(Chest. 2002;122:334S-339S.)
© 2002
American College of Chest Physicians
Overview of Pulmonary Fibrosis*
Francis H.Y. Green, MD
* From the University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Correspondence to: Francis H.Y. Green, MD, Professor, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4N1; e-mail: fgreen{at}ucalgary.ca
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Pulmonary fibrosis is a component of over 200 interstitial lung diseases. Some have known etiologies, however, for many diseases, the etiology remains unknown or obscure. This brief review examines the prevalence and classification of these diseases, the approach to be taken for the investigation of a patient suspected of having pulmonary fibrosis, the indications for the performance of lung biopsy, and current thoughts concerning the pathogenesis of the idiopathic forms of fibrotic lung disease. A brief review of established and emerging therapeutic strategies is included.
Key Words: classification idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis pathogenesis review
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a diverse group of lung diseases that are characterized by chronic inflammation and progressive fibrosis of the pulmonary interstitium. The interstitium is defined as the alveolar walls (including epithelial cells and capillaries), septae, and the perivascular, perilymphatic, and peribronchiolar connective tissues.
There are over 200 ILDs (Fig 1
). They can be broadly classified into the following categories: ILDs with a known etiology, such as those due to occupational/environmental factors, drugs, hypersensitivity reactions and infections; ILDs associated with systemic disorders, such as sarcoidosis and collagen vascular disorders; and rare miscellaneous conditions, such as eosinophilic granuloma and the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs). The fibrosing ILDs have certain clinical and pathologic features in common. The common clinical features include the following:
- progressive dyspnea on exertion;
- nonproductive paroxysmal cough;
- abnormal breath sounds on auscultation;
- abnormal findings on chest radiograph (CXR) or high-resolution CT (HRCT) scan; and
- restrictive pulmonary physiology with decreased vital capacity and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and widened alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference.
The common pathologic features include the following:
- fibrosis of the interstitium, involving collagen, elastic and smooth muscle elements;
- architectural remodeling of the interstitium;
- chronic inflammation of the interstitium (ie, variable increases in lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophages, eosinophils, and mast cells);
- hyperplasia of type II cells; and
- hyperplasia of endothelial cells.
Data on the prevalence of ILD is scant, and death certificate-based mortality data are neither sensitive nor accurate for describing the occurrence of ILDs.1
The prevalence in New Mexico for all types of ILD was estimated at 80.9 cases per 100,000 population for men and 62.2 cases per 100,000 population for women. The incidence of ILD was estimated at 31.5 per 100,000 persons per year for men and 26.1 per 100,000 persons per year for women. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) accounted for 46.2% of all ILD diagnoses in men, and 44.2% in women.2
Despite the poor quality of the data and the changes in diagnostic criteria/classification (ie, diagnostic transfer), there is evidence that IPF is increasing in many Western nations.3
By contrast, asbestosis, one of the more common occupationally induced ILDs, accounts for approximately 7 deaths per million in the US population.4
 |
Evaluation of a Patient With Pulmonary Fibrosis
|
|---|
A complete patient evaluation would include the following: history; physical examination; laboratory investigations; lung function tests; CXR and HRCT scanning; and lung biopsy.
History and Physical Examination
It is necessary to establish whether the disease is acute, episodic, or chronic, and whether it is associated with a systemic illness. It is also essential to establish a lifetime exposure history, including a complete list of occupations, drug use, hobbies, pets, travel, potential immunosuppression, and smoking history.
Laboratory Investigations
The minimum initial investigations should include urinalysis, full blood count, and differential blood count, measurements of urea, electrolyte, and creatinine levels, liver function tests, and autoantibody tests [ie, antinuclear factor (ANF) and rheumatoid factor (RF)]. If vasculitis is suspected, antineutrophil cytoplasmic and antibasement membrane antibodies also should be measured.
Lung Function Tests
Although a restrictive pattern of lung function is probably the most common symptom, a proportion of patients have preserved lung volumes or airflow obstruction in the initial stages of the disease. The most appropriate and simplest tests are for vital capacity and DLCO, and these tests are the most useful for monitoring the progression of the disease.
Imaging Techniques
CXRs and HRCT scans are essential for the evaluation of a patient with ILD. HRCT scanning helps to narrow the differential diagnosis, allows earlier diagnosis, is useful for assessing disease extent, and can detect confounding diseases, such as emphysema.5
A correct diagnosis can be made using HRCT scanning on 61 to 80% of patients.6
In a recent study,7
the correlation between the findings of HRCT scanning and tissue diagnosis in IPF was found to be good for the presence of honeycombing, the extent of normal tissue, and vessel changes. However, there was a poor correlation between ground-glass appearance and the histologic findings.7
Lung Biopsy and BAL
Lung biopsy may be valuable for diagnosis and for measuring disease activity, progression, and response to treatment. Transbronchial lung biopsy is diagnostically useful in 38 to 79% of patients, particularly those with specific entities, such as infections or sarcoidosis.8
9
10
Open-lung biopsy may not be required for the evaluation of a patient with suspected ILD as many of the diseases have sufficiently characteristic clinical, radiologic, and laboratory features to establish the diagnosis. The diagnostic yield is approximately 90%. Open-lung biopsy should include at least two biopsy sites, the choice of which should be based on the HRCT results. Areas of honeycomb fibrosis should be avoided, as these reveal nonspecific end-stage changes that are of no diagnostic usefulness. The performance of a biopsy early in the course of the disease and prior to treatment is also recommended.
BAL is a useful technique that may play a role in the diagnosis of inorganic dust diseases, opportunistic infections, suspected malignancy, some hematologic diseases, transplantation-related and drug-induced diseases, and alveolar proteinosis. BAL is of value in research studies of IIP but is of limited use diagnostically, except when used to exclude alternative diagnoses.
 |
The IIPs
|
|---|
The classification and diagnostic criteria for the IIPs were recently reviewed by an international multidisciplinary panel that was jointly convened by the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society.11
The panel included clinicians, radiologists, and pathologists who were experts in adult pulmonary diseases. In all, the panel identified seven conditions that were considered sufficiently different from one another to be designated as separate disease entities (Table 1
). The most important of these conditions was IPF, also known as usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). The committee stressed the need for the diagnosis to be made in a dynamic manner requiring close communication among clinician, radiologist, and pathologist. Other recommendations of the committee included that the term nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) be considered a provisional diagnosis until there is further clarity on the nature of the conditions and the spectrum of clinical entities associated with this pathology. The committee recommended that, in the absence of contrary indications, the performance of a surgical lung biopsy should be performed in patients with suspected IIP who do not show the classic clinical and HRCT picture of IPF/UIP. Finally, the committee recommended that a final diagnosis should not be rendered until the pathologic, radiologic, and clinical information have been reviewed in toto. For this reason, the committee recommended that the use of the term pattern be applied to the appearance of the lung on the lung biopsy.
The six categories of IIP that need to be distinguished from IPF/UIP are desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP), respiratory bronchiolitis (RB)-associated ILD, acute interstitial pneumonia, NSIP, and cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP), which also is known as idiopathic bronchiolitis obliterans-organizing pneumonia and lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia (LIP).11
12
These entities have distinct pathologic and clinical features, and markedly different outcomes in response to corticosteroid therapy.5
The major purpose of a histologic examination is to distinguish IPF/UIP from the other histologic subsets of IIP. The contrasting pathologic features for four of the IIP subsets are shown in Table 2
. DIP, LIP, and COP are more distinct pathologically and rarely cause diagnostic confusion. Many of the pathologic features associated with IIP are seen in patients with connective tissue disorders. Their prognosis, however, is related to that for patients with the underlying disease, and their condition should be classified as ILD associated with a specific connective tissue disorder.13
Patients with IPF/UIP have a poor prognosis, with a median survival time of 28.2 months.14
The survival time for patients with IPF/UIP is considerably worse than that for the other categories of IIP.15
16
The risk factors for progressive disease include the following: male gender (age > 50 years); moderate dyspnea on exertion; history of cigarette smoking17
; moderate to severe loss of lung function; neutrophilia or eosinophilia at presentation in BAL fluid; reticular opacities or honeycomb changes found on HRCT scans; poor response to corticosteroid therapy; and fibroblastic foci found on lung pathology. Patients with IPF are at greater risk for lung cancer, which accounts for 10% of all deaths.18
Therapeutic Approaches to IPF/UIP
Since lung fibrosis is currently considered to be irreversible, the management principles for IPF/UIP and other chronic fibrosing lung diseases are as follows: (1) early identification and aggressive treatment; (2) permanent removal of offending agents; and (3) palliation of complications.
Although corticosteroid therapy is commonly used for treatment of IPF/UIP, there have been no placebo-controlled clinical trials performed.19
Approximately 20% of patients will respond positively. Unfortunately, in many studies diagnoses were not based on the findings of lung biopsies or were not classified by current pathologic criteria, thus, there is doubt as to the nature of the disease being treated. Newer agents, such as interferon (IFN)-
, show considerable promise for treatment of the disease.11
20
Other nonsteroidal agents that have been tried in initial clinical trials or are under consideration are shown in Table 3
.
Prognostic and Predictive Factors
The relationship between individual histologic features and disease progression in patients with IPF/UIP was recently addressed using biopsy materials from the Royal Brompton Hospital (London, UK).13
Four histologic features (ie, fibroblastic foci, interstitial mononuclear cell infiltrates, established fibrosis, and intra-alveolar macrophages) were evaluated for prognostic significance. Fibroblastic foci were linked to increased mortality, low DLCO, and declines in FVC at 6 and 12 months. Increased levels of interstitial mononuclear cell infiltrates were also independently linked to functional decline, but only at 6 months. The other histologic features had no prognostic value. These data suggest that disease progression can be predicted by lung biopsy findings. Similar findings have been reported by Bjoraker et al16
from the Mayo Clinic. The differential cell count from samples of BAL fluid21
has been used with limited success to monitor the progression of IPF.5
The use of serum markers looks to be more promising. The presence of serum surfactant proteins has been shown to have predictive value for disease progression in patients with IPF/UIP22
23
and pulmonary fibrosis associated with scleroderma.24
Plasma
-defensins, and serum type I and type II procollagen also have been suggested for use as prognostic markers.25
26
Pathogenesis of Pulmonary Fibrosis
The pathogenesis of IPF/UIP is poorly understood. Genetic and environmental factors play a role.5
Inherited abnormalities of surfactant proteins are associated with IPF.27
Recently, cases of IPF/UIP and NSIP have been found in one family that were associated with a mutation in the surfactant protein C (SP-C) gene.28
SP-C-deficient (-/-) mice also developed severe ILD.29
The finding that both IPF/UIP and NSIP were associated with the SP-C gene in this kindred is of interest as it suggests that the two entities are closely linked. Environmental factors also play a role. IPF is more likely to occur in certain occupations in which participants are exposed to dust, raising the possibility of environmental factors in the pathogenesis. Occupations carrying an increased risk for IPF include the following: farming; hair dressing; raising birds; stone cutting and polishing; and those occupations in which there is exposure to vegetable and animal dust.30
Infectious agents also have been implicated in the pathogenesis of IPF/UIP.5
With regard to the underlying pathogenesis, it is not known whether the disease is caused by a persistent inflammatory stimulus31
or an abnormal response to shear forces,29
or whether it represents abnormal repair and remodeling in response to patchy foci of injury.32
Numerous cytokines and fibrogenic factors are up-regulated or down-regulated in pulmonary fibrosis, including transforming growth factor (TGF)- ß, endothelin-1, insulin-like growth factor-1, tumor necrosis factor-
, and platelet-derived growth factor.33
34
35
Changes in matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors,36
apoptosis,37
the presence of cell adhesion molecules,38
the presence of myofibroblasts,39
changes in mast cell function,40
excessive procoagulant activity,41
diminished vascularity,35
and abnormal epithelial cell function42
have been described in patients with IPF/UIP. All of these studies offer promising opportunities for therapeutic interventions. The early indications that IFN-
may be beneficial in the treatment of patients with IPF may be due to the known interactions of this cytokine with several pathways that are implicated in its pathogenesis. IFN-
down-regulates the cytokines TGF-ß and interleukin-4, inhibits myofibroblast apoptosis, suppresses the myofibroblast phenotype, and increases the activity of matrix metalloproteinases.36
Future Directions
Major unanswered questions concerning the pathogenesis of IPF/UIP remain. What is the continuing stimulus for the inflammatory-fibrotic process in IPF/UIP? Is IPF/UIP primarily a disorder of the repair process? What are the mechanical and structural changes involved in the remodeling of the lung? What is the significance of the fibroblastic foci? What is the role of the alveolar epithelium? What interventions are most likely to succeed in mitigating the fibrosis? At this time, no one approach or theory is preeminent. Research should continue on as many fronts as possible. Recently, a working group of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute met to discuss potential directions for future research.35
Because the occurrence of IPF/UIP is relatively rare in the general population, many of the recommendations concerned the requirement to create regional centers of excellence that would be able to conduct clinical trials and develop investigative procedures and would have an ability to share information through the use of standardized data collection. These centers would be the focus for the development of target-based drugs, innovative diagnostic techniques, and new drug delivery systems.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
This work was funded by the University of Calgary.
Abbreviations: COP = cryptogenic organizing pneumonia; CXR = chest radiograph; DIP = desquamative interstitial pneumonia; DLCO = diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; HRCT = high-resolution CT; IFN = interferon; IIP = idiopathic interstitial pneumonia; ILD = interstitial lung disease; IPF = idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; LIP = lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia; NSIP = nonspecific interstitial pneumonia; RB = respiratory bronchiolitis; SP-C = surfactant protein C; TGF = transforming growth factor; UIP = usual interstitial pneumonia
 |
References
|
|---|
- Coultas, DB, Hughes, MP () Accuracy of mortality data for interstitial lung diseases in New Mexico, USA. Thorax 51,717-720
- Coultas, DB, Zumwalt, RE, Black, WC, et al The epidemiology of interstitial lung diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150,967-972[Abstract]
- Hubbard, R, Johnston, I, Coultas, DB, et al Mortality rates from cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis in seven countries. Thorax 1996;51,711-716[Abstract]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Work-related lung disease surveillance report 1999 US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Cincinnati, OH. Publication No. 20002105
- American Thoracic Society. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and treatment. International consensus statement: American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161,646-664[Free Full Text]
- Grenier, P, Chevret, S, Beigelman, C, et al Chronic diffuse infiltrative lung disease: determination of the diagnostic value of clinical data, chest radiography and CT with Bayesian analysis. Radiology 1994;191,383-390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schettino, IA, AbSaber, AM, Vollmer, R, et al Accuracy of high resolution CT in assessing idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis histology by objective morphometric index. Pathol Res Pract 2002;198,347-354[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Hunninghake, GW, Zimmerman, MB, Schwartz, DA, et al Utility of a lung biopsy for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Care Med 2001;164,193-196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Thorax DPLD Committee. Diagnosis and assessment of diffuse parenchymal lung disease. Thorax 1999;54(suppl),S1-S14[Medline]
- Thorax DPLD Committee. Treatment of diffuse parenchymal lung disease: part 2. Thorax 1999;54(suppl),S15-S30
- American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. International multidisciplinary consensus classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165,277-304[Free Full Text]
- Katzenstein, ALA, Myers, JL Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: clinical relevance of pathologic classification. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157,1301-1315[Free Full Text]
- Nicholson, AG, Fulford, LG, Colby, TV, et al The relationship between individual histologic features and disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166,173-177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schwartz, DA, Helmers, RA, Galvin, JR, et al Determinants of survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149,450-454[Abstract]
- Daniil, ZD, Gilchrist, FC, Nicholson, AG, et al A histologic pattern of non-specific interstitial pneumonia as associated with a better prognosis than usual interstitial pneumonia in patients with cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160,899-905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bjoraker, JA, Ryu, JH, Edwin, MK, et al Prognostic significance of histopathologic subsets in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157,199-203
- Baumgartner, KB, Samet, JM, Stidley, CA, et al Cigarette smoking: a risk factor for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;55,242-248
- Hubbard, R, Venn, A, Lewis, S, et al Lung cancer and cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis: a population-based cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;151,5-8
- Mapel, DW, Samet, JM, Coultas, DB Corticosteroids and the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: past, present, and future. Chest 1996;110,1058-1067[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ziesche, R, Block, L-H Interferon gamma-1b in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: reanalysis of a published study. King, TE eds. New approaches to managing idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 2000,36-43 American Thoracic Society New York, NY.
- Costabel, U, Guzman, J Bronchoalveolar lavage in interstitial lung disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2001;7,255-261[CrossRef][Medline]
- Greene, KE, King, TE, Jr, Kuroki, Y, et al Serum surfactant proteins-A and -D as biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2002;19,439-446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- McCormack, FX, King, TE, Jr, Bucher, BL, et al Surfactant protein A predicts survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152,751-759[Abstract]
- Asano, Y, Ihn, H, Yamane, K, et al Clinical significance of surfactant protein D as a serum marker for evaluating pulmonary fibrosis in patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44,1363-1369[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Mukae, H, Iiboshi, H, Nakazato, M, et al Raised plasma concentrations of alpha-defensins in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax 2002;57,623-628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lammi, L, Ryhanen, L, Lakari, E, et al Type III and type 1 procollagen markers in fibrosing alveolitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159,818-823[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Amin, RS, Wert, SE, Baughman, RP, et al Surfactant protein deficiency in familial interstitial lung disease. J Pediatr 2001;139,85-92[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Thomas, AQ, Lane, K, Phillips, J, III, et al Heterozygosity for a surfactant protein C gene mutation associated with usual interstitial pneumonitis and cellular nonspecific interstitial pneumonitis in one kindred. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165,1322-1328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Whitsett, JA Genetic basis of familial interstitial lung disease [editorial]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165,1201-1202[Free Full Text]
- Baumgartner, KB, Samet, JM, Coultas, DB, et al Occupational and environmental risk factors for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a multicenter case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152,307-315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Strieter, RM, Keane, MP Cytokine biology and the pathogenesis of interstitial lung disease. King, TE eds. New approaches to managing idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 2000,27-35 American Thoracic Society New York, NY.
- Selman, M, King, TE, Pardo, A Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: prevailing and evolving hypotheses about its pathogenesis and implications for therapy. Ann Intern Med 2001;134,136-151[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Uh, ST, Inoue, Y, King, TE, Jr, et al Morphometric analysis of insulin-like growth factor-I localization in lung tissues of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158,1626-1635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Chen, J, Ziboh, V, Giri, SN Up-regulation of platelet-activating factor receptors in lung and alveolar macrophages in the bleomycin-hamster model of pulmonary fibrosis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;280,1219-1227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Crystal, RG, Bitterman, PB, Mossman, B, et al Future research directions in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: summary of a national heart, lung, and blood institute working group (NHLBI workshop summary). Am J Respir Crit Care 2002;166,236-246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Winkler, MK, Fowlkes, JL Metalloproteinase and growth factor interactions: do they play a role in pulmonary fibrosis? Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2002;283,L1-L11[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hagimoto, N, Kuwano, K, Inoshima, I, et al TGF-beta 1 as an enhancer of Fas-mediated apoptosis of lung epithelial cells. J Immunol 2002;168,6470-6478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Paine, R, III, Ward, PA Cell adhesion molecules and pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Med 1999;107,268-279[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Ohta, K, Mortenson, RL, Clark, RA, et al Immunohistochemical identification and characterization of smooth muscle-like cells in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152,1659-1665[Abstract]
- Inoue, Y, King, TE, Jr, Tinkle, SS, et al Human mast cell basic fibroblast growth factor in pulmonary fibrotic disorders. Am J Pathol 1996;149,2037-2054[Abstract]
- Kobayashi, H, Gabaa, EC, Taguchi, O, et al Protein C anticoagulant system in patients with interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157,1850-1854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Pardo, A, Selman, M Molecular mechanisms of pulmonary fibrosis. Front Biosci 2002;7,D1743-D1761
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Kapoun, N. J. Gaspar, Y. Wang, D. Damm, Y.-W. Liu, G. O'Young, D. Quon, A. Lam, K. Munson, T.-T. Tran, et al.
Transforming Growth Factor-beta Receptor Type 1 (TGFbetaRI) Kinase Activity but Not p38 Activation Is Required for TGFbetaRI-Induced Myofibroblast Differentiation and Profibrotic Gene Expression
Mol. Pharmacol.,
August 1, 2006;
70(2):
518 - 531.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E S Choi, E M Pierce, C Jakubzick, K J Carpenter, S L Kunkel, H Evanoff, F J Martinez, K R Flaherty, B B Moore, G B Toews, et al.
Focal interstitial CC chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) expression in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia
J. Clin. Pathol.,
January 1, 2006;
59(1):
28 - 39.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. S. Choi, C. Jakubzick, K. J. Carpenter, S. L. Kunkel, H. Evanoff, F. J. Martinez, K. R. Flaherty, G. B. Toews, T. V. Colby, E. A. Kazerooni, et al.
Enhanced Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-3/CC Chemokine Ligand-7 in Usual Interstitial Pneumonia
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
September 1, 2004;
170(5):
508 - 515.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Kaminski, J. A. Belperio, P. B. Bitterman, L. Chen, S. W. Chensue, A. M.K. Choi, S. Dacic, J. H. Dauber, R. M. du Bois, J. J. Enghild, et al.
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.,
September 1, 2003;
29(3):
S1 - 105.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|