|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Pneumonology, Medical School University of Crete, Crete, Greece.
Correspondence to: Demosthenes Bouros, MD, FCCP, Associate Professor of Pneumonology, Department of Pneumonology, Medical School, University of Crete and University Hospital, 711 10 Heraklion, Crete, Greece; e-mail: bouros{at}med.uoc.gr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: asbestosis cancer lung cancer malignancy pulmonary fibrosis sarcoidosis scar cancer
An excessive relative risk (RR) [range, 2 to 14] of lung cancer has been found in patients with pulmonary fibrosis of diverse etiology compared to the general population.1 2 Although the pathogenesis of cancer in such cases is still obscure, it appears that cases without fibrosis may also have an excessive incidence, but to a much lesser extent.3 If this is so, it raises fundamental questions about the relationship between exuberant collagen deposition in the lung and neoplastic change. In this article, we review the existing data on the pathogenesis and incidence of lung cancer in patients with several forms of interstitial lung disease (ILD), as well as in patients with local fibrosis, the so-called "scar cancer."
| Pathogenesis of Lung Cancer in Patients With ILDs |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The precise properties of fibrosis that lead to the development of carcinoma are unknown. One possibility that has been suggested6 is that scarring causes lymphatic obstruction, resulting in a local increase in potentially carcinogenic material. High concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen in the BAL fluid of patients with fibrosing alveolitis, particularly in patients with associated lung cancer, have also been reported.7 Such high levels of carcinoembryonic antigen may be a marker of premalignant metaplasia and hyperplasia, and may reflect a greater risk of pulmonary carcinoma in the clinical course of pulmonary fibrosis. Moreover, in patients with cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis (CFA), hyperplasia of alveolar lining cells has been observed, which may lead to an increased incidence of alveolar cell carcinoma.8 The fundamental reason for predisposition to neoplastic change is largely unknown, although alterations in the function of cells controlling the inflammatory response must be considered. If defective surveillance mechanisms are important, the finding of autoantibodies in a high proportion of patients with CFA is of interest.9 A reduction of normal delayed hypersensitivity responses in patients with lung cancer has been used as further evidence of a surveillance defect. However, the delayed skin type reactions are not in general reduced in patients with CFA.10 Whether they are reduced in those cases of developing lung cancer is unknown, although study of T-cell subpopulations is needed before such a defect can be excluded. Macrophage-lymphocyte interaction may be also important in surveillance mechanisms. Differences in the phenotype of T cells and macrophages have been detected in the BAL fluid of patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis and systemic sclerosis.11 Alveolar macrophages in patients with CFA are activated and appear to contain less lysosomal enzymes than in control subjects.12 It is conceivable that such continuous stimulation of macrophages, perhaps by immune complexes,13 alters their capacity to maintain a normal surveillance function.9
Cytokines (ie, tumor necrosis factor-
), as well as chemotactic agents and growth factors, which are related with fibroblast chemotaxis/proliferation, such as fibronectin, platelet-derived growth factor, alveolar macrophage-derived growth factor, and insulin-like growth factor-1, promote the inflammation, destruction, and subsequent fibrosis of lung parenchyma with its permanent disorganization.14
15
Therefore, it is quite possible that changes in the lung tissue, with the subsequent epithelial atypia that follows, may predispose to the development of cancer. Furthermore, genetic alterations may contribute to lung cancer development, since p53 and p21 genes were overexpressed in hyperplasic bronchial and alveolar epithelial cells from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).16
17
Genes p53 and p21 play an important role in the inhibition of cellular proliferation and promote the repair of tissue injury in patients with IPF. During the long clinical course of IPF, chronic DNA damage may result in mutations of the p53 gene. The loss of p53 function in tumors will lead to decreased expression of p21 and a failure to arrest in G1 in response to appropriate signals. Chronic DNA damage that might lead to p53 gene mutation may be one of the reasons of the high incidence of lung cancer in patients with IPF. Recently, genetic alterations at the level of microsatellite DNA (microsatellite instability) and loss of heterozygosity have been detected in patients with IPF with an increased rate (30%).18
The role of these findings in the inflammatory or malignant process is unknown, and further follow-up studies are needed.
| Pulmonary Fibrosis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In the majority of the studies,9 19 21 lung carcinomas were peripheral and located in the lower lobes. This finding is in accordance to the distribution of the severity of fibrotic lesions in patients with IPF, implicating the inflammatory procedure and bronchiolar squamous metaplasia in the pathogenesis of lung cancer. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histologic type (47%) in male patients, and adenocarcinoma was most common in female patients (64%).2 9 19 Lung cancer did not seem to correlate with longer or shorter survival from the onset of the disease, or with more severe initial radiographic changes.9 Moreover, the distribution of histologic types was not different from that found in patients with lung cancer without pulmonary fibrosis.2 9 19
The incidence of synchronous multiple lung tumors has been studied less frequently in patients with IPF. In one study,19 the clinical features showed higher rates for male, smoking patients, with predisposition for the lower lobes and a peripheral location. A striking difference with a significantly higher incidence of small cell lung cancer was observed. The most common combinations were between squamous cell carcinoma-small cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma-small cell carcinoma.19 In the large review article by Rohwedder and Weatherbee,22 the most common combinations were squamous cell carcinoma-small cell lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma-squamous cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma-adenocarcinoma, in 77 synchronous cases.22
In a 1999 study,23 a quantitative assessment of the metaplastic epithelia in the honeycombed areas revealed that squamous metaplasia, but not cuboidal cell metaplasia or bronchial cell metaplasia, occurred more frequently in patients with IPF (usual interstitial pneumonitis pattern [UIP] on histology) with lung carcinoma than in UIP without lung carcinoma (p = 0.02). The degree of atypical squamous metaplasia was not different between the two groups. The authors speculated that the quantitative predominance of squamous metaplasia in the honeycombed areas may not be a precursor for lung carcinoma, but might reflect a constitutional susceptibility of patients with UIP to develop lung carcinoma. Finger clubbing was much more common in patients with IPF and lung cancer (95%) than in those with IPF and without lung cancer (63%). The cause of this phenomenon is unknown and often precedes the clinical evidence of the cancer.9
| Sarcoidosis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Evidence of a causal relationship between sarcoidosis, lymphoma, or lung cancer comes from a number of studies. Brincker and Wilbek24 studied 2,544 patients and found that lymphoma and lung cancer occurred 11 times and 3 times, respectively, more frequently in patients with sarcoidosis.
In a linkage analysis of 243 cases observed for 24 years, sarcoidosis and malignancy were etiologically related in about 25% of 12 cases in which both were present.30 In another large study from Japan,31 1,411 sarcoidosis patients were followed up for a 3-year period. Excess death was investigated using standardized mortality ratio and was found for leukemia and uterine cancer to be 5.8% and 8.7%, respectively. The number of patients with lung cancer was very small (n = 3), while other forms of cancer, such as gastric, hepatic, and colonic, were not observed.31
In a retrospective cohort study32 with 474 patients, the RR of lung cancer was doubled during the first decade of follow-up, and thereafter it was significantly decreased. In the same study,32 the association of sarcoidosis and malignant lymphoproliferative disease was so constant that the authors suggested the existence of a sarcoidosis-lymphoma syndrome, in which the chronic active type of sarcoidosis appears to be responsible for an increased risk of malignant transformation of lymphoid cells. Similarly, Marschke33 recorded an overrepresentation of lymphoma but an underrepresentation of lung cancer in 2,700 cases of sarcoidosis. Studies25 27 challenge the existence of a sarcoidosis-lymphoma syndrome. Seersholm et al25 followed up 254 patients for a median of 25 years. They registered 5 cases of lung cancer among 33 types of cancers compared to the 2.5 cases and 23 types that were expected. No lymphoma was found and only one case of leukemia occurred, a finding that prompted the authors to suggest that previous correlations were probably due to misclassification. Similarly, Romer et al27 failed to demonstrate a high risk of malignancy in patients with sarcoidosis. It is worth mentioning that in all studies, the patients with cancer were older than those without cancer, which probably reflects the increased cancer rate in older people. Table 2 shows the reported studies of lung cancer in patients with sarcoidosis.
|
| Systemic Sclerosis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In the study of Winkemann et al,37 14 cases of lung cancer occurred in a population of 3,550 patients with scleroderma. Scleroderma preceded the diagnosis of lung cancer by at least 6 years in eight cases. The most frequent type of carcinoma in this series was small cell carcinoma, which accounted for 5 of the 14 cases.
In another retrospective chart review38 of 248 patients, cancer developed in 18 patients (7.3%). The most common malignancies were breast (n = 5) and lung cancer (n = 7). Lung cancer in particular was always associated with the presence of pulmonary fibrosis, which preceded the development of cancer by an average of 9 years.38 Similarly, with the report of Rosenthal et al,36 the usual histologic types were adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Systemic sclerosis was found to be a significant independent predictor of cancer, since gender, smoking status, type of scleroderma, and penicillamine therapy were not found to differ significantly in these two groups. Furthermore, Roumm and Medsger39 also found a 5% incidence of lung cancer in a group of 262 patients with scleroderma, which occurred in the setting of long-standing pulmonary fibrosis, but was not associated with cigarette smoking. In addition to lung cancer, other malignancies, such as breast cancer,38 39 skin cancer,36 38 and cancers of the hematopoietic system,36 have been observed with an increased incidence in patients with scleroderma.
Immunologic abnormalities noted in patients with systemic sclerosis indicate the possibility of an altered immune response that, combined with the local fibrotic changes of the lung, may predispose to cancer development, or provide a common etiologic link.40 Substances secreted by malignant cells may be directly responsible for the scleroderma changes, as occasionally seen with the carcinoid syndrome.41 The possibility of scleroderma causing organ damage that predisposes to malignant changes has been suggested, as lung cancer almost invariably develops late in the course of systemic sclerosis and in the presence of preexisting pulmonary fibrosis.38
| Dermatomyositis/Polymyositis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sigurgeirsson et al45 studied the incidence and mortality rate from cancer in 788 patients. Of the 396 patients with polymyositis, cancer developed in 9% at the same time or after polymyositis was diagnosed. The RR of cancer was 1.8 in male patients and 1.7 in female patients. Eighty-four male patients and 85 female patients died; in 24 of them (14%), cancer was the principal cause of death. Of the 392 patients with dermatomyositis, 15% had cancer develop at the same time or after dermatomyositis was diagnosed, and the RR of cancer was 2.4 in male patients and 3.4 in female patients.45 Similarly, in the study of Chow et al,44 in which 539 patients were included, the cancer risk ratio was elevated in patients with dermatomyositis (standardized incidence ratio [SIR], 3.8) and to a lesser extent polymyositis (SIR, 1.7).
The diagnosis of cancer may precede, coincide, or follow the diagnosis of dermatomyositis/polymyositis.43 44 46 47 Cancer risk declined steadily after the diagnosis of dermatomyositis/polymyositis, with no significant excess after the first 2 years.44 It has been suggested43 44 that polymyositis and dermatomyositis often occur as a paraneoplastic syndrome; therefore, a search for an occult neoplasm must be considered seriously. The histologic type of malignancies did not seem to differ from those found in the general population. Lung cancer, and cancer of the stomach, ovaries, and lymphomas are among them.48
The pathogenic mechanisms between polymyositis/dermatomyositis and malignancy remain unclear. There may be a common genetic and environmental cause, or malignancy may be induced by the immunosuppressive therapy of the disease. Another possibility is that myositis consists a paraneoplastic syndrome mediated by circulating immune complexes induced by the underlying malignancy. Recently, cytokeratin 19 fragment levels were found to be increased in the serum of patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis, and the cytokeratin 19 fragment has been suggested as a useful variable to evaluate the activity of lung injury.49 To our knowledge, the possible relation of the interstitial disease that may accompany polymyositis and dermatomyositis and the development of lung cancer has not yet been examined.
| Sjögren Syndrome |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary Sjögren syndrome is associated with increased incidence of lymphoma50
51
with an RR up to 43.8.52
Lymphoma frequently involves the lung, so that it must be included in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary lesion in such patients.53
However, an increased incidence of Sjögren syndrome has been found in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.54
The mean interval between the onset of the disease and the diagnosis of lymphoma was 5.4 years in one series53
and 6.3 in another series50
with a follow-up period of 12 years. Prognostic factors for lymphoma development may be the detection of
and
light chains,55
heavy-chain gene rearrangements in labial salivary glands,56
mixed monoclonal cryoglobulinemia,57
as well as extraglandular manifestations of the syndrome.50
| RA |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The positive association between RA and hematologic malignancies is incompletely understood. This may be due to the persistent immune stimulation associated with RA itself. Monoclonal paraproteinemia is slightly increased in patients with RA. It indicates monoclonal B-cell proliferation and carries a high risk of malignant transformation.
IgA paraprotein seems to carry a higher risk than IgG, while other factors such as urinary free light chains and the presence of secondary Sjögren syndrome are of less prognostic significance.61 Lymphomas occurring in patients with rheumatic disease have the features of those occurring in immunosuppressed patients. This may suggest an impairment of the immune system secondary to the rheumatic disease; it may be due to the treatment given for the rheumatic disease, or to a combination of these factors.62 For example, a role for cyclophosphamide and cyclosporin A, particularly in bladder cancer, has been suggested. In one study,63 the risk of malignancy in patients with RA treated with oral cyclosporin A continued even 17 years after discontinuation of the drug. The risk factors for lymphoma developing in patients with RA receiving methotrexate include severe disease, intense immunosuppression, genetic predisposition, and an increased frequency of latent infection with pro-oncogenic viruses, such as Epstein-Barr virus. The spontaneous remission of lymphomas after methotrexate treatment was discontinued highlights the likely causative role of the drug in the development of these malignancies.64
Patients treated with alkylating agents have shown an increased risk for the development of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia, and both alkylating agents and azathioprine were associated with the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.65 It seems that immunosuppression favors the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, which includes the excess of malignancies found in transplant recipients and patients receiving long-term renal dialysis. In summary, the observed increased risk of cancer in patients with RA could be due to shared host susceptibility to both diseases, shared risk factors, RA-caused changes predisposing to cancer, or the treatment of the disease.
| Systemic Lupus Erythematosus |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a cohort of 1,585 patients with SLE, a significant excess of non-Hodgkin lymphoma was found (RR, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.2 to 10.3). In addition, a significantly increased RR was found for cancer of the lung (RR, 1.9), the liver (RR, 8.0), and the vagina/vulva (RR, 5.7).66 Similarly, an increased risk of malignancy was observed in women with SLE. The SIR for malignancy for all women with SLE was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.9), and lung cancer was the only individual cancer increased in all women (SIR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 7.9). Breast cancer was the only individual cancer increased in white women with SLE (SIR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 0.4).67
In addition, a significantly higher incidence of cervical atypia was found in women with SLE (35.9%) compared with non-SLE control groups, regardless of previous cytotoxic therapy (p < 0.01). Three cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia were revealed among the cases with atypia; therefore, women with SLE are encouraged to have regular cytologic cervical smears.68
In a cohort of 276 patients with SLE from the United Kingdom who were followed up prospectively between 1978 and 1999, the overall estimated risk for all cancers was not increased (SIR, 1.16; 95% CI, 10.5 to 2.1). However, SLE was associated with an increased risk of Hodgkins lymphoma compared with the general population (SIR, 17. 8; 95% CI, 0.45 to 99.2).69 Similarly, in the study of Abu-Shakra et al,70 the overall estimated risk for cancer was not increased in the SLE cohort (SIR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.6). A 4.1-fold increased risk for hematologic cancers was observed, due mainly to an increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The risk for cancer was significantly lower in the SLE cohort compared with patients with RA and systemic sclerosis.70
There seems to be a positive association between SLE and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Other cancers with a possible virus-related etiology, such as liver and vaginal/vulva cancer, are also observed in excess.71 Several factors probably play a role in the etiology of malignancies associated with SLE, including intrinsic disturbances of immunity and concomitant immunosuppressive therapy. There are no predictive indicators for malignancy, and immunosuppressive therapy may be a contributing factor, although there have been no reports of malignancies associated with such treatment regimes. Long-term follow-up and a multicenter effort are needed to refine risk estimates of cancer in patients with lupus.
| Histiocytosis X |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The incidence of lung cancer was high in patients with histiocytosis X in two series: three cases among 21 patients in one study,72 and five cases among 93 patients in the other study.73 Smoking must be an important risk factor in these patients, as patients in whom cancer developed were smokers with greater cigarette consumption than control subjects, so that the diagnosis of histiocytosis X strongly advocates the discontinuation of tobacco smoking and long-term medical follow-up.73
The reason of the high incidence of lung cancer in patients with histiocytosis X has not been clarified. Langerhans cells that have been found in the vicinity of tumor cells in some patients with bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma, and the atypical bronchiolar and alveolar cells in patients with histiocytosis X may link the two diseases etiologically.74 However, histochemical stain for S-100 protein and study of lymphocytes and Langerhans cells from patients with histiocytosis X and from patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung detected a number of differences, making the above-mentioned relationship a matter of controversy.75
| Occupational Lung Diseases |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The fact that asbestos exposure is associated with malignancies, especially mesothelioma and lung cancer, has been long recognized by experiments in animals.77 Studies78 79 80 in humans suggest a close relationship between asbestosis (the development of ILD induced by asbestos) and lung cancer. It seems to be specific for asbestosis, since, for example, lung cancer develops in its presence much more often than in patients with pulmonary silicosis. Asbestos exerts a carcinogenic effect even in the absence of smoking, whereas it acts synergistically when both risk factors are present.81
Different types of asbestos bodies have been found in patients with lung cancer during autopsy. The number of asbestos bodies found in the lungs of 158 subjects suggests that 70.4% of the 51 diagnosed cases of lung cancer could be attributed to asbestos exposure, while there was significant asbestos exposure in 38.4% of 107 subjects without cancer.80
Most epidemiologic studies that have considered the relationship between the dose of asbestos and the risk of lung cancer have produced results consistent with an approximately linear relationship between dose and mortality with no threshold dose below which there is no increased risk for lung cancer.82 Age at the time of exposure does not seem to affect the RR produced by asbestos exposure.83
The latent period is variable. Some cases occur 5 to 9 years after the onset of exposure, but the risk rises until at least 30 years after first exposure.83 A study84 of amosite factory workers suggested that the latent period might be shorter when first exposure occurs at older ages, while a study85 of chrysotile miners found no evidence of a relationship between latency and dose. Lung cancer in asbestos workers arises principally in the main bronchi and occurs in all the common histologic forms, including squamous cell, small cell, adenocarcinoma, and large cell carcinoma. It can also arise in the smaller bronchi and in the peripheral parts of the lung.86
Increased lung markings are present radiologically more often in asbestos workers with lung cancer in whom lung biopsy reveals fibrosis, although random biopsy specimens may miss it. In patients without parenchymal opacities, there was a 56% excess of lung cancer in patients who had a high probability of occupational asbestos exposure at least 15 years before, with somealbeit weakevidence of a relation with duration of exposure.87 Nevertheless, it has been shown88 that asbestos is associated with lung cancer even in the absence of radiologically apparent pulmonary fibrosis.
The mechanisms by which asbestos causes lung cancer remain a matter of speculation with various plausible but unproven hypotheses.89
90
Epidemiologic evidence suggests that asbestos acts at one or more of the later stages in carcinogenesis of lung cancer, and it may be a tumor promoter.90
Asbestos may augment the carcinogenic potential of polycyclic aromatic polycarbons, which are constituents of cigarette smoke and air pollution. This may occur as a result of absorption of carcinogens onto the fibers, resulting in their persistence in lung tissue. The greater persistence of amphiboles in tissue may be a factor in their greater carcinogenicity. Interactions between asbestos fibers and target cells may lead to genetic alterations, such as activation of oncogenes, or inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. These alterations may occur as a result of direct effects of fibers on chromosomes, or via genetic damage induced by the oxidant action of reactive oxygen species produced when phagocytes engulf asbestos fibers. In addition, long-term exposure to asbestos leads to the enhanced release of significant amounts of interleukin (IL)-1ß, tumor necrosis factor-
, IL-6, and prostaglandin, which have activity for the fibroblast, even in the absence of overt fibrosis.91
Furthermore, asbestos has shown to impair the function of natural killer (NK) cells, an important defense mechanism against cancer. In the study by Robinson,92 all types of asbestos caused a dose-related suppression of the ability of NK cells to lyse tumor cells. Moreover, a reduction in circulating CD16+ lymphocytes, a subset of NK cells, was found in patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis and was correlated with the duration of asbestos exposure.92 Nowadays, occupational asbestos exposure is considered to be one of the important risks for the development of lung cancer; therefore, frequent and accurate observation is necessary.
Silicosis
The risk of lung cancer in patients with silicosis, another common occupational lung disease, is not clear. Although there is sufficient evidence for the carcinogenicity of crystalline silica in animals,93
its carcinogenicity in humans was until recently a matter of controversy.94
A number of cohort and case-control studies consistently suggest an excess of lung cancer in individuals with occupational silica exposure (RR, 2 to 4), although it is difficult to exclude the confounding factor of smoking.95
The International Agency for Research on Cancer defined nine cohort studies that provided the least confounded examinations of an association between crystalline silica and lung cancer: three studies of the stone and quarrying industries; five studies of the ceramics, pottery, and related industries; and one study of gold miners in the United States. The risk of lung cancer in the three cohorts from the stone and the quarrying industries varied between 1.05 and 1.19 compared with the general population, and up to 1.93 compared with the local population. In subgroups, however, higher risks were reported.96 97 98 The RRs of lung cancer in the five studies99 100 101 102 103 of the ceramic industries varied from 0.58 to 1.51; smoking did not account for the high incidence of lung cancer in silicotic patients, as a large number of smoking patients were not characterized by increased risk of lung cancer. Silica may act as a direct carcinogen or indirectly by the absorption of co-carcinogens, such as polyaromatic hydrocarbons from cigarette smoke, or industrial pyrolysis products. It may also increase the effective dose and duration of exposure to these carcinogens by impairing pulmonary clearance. Pulmonary fibrosis itself may be a precursor for the development of lung cancer.94 In the absence of lung fibrosis, the evidence of an association between silica and lung cancer must be considered to be scanty and inconsistent, but still biologically plausible.104
In a recent study,105 patients with pneumoconiosis and diffuse ILD had an exceedingly high concurrence of lung cancer compared with pneumoconiosis patients without ILD (53% vs 15%, p < 0.001). Pathologic examination revealed that dysplasias were significantly more frequently observed in peripheral bronchioles of patients with pneumoconiosis and ILD.105 These findings may suggest a positive causal relationship between pneumoconiosis and peripheral- type, single-cell carcinomas of the lung, and further indicate a pivotal role of diffuse fibrosis for the high incidence of lung cancer in patients with pneumoconiosis and ILD.
Beryllium
Beryllium has been shown to be carcinogenic in animal models.106
The International Agency for Research on Cancer has reclassified beryllium as a class-1 human carcinogen.107
108
Epidemiologic studies in beryllium-exposed industrial workers showed an increased risk of lung cancer.109
110
Histologically, beryllium-induced tumors vary mostly from adenocarcinoma to bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma.106
Similar conclusions were derived from two other studies111
112
of beryllium-exposed workers, with standardized mortality ratios ranging from 1.26 to 2.0. Very high exposure with acute beryllium disease increased this ratio, while neither smoking nor geographic location accounted for the increased risk for lung cancer.112
Coal Miners Pneumoconiosis
Although coal is not considered carcinogenic in itself, coal dust may contain various potentially carcinogenic organic (ie, hydrocarbons) and inorganic (ie, cadmium, chromium) agents. An increased incidence of stomach and intestinal cancers has been reported in coal miners, although the risk of stomach cancer was lower in workers with pneumoconiosis than in those without pneumoconiosis.113
This may be due to the impaired pulmonary clearance with the subsequent inhibition of coal reaching the digestive system. Other studies113
114
were not able to show a high incidence of malignancies or an excessive risk of lung cancer.
In the study by Ebihara115 of patients with pneumoconiosis-induced lung cancer, the predominant histologic type was the squamous cell carcinoma (54.2%), followed by small cell carcinoma (22.9%), and adenocarcinoma (14.6%). Squamous cell carcinomas were located mainly in large airways, whereas adenocarcinomas were found in the peripheral lung tissue. In cases of mild pneumoconiosis, the majority of tumors were found in the right, upper, and large airways; in moderate and severe cases, tumors were found in the left, lower, and peripheral lung areas.
Katabami et al116 suggested that pneumoconiosis-associated diffuse fibrosis may be an important accelerator toward the development of lung cancer, especially for peripheral type squamous cell carcinomas, and therefore must be carefully followed for early detection, if any, of lung cancer. It is of note that in the same study,116 pneumoconiosis-related lung cancer was associated with a significantly increased amount of cigarette consumption, although the influence of smoking remains controversial.104 Thus, further investigation is needed to determine whether smoking exerts a synergistic or additive effect on the development of lung cancer, and/or diffuse fibrosis associated with pneumoconiosis.
| Scar Carcinomas |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Other possible mechanisms include uncontrolled epithelial hyperplasia in relation to bland fibrosis. Carcinogenic properties of some fibrogenic agents, such as asbestos, or of scar components, namely elastic121 and cholesterol,122 are also incriminated. Scarring is seen in up to 40% of surgical resections and 10% of necropsies.123 Forty-five percent of adenocarcinomas in men108 and 25% of all lung tumors124 are scar related.
In a review125 of 1,186 cases of lung cancer, a total of 82 peripheral tumors were related to scars (7%). Forty-five percent of all peripheral cancers originated in a scar. More than 75% of these scar cancers were found in the upper lobes, and > 50% were related to infarcts. Less than 25% were related to tuberculosis scars, while no relationship was found between smoking habits and scar cancer. The great majority (72%) of lung cancers were adenocarcinomas, 18% were of squamous cell type, while the rest were large cell undifferentiated carcinomas. The maturity of the scar was found to be a prognostic factor that was interpreted by the authors to correlate with the duration of the tumor.126 Prognosis of patients with those tumors remains controversial.127 128
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication December 20, 2000. Accepted for publication June 27, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|