Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egermayer, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Egermayer, P.
(Chest. 2001;120:1756.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Normoxemia and Pulmonary Embolism

Paul Egermayer, MBChB

Canterbury Respiratory Research Group Christchurch, New Zealand

To the Editor:

In 1971, Szucs et al1 reported a series of 50 nonconsecutive angiographically proven cases of pulmonary embolism (PE), all of which with PaO2 < 80 mm Hg, ie, "hypoxemia." They concluded that normoxemia effectively excludes the diagnosis of PE. In succeeding issues of CHEST, there quickly followed a dozen or more well-documented exceptions to this rule. This was one of the first of many such "failed tests" to exclude PE.2

In more recent years, further retrospective studies3 4 of nonconsecutive patients have been cited emphasizing the limitations of blood gas analysis in this context. One of the most commonly quoted articles5 was based on the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis Study findings. Stein et al5 concluded that blood gas levels are of insufficient discriminant value to permit the exclusion of the diagnosis of PE in about 30% of patients without prior cardiopulmonary disease. However from Paul Stein’s book,6 containing unpublished background material, we learn that only 132 of 330 patients (40%) with PE and no prior cardiopulmonary disease actually had their blood gas levels measured while breathing room air. Since this was a small series of nonconsecutive patients, the calculation of sensitivity and specificity appears inappropriate.

To date, only three studies4 7 8 have prospectively studied the incidence of normoxemia in patients with PE. Egermayer et al7 found objective evidence of PE in 5 of 39 patients (13%). Prediletto et al8 observed normoxemia in 14 of 312 consecutive patients (4%) with angiographic evidence of PE. In another recent study,4 only 5 of 49 consecutive patients (10%) with high-probability ventilation/perfusion lung scan results and an intermediate pretest probability had normoxemia.4

PE is a complex and often poorly defined disease, and it is doubtful that any one test will ever completely rule in or rule out the diagnosis. However, in my opinion, blood gas analysis is a useful part of the workup, and it is clear that normoxemia greatly diminishes the pretest probability of PE, and may exclude clinically important events.

Footnotes

Editor’s note: Dr. Egermayer died subsequent to receipt of this letter.

References

  1. Szucs, MM, Brooks, HL, Grossman, W, et al (1971) Diagnostic sensitivity of laboratory findings in acute pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 74,161-166
  2. Egermayer, P (1996) Not all pulmonary embolism tests survive utilization [letter]. Chest 109,294[Free Full Text]
  3. Jones, JS, Neff, TL, Carlson, SA (1998) Use of the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient in the assessment of acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med 16,333-337[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Rodger, MA, Arrier, M, Jones, GN, et al (2001) Diagnostic value of arterial blood gas measurements in suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162,2105-2108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Stein, PD, Goldhaber, SZ, Henry, JW, et al (1996) Arterial blood gas analysis in the assessment of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 109,78-81[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Stein, PD (1997) Pulmonary embolism. ,80 Williams & Wilkins (Baltimore, MD).
  7. Egermayer, P, Town, GI, Turner, JG, et al (1998) Usefulness of D-dimer, blood gas, and respiratory rate measurement for excluding pulmonary embolism. Thorax 53,830-834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Prediletto, R, Miniati, M, Tonelli, L, et al (1999) Diagnostic value of gas exchange tests in patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism. Crit Care 3,111-116[CrossRef][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egermayer, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Egermayer, P.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS