|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Third Department of Internal Medicine (Drs. Wu, Yamauchi, Kobayashi, Tanifuji, and Inoue) and First Department of Internal Medicine (Drs. Kato and Suzuki), Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan.
Correspondence to: Hiroshi Inoue, MD, PhD, FCCP, Chief and Professor, The Third Department of Internal Medicine, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 19-1 Uchimaru Morioka, 020 Japan; e-mail: hinoue{at}iwate-med.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients and interventions: In seven patients with mild persistent bronchial asthma (mean ± SD age, 57.7 ± 3.7 years; four women and three men), esophageal pH was monitored by a pH meter and cough responsiveness was evaluated by single-breath aerosol inhalation of capsaicin with increasing dosage from 0.30 to 9.84 nmol. Simultaneously, esophageal perfusion was performed through an esophageal tube filled with either saline solution or 0.1 N hydrochloric acid (HCl), the order of which was selected at random, in 1-week intervals. Results were expressed as the lowest concentration of capsaicin eliciting three coughs (PD3). Spirometry was also performed during esophageal pH monitoring.
Results: A significant decrease in the geometric mean of log PD3 was observed during distal esophageal HCl perfusion (0.45 ± 0.04 nmol) compared with that of the saline solution perfusion (0.04 ± 0.06 nmol) [p < 0.01]. However, no significant changes were observed either in FVC, FEV1, or peak expiratory flow during the periods of the saline solution or HCl perfusion.
Conclusion: The present data demonstrate that an increase in cough responsiveness may be induced when HCl stimulates the distal portion of esophagus in patients with bronchial asthma, suggesting that the GER would be one of the important factors that influence asthmatic status.
Key Words: bronchial asthma cough responsiveness esophageal acid perfusion gastroesophageal reflux
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The subjects were willing to give informed written consent for their participation after the experimental protocol was explained to them. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Iwate Medical University.
Acid Provocation Test and Esophageal pH Monitoring
Esophageal acid provocation was performed in a sitting position. The pH monitor catheter (Digitrapper MK III; Synectics Medical AB; Stockholm, Sweden), two channel, interval of 18 cm, was introduced transnasally into the stomach and then slowly withdrawn, and the distal channel was positioned 5 cm above the LES, as determined by the change in pH between the stomach and esophagus. The proximal channel was located in the upper third of the esophagus. The location of the distal and the proximal pH channels were also checked by radiography. Through the esophageal catheter (5F external diameter), the outlet of which was positioned at approximately 15 cm above the LES, 0.1 N HCl was perfused at a rate of 2 mL/min for 10 min. After FEV1 was measured by a dry spirometer (DISCOM-21; Chest M.I.; Tokyo, Japan), cough responsiveness was obtained by capsaicin inhalation test with the catheters in the esophagus. The catheter was firmly set and not removed during both the pulmonary function test and the cough test. During the cough test and spirometry, the pH in the lower part of the esophagus was maintained at pH of 1.0 with additional intermittent perfusion of HCl, and the total amount of HCl administered was 23 to 25 mL. During the acid perfusion, there was no pH change in the upper part of the esophagus, as indicated via the pH monitor. One week later, spirometry and the cough test were performed again in the similar method, except with saline solution perfusion instead of esophageal HCl perfusion (although the order of HCl and saline solution perfusion was done at random). In the present study, the patients were unaware of whether HCl or saline solution was perfused. In addition, none of the patients expressed any different feelings between HCl or saline solution perfusion in the esophagus.
Pulmonary Function
FVC, FEV1, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements were performed three consecutive times, and the highest value was recorded.
Cough Inducement Test
Capsaicin (ICN Biomedicals; Aurora, OH) the pungent agent of hot pepper, was prepared by dissolving 3.0 mg of the substance in 10 mL of 20% (volume/volume) ethanol in saline solution, obtaining a final concentration of 9.84 x 104 mol/L. The lower concentration was obtained by sequential twofold dilution of this solution.
Aerosol was delivered by a jet nebulizer attached to the breath-activated dosimeter (Nebicheck; PK Morgan Ltd; Gillingham, Kent, UK), set to nebulize for 0.9 s at a pressure of 21 pounds per square inch and used with an output of 10 L per breath. The challenge was performed by single-breath inhalation of doses increasing from 0.30 to 9.84 nmol. Ethanol in saline solution was administered at random to increase challenge blindness.
Subjects were asked to inhale once deeply (from functional residual capacity to total lung capacity) from the nebulizer over a period of 2 s, at 2-min intervals. The number of coughs during the first 30 s after each dose was counted. The challenge continued until three coughs were produced or the maximal dosage of capsaicin was attained. The inhalation challenge was performed during esophageal HCl or saline solution perfusion. Subjects were unaware that cough was a specific point of research interest.
Results were expressed as the lowest concentration of capsaicin causing three or more coughs (PD3). We modified the method of cough response test by capsaicin inhalation originally reported by Ferrari et al.15 Since more than four coughs were not recorded during capsaicin cough test in three of seven patients in the present study, we used PD3 as the dose to express cough sensitivity of all subjects. The results were reproducible with capsaicin as two separate administration for the preliminary examination. If no cough was elicited by the highest tested dose, PD3 was arbitrarily given the value 19.7 nmol (ie, twice the highest tested dose).
Statistics
Two-way analysis of variance was used to compare the results of different continuous variables in the two perfusion periods. As a follow-up to the analysis of variance, the Tukey studentized range test was used to compare the different parameters between the two periods. The PD3 data were log transformed. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. The accepted statistical significance was p < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Log PD3 revealed lower value during distal esophageal HCl perfusion (0.45 ± 0.04 nmol) compared with that of saline solution perfusion (0.04 ± 0.06 nmol) [p < 0.01; Fig 1 ]. However, no significant difference in FEV1 was observed during distal esophageal saline solution perfusion and during HCl perfusion (saline solution, 1.96 ± 0.25 L, vs HCl, 1.95 ± 0.24 L; n = 7; p = 0.88) [Fig 2 , Table 2 ]. Neither FVC nor PEF components changed during distal esophageal HCl perfusions (FVC: saline solution, 2.51 ± 0.31 L, vs HCl, 2.50 ± 0.27 L; n = 7; p = 0.81; and PEF: saline solution, 5.79 ± 0.69 L/s, vs HCl, 5.64 ± 0.72 L/s; n = 7; p = 0.21) [Table 2 ].
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It was previously shown that chronic persistent cough that remains unexplained after a standard diagnostic evaluation is associated with either asymptomatic GER7 16 17 or impaired clearance of acid from the esophagus.18 Irwin et al7 indicated cough correlated with distal but not proximal acid reflux events, with endoscopy usually showing evidence of distal esophagitis. They concluded that acid stimulated inflamed distal esophageal mucosal receptors, resulting in a reflex-mediated cough. Ing et al19 suggested that acid in the distal esophagus precipitates cough, and that there is evidence for an esophageal-tracheobronchial cough reflex mechanism in patients with chronic cough associated with GER. However, their subjects were not asthmatic patients, and they did not study the change of cough responsiveness during esophageal HCl infusion. Furthermore, they did not perform esophagogastroscopy to reveal if their patients had esophagitis. In our study, we confirmed the patients with mild persistent bronchial asthma have neither GER symptoms nor esophagitis, which was evaluated by gastroesophagoscopy.
Field20 indicated that asthmatics without symptomatic GER did not show any changes in FVC, FEV1, and PEF during esophageal HCl perfusion. In the present study, we did not observe any significant changes of FVC, FEV1, and PEF during esophageal HCl perfusion.
In the US National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines,14 as a long-term control, sustained-release theophylline is listed in the treatment for the asthmatics with mild persistent asthma; however, it is not preferred as inhaled corticosteroid or cromolyn or nedocromil. In contrast, the Japanese Asthma Prevention and Management Guideline21 recommended sustained-release theophylline as the same as inhaled corticosteroid. In this regard, a higher ratio of asthmatics with mild persistent asthma are receiving theophylline in Japan compared to the patients in the United States.
Asthma is exacerbated by multiple triggers. One common, often overlooked trigger is GER. Sontag et al22 23 reported that 82% of 104 adult asthmatics had abnormal amounts of acid reflux, significantly lower LES pressure, more frequent reflux episodes, and higher esophageal acid contact times, evaluated by 24-h pH esophageal testing and esophageal manometry.
There are two proposed mechanisms of GER-associated cough: (1) acid in the distal esophagus stimulating an esophageal-tracheobronchial cough reflex, and (2) microaspiration or macroaspiration of esophageal contents into the larynx and tracheobronchial tree. We studied the GER-associated cough responsiveness while acid in the distal esophagus stimulated an esophageal-tracheobronchial cough reflex, though the mechanisms would need to be elucidated further. Hamamoto et al24 studied the airway plasma extravasation induced by intraesophageal HCl stimulation in anesthetized guinea pigs, and found that infusion of 1 N HCl into the esophagus significantly increased plasma extravasation in the trachea, which was inhibited by capsaicin or bilateral vagotomy. They thus concluded that tachykinin-like substances are released to cause plasma extravasation in the airways as a result of intraesophageal HCl stimulation, and there are neural pathways communicating between the esophagus and airways, including the vagus nerve. Capsaicin releases tachykinins from storage in nerve endings in the airway. Substance P is one of the potent tachykinins to stimulate C fiber and to induce cough. The increased capsaicin-induced cough sensitivity by HCl perfusion of lower esophagus was due to the increased susceptibility of C fiber-mediated vagal nerve network communicating between airway and esophagus.23 In the present study, spontaneous coughing did not occur during the acid stimulation to esophagus on all subjects. Therefore, the acid stimulation to esophagus itself increased only cough sensitivity to capsaicin, but did not induce spontaneous cough. In this regard, GER may increase cough responsiveness when asthmatics receive stimuli to their airway.
In the present study, we observed patients with mild persistent asthma without GER symptoms or esophagitis. One may expect a further exaggerated increase in cough responsiveness in patients with esophagitis or in patients with severe persistent asthma. However, it is still uncertain whether either case is true. In the present study, we did not examine nonasthmatic subjects. There is no report concerning the effect of HCl perfusion on cough sensitivity of normal subjects. However, Schmidt et al25 reported that in normal subjects and patients with mild bronchial asthma, cough thresholds were not significantly different from each other.
The present data suggest that artificially induced GER leads to an increase in cough responsiveness in patients with mild persistent asthma. The increased cough sensitivity itself does not cause an asthma attack. However, increased cough itself lowers the quality of life in asthmatics because of sleep disturbance, interruption of speech, etc. Our previous study26 also indicated that an increase in airway hyperresponsiveness was induced when HCl stimulated the esophagus in patients with bronchial asthma.
We conclude that acid stimulation of the lower esophagus increased cough responsiveness to capsaicin in patients with mild persistent asthma, even in those without GER symptoms or evidence of esophagitis. The clinical importance of this finding will require further investigation.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan.
Received for publication March 26, 2001. Accepted for publication March 26, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C F Everett, J A Kastelik, S A Mulrennan, A H Morice, L Heaney, and B Johnston Predictors of therapy resistant asthma * Authors' reply Thorax, March 1, 2004; 59(3): 270 - 271. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |