|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
a-Kulawik, MD, PhD
chowska, MD* From the Department of Pneumonology and Allergology, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.
Correspondence to: Joanna Domaga
a-Kulawik, MD, PhD, Department of Pneumonology and Allergology, ul Banacha 1a, 02 097 Warsaw, Poland; e-mail: jokula{at}amwaw.edu.pl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Changes in cell profiles in induced sputum (IS) samples from smokers with COPD and patients who ceased smoking were compared.
Setting: Department of pneumonology in a university hospital.
Patients: IS samples were collected from 17 smokers and 17 ex-smokers with COPD.
Interventions: We examined IS samples for differential cell counts and macrophage phenotypes determined by immunocytochemistry with monoclonal antibodies anti-CD11b, anti-CD14, anti-CD54, and anti-CD71.
Measurements and results: The median IS volume was greater and the total cell count was higher in smokers than in ex-smokers. The difference, however, was not significant. We did not find any significant differences in the proportions of cells and in the phenotypes of macrophages between the two groups, with the proportion of eosinophils being slightly higher in the group of smokers. We found, however, a significant positive correlation between the decrease in pulmonary function parameters and the number of pack-years smoked, an inverse correlation of pulmonary function test results with the number of lymphocytes in IS, and a correlation between some changes in the expression of macrophage surface markers and smoking history. There was no correlation between the time from smoking cessation and any cellular component found in IS samples.
Conclusions: The analysis of IS samples in patients with COPD revealed no significant differences in cell count and macrophage phenotypes between active smokers and ex-smokers.
Key Words: COPD ex-smokers induced sputum macrophages smokers
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the majority of studies on the cellular bases of COPD, findings from bronchial biopsy specimens, BAL fluid (BALF) samples, and induced sputum (IS) samples were analyzed. The IS sample examination is a well-tolerated, effective method for the analysis of bronchial cellular response.3 4 5 Several studies performed in patients with COPD revealed the role of neutrophils, macrophages, and CD8-positive lymphocytes in the pathogenesis of this disorder.6 7 8 9 Long-term smoke exposure causes similar changes in the IS cell profile with features of neutrophil and macrophage activation.10 11 It is difficult to establish the macrophage phenotype, since these cells represent a heterogeneous population with different stages of activation. The most stable surface markers seem to be the following: (1) the transferrin receptor CD71; (2) the adhesion associated molecules CD11a, CD11b, and CD11c; (3) the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (CD54); and (4) the receptor to lipopolysaccharide-CD14.12 As shown in the investigation of the BALF from smokers, cigarette smoke alters the expression of the above markers.13 14
To investigate the differences in the airway inflammatory process in active smokers and patients who had ceased smoking, we compared the cellular composition of IS from smokers and ex-smokers with COPD. For macrophage characteristics, we used the antibodies anti-CD11b, anti-CD14, anti-CD54, and anti-CD71. The correlation between the proportion of cells in IS and the expression of macrophage markers and smoking consumption, the length of time from smoking cessation, and pulmonary function test results were analyzed.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Immunocytochemistry:
For macrophage phenotyping, an immunocytochemistry method was used with the commercially available antibodies anti-CD14, anti-CD11b, anti-CD54, and anti-CD71 (Dako; Copenhagen, Denmark). The alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase reaction was performed on the air-dried slides according to the instructions of the manufacturer (LSAB2 kit; Dako). Two hundred macrophages on each reaction area were evaluated using a light microscope, and the percentages of positive cells were recorded.
Statistical Analysis
For data comparison, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used, with a p value of < 0.05 being regarded as significant. The relationship between the proportion of cells and smoking history, expressed as the number of pack-years, and the results of pulmonary function tests were tested by the Spearman correlation test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Initially, 34 patients were included in the study. Sputum samples with a volume of at least 2 mL were obtained from 29 patients (sputum expectoration after inhalation of 3% NaCl solution, 49% of patients; sputum expectoration after inhalation of 4% NaCl solution, 38% of patients; and sputum expectoration after inhalation of after 5% NaCl solution, 13% of patients). No clinical signs of bronchoconstriction were observed during sputum induction. A decreased value of FEV1 exceeding 20% of the baseline was observed only in one case, and it was not accompanied by dyspnea or wheezing on auscultation.
The median volume of the sputum in the smokers group (3.5 mL) was larger than that in the ex-smokers group (2.5 mL), but the difference was not significant. Eighty-five percent of all sputum samples containing < 50% squamous cells were adequate for the analysis, and, finally, the sputum obtained from 24 patients (14 smokers and 10 ex-smokers) was subjected to further analysis. The mean cell viability was > 90%. The total cell count was elevated in the group of smokers (mean, 9.7 x 106 cells/mL; median, 4.8 x 106 cells/mL; range, 0.8 to 52.0 x 106 cells/mL). In the ex-smokers group, the mean total cell count was 4.2 x 106 cells/mL, the median was 3.0 x 106 cells/mL, and the range was 0.3 to 13.0 x 106 cells/mL. This difference was not significant. We did not find any significant differences in the proportion of macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, or eosinophils in the IS between smokers and ex-smokers (Table 3 ). The proportion of eosinophils was slightly higher in the smokers group (median, 8%; range, 0.6 to 36.0%) than in the ex-smokers group (median, 4%; range, 0 to 28.0%), but it was not significant. There were no differences between the two groups when the differential cell count also was expressed in terms of absolute cell counts. We found a significant positive correlation between the total count of lymphocytes and the proportion of lymphocytes with FEV1 percent predicted (r = 0.4; p < 0.05) and FVC percent predicted (r = 0.4; p < 0.05). We found an inverse correlation of the total lymphocyte count in IS samples with arterial blood PCO2 (r = -0.44; p < 0.05). We did not find any neoplastic or atypical epithelial cells in the IS smears.
|
|
We did not find any correlation between the proportion of cells or macrophage markers and the length of time from smoking cessation. There was no correlation of the mean dose of steroids with any of the investigated parameters.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, the clinical characteristics of the groups of smokers and ex-smokers did not differ significantly. We found a significant inverse correlation between the results of pulmonary function tests, and we found a positive correlation between the arterial blood PCO2 values and smoking consumption, which were expressed as the number of pack-years in both groups that were analyzed. The group of ex-smokers was composed of patients who had ceased smoking > 1 year earlier, and the maximum time from smoking cessation was 20 years. We did not find any correlation between the results of pulmonary function tests and the length of time from smoking cessation.
The effectiveness of sputum induction was comparable in both groups. The mean volume of sputum and the total cell count were higher in active smokers when compared with those of ex-smokers and was close to normal values in healthy subjects. Skold et al16 found that the normalization of the total cell count and the cell concentration in the BALF samples to be in proportion to the length of time from smoking cessation.
No significant differences were found when the comparison of total and differential cell counts was made between the groups. The differential cell count in IS samples from our patients with COPD was similar to those reported by other authors.19 20 21 22 23 However, in other investigations the percentage of neutrophils in smokers with COPD was higher than in our patients,21 22 23 but the number of neutrophils was similar.22 We noted an elevated proportion of eosinophils and higher total number of eosinophils in both smokers and ex-smokers with COPD, and a slightly higher proportion of these cells in smokers when compared with ex-smokers (difference not significant). In the study of Hargreave and Leigh,20 the participation of eosinophils in bronchial constriction in smokers was observed. Lebowitz et al24 concluded that eosinophilia is an important aspect of bronchial constriction in smokers. Cosio and Guerassimov25 divided case of COPD in smokers into the following two types: one with eosinophilia; and the other without eosinophilia. There were no differences in IS or BAL samples in the proportion of eosinophils between healthy smokers and nonsmokers in the study of Lensmar et al.11 It may be that eosinophilia found in IS samples may reflect the presence of inflammation in smokers with COPD who have airway responsiveness to corticosteroids, which is an asthmatic pattern of COPD.8 A slightly lower proportion of eosinophils observed in IS samples from ex-smokers may indicate a normalization of the inflammatory process in the airways after smoking cessation.
Pulmonary macrophages are a heterogeneous population of cells. Most studies have been concerned with alveolar macrophages (AMs) obtained by BAL of the peripheral airways. The cells in IS samples originate from the proximal airways, and it has been shown that macrophages in IS samples represent a more mature phenotype.3 However, it is possible to find an expression of the same markers on IS macrophages as that of the same markers on the AMs present in the BALF.11 For the analysis of pulmonary macrophages, we used antibodies recognizing some of the most stable surface markers, such as CD11b, CD14, CD54, and CD71.12 The proportion of CD54-positive macrophages and the proportion of CD71-positive macrophages in IS samples from active smokers with COPD in our study were lower than those in the group of healthy smokers reported by Lensmar et al,11 but the proportion of macrophages with expression of CD11b was higher in our study than in theirs.11 Long-term exposure to cigarette smoke has been shown to alter the expression of these markers. The proportion of CD11b-positive, CD14-positive, CD54-positive, and CD71-positive macrophages was lower in the BALF and IS samples of smokers when compared with those of nonsmokers.11 26 27 In the study of Schaberg et al,13 the increased expression in CD11/CD18 on AMs from smokers was found. In our analysis, the proportion of macrophages expressing CD11b, CD14, CD54, and CD71 did not differ significantly between smokers and ex-smokers with COPD.
CD11b seems to be an important agent in eosinophil activation.28 We found a slightly elevated proportion of eosinophils in current smokers, but there was no correlation with the proportion of CD11b-positive macrophages. A positive correlation between CD11b macrophages and smoking history, expressed as the number of pack-years smoked, and blood PCO2 that was observed in our study may reflect the role of this molecule in the pathogenesis of COPD in smokers. This was also a hypothesis put forward by Saetta et al.8 We found a correlation between the proportion of macrophages expressing CD14 and FVC, and between the proportion of macrophages expressing CD71 and arterial PCO2. The role of these cells in the structural changes that occur in COPD has not been elucidated. In the study of Turato et al17 on the influence of smoking cessation on cellular changes found in bronchial biopsy specimens from COPD patients, no changes in macrophage count were found.
We have not found any differences in the cellular profiles and macrophage phenotypes of patients with COPD, when comparing smokers with ex-smokers. It may be that smoking causes persistent inflammatory changes in the airways in patients who are predisposed to COPD.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication January 7, 2002. Accepted for publication October 9, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Chaudhuri, E. Livingston, A. D. McMahon, J. Lafferty, I. Fraser, M. Spears, C. P. McSharry, and N. C. Thomson Effects of Smoking Cessation on Lung Function and Airway Inflammation in Smokers with Asthma Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2006; 174(2): 127 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R O'Donnell, D Breen, S Wilson, and R Djukanovic Inflammatory cells in the airways in COPD Thorax, May 1, 2006; 61(5): 448 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. F. M. Wouters Local and Systemic Inflammation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Proceedings of the ATS, April 1, 2005; 2(1): 26 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hodge, G. Hodge, M. Holmes, and P. N. Reynolds Increased airway epithelial and T-cell apoptosis in COPD remains despite smoking cessation Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2005; 25(3): 447 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N.C. Thomson, R. Chaudhuri, and E. Livingston Asthma and cigarette smoking Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2004; 24(5): 822 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Rennard Antiinflammatory Therapies Other Than Corticosteroids Proceedings of the ATS, November 1, 2004; 1(3): 282 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Laan, S. Bozinovski, and G. P. Anderson Cigarette Smoke Inhibits Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Production of Inflammatory Cytokines by Suppressing the Activation of Activator Protein-1 in Bronchial Epithelial Cells J. Immunol., September 15, 2004; 173(6): 4164 - 4170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Grootendorst and K. F. Rabe Mechanisms of Bronchial Hyperreactivity in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Proceedings of the ATS, April 1, 2004; 1(2): 77 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Sin, F. A. McAlister, S. F. P. Man, and N. R. Anthonisen Contemporary Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Scientific Review JAMA, November 5, 2003; 290(17): 2301 - 2312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |