|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (Drs. Kim, Kim, Koh, Lee, Lim and Kim), and Asan Institute for Life Sciences (Dr. Cho), Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Correspondence to: Won-Dong Kim, MD, FCCP, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Pungnab-dong, Songpa-ku, Seoul 138-736, Republic of Korea; e-mail: wdkim{at}amc.seoul.kr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Outpatient pulmonary department of a university hospital.
Methods: To investigate this hypothesis, peripheral blood T-lymphocyte subsets were measured by flow cytometry using specific monoclonal antibodies in 20 healthy nonsmokers, 20 healthy smokers, and 20 smokers with stable COPD. No significant differences in the peripheral blood T-lymphocyte subsets were observed among the three groups. Because a previous study showed peripheral blood T-lymphocyte abnormalities in the subgroup of nonsmoking patients with COPD, we wanted to investigate what factors determine the subgroup of COPD with abnormal T-lymphocyte subsets. We tried to measure the relationship between T-lymphocyte subsets and physiologic indexes of pulmonary function tests in patients with COPD. The proportion of CD8+ T lymphocytes significantly correlated with diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and DLCO per unit of alveolar volume (DLCO/VA), and CD4+/CD8+ ratio correlated with DLCO/VA. Therefore, we attempted to classify the patients with COPD into two subgroups on the basis of DLCO/VA: 10 COPD patients with low DLCO/VA (< 80% predicted) and 10 patients with normal DLCO/VA (
80% predicted).
Results: The normal DLCO/VA subgroup had a significantly higher proportion of CD8+ T lymphocytes and a lower CD4+/CD8+ ratio than the healthy smokers or the low DLCO/VA subgroup. Moreover, FEV1/FVC significantly correlated with the CD4+/CD8+ ratio only in the normal DLCO/VA subgroup.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that T-lymphocyte abnormalities might be involved in the pathogenesis of airflow limitation in a subgroup of patients with COPD, presumably with small airways disease, but not in all cases of COPD.
Key Words: CD8+ T lymphocyte COPD diffusing capacity T-lymphocyte subsets
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies2 3 analyzing T-lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood have demonstrated a relative decrease in CD4+ T lymphocytes and increase of CD8+ T lymphocytes with a low CD4+/CD8+ ratio in heavy smokers. In addition, it has been reported that the percentage of CD8+ T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood is significantly higher in nonsmoking patients with COPD compared with nonsmoking, healthy control subjects, and a lower CD4+/CD8+ ratio is associated with a lower FEV1 in these patients with COPD.4
A histopathologic study5 on surgical specimens from smokers with COPD has demonstrated an increased number of CD8+ T lymphocytes in the peripheral airways, which are the sites responsible for chronic airflow limitation. These patients had not only an increased number of CD8+ T lymphocytes, but also an increased smooth-muscle mass in the peripheral airways, suggesting the presence of small airways remodeling in these patients with chronic airflow limitation. In this study, when all the smokers were considered together, the number of CD8+ T lymphocytes showed a significant negative correlation with FEV1.
These findings suggest that T-lymphocyte abnormalities might play a role in the pathogenesis of airflow limitation in smokers. A hypothesis was proposed that smoking is most likely to induce the development of persistent airflow obstruction in individuals who have inherited the tendency to a low peripheral blood CD4+/CD8+ ratio.6 However, a previous study4 showed that T-lymphocyte abnormalities in peripheral blood are not present in all patients with COPD, but only in the nonsmoking patients with COPD, although the nature of this subgroup of nonsmoking patients with COPD is not known. To test this hypothesis, and, if it is true only in a subgroup of patients with COPD, then to know in what subgroup of patients with COPD it is true, we measured the T-lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood of healthy nonsmokers, healthy smokers, and smokers with COPD.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
15% in FEV1, an increase of
15% in FVC, or an increase of
25% in the mean forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Pulmonary Function Study
Spirometric measurement was performed according to the recommendation of the American Thoracic Society7
with a spirometer (System 2100; SensorMedics; Yorba Linda, CA) in all subjects. All values are expressed as percentage of predicted using the formula of Cho and colleagues.8
The lung volume subdivisions were measured in a body plethysmograph (System 2800; SensorMedics) in smokers with COPD and was expressed as percentage of predicted using the prediction formula of Goldman and Becklake.9
Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was measured by the single-breath method (System 2100; SensorMedics) and was expressed as a percentage of predicted using the formula of Park and colleagues10
in smokers with COPD.
Analysis of Mononuclear Cell Subsets
Peripheral venous blood was drawn from all subjects after obtaining informed consent. Aliquots were submitted to the laboratory for CBC count and differential WBC count. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were separated from heparinized venous blood by centrifugation on Ficoll-Hypaque (Pharmacia; Uppsala, Sweden) within 24 h. Expression of the mononuclear cell surface markers CD3, CD19, CD4, CD8, CD14, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR was assessed using specific fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated or phycoerythrin-conjugated mouse monoclonal antibodies (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems; Mountain View, CA). For cell surface marker staining, aliquots of 100 µL of cells of peripheral blood mononuclear cell suspension (1 x 106/mL) were incubated for 45 min at 4°C with the appropriate monoclonal antibodies. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-IgG1 and phycoerythrin-IgG2 murine isotype control reagents were used to evaluate the nonspecific binding. Two-color analysis was performed on an FACScan (Becton Dickinson) equipped with an argon laser tuned to 488 nm, and the data analysis was performed using the CONSORT 30 Data Management System (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems; San Jose, CA). Lymphocyte or monocyte populations were gated on the basis of forward and right-angle light scatter, with 10,000 events evaluated for each determination. Positively labeled cells were quantified as a percentage of the total lymphocyte population in the range of fluorescence intensity channels above a predefined threshold channel.
Statistical Analysis
The results are reported as mean ± SD. A one-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate significant differences among groups, and, when a significance was found, post hoc between-group analysis was performed with the Student-Newman-Keuls test. A nonparametric analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis test) and post hoc analysis with Dunn test were used for data that did not pass a normality test or equal variance test. Spearman rank correlation was used to determine how T-lymphocyte subsets correlated with physiologic indexes in patients with COPD. All statistical analyses were performed with software (Sigma Stat Statistical Analysis System, Version 1.0; Jandel Corporation; San Rafael, CA); p values < 0.05 were considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
T-Lymphocyte Subsets in Healthy Nonsmokers, Healthy Smokers, and Smokers With COPD
No differences in the proportions of peripheral blood T-lymphocyte subsets and CD4+/CD8+ ratio among the healthy nonsmokers, healthy smokers, and smokers with COPD were observed (Table 2
).
|
80% of predicted were grouped as patients with normal DLCO/VA.11
Coincidentally, 10 patients were subclassified to the low DLCO/VA group (mean age ± SD, 65.8 ± 5.3 years) and 10 patients to the normal DLCO/VA group (mean age, 65.1 ± 9.8 years) of 20 smokers with COPD. The mean smoking history was 33.5 ± 8.8 pack-years for the low DLCO/VA group and 40.8 ± 11.7 pack-years for the normal DLCO/VA group (p > 0.05). The original purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in T-lymphocyte subsets between healthy smokers and smokers with COPD. Therefore, we compared the T-lymphocyte subsets among the healthy smokers, the low DLCO/VA group, and the normal DLCO/VA group. Characteristics and results of pulmonary function tests of the three study groups of healthy smokers, low DLCO/VA patients, and normal DLCO/VA patients are shown in Table 3 . Low DLCO/VA patients had severe airflow limitation, hyperinflation, air trapping, and, as designed for the study, decreased DLCO. Normal DLCO/VA patients also had severe airflow limitation, hyperinflation, and air trapping, but normal DLCO. Low DLCO/VA patients had higher TLC, FRC, and RV than normal DLCO/VA patients (p < 0.05).
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Analysis of T-lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood indicates that, in light-to-moderate smokers, the total T-lymphocyte and CD4+ T-lymphocyte populations increase, whereas in heavy smokers, CD4+ T lymphocytes decrease and both the percentage and total numbers of CD8+ T lymphocytes increase.2 3 de Jong et al4 showed that percentages of blood lymphocyte subsets are not significantly different between healthy control groups and patients with COPD. Also no significant difference was observed between smoking healthy control subjects and smokers with COPD, but the percentage of CD8+ T lymphocytes was significantly higher in the nonsmoking patients with COPD compared with the nonsmoking, healthy control subjects, and a lower CD4+/CD8+ ratio was associated with a lower FEV1 in these patients with COPD.4 A study on BAL fluid has also shown that the CD4+/CD8+ ratio is significantly decreased in smokers with and without COPD, and the percentage of CD8+ T lymphocytes positively correlates with the smoking history expressed as pack-years.12
A pathologic study13 on lymphocytic infiltration of central airway epithelium showed that CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes are increased in patients with chronic bronchitis and mild airflow limitation. Another study6 on bronchial biopsies obtained from healthy nonsmokers and smokers with bronchitis has demonstrated an increased number of CD8+ T lymphocytes in the central airways of patients with COPD and a correlation between the number of CD8+ T lymphocytes and the degree of airflow limitation. In the peripheral airways of the lung, the only difference observed between the smokers without COPD and smokers with COPD was an increased number of CD8+ T lymphocytes and airway remodeling in smokers with COPD compared with smokers without COPD.5 CD8+ T lymphocytes were not only increased in these subjects, but also correlated with the degree of airflow limitation. Thus, it was concluded that smokers who have COPD develop have an increased number of CD8+ T lymphocytes in both central and peripheral airways, compared with smokers who do not have COPD develop, supporting the important role of these cells in the pathogenesis of chronic airflow limitation in smokers.14
It was proposed that the pathologic effect of cigarette smoke would be greater in those individuals who already have a genetically determined low CD4+/CD8+ ratio, and that this could explain why only a proportion of smokers succumb to disease and have their lung function adversely affected by cigarette smoke.6 To investigate this hypothesis, our data were analyzed according to the presence or absence of airflow limitation in the smokers. Although we expected a difference in T-lymphocyte subsets between healthy smokers and smokers with airflow limitation, we could not find any difference. These findings of no difference in T-lymphocyte subsets between healthy smokers and smokers with COPD are not inconsistent with the previous report.4 However, this previous study had shown abnormal peripheral blood T-lymphocyte subsets in a subgroup of nonsmoking patients with COPD, although the nature of this subgroup is not known. In these nonsmoking patients with COPD, ex-smokers with a history of smoking cessation of > 1 year were included,4 and they may be more severely affected by the disease.1
Therefore, it was necessary to know the nature of this subgroup of patients with COPD to find out which smokers with COPD have abnormalities in T-lymphocyte subsets. To investigate what factors determine this subgroup, we measured the relationship between T-lymphocyte subsets and physiologic indexes of pulmonary function tests in the smokers with COPD. The percentage of CD8+ T lymphocytes significantly correlated with DLCO and DLCO/VA, and CD4+/CD8+ ratio correlated with DLCO/VA. Therefore, we classified the smokers with COPD into groups of normal DLCO/VA and low DLCO/VA, and found that normal DLCO/VA patients had a higher proportion of CD8+ T lymphocytes and a lower CD4+/CD8+ ratio. In addition, a significant correlation was found between FEV1/FVC and CD4+/CD8+ ratio in the normal DLCO/VA group, but not in the healthy smokers or low DLCO/VA group.
Chronic airflow limitation may be caused by either emphysema or irreversible obstructive changes in the peripheral airways.15 Whether these two pathologic processes are pathogenetically related or represent two separate responses to a common exposure has remained a subject of investigation. We have shown that smokers have different patterns of lung destruction develop, some with pure or predominant centrilobular emphysema associated with a higher degree of abnormalities in the small airways, and others with pure or predominant panlobular emphysema with a smaller degree of abnormalities of the small airways.16 We have also shown that, in centrilobular emphysema, flow limitation is primarily a function of abnormalities of the small airways, whereas in panlobular emphysema, flow limitations are accompanied by loss of elastic recoil pressure of the lung. This suggests that different pathogenetic mechanisms could be present in these two types of emphysema.
Although no currently available physiologic test provides an accurate diagnosis of emphysema, emphysema severity has been shown to correlate most closely with the DLCO.17 18 The high degree of airflow limitation found in the normal DLCO/VA group with no history or evidence of asthma may indicate the presence of a large amount of peripheral small airways disease without a sufficient degree of emphysema that would decrease the surface area for diffusion. In contrast, our smokers with airflow limitation who had very low DLCO, high RV, and high TLC would represent predominant emphysema, probably panlobular. Therefore, it is presumed that most, if not all, of the normal DLCO/VA patients might have peripheral small airways disease, and most of the low DLCO/VA patients might have panlobular emphysema.
To our knowledge, no study has ever observed T lymphocytes simultaneously in both peripheral blood and pathologic airways of the same smokers with COPD. It has been suggested that continuing migration of CD4+ T lymphocytes from blood to sites of disease activity in the lung could result in a decreased number of circulating blood CD4+ T lymphocytes and increased number of these T cells in the lungs of pulmonary sarcoidosis.19 However, previous reports have shown increased peripheral blood CD8+ T lymphocytes in heavy smokers,2 3 positive correlation of CD8+ T lymphocytes in BAL fluid with pack-year smoking history,12 and positive correlation of CD8+/CD3+ ratio of cells infiltrating small-airway submucosa with pack-years smoked in smokers20 ; these findings suggest the possibility that increased CD8+ T lymphocytes in peripheral blood are associated with increased CD8+ T lymphocytes in the airways of smokers with COPD.
In this study and in a previous report,4 abnormalities in the peripheral blood T-lymphocyte subsets were not present in all smokers with COPD, but only in a subgroup. In addition, in the previous study,5 the increased scores of CD8+ T lymphocyte and muscle in the peripheral airways were not present in all patients with COPD. These patients with increased CD8+ T lymphocytes and airway remodeling in the peripheral airways5 are thought to represent patients with small airways disease. Thus, we suspected that the degree of association between abnormalities in peripheral blood T lymphocytes and development of airflow limitation in smokers could be different between the two subtypes of COPD. Then we reasoned that abnormalities in peripheral blood T-lymphocyte subsets would more likely be associated with COPD patients with small airways disease than with COPD patients with panlobular emphysema, who are known to have lower levels of small airways disease.
The subgroups of low DLCO/VA and normal DLCO/VA had similar mean ages, smoking histories, and degrees of airflow limitation. When the patients were analyzed as a single group of patients with COPD, no difference in T-lymphocyte subsets from the healthy nonsmokers or healthy smokers was apparent; however, when we classified them into two subgroups, a difference in T-lymphocyte subsets became apparent. This suggests that different pathogenetic mechanisms are involved in the subtypes of COPD, and that T-lymphocyte abnormalities might be involved in the pathogenesis of airflow limitation in a subgroup of COPD patients with normal DLCO/VA, probably patients with small airways disease. The significance of the change in T-lymphocyte subsets in this subgroup is further supported by the significant correlation between FEV1/FVC and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio.
It has been suspected that the pathogenesis of the two subtypes of COPD could be different morphologically and physiologically,16 21 but direct evidence has not yet been reported. The result of this study could be the first clue that may lead to substantial evidence of the different pathogenetic mechanisms of the two subgroups of COPD, small airways disease, and panlobular emphysema. These results might also have an important potential implication in the field of research and clinical practice. Presently, patients with COPD are regarded as a single group of patients with a similar physiologic abnormality of airflow limitation. However, if further study confirms the present finding and consequently different disease entities of COPD, a different approach should be applied not only to basic and clinical research, but also to the application of therapeutics such as corticosteroid in the two subtypes of COPD, and presumably different results would be obtained. In clinical practice, it has been difficult to make a differential diagnosis of the subtypes of COPD; however, in the future, high-resolution CT might have a role in solving this problem.22 23
A limitation of this study was the small number of patients with COPD, and consequently too small a number of presumed subtypes of patients with COPD. Further study in a larger number of smokers with COPD is needed to confirm these results. In addition, further study investigating both T-lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood and T lymphocytes in the lung tissues of the same smokers with COPD are necessary.
The finding of a previous study has suggested that the diagnosis of emphysema based on diffusing capacity could be erroneous, in that severe small airways disease may cause a spurious reduction in diffusing capacity as well as severe loss of lung elastic recoil.24 Therefore, we might suspect that our study group of COPD patients with low diffusing capacity might have been "contaminated" by cases with small airways disease. If so, it would be expected that the difference in T-lymphocyte subsets between the two groups would be obscured by the contamination of cases. However, in this study, there was a statistically significant difference in T-lymphocyte subsets between the two groups, suggesting that only a small number of cases, if at all, with small airways disease might have been falsely classified as the group with low diffusing capacity. Moreover, if there was no contamination of cases by more correct method of differential diagnosis of subtypes of COPD such as high-resolution CT, the difference in T-lymphocyte subsets would have been more prominent between the two groups.
In conclusion, we have found that the proportions of peripheral blood CD8+ T lymphocytes and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio in a subgroup of COPD patients with normal DLCO/VA were significantly different from those in healthy smokers or in a subgroup of COPD patients with low DLCO/VA, and the degree of airflow limitation significantly correlated with the CD4+/CD8+ ratio only in this subgroup. This suggests that T-lymphocyte abnormalities might be involved in the pathogenesis of airflow limitation in a subgroup of patients with COPD, presumably with small airways disease, but not in all patients with COPD.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by a grant from the Asan Institute for Life Sciences.
Received for publication September 13, 2001. Accepted for publication February 20, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Reyes, A. Prieto, A. de la Hera, P. de Lucas, R. Alvarez-Sala, J. L. Alvarez-Sala, and M. Alvarez-Mon Treatment With AM3 Restores Defective T-Cell Function in COPD Patients Chest, March 1, 2006; 129(3): 527 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. MacNee Pathogenesis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Proceedings of the ATS, November 1, 2005; 2(4): 258 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pons, J. Sauleda, J. M. Ferrer, B. Barcelo, A. Fuster, V. Regueiro, M. R. Julia, and A. G. N. Agusti Blunted {gamma}{delta} T-lymphocyte response in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2005; 25(3): 441 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Barnes Mediators of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2004; 56(4): 515 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.J. Barnes, S.D. Shapiro, and R.A. Pauwels Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: molecular and cellularmechanisms Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2003; 22(4): 672 - 688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |