|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Heart Lung Transplant Unit, St. Vincents Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Correspondence to: Prashant N. Chhajed, MD, DNB, FCCP, Heart Lung Transplant Unit, St. Vincents Hospital, deLacy Building, Level 14, Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Sydney, Australia; e-mail: chhajed{at}hotmail.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Retrospective study.
Setting: Heart-lung transplant unit of a university hospital.
Patients: From November 1986 to January 2000, interventional bronchoscopy was performed in 41 of 312 lung transplant recipients (13.1%) for tracheobronchial stenosis, bronchomalacia, granuloma formation, and dehiscence.
Interventions: Dilatation, stent placement, laser or forceps excision.
Measurements and results: Mean (± SE) improvement in FEV1 in 26 patients undergoing dilatation for a stenotic or a combined lesion was 93 ± 334 mL or 8 ± 21%. In seven of these patients not proceeding to stent placement, mean improvement in FEV1 was 361 ± 179 mL or 21 ± 9%. Patients needing stent placement after dilatation had a mean change in FEV1 after dilatation of - 5 ± 325 mL or 3 ± 23%, and an improvement of 625 ± 480 mL or 52 ± 43% after stent insertion. Mean improvement in FEV1 for patients treated with stent insertion for bronchomalacia was 673 ± 30 mL or 81 ± 24%. Complications of airway stents were migration (27%), mucous plugging (27%), granuloma formation (36%), stent fracture (3%), and formation of a false passage (6%). Mortality associated with interventional bronchoscopy was 2.4% (1 of 41 patients). For patients with airway complications successfully undergoing interventional bronchoscopy, the overall 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 79%, 45%, and 32%, respectively, vs 87%, 69%, and 56% for those without airway complications (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Only a small number of patients with airway stenosis after lung transplantation will respond to bronchial dilatation alone. Patients with airway complications after lung transplantation have a higher mortality than patients without airway complications.
Key Words: airway stenosis bronchomalacia dilatation fiberoptic bronchoscopy interventional bronchoscopy lung transplantation stent
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Flexible bronchoscopy was performed immediately after surgery and subsequently on postoperative days 2 and 7. Surveillance bronchoscopy and transbronchial biopsy was performed at 3 weeks and 6 weeks, and at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after transplantation. Bronchoscopy was also performed for clinical symptoms, a fall in lung function, or development of an infiltrate on chest radiograph. The indications for dilatation in patients with a stenotic lesion were as follows: increased shortness of breath, stridor, drop in lung function, a terminal plateau of the expiratory component on the flow volume loop, significant narrowing of the airway (endoscopically > 50% of predicted airway diameter or inability to pass the bronchoscope through a stenotic lesion in the main bronchi or bronchus intermedius), and inability to clear secretions beyond the stenosis with increased frequency of lower respiratory tract infections. The indications for stent placement were stenotic or combined lesions not improving with repeated dilatation, significant bronchomalacia (subtotal occlusion of the airway visualized at bronchoscopy during expiration associated with retention of secretions), or anastomotic dehiscence (in patients not suitable for open surgery). In stenotic lesions with significant inflammation, metallic stent placement was undertaken after dilatation after the lesion had matured into a fibrous stricture. Flexible bronchoscopy was performed with a 6.2-mm diameter bronchoscope. All patients received IM atropine, 0.01 mg/kg, and morphine, 2.5 to 5 mg. Sedation was achieved with IV midazolam, 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg, and fentanyl, 1 to 2 µg/kg. Rigid bronchoscopy was performed with the Dumon-Harrell Universal Bronchoscope (Efer la Ciotat; France) under general anesthesia.4
In the earlier years, dilatation was achieved with the use of rigid bronchoscopes of increasing diameter (eight patients). Balloon dilatation (Schneider GmbH; Bulach, Switzerland) was performed under fluoroscopy guidance using a radiopaque solution (urograffin, 10 mL, plus normal saline solution, 10 mL; n = 23 patients). Inflation of the balloon (Bard; Billerica, MA) was maintained for 1 min. If necessary, the procedure was repeated either with the same balloon or a larger-diameter balloon. Various stents (Dumon, Bryan, Woburn, MA; Gianturco, Cook, Bloomington, IN; Wallstent, Schneider, Minneapolis, MN; and Ultraflex, Boston Scientific, Watertown, MA) used for stenosis and bronchomalacia were the result of stent evolution and availability. In all, 10 patients had anastomotic dehiscence postoperatively. Reoperation was performed in two patients, interventional bronchoscopy was performed in two patients, and in six patients neither procedure was undertaken. We chose covered Wallstents for the two patients with postoperative anastomotic dehiscence in an attempt to seal the defect, and in one patient with combined lesion having anastomotic bleeding. Nd-YAG laser was used in one patient for the resection of excessive granulation tissue and in another patient with web formation. Patients surviving 30 days postprocedure were considered to have a successful interventional bronchoscopic procedure.
Lung volumes (FEV1) were measured before and after interventional bronchoscopic procedures. FEV1 was measured as recommended by the American Thoracic Society guidelines at the following time points as applicable: predilatation, postdilatation, postdilatation prior to stent insertion, before stent insertion (for patients having only stent placement), and after stent insertion. The functional outcome for all patients who underwent dilatation was assessed comparing predilatation and postdilatation FEV1. For patients who underwent stent insertion following a dilatation procedure, the final outcome of both these procedures were measured using FEV1 predilatation and after stent insertion. The functional outcome of dilatation only, in patients who underwent stent placement following a dilatation procedure, was also assessed using the predilatation FEV1 and comparing it with the FEV1 measured prior to stent insertion. The functional outcome of only stent insertion was assessed using FEV1 before stent insertion and after stent insertion. The Cox-Mantel log-rank statistic was used to compare the survival in recipients with airway complications treated with successful interventional bronchoscopy and those without airway complications.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2, 9.23; p < 0.05). There was no
association of the complications with the age of the patient or
the experience of the surgeon. The frequency of the complications did
not change over time. The mean duration from transplantation to
the diagnosis and treatment of airway complications was 97 ± 68.3
days (range, 17 to 291 days). Twenty-eight patients had pure stenotic
lesions in 31 anastomosed airways (3 patients with BL transplantation
had bilateral bronchial stenosis). Five patients had bronchomalacia,
seven patients had combined lesions, and two patients had anastomotic
dehiscence. Of these, one patient with BL transplantation had a
combined lesion in the left main bronchus and bronchomalacia in
the right main bronchus. All 24 lesions of the left side were located
in the main bronchus, whereas 10 of 20 lesions on the right side were
located beyond the main bronchus. Thirty-one patients underwent dilatation for stenotic or combined lesions; of these, 23 patients (74%) underwent stent placement following dilatation (including 3 patients with BL transplantation having bilateral bronchial stenosis). The mean time interval between dilatation and stent insertion was 34.9 ± 30.1 days (range, 3 to 111 days). Three patients underwent dilatation and stent placement in the same sitting. Eight patients (26%) underwent only dilatation for stenotic or combined lesions. Stent placement without dilatation was performed in 10 patients: bronchomalacia (n = 4), stenosis (n = 3), combined lesion (n = 1), dehiscence (n = 2). One patient with bilateral dehiscence underwent placement of two overlapping covered Wallstents in each main bronchus. The functional outcome of dilatation and/or stent placement measured as a change in FEV1 is presented in Table 2 . Patients who underwent dilatation alone were followed up for a mean of 207 ± 211 days (range, 33 to 625 days). In five patients, the FEV1 at follow-up was greater than the postdilatation FEV1. One patient had a fall in FEV1 of 160 mL, and another patient had a fall in FEV1 of 580 mL. The fall in lung function in these patients was not attributed to restenosis as evidenced by bronchoscopy.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A mean gain in FEV1 of 24% after balloon dilatation and an increase in FEV1 ranging from 56 to 117% (maximum, 900 mL) have been reported in the interval before stent insertion and after stent insertion.9 10 11 In our study, the mean improvement in FEV1 was 21% in patients who did not need stent placement postdilatation. The other patients who did not show this improvement in FEV1 benefited by stent placement, with a mean improvement in FEV1 of 52%. Patients with bronchomalacia had a mean improvement in FEV1 of 81% after stent placement. All of these patients have done well, and we believe that stent placement offers a satisfactory outcome for patients with bronchomalacia. Placement of covered Wallstents did not help control the air leak in two patients with anastomotic dehiscence due to ischemia. In four patients with a stenotic lesion, stent placement was attempted without a prior dilatation procedure; of these, one patient (25%) succumbed due to the formation of a false passage and rupture of the left pulmonary artery. Dilatation of airway stenosis before stent placement allows the assessment of the extent of the lesion, the degree of inflammation, and the status of the bronchial tree beyond the lesion. Furthermore, 20% of patients may not need subsequent stent placement. Following the single negative experience with the Gianturco stent, we believe that dilatation may contribute to the safety of subsequent stent placement. Exuberant granulation tissue from an inflammatory stricture may occlude the lumen of a metallic stent. Consequently, as a further advantage, balloon dilatation in this situation allows time for the inflammatory lesion to mature into a fibrous stricture, which is more suitable for metallic stent placement.9 For stenotic lesions, we would recommend the use of balloon dilatation on two occasions prior to stent insertion or more than two occasions if required in presence of significant inflammation.
Bolot et al12 opine that predilatation of a stenosis may not be necessary with the Gianturco stent, as it is a self-expanding device. We had a procedure-related death in one of our patients in whom the insertion of the stent was undertaken without prior dilatation. We had three patients who underwent dilatation and stent placement in the same sitting. All these patients had severe near-total stenosis involving the left main bronchus. We have not used this approach for > 4 years now, during which time balloon dilatation has been employed in all patients with a stenotic lesion prior to stent placement. The other advantages of balloon dilatation are that it may be performed via flexible bronchoscopy, it can be closely monitored under fluoroscopy guidance, it may be repeated, and it is a safe procedure. Formation of granulation tissue is a common complication following Wallstent insertion in lung transplant recipients13 14 ; in our series, it was noted in 27% patients with uncovered Wallstents. The Ultraflex stent, consisting of nitinol,15 has smooth proximal and distal ends and potentially invokes less granulation response. So far, we have not noted complications with our single use of the Ultraflex stent. Mucous plugging following insertion of Wallstents for lung transplant recipients was not a feature in some studies,13 14 and has been reported with the use of covered Wallstents in malignant lesions.16 17 The mucous plugging noted in our group of patients with uncovered Wallstents could be explained by the partial neoepithelialization that may occur with this stent, as opposed to the complete neoepithelialization that occurs with the Gianturco stent, which is designed as a broad metal lattice.
Excessive granulation tissue is removed either with forceps or laser, and often the associated stenosis needs to be treated with stent placement. Mucous plugging is treated using normal saline solution and/or n-acetylcysteine nebulization and physiotherapy. Patients who have difficulty in clearing secretions may need to receive these treatments on a long-term basis. Stents that migrate should be removed and replaced. Stents with minimal migration may be left in situ if they are not occluding any part of the airway and if they are functioning properly. A potential surgical problem could arise with the use of metallic stents if a patient needed retransplantation, as these stents become either partially or completely embedded in the airway wall. Tracheobronchial prostheses are clearly useful for short-term to medium-term gains. Complications associated with the Gianturco stent have led to caution in its use. Our experience enumerates the various problems associated with stent placement and highlights the fact that stent technology is still evolving. In our series, the survival of patients with airway complications needing intervention was lower than survival in patients who did not need intervention. Those who survived 30 days from intervention had a survival rate that was comparable to recent survival rates from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry.18
In conclusion, only a small number of patients with airway stenosis after lung transplantation will respond to bronchial dilatation alone. Patients with airway complications after lung transplantation have a higher mortality than patients without airway complications.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication June 28, 2000. Accepted for publication June 4, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. N. Chhajed, R. Eberhardt, H. Dienemann, A. Azzola, M. H. Brutsche, M. Tamm, and F. J.F. Herth Therapeutic bronchoscopy interventions before surgical resection of lung cancer. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1839 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Mughal, T. R. Gildea, S. Murthy, G. Pettersson, M. DeCamp, and A. C. Mehta Short-Term Deployment of Self-Expanding Metallic Stents Facilitates Healing of Bronchial Dehiscence Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2005; 172(6): 768 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Kotloff, V. N. Ahya, and S. W. Crawford Pulmonary Complications of Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2004; 170(1): 22 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. N. Chhajed, M. Brutsche, and M. Tamm Balloon Dilatation Using Flexible Bronchoscopy for the Management of Benign and Malignant Airway Stenoses Chest, January 1, 2004; 125(1): 354 - 355. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Saad, S. Murthy, G. Krizmanich, and A. C. Mehta Self-Expandable Metallic Airway Stents and Flexible Bronchoscopy: Long-term Outcomes Analysis Chest, November 1, 2003; 124(5): 1993 - 1999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Halkos, K. D. Godette, E. C. Lawrence, and J. I. Miller Jr High dose rate brachytherapy in the management of lung transplant airway stenosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2003; 76(2): 381 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |