Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sin, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sin, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, T. D.
(Chest. 2003;123:1536-1543.)
© 2003 American College of Chest Physicians

Relationship of Systolic BP to Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients With Heart Failure*

Don D. Sin, MD, MPH; Fabia Fitzgerald, RN; John D. Parker, MD; Gary E. Newton, MD; Alexander G. Logan, MD; John S. Floras, MD, DPhil and T. Douglas Bradley, MD

* From the From the Sleep Research Laboratory (Dr. Sin), Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; Department of Medicine (Ms. Fitzgerald and Dr. Bradley), Toronto General Hospital/University Health Network; and Department of Medicine (Drs. Parker, Newton, Logan, and Floras), Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Correspondence to: T. Douglas Bradley, MD, NU 9–112, The Toronto General Hospital/University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada; e-mail: douglas.bradley{at}utoronto.ca


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent risk factor for hypertension in the general population. Hypertension is, in turn, an important risk factor for the development and progression of congestive heart failure (CHF). Our objective was to determine whether OSA would be associated with elevated daytime BP in medically treated patients with CHF.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Tertiary care, university-affiliated sleep disorders and heart failure clinics.

Patients: Three hundred one consecutive patients with CHF.

Measurements and results: We measured daytime BP and performed overnight sleep studies to assess for the presence of OSA. Among these patients, OSA was present in 121 patients (40%) and their systolic BP was significantly higher than in patients without OSA. Patients with OSA were 2.89 times (95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 6.73) more likely to have systolic hypertension (ie, BP >= 140 mm Hg) than those without OSA after controlling for other risk factors, including obesity. The degree of systolic BP elevation was directly related to the frequency of obstructive apneas and hypopneas.

Conclusions: In medically treated patients with CHF, daytime systolic BP and the prevalence of systolic hypertension are significantly increased in patients with OSA, compared to those without OSA, independent of other potentially confounding factors. OSA may therefore have contributed to the presence of systolic hypertension in some of these patients.

Key Words: epidemiology • heart failure • hypertension • sleep apnea


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), where its prevalence has been estimated at between 10% and 37%.1 2 OSA may be particularly detrimental in patients with CHF because it is associated with increases in nocturnal sympathetic nervous system activity and BP.3 Several epidemiologic studies4 5 have also identified a strong association between OSA and both the presence and development of daytime hypertension. Since elimination of OSA by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may reduce both daytime and nocturnal BP,6 the identification and abolition of OSA may be an important therapeutic consideration in patients with CHF.

Hypertension is the most common risk factor for heart failure.7 It has been demonstrated that exposure of dogs to OSA over several weeks leads not only to the development of nocturnal and daytime hypertension, but to left ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction as well8 9 ; therefore, obstructive apnea-associated elevations in nocturnal and daytime BP could play a role in the development or progression of myocardial hypertrophy and failure.7 9 10 Moreover, once CHF has developed, the detrimental effects of elevated BP are likely to be amplified, since the failing heart is particularly sensitive to the adverse effects of increased left ventricular afterload.11 Another major concern for patients with CHF is that the pressor effects of OSA are relatively resistant to conventional antihypertensive agents.12 For example, we have shown that OSA raises nocturnal BP in patients with heart failure, despite treatment with drugs with hypotensive actions13 ; however, it is not yet known whether OSA is associated with daytime hypertension in medically treated patients with CHF. We therefore hypothesized that daytime BP and the prevalence of hypertension would be higher in patients with CHF than in those without OSA, independent of known confounding factors.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study Population
Subjects consisted of 301 consecutive patients with CHF referred to the Sleep Research Laboratory who met our inclusion criteria (see below). Patients were all referred by cardiologists because of clinical suspicion of sleep apnea or refractory symptoms of heart failure despite optimal medical therapy. None were referred because of hypertension. Inclusion criteria were patients with all of the following: (1) a diagnosis of CHF of at least 6 months in duration established by a cardiologist on the basis of at least one episode of pulmonary edema and dyspnea, (2) a resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <= 40% measured by equilibrium radionuclide angiography or two-dimensional echocardiography within 3 months prior to a diagnostic sleep study, (3) continued dyspnea (New York Heart Association class 2 to 4) despite appropriate medical therapy, and (4) stable clinical status with no medication adjustment for at least 4 weeks prior to polysomnography. Patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction within 3 months of the study were excluded.

Clinical Data and Outcomes
At the initial examination in the sleep disorders clinic, prior to performance of sleep studies, seated systolic and diastolic BP were measured between 1:30 PM and 4:30 PM after a 15-min rest period using a mercury-column sphygmomanometer and appropriate-sized arm cuff by a single physician within 4 weeks prior to the sleep study. BP recordings from this initial clinic visit were used for analysis. Drug treatment and body mass index (BMI) were also documented during this clinic visit.

Sleep Studies
Following the clinic assessment, overnight polysomnography and sleep staging were performed and scored, without knowledge of patients’ BP, using standard techniques.14 15 Thoracoabdominal movements and tidal volume were measured by inductance plethysmograph (Respitrace; Ambulatory Monitoring; Ardsley, NY). Oxyhemoglobin saturation (SaO2) was measured continuously using a pulse oximeter (Oxyshuttle; SensorMedics; Yorba Linda, CA). Transcutaneous PCO2 was continuously measured with a transcutaneous capnograph (Kontron Medical; Hoffman-La Roche; Basel, Switzerland).15 Oxygen saturation during sleep was expressed as follows: (1) mean SaO2, which represents the mean of the highest and lowest SaO2 for each 30-s epoch of sleep averaged over the entire sleep period; and (2) lowest SaO2, which represents the lowest SaO2 recorded over the entire sleep period. Mean transcutaneous PCO2 during sleep was calculated as above for mean SaO2.

Obstructive apneas were defined as the absence of tidal volume excursion for at least 10 s accompanied by paradoxical rib cage and abdominal movements. Obstructive hypopneas were defined as a >= 50% reduction in tidal volume from the baseline value, with paradoxical chest wall motion or evidence of flow limitation, persisting for at least 10 s. Central apneas and hypopneas were similarly defined, except that apneas were not accompanied by any rib cage or abdominal movements and there was no paradoxical motion of rib cage and abdomen or evidence of flow limitation during hypopneas. An OSA disorder was defined as the presence of >= 10 apneas and hypopneas per hour of sleep, of which >= 50% had to be obstructive.1 A central sleep apnea (CSA) disorder was similarly defined, except that > 50% of the events had to be central. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was defined as the number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of sleep. Patients with an AHI < 10 per hour of sleep were categorized as having no sleep-related breathing disorder (SBD).

Data Analysis
Potential associations between sleep apnea and individual risk factors were assessed for significance with a {chi}2 test for binary variables and one-way analysis of variance with the Tukey post-hoc analysis for continuous variables. To determine whether systolic BP was related to the severity of OSA, linear regression techniques were also applied to the data containing those with OSA and those without any SBD. Systolic and diastolic BP served as the dependent variables and AHI as the primary independent variable. Other covariates were added in a stepwise manner to the crude model. Covariates were included in the final model if the terms changed the risk estimate of the primary independent variable by > 15% or conferred a significant change in the log-likelihood statistic of the reference model. In the final model, we controlled for the effects of obesity, age, mean and minimum SaO2, LVEF, and gender. Class of medication had no significant effect on the relationship between BP and severity of OSA and, therefore, was not included in the final model.

In addition, multivariate logistic modeling16 was used to determine risk factors for hypertension defined as systolic BP >= 140 mm Hg or diastolic BP >= 90 mm Hg. The reference and comparison groups for the baseline model were patients without any SBD and those with OSA, respectively. Other covariates were added in a stepwise manner to the crude model as described above.

Relative odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were constructed using standard methods. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, unless otherwise indicated. Two-tailed p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Standard regression diagnostics were performed to assess model fit and adequacy of compliance with the modeling assumptions. All analyses were conducted using SAS, release 6.10 (SAS Institute; Cary, NC).


    Results
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The causes of CHF were ischemic cardiomyopathy (including hypertensive heart disease) [63%], nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (25%), and others (12%), which included valvular and congenital heart disease, and alcoholic cardiomyopathy. Patients with OSA had higher systolic BP (Fig 1 ), greater BMI, and were more likely to use calcium-channel blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors compared to those with CSA or no SBD (Table 1 ). Patients with OSA also had higher diastolic BP and LVEFs compared to those with CSA; however, these values were not significantly different from those in patients with no SBD (Table 1 , Fig 1 ). In contrast, patients with CSA were older, slimmer, and more likely to be men, but less likely to be receiving ß-blockers than those in the other two groups. Patients with OSA had more severe degrees of nocturnal hypoxia than either the no-SBD group or CSA group, as indicated by significantly lower mean and minimum SaO2 during sleep (Table 2 ). Patients with CSA had significantly lower mean transcutaneous PCO2 during sleep than the other two groups.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Systolic and diastolic BP stratified according to sleep apnea status. *p < 0.05 compared to both other groups; {dagger}p < 0.05 compared to CSA group only.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Characteristics of the Subjects*

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Sleep Data*

 
A logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate the potential relationship between SBDs and the presence of systolic BP >= 140 mm Hg or diastolic BP >= 90 mm Hg. Systolic BP >= 140 mm Hg was found in 13.5% of patients without a SBD, 21.1% of those with CSA, and 35.9% of patients with OSA. Diastolic BP >= 90 mm Hg was observed in 13.5% of patients without a SBD, 8.7% of patients with CSA, and 23.1% of patients with OSA. The final multiple logistic regression model, which controlled for BMI (and thus for obesity), age, gender, mean and minimum SaO2, and LVEF, demonstrated that the presence of OSA was associated with a 2.89 relative odds of having systolic BP >= 140 mm Hg compared to patients without any SBD (Table 3 ). In contrast, there was no significant association between OSA and diastolic BP >= 90 mm Hg. There was no significant relationship between arousal index and either systolic or diastolic BP. Age and BMI were also significant determinants of systolic BP >= 140 mm Hg, but only BMI was a significant determinant of diastolic BP >= 90 mm Hg (Table 3) .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Adjusted Risk Factors for Systolic and Diastolic Hypertension*

 
Unadjusted relationships between various factors and systolic and diastolic BP are displayed in Table 4 . When the potential confounders of obesity (as assessed by BMI), age, gender, mean and minimum SaO2, and LVEF were controlled for, there was a significant relationship between obstructive AHI and systolic BP (Fig 2 ). The regression coefficient for obstructive AHI was 0.23, indicating that for every 10-U rise in obstructive AHI, systolic BP increased by 2.3 mm Hg (95% CI, 1.6 to 3.1 mm Hg). Other significant independent factors associated with increments in systolic BP were increasing age, BMI, and LVEF. The ß-coefficients for a 1-year increment in age, 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI, and 1% increase in LVEF were 0.4, 0.5, and 0.3, respectively. These data indicate that a 10-U increase in obstructive AHI was associated with an increase in systolic BP equivalent to that associated with a 6.3-year increase in age or 4.5 kg/m2 increase in BMI. In contrast, there was no significant relationship between AHI and diastolic BP. Among patients with CSA, there was no significant relationship between AHI and either systolic or diastolic BP.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Unadjusted Relationship Between Various Factors and Systolic or Diastolic BP

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Predicted increase in daytime systolic BP as a function of nocturnal AHI in patients with OSA and those with no SBD. Increases are based on linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and LVEF using a mean of covariates method. The intercept as well as the 95% confidence limits may change if the covariate values fall outside the mean values for a given patient; however, the slope of the regression line will remain constant. Broken lines represent 95% CIs.

 
To eliminate any potential confounding influence of obesity on BP, we performed a multivariate linear regression analysis, using the same covariates as for the entire cohort, on the subgroup of nonobese patients with OSA (BMI of 22 to 27). The BMI in this subgroup of OSA patients (mean ± SD, 24.8 ± 0.3, n = 24) did not differ significantly from that of the patients without any SBD (24.6 ± 0.3, n = 28). In this nonobese subgroup, the adjusted regression coefficient for obstructive AHI was 0.29, which indicated that for every 10-U rise in AHI, systolic BP increased by 2.9 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.0 to 6.1 mm Hg).


    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study is the first to demonstrate, in patients with CHF, that OSA is associated with elevated daytime systolic BP. After controlling for potential confounding factors, including age, sex, and obesity, we found that among 301 medically treated patients with CHF, OSA was associated with increased odds for systolic BP >= 140 mm Hg 2.89 times that of patients without any SBD. In addition, when only nonobese patients with OSA were included, the odds for daytime systolic hypertension were even greater: 7.34 times that of nonobese patients without any SBD. Furthermore, there was a direct linear relationship between the severity of OSA and systolic BP: for the entire group, every 10-U increment in the obstructive AHI was accompanied by a 2.3-mm Hg increase in systolic BP, and for nonobese patients, by a 2.9-mm Hg increase.

The independent relationship between OSA and systolic hypertension held even though a higher proportion of the patients with OSA were receiving ACE inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers than in patients without OSA. If these medications had a significant impact on systolic BP, then the strength of the relationship between OSA and elevated systolic BP may have been underestimated. This observation also suggests that BP control with antihypertensive medications may be more difficult to achieve in CHF patients with OSA than in those without it. This concept is consistent with a study12 in which the great majority of patients with drug-resistant hypertension were found to have OSA. In addition, Tkacova et al13 showed that CHF patients with OSA experience recurrent apnea-related surges in systolic BP during sleep, despite receiving various combinations of drugs with hypotensive effects. Elimination of OSA by CPAP abolished these apnea-related surges in BP.

There is now strong epidemiologic evidence that OSA is a cause of hypertension,4 5 which is the most common risk factor for heart failure.7 In addition, exposure of dogs to experimental OSA induces sustained daytime hypertension and left ventricular dysfunction.8 9 Moreover, epidemiologic data indicate that the presence of OSA is associated with increased odds of having CHF.17 It is therefore likely that in many of our patients with CHF, OSA, and hypertension preceded the onset of their cardiac failure, although this information was not available to us. Because patients with hypertension who acquire CHF usually do so secondary to ischemic heart disease, such patients would have been classified under ischemic cardiomyopathy in Table 1 . Once the myocardium begins to fail, persistent elevations in systemic BP are associated with accelerated deterioration in cardiac function.10 11 Aggressive control of BP is therefore recommended as an important component of heart failure management.18 Even so, many of the CHF patients with OSA in our study had elevated daytime systolic BP despite receiving multiple antihypertensive medications. Our data therefore raise the possibility that OSA, through hypertension, could both predispose to CHF and contribute to its progression.9 10

Cardiovascular risk is greater for systolic than for diastolic hypertension, probably because of its greater impact on left ventricular wall tension. Accordingly, the critical importance of controlling systolic hypertension, especially in patients with cardiovascular diseases, such as CHF, has recently been emphasized.19 Moreover, OSA prevents the normal fall in systolic BP at the onset of sleep.13 20 21 Thus, for a given level of daytime BP, the systolic BP burden over the full 24-h period is likely to be greater in those patients with than in those without OSA.20 21 It might therefore be particularly important to initiate specific therapy for OSA in such patients, because of the potential to lower both nocturnal and daytime BP.6 13 In fact, we have previously shown that abolition of OSA by CPAP in patients with CHF causes remarkable improvements in both LVEF and symptoms of heart failure.22 These beneficial effects were likely due, in part, to lowering of BP and afterload.13

Systolic, but not diastolic BP was elevated in our patients with OSA. These findings are consistent with those of a study of patients without CHF. In that study, Logan and associates12 found that among patients with hypertension refractory to medical therapy, those with OSA had predominantly systolic hypertension, while those without any SBD had predominantly diastolic hypertension. The reason for this is not clear, but a possible explanation is a somewhat different pathophysiology of systolic and diastolic hypertension.23

Mechanisms by which OSA could raise daytime systolic BP are not completely understood. However, intermittent apnea-related hypoxia seems to play an important role in the causation of acute nocturnal BP elevations, and subsequent development of daytime hypertension.8 24 These events increase BP acutely by raising sympathetic nervous system activity.3 In theory, they could chronically raise BP by resetting the baroreflex or by up-regulating chemoreflex control of sympathetic vasoconstrictor discharge.25 26 27 For example, exposure of humans to intermittent hypoxia leads to an increase in sympathetic vasoconstrictor activity that lasts for at least 20 min after return to normoxia.28 In addition, overnight exposure of humans to hypoxia leads to a sustained increase in BP that carries over into wakefulness,29 and rats subjected to intermittent hypoxia for 8 h/d acquire sustained hypertension.24 Moreover, carbon dioxide also stimulates sympathetic vasoconstrictor activity that is additive to the effects of hypoxia.30 In this regard, patients with OSA had more severe nocturnal hypoxia than either the no-SBD group or the CSA group (Table 2) . They also had higher PCO2 during sleep than patients with CSA. Greater degrees of vasoconstrictor chemostimulation may therefore have contributed to the higher systolic BP in patients with OSA than in those with CSA, despite similar AHI. There were slight differences in medication use among the three groups. However, data from Kraiczi et al31 indicate that a wide variety of antihypertensive medications have no effect on the severity of OSA. It is therefore very unlikely that greater antihypertensive medication use in the OSA group induced OSA in our study subjects.

Only a minority of patients in our study were receiving ß-blockers. This is because the results of large randomized trials demonstrating the usefulness of ß-blockers in the therapy of CHF only became available after our study was completed.32 Moreover, it usually takes several years before clinical trial results are implemented in community medical practice. It is possible that increased use of ß-blockers could provide additional BP-lowering effects in CHF patients with OSA. However, even after controlling for medication use, including ß-blockers, the relationship between OSA and elevated BP held.

Another interesting observation in our study was that patients with CSA did not have elevations in either daytime systolic or diastolic BP compared to patients without any SBD or those with OSA. This may be because of lesser degrees of nocturnal chemostimulation than patients with OSA, as discussed above. Another possibility is that differences in BP may be related to the differing pathophysiologies of OSA and CSA. Whereas OSA likely contributes to the development of CHF, partly through hypertension,9 13 CSA appears to be a consequence of CHF, and may therefore not have the same effects on daytime BP as does OSA.15 Moreover, because of more severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, patients with CSA (Table 1) may have had insufficient contractile force to generate as high BP as patients with OSA. However, LVEF in patients with OSA did not differ significantly from that in patients with no SBD. In addition, after controlling for differences in LVEF, multiple regression analysis indicated OSA was independently associated with systolic hypertension (Table 3 , Fig 2 ).

There are some potential limitations of this study. First, as with most observational studies, confounding by external factors is a concern. To limit this possibility, we used strict entry criteria (making our cohort relatively homogeneous), and had a large sample size that allowed us to employ standard multiple regression techniques, adjusting for the baseline differences in clinical characteristics across the study groups. It was reassuring that both the univariate and multivariate analyses showed a strong association between OSA and elevations in systolic BP, suggesting that the slight differences in baseline characteristics of the study groups could not explain away our findings. Second, we made only a single BP measurement; however, BP measurements were made by the same physician at the same time of day for all subjects. Therefore, differences in BP between groups are unlikely to be explained on the basis of having made a single BP measurement. Third, because our study was cross-sectional in nature, we could not ascertain whether the relationship between OSA and systolic BP was causal. Based on prior experiments, however, it is much more plausible that OSA leads to elevations in systolic BP5 6 8 13 ; there is no clinical or physiologic evidence in the literature that elevations in systolic BP could lead to OSA.

In view of the poor prognostic implications of uncontrolled BP in patients with CHF, and of the clinical benefits of lowering BP in such patients, it is important to identify potentially reversible causes of hypertension.10 11 Our data suggest that, in patients with CHF, OSA should be considered as a possible contributing factor to drug-resistant hypertension.12 Indeed, recent evidence suggests that treatment of OSA by CPAP can lower both nocturnal13 and daytime BP.6 More importantly, there is mounting evidence that treatment of OSA by CPAP in patients with CHF improves left ventricular function and symptoms of CHF beyond that due to standard medical therapy.22 33 34 Consequently, it seems very likely that OSA is contributing to the development or progression of CHF in a significant proportion of patients, partially through the intermediary step of hypertension. Therefore, larger trials are now required to determine whether the treatment of OSA in medically treated patients with CHF reduces BP and improves cardiac function.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; AHI = apnea-hypopnea index; BMI = body mass index; CHF = congestive heart failure; CI = confidence interval; CPAP = continuous positive airway pressure; CSA = central sleep apnea; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; OSA = obstructive sleep apnea; SaO2 = oxyhemoglobin saturation; SBD = sleep-related breathing disorder

Supported by an operating grant from the Ontario Thoracic Society.

Dr. Sin was a Research Fellow of the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Dr. Newton was a Research Scholar of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, Dr. Floras was a Career Investigator of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, and Dr. Bradley is a Senior Scientist of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Received for publication March 27, 2002. Accepted for publication November 19, 2002.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Sin, DD, Fitzgerald, F, Parker, JD, et al (1999) Risk factors for central and obstructive sleep apnea in 450 men and women with congestive heart failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160,1101-1106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Javaheri, S, Parker, TJ, Liming, JD, et al Sleep apnea in 81 ambulatory male patients with stable heart failure: types and their prevalences, consequences and presentations. Circulation 1998;97,2154-2159[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Somers, VK, Dyken, ME, Clary, MP, et al Sympathetic neural mechanisms in obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Invest 1995;96,1897-1904[ISI][Medline]
  4. Nieto, FJ, Young, TB, Lind, BK, et al Association of sleep-disordered breathing, sleep apnea, and hypertension in a large community-based study: Sleep Heart Health Study. JAMA 2000;283,1829-1836[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Peppard, PE, Young, T, Palta, M, et al Prospective study of the association between sleep-disordered breathing and hypertension. N Engl J Med 2000;,1378-1384
  6. Pepperell, JC, Ramdassingh-Dow, S, Crosthwaite, N, et al Ambulatory blood pressure after therapeutic and subtherapeutic nasal continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised parallel trial. Lancet 2002;359,204-210[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  7. Levy, D, Larson, MG, Vasan, RS, et al The progression from hypertension to congestive heart failure. JAMA 1996;275,1557-1563[Abstract]
  8. Brooks, D, Horner, R, Kozar, LF, et al Obstructive sleep apnea as a cause of systemic hypertension: evidence from a canine model. J Clin Invest 1997;99,106-109[ISI][Medline]
  9. Parker, JD, Brooks, D, Kozar, LF, et al Acute and chronic effects of airway obstruction on left ventricular performance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160,1888-1896[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Chin, MH, Goldman, L Factors contributing to the hospitalization of patients with congestive heart failure. Am J Public Health 1997;87,643-648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Ross, J, Jr Afterload mismatch and preload reserve: a conceptual framework for the analysis of ventricular function. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1976;28,254-264
  12. Logan, AG, Tkacova, R, Tisler, A, et al High prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in refractory hypertension. J Hypertension 2001;19,2271-2277[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  13. Tkacova, R, Rankin, F, Fitzgerald, FS, et al Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on obstructive sleep apnea and left ventricular afterload in patients with heart failure. Circulation 1998;98,2269-2275[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Rechtschaffen, A, Kales, AA A manual of standardized terminology, technique and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects. 1968 Brain Information Service/Brain Research Institute. Los Angeles, CA:
  15. Naughton, MT, Benard, D, Tam, A, et al The role of hyperventilation in the pathogenesis of central sleep apnea in patients with congestive heart failure. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;148,330-338[ISI][Medline]
  16. Cochran, WG Sampling techniques. 1997 John Wiley. New York, NY:
  17. Shahar, E, Whitney, CW, Redline, S, et al Sleep-disordered breathing and cardiovascular disease: cross-sectional results of the Sleep Heart Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163,19-25[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Baker, DW, Konstam, MA, Bottorff, M, et al Management of heart failure; pharmacologic treatment. JAMA 1994;272,1361-1366[Abstract]
  19. Izzo, JL, Jr, Levy, D, Black, HR Clinical advisory statement: importance, of systolic blood pressure in older Americans. Hypertension 2000;35,1021-1024[Free Full Text]
  20. Suzuki, M, Guilleminault, C, Otsuka, K, et al Blood pressure "dipping" and "non-dipping" in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients. Sleep 1996;19,382-387[ISI][Medline]
  21. Portaluppi, F, Provini, F, Cortelli, P, et al Undiagnosed sleep-disordered breathing among male nondippers with essential hypertension. J Hypertension 1997;15,1227-1233[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  22. Malone, S, Liu, PP, Holloway, R, et al Obstructive sleep apnoea in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: effects of continuous positive airway pressure. Lancet 1991;338,1480-1484[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  23. O’Rourke, MF, Mancia, G Arterial stiffness. J Hypertens 1999;17,1-4[ISI][Medline]
  24. Fletcher, EC, Lesske, J, Qian, W, et al Repetitive, episodic hypoxia causes diurnal elevations of systemic blood pressure in rats. Hypertension 1992;19,555-561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Conway, J, Boon, N, Jones, JV, et al Involvement of the baroreceptor reflexes in the changes in blood pressure in sleep and mental arousal. Hypertension 1983;5,746-748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Brooks, D, Horner, RL, Floras, JS, et al Baroreflex control of heart rate in a canine model of obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159,1293-1297[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Carlson, JT, Hedner, JA, Sellgren, J, et al Depressed baroreflex sensitivity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154,1490-1496[Abstract]
  28. Morgan, BJ, Crabtree, DC, Palta, M, et al Combined hypoxia and hypercapnia evokes long-lasting sympathetic activation in humans. J Appl Physiol 1995;79,205-213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Arabi, Y, Morgan, BJ, Goodman, B, et al Daytime blood pressure elevations after nocturnal hypoxia. J Appl Physiol 1999;87,689-698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Somers, VK, Mark, AL, Zavala, DC, et al Contrasting effects of hypoxia and hypercapnia on ventilation and sympathetic activity in humans. J Appl Physiol 1989;67,2101-2106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kraiczi, H, Hedner, J, Peker, Y, et al Comparison of atenolol, amlodipine, enalapril, hydrochlorothiazide, and losartan for antihypertensive treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161,1423-1428[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Packer, M, Coats, AJ, Fowler, MB, et al Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2001;344,1651-1658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kaneko, Y, Floras, JS, Usui, K, et al Cardiovascular effects of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with heart failure and obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med 2003;348,1233-1241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Mansfield, D, Gollogly, NC, Bergin, P, et al Congestive heart failure and obstructive sleep apnea trial of continuous positive airway pressure [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165,B21



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. Usui, T. D. Bradley, J. Spaak, C. M. Ryan, T. Kubo, Y. Kaneko, and J. S. Floras
Inhibition of Awake Sympathetic Nerve Activity of Heart Failure Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea by Nocturnal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 21, 2005; 45(12): 2008 - 2011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. Tulaimat, B. Mokhlesi, D. Stevens, M. D. Weinstein, T. D. Bradley, J. S. Floras, and K. Usui
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients with Heart Failure
N. Engl. J. Med., July 3, 2003; 349(1): 93 - 95.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sin, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sin, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, T. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS