|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Correspondence to: Mark D. Eisner, MD, MPH, FCCP, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 350 Parnassus Ave, Suite 609, San Francisco, CA 94117; e-mail: eisner{at}itsa.ucsf.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design, setting, and participants: A cohort of 374 nonsmoking adults with asthma recruited from a random sample of allergy, pulmonary, and family practice physicians in northern California underwent structured telephone interviews.
Measurements and results: The prevalence of self-reported ETS exposure during travel in the past 12 months was substantial (30%; 95% confidence interval, 25 to 35%). Of the exposed subjects, approximately one third (34%) indicated no other regular source of ETS exposure. ETS-related cough, wheezing, or chest tightness during travel was the most common complaint (66%), followed by eye irritation (46%) and nose irritation (43%). After ETS exposure, many subjects indicated extra inhaled asthma medication use (55%). Subjects with no other regular ETS exposure reported a greater likelihood of eye irritation (58% vs 40%; p = 0.068) and nose irritation (58% vs 36%; p = 0.025) than persons with regular exposure. In contrast, there were no differences in respiratory symptoms, asthma medication use, or asthma exacerbation by regular ETS exposure status.
Conclusions: In adults with asthma, ETS exposure is common during travel. For many subjects, travel is their principal source of exposure.
Key Words: adverse effects asthma smoking tobacco smoke pollution travel
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects underwent structured telephone interviews that included assessment of recent ETS exposure in various locations (during the 7 days before interview) and exposure during travel in the 12 months before interview. Specifically, subjects were asked, "In the past 12 months, have you taken a vacation or business trip where you were noticeably exposed to someone elses tobacco smoke?" For subjects who indicated any travel exposure, we also ascertained sensory irritation and respiratory symptoms after ETS exposure. These included red eyes or eye irritation, runny nose or nose irritation, and coughing, wheezing, or chest tightness. The interview also assessed extra inhaled asthma medication use: "On this trip, did you use any extra asthma sprays after exposure to tobacco smoke?" The interview also assessed whether the subject had a symptomatic asthma exacerbation after ETS exposure during the 12 months before interview.
The data were analyzed using statistical software (SAS version 6.12; SAS Institute; Cary, NC). We report the prevalence of self-reported ETS exposure during travel and ETS-attributed sensory irritation symptoms, respiratory symptoms, extra inhaled medication use, and asthma exacerbation. For proportions, we calculated the exact binomial 95% confidence interval. Using the
2 test, we also examined whether the self-reported short-term health impact of ETS exposure was greater among persons without recent regular ETS exposure, defined as living with a smoker or exposure during the 7 days before interview in various environments (home, another persons home, vehicle, workplace, bar, or nightclub).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The prevalence of self-reported ETS exposure during travel in the 12 months before interview was substantial (n = 111; 30%; 95% confidence interval, 25 to 35%). Of the people reporting travel-related ETS exposure, 38 subjects (34%) did not live with a smoker or indicate other sources of ongoing ETS exposure. For these subjects, travel was apparently their principal source of exposure.
Many subjects reported ETS-attributed sensory irritation or respiratory symptoms during travel (Table 1 ). The most common complaint was ETS-related cough, wheezing, or chest tightness (66%), followed by eye irritation (46%) and nose irritation (43%). After ETS exposure, many subjects indicated extra inhaled asthma medication use (55%) or asthma exacerbation (54%). Compared with people with a regular source of ETS exposure, those without regular exposure indicated a greater likelihood of eye or nose irritation after ETS exposure (Table 1) . In contrast, the prevalence of exposure-related cough, extra asthma medication use, and asthma exacerbation was similar in both groups.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The health impact of intermittent ETS exposure during travel has not been examined previously. In people with asthma, who may comprise a vulnerable group, travel-related ETS exposure was associated with a high prevalence of sensory irritation symptoms and respiratory symptoms. More than one half of these adults with asthma indicated that travel-related exposure exacerbated their asthma or necessitated additional inhaled medication use.
Compared with people with regular ETS exposure, travel-related ETS exposure was more strongly associated with sensory irritation symptoms among those without regular exposure. Our findings may indicate that subjects who are sensitive to ETS selectively avoid regular exposure. During travel, when exposure may be less avoidable, these subjects experience a greater likelihood of sensory irritation symptoms than subjects who are less sensitive. Previous research confirms that ETS sensitive subjects experience a greater physiologic effect after experimental ETS exposure, developing a greater increase in nasal resistance.9
Our study assessed ETS exposure by self-report, which could have resulted in misclassification of some subjects. Similarly, the observed association between travel-related ETS exposure and ETSattributed symptoms could be influenced by subjects beliefs about the health effects of ETS. Furthermore, the prevalence of travel-related ETS exposure among adults with asthma may be different than in the general population. Because adults with asthma may avoid ETS, the prevalence may be even higher in people without chronic respiratory conditions.
The negative public health impact of ETS exposure has been conclusively established.3 Although efforts to prohibit public smoking in California have successfully reduced ETS exposure,5 exposure during travel continues to occur. To further curtail ETS exposure, legislation to prohibit public smoking nationally and internationally should be promoted.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by National Institutes of Health grants K23 HL04201 (Dr. Eisner) and RO1 HL56438 (Dr. Blanc).
Received for publication December 4, 2001. Accepted for publication March 22, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M D Eisner, J Klein, S K Hammond, G Koren, G Lactao, and C Iribarren Directly measured second hand smoke exposure and asthma health outcomes Thorax, October 1, 2005; 60(10): 814 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |