Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, D.-N.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, D.-N.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, H.
(Chest. 2002;122:505-509.)
© 2002 American College of Chest Physicians

Effects of Esophageal Acid Perfusion on Cough Responsiveness in Patients With Bronchial Asthma*

De-Nan Wu, MD; Kohei Yamauchi, MD, PhD; Hitoshi Kobayashi, MD, PhD; Yukio Tanifuji, MD; Chieko Kato, MD; Kazuyuki Suzuki, MD, PhD and Hiroshi Inoue, MD, PhD, FCCP

* From the Third Department of Internal Medicine (Drs. Wu, Yamauchi, Kobayashi, Tanifuji, and Inoue) and First Department of Internal Medicine (Drs. Kato and Suzuki), Iwate Medical University, School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan.

Correspondence to: Hiroshi Inoue, MD, PhD, FCCP, Chief and Professor, The Third Department of Internal Medicine, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 19-1 Uchimaru Morioka, 020 Japan; e-mail: hinoue{at}iwate-med.ac.jp


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study objectives: The effect of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) on cough responsiveness in patients with bronchial asthma has yet to be studied in significant detail. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of distal esophageal acid perfusion on cough responsiveness in patients with bronchial asthma.

Patients and interventions: In seven patients with mild persistent bronchial asthma (mean ± SD age, 57.7 ± 3.7 years; four women and three men), esophageal pH was monitored by a pH meter and cough responsiveness was evaluated by single-breath aerosol inhalation of capsaicin with increasing dosage from 0.30 to 9.84 nmol. Simultaneously, esophageal perfusion was performed through an esophageal tube filled with either saline solution or 0.1 N hydrochloric acid (HCl), the order of which was selected at random, in 1-week intervals. Results were expressed as the lowest concentration of capsaicin eliciting three coughs (PD3). Spirometry was also performed during esophageal pH monitoring.

Results: A significant decrease in the geometric mean of log PD3 was observed during distal esophageal HCl perfusion (0.45 ± 0.04 nmol) compared with that of the saline solution perfusion (0.04 ± 0.06 nmol) [p < 0.01]. However, no significant changes were observed either in FVC, FEV1, or peak expiratory flow during the periods of the saline solution or HCl perfusion.

Conclusion: The present data demonstrate that an increase in cough responsiveness may be induced when HCl stimulates the distal portion of esophagus in patients with bronchial asthma, suggesting that the GER would be one of the important factors that influence asthmatic status.

Key Words: bronchial asthma • cough responsiveness • esophageal acid perfusion • gastroesophageal reflux


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
There is a potential association between asthma and gastroesophageal reflux (GER), with GER being a potential trigger in selected patients.1 2 3 4 5 6 Chronic cough and asthma are two clinical problems caused or triggered by GER disease.5 7 Irwin et al7 indicated chronic persistent cough correlated with distal but not proximal acid reflux events usually showing evidence of distal esophagitis observed with endoscopy; they concluded that acid stimulated inflamed distal esophageal mucosal receptors, resulting in a reflex-mediated cough. However, the effect of GER on cough responsiveness in patients with bronchial asthma has not yet been adequately studied.8 9 10 11 12 13 The purpose of the present study was to determine whether distal esophageal acid perfusion itself could alter cough responsiveness in patients with bronchial asthma even if there was no evidence of esophagitis.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients
Seven patients with mild persistent bronchial asthma (four women and three men; mean ± SD age, 57.7 ± 3.7 years; range, 39 to 64 years) took part in the study. All patients satisfied the criteria for asthma published by the National Institutes of Health.14 We performed esophagogastroscopy on all patients in the study. The results revealed that none of the patients had esophagitis. Subjects with chronic bronchitis, allergic rhinitis, sinusitis, and postnasal drip were excluded from the study. Additional exclusion criteria were the presence of chronic cough (defined as daily cough for at least 1 month), acute respiratory infections during the previous 2 months, malignancy, and significant renal, cardiac, and interstitial lung disease. Smokers and patients receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or drugs that may influence airway reactivity or lower esophageal sphincter (LES) tone were also excluded from the study.

The subjects were willing to give informed written consent for their participation after the experimental protocol was explained to them. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Iwate Medical University.

Acid Provocation Test and Esophageal pH Monitoring
Esophageal acid provocation was performed in a sitting position. The pH monitor catheter (Digitrapper MK III; Synectics Medical AB; Stockholm, Sweden), two channel, interval of 18 cm, was introduced transnasally into the stomach and then slowly withdrawn, and the distal channel was positioned 5 cm above the LES, as determined by the change in pH between the stomach and esophagus. The proximal channel was located in the upper third of the esophagus. The location of the distal and the proximal pH channels were also checked by radiography. Through the esophageal catheter (5F external diameter), the outlet of which was positioned at approximately 15 cm above the LES, 0.1 N HCl was perfused at a rate of 2 mL/min for 10 min. After FEV1 was measured by a dry spirometer (DISCOM-21; Chest M.I.; Tokyo, Japan), cough responsiveness was obtained by capsaicin inhalation test with the catheters in the esophagus. The catheter was firmly set and not removed during both the pulmonary function test and the cough test. During the cough test and spirometry, the pH in the lower part of the esophagus was maintained at pH of 1.0 with additional intermittent perfusion of HCl, and the total amount of HCl administered was 23 to 25 mL. During the acid perfusion, there was no pH change in the upper part of the esophagus, as indicated via the pH monitor. One week later, spirometry and the cough test were performed again in the similar method, except with saline solution perfusion instead of esophageal HCl perfusion (although the order of HCl and saline solution perfusion was done at random). In the present study, the patients were unaware of whether HCl or saline solution was perfused. In addition, none of the patients expressed any different feelings between HCl or saline solution perfusion in the esophagus.

Pulmonary Function
FVC, FEV1, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements were performed three consecutive times, and the highest value was recorded.

Cough Inducement Test
Capsaicin (ICN Biomedicals; Aurora, OH) the pungent agent of hot pepper, was prepared by dissolving 3.0 mg of the substance in 10 mL of 20% (volume/volume) ethanol in saline solution, obtaining a final concentration of 9.84 x 104 mol/L. The lower concentration was obtained by sequential twofold dilution of this solution.

Aerosol was delivered by a jet nebulizer attached to the breath-activated dosimeter (Nebicheck; PK Morgan Ltd; Gillingham, Kent, UK), set to nebulize for 0.9 s at a pressure of 21 pounds per square inch and used with an output of 10 L per breath. The challenge was performed by single-breath inhalation of doses increasing from 0.30 to 9.84 nmol. Ethanol in saline solution was administered at random to increase challenge blindness.

Subjects were asked to inhale once deeply (from functional residual capacity to total lung capacity) from the nebulizer over a period of 2 s, at 2-min intervals. The number of coughs during the first 30 s after each dose was counted. The challenge continued until three coughs were produced or the maximal dosage of capsaicin was attained. The inhalation challenge was performed during esophageal HCl or saline solution perfusion. Subjects were unaware that cough was a specific point of research interest.

Results were expressed as the lowest concentration of capsaicin causing three or more coughs (PD3). We modified the method of cough response test by capsaicin inhalation originally reported by Ferrari et al.15 Since more than four coughs were not recorded during capsaicin cough test in three of seven patients in the present study, we used PD3 as the dose to express cough sensitivity of all subjects. The results were reproducible with capsaicin as two separate administration for the preliminary examination. If no cough was elicited by the highest tested dose, PD3 was arbitrarily given the value 19.7 nmol (ie, twice the highest tested dose).

Statistics
Two-way analysis of variance was used to compare the results of different continuous variables in the two perfusion periods. As a follow-up to the analysis of variance, the Tukey studentized range test was used to compare the different parameters between the two periods. The PD3 data were log transformed. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. The accepted statistical significance was p < 0.05.


    Results
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The patients’ characteristics are presented in Table 1 . All patients had mild asthmatic symptoms without symptoms of GER (heartburn, regurgitation of acid into the mouth, retrosternal pain, or dysphagia). The patients had received bronchodilator therapy: sustained-release theophylline, 200 mg qd or bid (n = 7), and beclomethasone dipropionate, 400 µg bid (n = 4). None of the patients received oral corticosteroids, and all refrained from medication for 24 h before the study. Caffeine-containing drinks were not allowed for 12 h before capsaicin challenge cough test, and ß2-inhalants were withdrawn at least 8 h prior to testing. In addition, none of the patients tested in this study took any antacids, histamine type 2 blockers, or proton pump inhibitors for at least 14 days prior to the study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Characteristics of Seven Study Patients With Bronchial Asthma*

 
In the present study, four asthmatics received HCl perfusion firstly and three asthmatics did secondly. There was no significant difference between the data at the first and second measurements including the HCl and saline perfusion. This result indicated that the increased cough sensitivity could be detected without an effect of the measuring order.

Log PD3 revealed lower value during distal esophageal HCl perfusion (0.45 ± 0.04 nmol) compared with that of saline solution perfusion (0.04 ± 0.06 nmol) [p < 0.01; Fig 1 ]. However, no significant difference in FEV1 was observed during distal esophageal saline solution perfusion and during HCl perfusion (saline solution, 1.96 ± 0.25 L, vs HCl, 1.95 ± 0.24 L; n = 7; p = 0.88) [Fig 2 , Table 2 ]. Neither FVC nor PEF components changed during distal esophageal HCl perfusions (FVC: saline solution, 2.51 ± 0.31 L, vs HCl, 2.50 ± 0.27 L; n = 7; p = 0.81; and PEF: saline solution, 5.79 ± 0.69 L/s, vs HCl, 5.64 ± 0.72 L/s; n = 7; p = 0.21) [Table 2 ].



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Changes in cough responsiveness (PD3) to inhaled capsaicin during distal esophageal saline solution or HCl perfusion in patients with bronchial asthma. Log PD3 decreased significantly during esophageal HCl perfusions (p < 0.01).

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. FEV1 of individual patients during esophageal saline solution or HCl perfusion. FEV1 during saline solution and during HCl perfusion were 1.96 ± 0.25 L and 1.95 ± 0.24 L, respectively. There was no significant change between the two values.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Lung Function Data of Patients With Bronchial Asthma During Distal Esophageal Acid or Saline Solution Perfusion

 

    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
While it has thus far remained unclear whether esophageal acid infusion itself can increase cough responsiveness in adults with bronchial asthma, results in the present study showed that cough responsiveness significantly increased after acid perfusion in the distal esophagus in patients with mild persistent bronchial asthma. To our knowledge, there has been no study to investigate the change of cough responsiveness during distal esophagus acid instillation with monitoring pH of the esophagus. We therefore monitored the pH of both the upper and lower part of the esophagus simultaneously, and report that no pH change was observed in the upper part of the esophagus during acid perfusion. These results convinced us that the pharynx had not been stimulated by the acid perfusion. In the present study, we demonstrated that distal esophageal acid perfusion itself can increase cough responsiveness in patients with mild persistent bronchial asthma even without GER symptoms and the presence of esophagitis. Twenty-four hour esophageal pH testing was very important in this study. Unfortunately, we could not agree on the subjects on which to perform the 24-h esophageal pH testing; therefore, we could not evaluate GER in the patients.

It was previously shown that chronic persistent cough that remains unexplained after a standard diagnostic evaluation is associated with either asymptomatic GER7 16 17 or impaired clearance of acid from the esophagus.18 Irwin et al7 indicated cough correlated with distal but not proximal acid reflux events, with endoscopy usually showing evidence of distal esophagitis. They concluded that acid stimulated inflamed distal esophageal mucosal receptors, resulting in a reflex-mediated cough. Ing et al19 suggested that acid in the distal esophagus precipitates cough, and that there is evidence for an esophageal-tracheobronchial cough reflex mechanism in patients with chronic cough associated with GER. However, their subjects were not asthmatic patients, and they did not study the change of cough responsiveness during esophageal HCl infusion. Furthermore, they did not perform esophagogastroscopy to reveal if their patients had esophagitis. In our study, we confirmed the patients with mild persistent bronchial asthma have neither GER symptoms nor esophagitis, which was evaluated by gastroesophagoscopy.

Field20 indicated that asthmatics without symptomatic GER did not show any changes in FVC, FEV1, and PEF during esophageal HCl perfusion. In the present study, we did not observe any significant changes of FVC, FEV1, and PEF during esophageal HCl perfusion.

In the US National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines,14 as a long-term control, sustained-release theophylline is listed in the treatment for the asthmatics with mild persistent asthma; however, it is not preferred as inhaled corticosteroid or cromolyn or nedocromil. In contrast, the Japanese Asthma Prevention and Management Guideline21 recommended sustained-release theophylline as the same as inhaled corticosteroid. In this regard, a higher ratio of asthmatics with mild persistent asthma are receiving theophylline in Japan compared to the patients in the United States.

Asthma is exacerbated by multiple triggers. One common, often overlooked trigger is GER. Sontag et al22 23 reported that 82% of 104 adult asthmatics had abnormal amounts of acid reflux, significantly lower LES pressure, more frequent reflux episodes, and higher esophageal acid contact times, evaluated by 24-h pH esophageal testing and esophageal manometry.

There are two proposed mechanisms of GER-associated cough: (1) acid in the distal esophagus stimulating an esophageal-tracheobronchial cough reflex, and (2) microaspiration or macroaspiration of esophageal contents into the larynx and tracheobronchial tree. We studied the GER-associated cough responsiveness while acid in the distal esophagus stimulated an esophageal-tracheobronchial cough reflex, though the mechanisms would need to be elucidated further. Hamamoto et al24 studied the airway plasma extravasation induced by intraesophageal HCl stimulation in anesthetized guinea pigs, and found that infusion of 1 N HCl into the esophagus significantly increased plasma extravasation in the trachea, which was inhibited by capsaicin or bilateral vagotomy. They thus concluded that tachykinin-like substances are released to cause plasma extravasation in the airways as a result of intraesophageal HCl stimulation, and there are neural pathways communicating between the esophagus and airways, including the vagus nerve. Capsaicin releases tachykinins from storage in nerve endings in the airway. Substance P is one of the potent tachykinins to stimulate C fiber and to induce cough. The increased capsaicin-induced cough sensitivity by HCl perfusion of lower esophagus was due to the increased susceptibility of C fiber-mediated vagal nerve network communicating between airway and esophagus.23 In the present study, spontaneous coughing did not occur during the acid stimulation to esophagus on all subjects. Therefore, the acid stimulation to esophagus itself increased only cough sensitivity to capsaicin, but did not induce spontaneous cough. In this regard, GER may increase cough responsiveness when asthmatics receive stimuli to their airway.

In the present study, we observed patients with mild persistent asthma without GER symptoms or esophagitis. One may expect a further exaggerated increase in cough responsiveness in patients with esophagitis or in patients with severe persistent asthma. However, it is still uncertain whether either case is true. In the present study, we did not examine nonasthmatic subjects. There is no report concerning the effect of HCl perfusion on cough sensitivity of normal subjects. However, Schmidt et al25 reported that in normal subjects and patients with mild bronchial asthma, cough thresholds were not significantly different from each other.

The present data suggest that artificially induced GER leads to an increase in cough responsiveness in patients with mild persistent asthma. The increased cough sensitivity itself does not cause an asthma attack. However, increased cough itself lowers the quality of life in asthmatics because of sleep disturbance, interruption of speech, etc. Our previous study26 also indicated that an increase in airway hyperresponsiveness was induced when HCl stimulated the esophagus in patients with bronchial asthma.

We conclude that acid stimulation of the lower esophagus increased cough responsiveness to capsaicin in patients with mild persistent asthma, even in those without GER symptoms or evidence of esophagitis. The clinical importance of this finding will require further investigation.


    Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank Professor Michael Unher, Faculty of Education, Iwate University, for reading the manuscript, and the staff of the First Department of Internal Medicine for help with gastroesophageal fiberscopy testing.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: GER = gastroesophageal reflux; LES = lower esophageal sphincter; PD3 = concentration of capsaicin causing three or more coughs; PEF = peak expiratory flow

Supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan.

Received for publication March 26, 2001. Accepted for publication March 26, 2002.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ayres, JG, Miles, JF (1996) Oesophageal reflux and asthma. Eur Respir J 9,1073-1078[Abstract]
  2. Harding, SM, Richter, JE The role of gastroesophageal reflux in chronic cough and asthma. Chest 1997;111,1389-1402[Free Full Text]
  3. Sontag, SJ, Schnell, TG, Miller, TQ, et al Prevalence of oesophagitis in asthmatics. Gut 1992;33,872-876[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Mays, EE Intrinsic asthma in adults: association with gastroesophageal reflux. JAMA 1976;236,2626-2628[Abstract]
  5. Harding, SM, Richter, JE, Guzzo, MR, et al Asthma and gastroesophageal reflux: acid suppressive therapy improves asthma outcome. Am J Med 1996;100,395-405[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. Larrain, A, Carrasco, E, Galleguillos, F, et al Medical and surgical treatment of non-allergic asthma associated with gastroesophageal reflux. Chest 1991;99,1330-1335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Irwin, RS, Zawacki, JK, Curley, FJ, et al Chronic cough as the sole presenting manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;140,1294-1300[ISI][Medline]
  8. Wilson, NM, Charette, L, Thomson, AH, et al Gastrooesophageal reflux and childhood asthma: the acid test. Thorax 1985;40,592-597[Abstract]
  9. Bradley, RM, Stedman, HM, Mistretta, CM Superior laryngeal nerve response patterns to chemical stimulation of sheep epiglottis. Brain Res 1983;276,81-93[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Davies, AM, Koenig, JS, Thach, BT Upper airway chemoreflex responses to saline and water in preterm infant. J Appl Physiol 1988;64,1412-1420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Nishino, T, Kochi, T, Ishii, M Differences in respiratory reflex responses from the larynx, trachea, and bronchi in anesthetized female subjects. Anesthesiology 1996;84,70-74[ISI][Medline]
  12. Wetmore, RF Effects of acid on the larynx of the maturing rabbit and their possible significance to the sudden infant death syndrome. Laryngoscope 1993;103,1242-1254[ISI][Medline]
  13. Boyle, JT, Tuchman, DN, Altschuler, SM, et al Mechanisms for the association of gastroesophageal reflux and bronchospasm. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985;131(suppl),S16-S20[ISI][Medline]
  14. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert panel report II: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1997; publication No. 97–4051
  15. Ferrari, M, Olivieri, M, Sembenini, C, et al Tussive effect of capsaicin in patients with gastroesophageal reflux without cough. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;151,557-561[Abstract]
  16. Ing, AJ, Ngu, MC, Breslin, ABX Chronic persistent cough and gastro-oesophageal reflux. Thorax 1991;46,479-483[Abstract]
  17. Fitzgerald, JM, Allen, CJ, Craven, MA, et al Chronic cough and gastroesophageal reflux. Can Med Assoc J 1989;140,520-524[Abstract]
  18. Ing, AJ, Ngu, MC, Breslin, ABX Chronic persistent cough and clearance of esophageal acid. Chest 1992;102,1668-1671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ing, AJ, Ngu, MC, Breslin, ABX Pathogenesis of chronic persistent cough associated with gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149,160-167[Abstract]
  20. Field, SK A critical review of the studies of the effects of simulated or real gastroesophageal reflux on pulmonary function in asthmatic adults. Chest 1999;115,848-856[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Makino S, Furusho K, Miyamoto T, eds. Japanese Asthma Prevention and Management Guideline. Japanese guideline for the prevention and management of bronchial asthma. 1998 Tokyo, Kyowakikaku-Tsushin (Japanese)
  22. Sontag, SJ, O’Connell, S, Khandelwal, S, et al Most asthmatics have gastroesophageal reflux with or without bronchodilator therapy. Gastroenterology 1990;99,613-620[ISI][Medline]
  23. Sontag, SJ, Schnell, TG, Miller, TQ, et al Prevalence of oesophagitis in asthmatics. Gut 1992;33,872-876[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hamamoto, J, Kohrogi, H, Kawano, O, et al Esophageal stimulation by hydrochloric acid causes neurogenic inflammation in the airway in guinea pigs. J Appl Physiol 1997;82,738-745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Schmidt, D, Jorres, RA, Magnussen, H Citric acid-induced cough thresholds in normal subjects, patients with bronchial asthma, and smokers. Eur J Med Res 1997;2,384-388[Medline]
  26. Wu, D, Tanifuji, Y, Kobayashi, H, et al Effects of esophageal acid perfusion on airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with bronchial asthma. Chest 2000;118,1153-1556



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
C F Everett, J A Kastelik, S A Mulrennan, A H Morice, L Heaney, and B Johnston
Predictors of therapy resistant asthma * Authors' reply
Thorax, March 1, 2004; 59(3): 270 - 271.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, D.-N.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, D.-N.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS