|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston MA.
Correspondence to: Gordon L. Snider, MD, FCCP, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston MA 02130; e-mail: Gordon.Snider{at}med.va.gov
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: COPD dyspnea exercise oxygen inhalation therapy physical endurance
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In contrast to the evidence-based criteria for the reimbursement of LTOT, the criteria for administering and reimbursing patients for oxygen therapy during exercise were set arbitrarily, by extrapolation. The January 1996 US Medicare policy stated that oxygen therapy during exercise was not considered to be medically necessary for breathlessness. Oxygen therapy was reimbursed during exercise only if patients demonstrated hypoxemia during low-level exertion, which is relieved by oxygen administration. The specific wording is as follows:
An arterial PO2 at or below 55 mm Hg or an arterial O2 saturation at or below 88%, taken during exercise for a patient who demonstrates an arterial PO2 at or > 56 mm Hg, or an arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) at or > 89%, during the day while at rest. In this case, supplemental oxygen is provided for during exercise if there is evidence the use of oxygen improves the hypoxemia that was demonstrated during exercise when the patient was breathing room air.3
This essay focuses on the question of whether the peer-reviewed literature contains evidence that oxygen should be prescribed for persons with COPD to relieve dyspnea and to improve exercise performance, as well as to relieve hypoxemia. The term hyperoxia is used in this essay because the process of relieving dyspnea during exertion appears to require sufficient oxygen supplementation to result in an increase in PaO2 rather than the simple restoration of saturation to normal levels. Reports in English were sought from a National Library of Medicine PubMed search and from the bibliographies of retrieved articles in which the patients studied had COPD with severe airflow obstruction (ie, mean FEV1 < 1.0 L or < 39% of predicted) and mild resting hypoxemia (ie, mean PaO2 of > 62 mm Hg or SaO2 measured by pulse oximetry [SpO2] of > 91%). These criteria were met by 16 reports published between 1956 and 2001. Only one of these reports was a randomized controlled trial. The total number of patients studied was 173, ranging from 8 to 26 patients per report.
| Summary of Literature |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Raimondi et al6 confirmed these results in eight men with a mean FEV1 of 0.74 L who increased their exercise endurance in response to a constant work-rate task by 35% (p < 0.005) when breathing 35% oxygen as compared with air. Vyas and colleagues7 studied the maximum duration of exercise in 12 men with a mean FEV1 of 29% of predicted values and mild resting hypoxemia (ie, mean resting PaO2, 72 mm Hg), which was measured while they were breathing air or 40% oxygen. Vyas et al found an increased exercise endurance of 12.8% (p < 0.025), which occurred at the expense of an increase in blood lactate levels and PaCO2, and a fall in pH.
Bradley and colleagues8 studied 26 men and women with severe airflow obstruction (ie, mean FEV1, 0.52 L) and mild resting hypoxemia (mean [SD] PaO2, 72.3 mm Hg [11.3 mm Hg]) while they exercised on a treadmill breathing compressed air or O2, 5 L/min by nasal prongs. Exercise endurance increased by 47% during O2 breathing, as compared with air breathing. There were no significant relationships among exercise endurance on air, oxygen breathing and rest, or exercise arterial blood gas values.
Woodcock et al9 reported studies on 10 patients with severe airflow obstruction (ie, mean FEV1, 0.71 L) and mild resting hypoxemia (ie, mean PaO2, 72.3 mm Hg). They used graduated exercise to exhaustion on a treadmill, with dyspnea measurement using an analog scale, while study participants breathed air or oxygen, 4 L/min, via cannula. Oxygen breathing resulted in a 25% mean increase in the distance walked on the treadmill (p < 0.01). The dyspnea score at 75% of the maximum treadmill distance was decreased by a mean of 24% (p < 0.02).
Stein et al10 studied nine COPD patients (mean FEV1, 0.87 L; mean PaO2, 63 mm Hg) using a graded treadmill test to maximum tolerance, breathing compressed air or 30% oxygen via a low-resistance valve. Exercise endurance was increased in eight of nine patients. This increase was achieved by a reduction in ventilatory requirements for the same workload, so that a limiting level of ventilation occurred later during incremental work. Blood lactate levels were reduced, but CO2 levels were retained.
Scano and colleagues11 studied 10 COPD subjects with somewhat less severe airflow obstruction than those in previous reports (ie, mean FEV1, 1.45 L; mean PaO2, 83.3 mm Hg). They used graded exercise to maximum on a bicycle ergometer while patients breathed air or 100% O2 through a low-resistance valved system. Total O2 consumption increased by a mean of 34% during oxygen breathing, and minute ventilation decreased. Mouth occlusion pressure at 0.1 s after onset and respiratory frequency decreased significantly during hyperoxia as compared with normoxia, suggesting a decrease in peripheral mechanical drive to respiration.
Bye and colleagues12 examined ventilatory muscle function during graded exercise to maximum on a cycle ergometer in eight COPD patients. They showed a doubling of exercise time at constant workload, which they considered to be associated with decreased minute ventilation and evidence of decreased respiratory muscle fatigue. Criner and Celli13 studied respiratory muscle recruitment in six COPD subjects with severe airflow obstruction (ie, mean FEV1, 0.66 L) and mild hypoxemia (ie, mean PaO2, 64.5 mm Hg) while breathing air or 30% O2. They showed that exercise with O2 breathing almost doubled exercise endurance time and altered respiratory muscle recruitment. While exercising while breathing O2, the diaphragm performed more ventilatory work, possibly preventing the overloading of the accessory muscles of respiration and thereby contributing to a decrease in dyspnea during exercise.
Davidson and colleagues14 assessed the effect of supplemental O2 therapy on exercise performance in 17 patients with severe airflow obstruction (ie, mean FEV1, 0.79 L) and mild hypoxemia (ie, mean PaO2, 64.5 mm Hg). O2, 4 L/min, increased the mean endurance time by 59% and the 6-min walking distance by 17%. The endurance time for cycling at a constant workload was increased by 51% at an O2 flow rate of 2 L/min, by 88% at 4 L/min, and by 80% at 6 L/min.
Light et al15 studied the relationship between improvement in exercise performance on O2 supplementation therapy and the magnitude of hypoxic ventilatory drive in 17 patients with COPD (ie, mean FEV1, 0.99 L) and mild hypoxemia (ie, mean PaO2, 68.7 mm Hg). Identical maximal cycle ergometer exercise was carried out breathing air or 30% O2. Nine subjects increased their maximum workload, and eight subjects did not. The maximum mean exercise ventilation fell from 15.4 L/min while breathing air to 13.8 L/min while breathing 30% O2 (p < 0.005). The dyspnea score while exercising fell from 8.5 while breathing air to 6.5 while breathing oxygen (p < 0.01). The measurement of hypoxic ventilatory drive was not helpful in predicting which patients would improve their exercise performance with oxygen breathing.
Dean and colleagues16 measured dyspnea scores during endurance testing on a cycle ergometer and correlated these measurements with right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) measured by Doppler echocardiography during a separate, supine, incremental exercise test. Tests were performed in 12 COPD patients with severe airflow obstruction (ie, mean FEV1, 0.89 L) and mild hypoxemia (ie, mean PaO2, 71 mm Hg) while the subjects breathed air or 40% O2. The duration of exercise increased from 10.3 min while breathing air to 14.2 min while breathing 40% O2 (p < 0.005). Oxygen therapy delayed the rise in dyspnea scores and lowered the mean RVSP at maximum exercise from 71 to 64 mm Hg (p < 0.03). An improvement in the duration of exercise correlated with the decrease in dyspnea (R2 = 0.66; p < 0.001), but not with the decrease in heart rate, minute ventilation, or RVSP.
Leach and colleagues17 measured exercise tolerance in 20 patients with severe COPD (ie, mean FEV1, 0.74 L) and mild hypoxemia (ie, mean PaO2, 68.7 mm Hg), and in 10 severely impaired patients with interstitial lung disease. The investigators used both an endurance walk and a 6-min walking test with patients breathing compressed air at a flow rate of 4 L/min or oxygen at 2, 4, or 6 L/min from a liquid O2 source. Exercise endurance in the endurance walk at 2, 4, and 6 L/min O2 was increased by 37.9%, 67.7%, and 85.0%, respectively, in comparison with that while breathing air. The exercise distance in the 6-min walk test was increased by 19.2%, 34.5%, and 36.3%, respectively, in comparison walking while breathing air. Carrying the oxygen container reduced the endurance walking distance by 22.4% and the 6-min walking distance by 14.1% in comparison with the unburdened walks. Results varied among patients but were similar in the COPD group and the interstitial lung disease group. Only among the COPD patients did desaturation while exercising have any predictive value. The authors concluded that exercise testing would be necessary to determine which patients exercise ability would benefit from supplemental oxygen.
ODonnell et al18 explored the factors that might contribute to relief from dyspnea during O2 administration in 11 COPD patients with severe airflow obstruction (ie, mean FEV1, 39% of predicted) and mild hypoxemia (ie, mean PaO2, 74 mm Hg). The study used exercise at approximately 50% of their patients incremental exercise capacity, breathing room air or 60% O2, as the test. The mean PaO2 value at exercise cessation was 65 mm Hg while breathing air and 226 mm Hg while breathing 60% O2 (p < 0.001). While breathing 60% O2, the Borg dyspnea score/time slopes, the slope of mouth occlusion pressure at 0.1 s after onset, and blood lactate levels all fell significantly over time. Endurance time increased by 35% (p < 0.01), but the PaCO2/time did not change. The authors concluded that the relief from dyspnea was explained by reduced ventilatory demand in association with decreased lactate levels.
Somfay and colleagues19 studied 10 patients with severe COPD (ie, mean FEV1, 0.92 L) and mild hypoxemia (ie, mean SpO2, 92%, rest and 88% exercise). The endurance time on a symptom-limited incremental exercise test was increased while breathing 30% O2 compared to air and increased further while breathing 50% O2, but not 75% or 100% O2. While breathing O2, in comparison with breathing air, there were significant but modest decreases in dyspnea score, end-expiratory lung volume, end-inspiratory lung volume, minute ventilation, and breathing frequency. Improved endurance time correlated negatively with end-expiratory lung volume (r = -0.48; p < 0.002) and with end-inspiratory lung volume (r = -0.43; p < 0.005). The dyspnea rating decrease correlated with the decrease in respiratory frequency (r = 0.35; p < 0.028). The authors concluded that oxygen supplementation during exercise induced a dose-dependent improvement in endurance and dyspnea, which may be partly related to decreased hyperinflation and slower breathing frequency. This effect was maximal at an inspiratory O2 concentration of 50%.
| Clinical Trial of Hyperoxic Exercise |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The 26 patients studied had a mean age of 73 years, severe airflow obstruction (ie, mean FEV1, 0.9 L), and mild resting hypoxemia (ie, mean PaO2, 69 mm Hg). The results of the 6-min walk tests showed an increase of 3.1 to 6.4% in distance walked from breathing air to breathing oxygen (all tests, p < 0.05). The step tests showed an increase in the number of steps from 12 to 20% (all tests, p < 0.05). Borg dyspnea scores fell slightly but not statistically significantly. Small, statistically significant improvements in dyspnea, fatigue, emotional functioning, and mastery occurred while breathing domiciliary O2 compared to baseline, however, mastery also improved significantly while breathing compressed air. There were no significant differences when the home O2 data were compared to the compressed air data. The 6-min walk test data and the step test data were similar at baseline and after the 6-week treatment period of breathing domiciliary O2 or air.
The authors concluded that although oxygen supplementation resulted in small improvements in exercise performance during both the 6-min walk test and the step test, such improvements had little effects on patients lives.
Critique
While on the whole the study was well-done, it has two serious flaws. The domiciliary oxygen was administered via a DODS (Oxymatic) at the 4 L/min setting. Roberts and colleagues22
compared exercise performance in subjects using the DODS Oxymatic as compared with using continuous-flow oxygen at the same flow rate. They found that use of the DODS Oxymatic produced only a small increase in walking distance, without an elevation in oxygen saturation. The results using the DODS Oxymatic were inferior to those breathing continuous-flow oxygen in most of the measured variables.
The other flaw in the study is that all patients received oxygen supplementation with only 4 L/min oxygen. A number of studies4 10 13 16 18 have shown that some patients require supplementation by as much as 6 L/min oxygen to obtain a maximal effect.
| The Physiology of Hyperoxic Exercise in Chronic Airflow Obstruction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ventilation/perfusion mismatch in the lungs of persons with COPD causes hypoxemia. Many individuals with severe airflow obstruction due to COPD, whether they have mild or severe resting hypoxemia, demonstrate improved exercise performance and decreased dyspnea in a dose-dependent fashion up to a fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) of 0.5 or up to a flow of 6 L/min of 100% O2 by nasal cannula. Decreased ventilatory rates, tidal volumes, minute volumes, and inspiratory capacities frequently are observed in patients. Dyspnea is decreased.4 10 13 16 18 Oxygen administration also consistently enhances arterial blood O2 saturation and, therefore, O2 content. Cardiac output, systemic BP, and pulmonary arterial pressure are decreased.5
Maltais and colleagues24 performed a crossover trial of peak exercise while patients breathed air or oxygen (FIO2, 0.75) in 14 COPD patients. The mean (± SD) peak exercise capacity increased from 46 ± 3 W while breathing room air to 59 ± 5 W when breathing supplemental oxygen (p < 0.001). Leg blood flow, O2 delivery, and O2 uptake were greater at peak exercise while breathing O2 than while breathing air (p < 0.05). During submaximal exercise, dyspnea score and minute ventilation were significantly reduced while breathing O2 (p < 0.05), whereas leg blood flow, leg O2 uptake, and leg fatigue were similar under both experimental conditions. The improvement in peak exercise work rate correlated with the increase in peak O2 delivery (r = 0.66; p < 0.01) and peak O2 uptake for the legs (r = 0.53; p < 0.05), and with the reduction in dyspnea at isoexercise intensity (r = 0.56; p < 0.05). The authors concluded that improvement in peak exercise capacity with oxygen supplementation could be explained by the reduction in dyspnea at submaximal exercise and by the increases in leg O2 delivery and uptake, which enabled the exercising muscles to perform more external work. The metabolic capacity of the lower limb muscles was not exhausted at peak exercise during room air breathing in these patients with COPD.
Simon and colleagues25 addressed the question of why, in some patients with COPD, a plateau in lower limb O2 uptake, O2 delivery, and blood flow occurs despite the progression of the imposed workload during cycling. In a study of 14 men with COPD, they found that in eight patients leg O2 uptake increased in parallel with total O2 uptake as the normoxic external work rate increased. In six subjects, a plateau in leg O2 uptake and blood flow occurred during exercise despite the increase in workload and total O2 uptake. These six patients also exhibited a plateau in O2 extraction during exercise. The peak exercise work rate was higher in the eight patients without a plateau than in the eight with a plateau (51 ± 10 vs 40 ± 13 W, respectively; p = 0.043). Tidal volume, minute ventilation, and dyspnea were significantly greater at submaximal exercise in patients in the plateau group compared with those in the nonplateau group. It appears that in some patients with COPD, blood flow directed to peripheral muscles and O2 extraction during exercise may be limited.
In the studies of Somfay et al19 of severely obstructed, mildly hypoxemic COPD patients, the degree of exercise enhancement produced by hyperoxia was correlated with the reduction in the ventilatory requirement for exercise. It was hypothesized that the reduction in ventilatory requirements occurred because hyperoxia resulted in decreased stimulation to ventilation from the aortic and carotid bodies and because the reduced ventilatory requirement enabled the prolongation of the time for exhalation and therefore, as the authors showed, less hyperinflation. Dynamic hyperinflation has long been postulated to be a major mechanism of exercise limitation in COPD patients.22
More recently, Somfay and colleagues26 have addressed the question of whether hyperoxic exercise can speed the dynamic response of O2 uptake and can reduce the transient lactate increase. In 10 study participants with severe COPD and mild hypoxemia, they found that the time constants for O2 uptake, heart rate, CO2 output, and minute ventilation were significantly slower than in healthy subjects. Hyperoxia decreased end-exercise ventilation in the COPD group but not in the normal group. Hyperoxia significantly slowed the kinetics of CO2 output and minute ventilation in both groups but did not increase the speed of oxygen uptake kinetics. Only small increases in blood lactate levels occurred with exercise, and this increase did not correlate with oxygen uptake kinetics. This study supported the authors hypothesis that the decreased ventilatory requirement for hyperoxic exercise stems from direct chemoreceptor inhibition rather than from improved muscle function.
In summary, the mechanisms of improvement of hyperoxic exercise performance in patients with severe COPD and mild hypoxemia are complex. Improvement in exercise performance is usually submaximal at an FIO2 of 0.3 (4 L/min of 100% oxygen) and is maximal at an FIO2 of 0.5 (6 L/min of 100% oxygen),4 10 13 16 18 indicating that the increase in PaO2 is the driving force rather than the increase in SaO2. In about half of COPD patients, a plateau in leg O2 uptake, O2 extraction, and blood flow occurs during normoxic exercise despite the increases in workload and total O2 uptake.24 The metabolic capacity of the lower limb muscles appears not to be exhausted at peak normoxic exercise in patients with COPD.23 The most consistent responses that have been observed in COPD patients during hyperoxic exercise are decreases in dyspnea, respiratory rate, and minute ventilation. PaCO2 often increases with an accompanying fall in blood pH. Blood lactate level is usually minimally affected but may increase. Dyspnea is decreased mainly due to a decrease in respiratory frequency and dynamic hyperinflation (decreased end-expiratory and end-inspiratory lung volumes) during exercise. The decrease in respiratory frequency and tidal volume likely relate to a decrease in respiratory drive, primarily because of a decrease in stimulus from the aortic and carotid bodies, which is in turn due to the hyperoxia-induced increase in PaO2. All patients do not have the same degree of relief from hyperoxia and some have none. Since the main factors causing increased performance during hyperoxic exercise in COPD patients are related to muscle function and the alleviation of hypoxic ventilatory drive, it is hardly surprising that the results of forced expiratory spirometry, lung volume measurements, resting SaO2 levels, or diffusing capacity measurements are not predictive of enhanced hyperoxic exercise performance.
| Suggested Action Plan |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| The Research Questions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
90%)? It is apparent that, apart from a full elucidation of the physiologic effects of hyperoxia, many other research questions arise from the issues considered in this essay. For example, in COPD patients who are hypoxemic at rest or during mild exercise, does the simple correction of hypoxemia by oxygen therapy result in optimal improvement in exercise performance, or is hyperoxia required? Will CO2 retention, and perhaps oxygen toxicity, be deleterious to condition of COPD patients who are hyperoxic during exercise for several hours each day?
| The Next Step |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Hyperoxia Endurance Test |
|---|
|
|
|---|
100-foot corridor with measurements marked at 20-foot intervals, might be performed as follows.
| Hyperoxic Exercise Performance |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication March 8, 2002. Accepted for publication May 24, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Amann, L. M. Romer, D. F. Pegelow, A. J. Jacques, C. J. Hess, and J. A. Dempsey Effects of arterial oxygen content on peripheral locomotor muscle fatigue J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2006; 101(1): 119 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. F. McKone, S. C. Barry, M. X. FitzGerald, and C. G. Gallagher Role of arterial hypoxemia and pulmonary mechanics in exercise limitation in adults with cystic fibrosis J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2005; 99(3): 1012 - 1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Lacasse, R. Lecours, C. Pelletier, R. Begin, and F. Maltais Randomised trial of ambulatory oxygen in oxygen-dependent COPD Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2005; 25(6): 1032 - 1038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.A. Lewis, T.E. Eaton, P. Young, and J. Kolbe Short-burst oxygen immediately before and after exercise is ineffective in nonhypoxic COPD patients Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2003; 22(4): 584 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |