tight-fitting
masks with 100% supplemental oxygen resulted in a mean decrement in
PVR of 24 ± 3% and a mean increase in cardiac index of 21 ± 4%.
Prior studies11
12
13
with small numbers of patients with
pulmonary hypertension not due to smoking-related lung disease have
shown variable and somewhat contradictory effects of supplemental
oxygen therapy. While others12
14
have found similar
decrements in PVR with supplemental oxygen therapy, only Morgan et
al12
found similar, albeit more variable, increases in
cardiac output. Unlike the study of oxygen in obliterative pulmonary
vascular disease by Packer et al,13
neither this study nor
the work of Atz et al14
found increased SVR with oxygen
therapy. Prior studies using thermodilution to measure cardiac output
may have inadequately accounted for tricuspid regurgitation. Our
cardiac output measurements using the Fick method rely on the
assumption that
O2 did not
change with 100% oxygen administration. This assumption has been
validated by numerous studies that are reviewed
elsewhere.18
Mechanistically, the beneficial effects of maximum supplemental oxygen therapy on PVR seen in this study are partially explained by release of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and overcoming ventilation/perfusion imbalances. Although the oxygen content of arterial blood and oxygen delivery to tissues are generally not reduced unless the PaO2 falls to < 60 mm Hg,19 some hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction may still be occurring at higher arterial oxygen tensions.
The correlation of decreasing patient age and magnitude of pulmonary vasodilatation could be explained by the physiology of age-related differences on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Animal experimentation20 has documented that the alveolar oxygen tension threshold required for hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction varies with age. Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction can be documented in newborn lambs at an alveolar oxygen tension of 360 ± 3 mm Hg. The threshold falls with age; in adult sheep, similar hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction does not occur until the alveolar oxygen tension falls to < 100 mm Hg. While the theoretical importance of this elevated threshold in newborns is obvious (to maintain flow through the ductus arteriosus in the fetal state), the exact mechanism of the increased sensitivity or its decline over time is less well understood. The anatomic difference in the location and degree of smooth muscle associated with the pulmonary vasculature in the newborn vs adult lung has been proposed20 21 as one potential mechanism.
Although maximum supplemental oxygen therapy did significantly increase MvO2, it is unlikely that the benefits of oxygen therapy seen in this study were mediated through changes in the pulmonary arterial oxygen tension. While both the sensors and mechanisms of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction are not known, alveolar hypoxia is a significantly greater stimulus for hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction than pulmonary arterial hypoxemia.23
The increased cardiac index after supplemental oxygen therapy seen in this study can be partially explained by the patients baseline cardiac function. All patients in this study were found to have normal LV function by echocardiography. In the setting of pulmonary vasodilatation, there likely was a transient increase in the LV end-diastolic volume. Given these patients adequate preload reserve, increased delivered volume to the LV resulted in significant improvement in cardiac index. While RAP and PAOP did not change with supplemental oxygen, this likely reflects the rapid nature of the reestablishment of a steady state and, again, adequate preload reserve.
The presence or absence of echocardiographic RV hypertrophy did not correlate significantly with response to supplemental oxygen therapy. While all patients had dilated RVs by echocardiography, only 55% had RV hypokinesis. In contrast to RV hypertrophy, echocardiographic diffuse RV hypokinesis was associated with a less vigorous response to breathing 100% oxygen in terms of cardiac index and SVI. While no difference was noted in the magnitude of decrement in PVR, the varied response in terms of cardiac function may reflect less RV/LV interaction and/or septal shift. This finding has prompted further investigation into the nature of the RV response to supplemental oxygen therapy.
Limitations and Implications
This pilot study was designed to measure the acute effects of
maximal supplemental oxygen in patients with pulmonary hypertension not
solely due to chronic hypoxemia. While a control group was not studied,
the hemodynamic effects of acute hyperoxia in normal volunteers are
known. Barratt-Boyes and Wood23
found that breathing 100%
oxygen resulted in a small (6%) decrement in HR, a small increase in
SVI, and no significant alterations in mean cardiac index. The radial
artery systolic pressure increased by an average value of 6 mm Hg and
the mean PAP fell by an average of 1 mm Hg. Daly and
Bondurant24
found similar decrements in HR and elevations
in mean systemic pressures, but no significant changes in SVI. Cardiac
index decreased in proportion to the decrement in HR, and the effects
were abolished by pretreatment with atropine.
In light of these data and other data, we could not justify drawing a control population from our cardiac catheterization laboratory due to increased risk from prolonged procedures. In comparison to the limited pulmonary vasodilatation and systemic vasoconstriction seen in normal volunteers, our data suggest in patients with pulmonary hypertension with a spectrum of resting oxygen tensions that supplemental oxygen therapy may relieve hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and improve cardiac index.
Future studies will include control groups, including nonhypoxemic patients without pulmonary hypertension, as well as pulmonary hypertension patients with and without hypoxemia. Additionally, further studies with long-term ambulatory oxygen therapy could include sham oxygen delivery as a control. While patients may have interpreted an oxygen mask and supplemental oxygen as a potentially beneficial therapy, a volitional decrement in PVR seems unlikely.
In this study, a minimum equilibration time of5 min was used before measurements of the effects of 100% oxygen were obtained. It has been our clinical experience in prior catheterization trials for pulmonary hypertension that equilibration occurs shortly after the initiation of 100% oxygen therapy. Additional data must be obtained in order to determine if these short-term effects of 100% oxygen are maintained over the course of long-term therapy. Similarly, at this time we are unable to advocate for the use of 100% oxygen in this population, given that potential adverse effects of long-term administration of high levels of inhaled oxygen are not known.
While the data suggest that the hemodynamic response to maximal supplemental oxygen was independent of the etiology of pulmonary hypertension, this study relies on data from a relatively small number of patients. Future confirmatory studies will require sufficient numbers of patients with forms of secondary pulmonary hypertension, such as HIV, structural heart disease, and COPD patients without hypoxemia, to determine if an etiology-specific response to oxygen exists.
Nearly 70% of the study patients could be classified as responders in
terms of a
20% decrement in PVR. In other studies of pulmonary
vasodilators, PVR response has been associated with greater survival.
Currently, we believe that any statements regarding outcome would be
premature, but we continue to monitor these patients for an outcome
analysis in the future. In the near-term, additional studies using
supplemental oxygen in concert with and in comparison to other
pulmonary vasodilators, such as nitric oxide and prostacyclin, may
provide guidance on how to interpret the PVR response to oxygen therapy
in this population.
Given that the magnitude of pulmonary vasodilatation or improvement in cardiac index was not predicted by baseline PaO2, we speculate that oxygen therapy may exert its beneficial effects by more than just releasing hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Although less likely to occur in the short-term, oxygen therapy may improve pulmonary hypertension via mechanisms similar to other pulmonary vasodilators, such as limiting endothelial dysfunction,25 26 27 improving imbalances in the endogenous vasoconstrictor-vasodilator system,28 or overcoming dysfunctional oxygen-sensing potassium channels.29 30 Finally, oxygen therapy could theoretically upregulate expression of prostacyclin synthase, which is decreased in patients with pulmonary hypertension,31 and which in an overexpression animal model is protective of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction.32
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our data suggest that supplementing arterial oxygen tension beyond the minimum goal of 60 mm Hg may improve PVR and cardiac index. These short-term effects are likely due at least partially to releasing hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, but may also be due to additional mechanisms as yet unidentified. Further studies are indicated to document whether a dose-response relationship exists for oxygen therapy, whether the short-term beneficial effects of oxygen are maintained over the course of long-term therapy, and perhaps to help define more appropriate disease-specific guidelines for the prescription of supplemental oxygen therapy.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
O2 = oxygen consumption Presented in part at CHEST 2000 on October 25, 2000 in San Francisco, CA.
Dr. Roberts is supported by the Nirenberg Center for Advanced Lung Diseases Fellowship at Massachusetts General Hospital. Dr. Semigran is supported by National Institutes of Health grant HL-04021.
Received for publication December 11, 2000. Accepted for publication May 25, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. West, K. Fagan, W. Steudel, B. Fouty, K. Lane, J. Harral, M. Hoedt-Miller, Y. Tada, J. Ozimek, R. Tuder, et al. Pulmonary Hypertension in Transgenic Mice Expressing a Dominant-Negative BMPRII Gene in Smooth Muscle Circ. Res., April 30, 2004; 94(8): 1109 - 1114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |