|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Montreal Childrens Hospital-McGill University Health Centre (Drs. Haccoun and Lands, and Mr. Smountas), and Montreal Chest Institute-McGill University Health Centre (Drs. Gibbons and Bourbeau), Montreal, PQ, Canada.
Correspondence to: Larry C. Lands, MD, PhD, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Montreal Childrens Hospital, Room D-380, 2300 Tupper St, Montreal, PQ, H3H 1P3 Canada; e-mail: larry.lands{at}muhc.mcgill.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Twenty-seven patients with COPD and 29 control subjects underwent anthropometric measures, spirometry, progressive cycle ergometry, and 30-s isokinetic cycling.
Results: There was no significant difference for weight, height, or body mass index between the groups. The COPD group was slightly older and had a significantly lower FEV1 than control subjects. They also had a lower Wmax (56 ± 28.3 W vs 141.9 ± 46.7 W) and isokinetic work accomplished over 10 s (W10), over 15 s (W15), over 20 s (W20), over 25 s (W25), and over 30 s (W30). Wmax correlated in both patients with COPD and in control subjects with W10, W15, W20, W25, W30, and FEV1. Combining FEV1 and isokinetic work (W10, W15, W20, W25, or W30) in a two-factor model to predict Wmax, the coefficients of determination (r2) for patients with COPD were 0.57, 0.57, 0.58, 0.59, and 0.58, and for control subjects were 0.69, 0.69, 0.71, 0.71, and 0.73, respectively. Wmax correlated with weight only in control subjects.
Conclusions: Both ventilatory function and leg muscle function contribute to exercise limitation, and a 20-s isokinetic test can be utilized to assess leg function in patients with COPD.
Key Words: COPD exercise testing skeletal muscle
Exercise limitation in patients with COPD results from multiple factors. It has been recognized that ventilatory limitation, particularly expiratory flow limitation, may be present in some patients. Expiratory flow limitation can lead to dynamic hyperinflation and contribute to increased work of breathing and dyspnea.1 2 While ventilatory limitation plays a significant role in the exercise limitation seen in patients with COPD, other factors such as abnormal skeletal muscle function are also involved.
The importance of peripheral muscle impairment in exercise limitation has been noted.3 4 5 Leg fatigue is often a major reason cited by these patients for stopping during maximum exercise testing.6 As this muscular impairment has the potential to improve with rehabilitation,7 8 it is useful to characterize peripheral skeletal muscle function and its relationship to exercise ability in this population. This information could then be used to guide rehabilitation strategies.
We have previously performed such an analysis on adolescents and young adults with cystic fibrosis and healthy subjects of similar age. We found that maximal exercise ability, as measured during progressive exercise testing on a cycle ergometer, could be predicted using a combination of lung function as characterized by FEV1 and leg muscle function as measured during a 30-s isokinetic cycle sprint.9 Furthermore, the decrease in isokinetic leg muscle power and leg work capacity in patients with cystic fibrosis could be attributed to their reduced muscle mass.9 In the present study, we performed a similar investigation of the relationship between exercise capacity and leg muscle function in older patients with COPD entering a pulmonary rehabilitation program and healthy adults in order to determine if such a method of characterizing exercise ability could be used. We also assessed whether a shorter measurement of isokinetic work ability, which may be more readily tolerated, could be used to characterize exercise tolerance in patients with COPD. Lastly, we examined if a two-variable model combining isokinetic work and FEV1 could be used in healthy older subjects and in patients with COPD, as in patients with cystic fibrosis to predict maximal exercise capacity (Wmax).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Procedures
As part of the initial assessment for rehabilitation, patients had their height measured without shoes on a portable stadiometer (Harpendem model; Holtain, LTD; Crymych, UK) and were weighed on an electronic scale (model UMC600; Lancaster Scales; Brantford, ON, Canada). They underwent expiratory spirometry (model 2130; SensorMedics; Yorba Linda, CA), and values were expressed in both absolute terms and as percentage of predicted.10
They then underwent a symptom-limited progressive exercise test on an electronically braked cycle ergometer (Ergometrics 800s; SensorMedics) with 1-min increments of 10 W. During the test, the patients were monitored with pulse oximetry, three-lead ECG, and BP measurements every minute. Patients normally receiving oxygen received a fraction of inspired oxygen of 28% during exercise testing. Tests were halted when the patient could no longer maintain a pedaling speed of 60 revolutions per minute, or had exercise-induced hypotension or arrhythmias. Patients breathed through a mouthpiece, and gas exchange was measured using 30-s averages of minute ventilation, tidal volume, breathing frequency, and mixed expiratory gas concentrations. From this test, the maximal workload achieved (in watts) was recorded and compared to predicted values.11
Within 2 weeks of this testing, all patients underwent isokinetic cycle testing for a clinical assessment of leg function. For this test, our previously described isokinetic cycle was used.12 Isokinetic cycling fixes the speed of pedaling, and the force on the flywheel axle strut is measured. From this torque, power and work for each revolution are calculated. If patients received ambulatory oxygen, this was used during the test at the flow prescribed by their treating physician for exertion. Patients made a 10-s all-out effort at 60 revolutions per minute to measure peak power (in watts). After a rest period of at least 2 min, patients then made a 30-s effort at 100 revolutions per minute to record 30-s work output (in kilojoules [kJ]). From the 30-s data, work for shorter time intervals was derived. Peak power and 30-s work capacity were compared to predicted values.12 Three of the 27 patients with COPD were unable to complete the 30-s sprints, but their values were recorded as the total work completed during the 30-s period.
The healthy subjects underwent the same anthropometric measures as the patients with COPD. Spirometry was performed (model 42; Vitalograph; Buckingham, UK) and expressed as both absolute values and as percentage of predicted. Symptom-limited maximal exercise was performed on an electronically braked cycle ergometer (Corival 300; Lode; Groningen, Netherlands) with 1-min increments of 16.35 W. Subjects were monitored using three-lead ECG and pulse oximetry. Subjects breathed through a mouthpiece using a one-way valve as previously described.13 Using a dry gas meter on the inspiratory line, and a mixing chamber adjusted to the vital capacity, mixed expired gases were analyzed by mass spectrometry (MGA-1100; Marquette; Milwaukee, WI). The maximal achievable workload was recorded in watts. After a rest period of 45 to 60 min, the subjects underwent isokinetic cycling as described above.
Data Analysis
Values were expressed as mean ± SD. Groups were compared using unpaired t testing, and proportions were compared with
2 testing. Relationships between variables were assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and forward stepwise linear regression analysis. A simple linear regression analysis was used to describe the relationship of Wmax and isokinetic work or FEV1 by the following expression: Wmax = a + bx, where a is the y intercept, b is the slope of the line, and x is isokinetic work at a given time interval or FEV1. A forward stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to describe the relationship between Wmax, isokinetic work, and FEV1, using the following expression: Wmax = a + b1x1 + b2x2, where x1 is isokinetic work and x2 is FEV1. The adjusted coefficient of determination (r2) for the multiple linear regression equation was used an expression of the degree to which the variability in the dependent variable (Wmax) could be explained by the combination of the independent variables (isokinetic work and FEV1). A p value < 0.05 was considered as significant, and all analyses were performed using Statistica software (version 5.5; Statsoft; Tulsa, OK).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using smaller increments during the progressive exercise test for the patients with COPD may have underestimated the Wmax for this group.14 However, this does not detract from our finding that Wmax can be predicted from a two-variable model using lung function and skeletal muscle function.
Eltayara and colleagues15 showed that expiratory flow limitation is a major cause of exercise intolerance in patients with COPD that would not be fully reflected in FEV1 values. The variability in flow limitation may account for some of the increased variability seen in patients with COPD when predicting Wmax. It will be interesting to evaluate the impact of flow limitation on exercise capacity in upcoming studies.
These results are similar to what we have previously demonstrated in healthy adolescents and young adults and in patients with cystic fibrosis.9 It is interesting to note that in patients with cystic fibrosis and in both younger and older healthy subjects, W30 was largely a function of body mass,9 while in the patients with COPD, there was no correlation with weight. Although we did not measure lean body mass or muscle cross-sectional area in the subjects tested in the current study, the fact that the BMI was normal and similar in both the control subjects and the patients with COPD may suggest near-normal muscle mass. While a normal BMI might not always signify a normal muscle mass in patients with COPD,16 the fact that the patients with COPD participating in this study had lung function and Wmax similar to a previously studied17 group of patients with COPD with normal nutritional status suggests that our patients probably did not have very abnormal muscle mass, although we lack direct evidence of this. If our patients with COPD have, as we believe, near-normal muscle mass, the lack of correlation between W30 and weight seen in healthy control subjects and in patients with cystic fibrosis suggest that the muscle in patients with COPD might be dysfunctional.
Several studies have found abnormalities in lower-limb muscle of patients with COPD that have been postulated to be related to a variety of factors, including hypoxemia,18 19 malnutrition,20 age,21 disuse leading to deconditioning,22 altered electrolyte concentrations,23 24 impaired enzyme activity,25 26 27 reduced oxidative ability,28 29 and steroid-induced myopathy.30 While it would be interesting to know if regular steroid use in our patients with COPD contributed to the observed dysfunction, we do not have data on the dose and duration of corticosteroid therapy.
In contrast, a recent study published by Richardson and colleagues31 suggests that there may be a systemic cause, possibly due to vascular redistribution causing impaired oxygen delivery, for the apparent muscle dysfunction in patients with COPD independent of the respiratory system. They also suggest that the skeletal muscle in patients with COPD has a significant metabolic reserve and normal intrinsic muscle function. Further work with subjects receiving supplemental oxygen or helium-oxygen gas mixtures while performing short isokinetic sprints might help to establish the relative importance of the muscle metabolic reserve vs oxygen delivery in patients with COPD.
The ability to define exercise ability in terms of ventilatory and peripheral skeletal muscular factors might allow for rehabilitation to be targeted to those areas that can be improved on. Work in patients with coronary heart disease has shown that in these patients, strength and aerobic training have complementary effects on peripheral muscle function and exercise ability.32 Simpson and colleagues33 reported that 8 weeks of strength training produces an improvement in muscle strength and in submaximal exercise tolerance in patients with COPD. Clark and colleagues3 demonstrated a significant improvement in muscle function and whole-body exercise ability after a 12-week program of weight training. In contrast, Bernard and his colleagues8 showed a greater increase in muscle strength and mass but did not find any difference in exercise capacity as measured by the 6-min walk test in patients with more severe COPD after a combination of exercise and aerobic training when compared with aerobic training alone. These studies, while appearing to demonstrate different responses to strength training in patients with COPD, studied very different populations and used different end points to define change in exercise tolerance. It may be that submaximal exercise endurance as measured by Simpson and colleagues33 is a better marker for improvements in functional ability than endurance at maximal exercise levels. Identifying those patients who have greater reductions in strength than endurance will allow for more emphasis to be placed and intervention targeted at increasing strength, such as diet, growth hormone, anabolic steroids,34 and strength training.
While most patients with COPD can tolerate the 30-s test, it is an uncomfortable experience for most of the them. Shorter sprints would be better tolerated, and our results indicate that 20-s sprints could be used instead of the longer sprint. A 20-s sprint provides qualitatively similar information to the 30-s test, and when combined with FEV1 can predict progressive exercise capacity. The response of isokinetic muscle function during the course of rehabilitation may provide useful information on the impact of therapeutic interventions.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Dr. Lands is a chercheur-clinicien of the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec.
Received for publication February 12, 2001. Accepted for publication October 3, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P Mattson and J. C Martin Emphysema-induced reductions in locomotory skeletal muscle contractile function Exp Physiol, July 1, 2005; 90(4): 519 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |