|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the University of Wisconsin, Department of Medicine and the Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI.
Correspondence to: Ailiang Xie, MD, PhD, Pulmonary Physiology Laboratory, William S. Middleton Veterans Hospital, 2500 Overlook Terrace, Madison, WI 53705; e-mail: axie{at}facstaff.wisc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: We examined the respiratory and cardiovascular effects of added DS in eight patients with CHF and CSA. The DS consisted of a facemask attached to a cylinder of adjustable volume. During wakefulness, the cardiorespiratory response to 200 to 600 mL of DS was tested. Cardiac output and stroke volume were measured using echocardiography with and without DS. During the nocturnal study, patients slept with and without DS, alternating at approximately 1-h intervals.
Results: Values are expressed as the mean ± SE. The wakefulness study revealed a plateau in the partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2) and the partial pressure of end-tidal O2 between DS amounts of 400 and 600 mL. The mean stroke volume index (33 ± 7 vs 34 ± 7 mL/m2, respectively) and the mean cardiac index (1.9 ± 0.3 vs 1.9 ± 0.4 L/min/m2, respectively) were not affected by DS. Neither heart rate nor BP showed a significant change in response to DS of
600 mL. During sleep, DS increased the PETCO2 (40.7 ± 2.7 vs 38.9 ± 2.6 mm Hg, respectively; p < 0.05), reduced apnea (1 ± 1 vs 29 ± 7 episodes per hour, respectively; p < 0.01) and arousal (21 ± 8 vs 30 ± 8 arousals per hour, respectively; p < 0.05), increased the mean arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) [94.4 ± 1.0% vs 93.5 ± 1.1%, respectively; p < 0.01), and reduced SaO2 oscillations (
SaO2 from maximum to minimum, 1.8 ± 0.4% vs 5.5 ± 0.9%, respectively; p < 0.01).
Conclusion: DS stabilized CSA and improved sleep quality in patients with CHF without significant acute adverse effects on the cardiovascular function.
Key Words: dead space heart failure sleep apnea
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been shown to reduce CSA and to reverse some of its negative pathophysiologic consequences, but it is not clear whether these beneficial effects are due to the elimination of the CSA or to a direct effect of CPAP on improving cardiac function.7 Compliance with nasal CPAP is also a problem in some patients. Thus, alternative therapy directly focused at the elimination of CSA would not only clarify the link between CSA and morbidity but also may provide a new therapy for patients who cannot tolerate nasal CPAP.
The narrow difference between eupneic PaCO2 and the hypocapnic apneic threshold is a critical determinant of the periodic breathing in patients with CHF.8 Widening this difference by elevating the eupneic PCO2 by administering exogenous CO2 has been highly effective in eliminating CSA in patients with CHF9 10 or without CHF.11 However, the cumbersome delivery system associated with exogenous CO2 was poorly suited for home use. The alternative of adding a small amount of dead space (DS) has been tested for its ability to stabilize the breathing pattern in patients with idiopathic CSA syndrome.11 Since DS is able to "boost" PaCO2 with no requirement for exogenous CO2, this technique might be more feasible for long-term home use and, therefore, may provide an intriguing approach to therapy for CSA.
We investigated the cardiovascular and ventilatory response to various levels of DS during wakefulness and sleep in patients with CHF and CSA. The daytime DS study enabled us to determine the patient tolerance of the DS system and to titrate the amount of DS needed to normalize the partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2). We then evaluated the effectiveness of DS in eliminating CSA along with its short-term effects on cardiac function.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Measurements
Ventilation was measured during wakefulness with a pneumotachograph (model 5719; Hans Rudolph; Kansas City, MO) coupled to a differential pressure transducer (Validyne; Northridge, CA). ECG was recorded using a monitor (model 78353 B; Hewlett-Packard Medical Products; Andover, MA). An automated sphygmomanometer (Dinamap, 1846SX; Critikon; Tampa, FL) was used to measure BP. Echocardiography was performed with an echocardiography device (SONOS model 5000; Hewlett-Packard Medical Products). Stroke volume was derived from a left ventricular outflow, Doppler flow velocity integral multiplied by the cross-sectional area derived from a parasternal view of a two-dimensional echocardiogram. Five consecutive Doppler flow images were obtained in each individual, and the values were averaged.
Overnight sleep studies were performed on each patient using standard polysomnographic techniques12 13 to identify sleep stage and arousals. Respiratory effort was monitored by respiratory inductive plethysmography (Respitrace; Ambulatory Monitoring Inc; Ardsley, NY) that was calibrated with an isovolumic maneuver. Arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation was measured continuously by pulse oximetry (Biox model No. 3740; Ohmeda; Madison, WI). The fraction of inspired O2 (FIO2) and the fraction of inspired CO2 (FICO2), as well as the partial pressure of end-tidal O2 (PETO2) and PETCO2, were sampled from the mask and were measured by a gas analyzer (model CD-3A; AMETEK; Pittsburgh, PA), which was calibrated with known gases before and after each experiment. All the signals were recorded continuously for off-line analysis of the data.
Central apneas were identified by the absence of the excursion of the sum tracing of the calibrated inductive plethysmography (ie, tidal volume [VT]) for at least 10 s with no movement of the rib cage or abdomen. The fraction of end-tidal CO2 (FETCO2) was used as a secondary method to confirm the plethysmographic output. Obstructive apneas were defined as the absence of VT excursion for > 10 s in the presence of paradoxical chest wall motion. Hypopneas were defined by
50% reduction in VT with a reduction of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) of > 4% for > 10 s.
Protocol
The DS system (Fig 1
) consisted of a tightly sealed facemask attached to an adjustable plastic cylinder. The cylinder contained an inner extensible piece. The volume of the system could be increased from 400 to 800 mL by extending the inner piece. Both the cylinder and the inner piece had a relatively large diameter to avoid any resistive load.
|
In the morning after the nocturnal study, all subjects received an echocardiogram while breathing room air to measure baseline stroke volume and cardiac output. Then the same amount of DS as used during the nocturnal study was applied to each subject for 15 min before repeating the same echocardiographic measurements.
Nocturnal Study:
Subjects underwent a nocturnal polysomnography that consisted of 30 to 60-min periods of room air breathing alternating with 30 to 60-min periods of DS breathing (Fig 2
). Each DS or room air trial was terminated by either awakening the subject when it had lasted 60 min or at the moment when the subject spontaneously awakened after at least 30 min in the same trial. Then a new trial was always started while the subject was awake. DS titration was repeated during the first portion of the night to determine the minimum amount of DS required to stabilize the breathing pattern. All subjects required DS levels between 400 and 600 mL, which was within the previously evaluated level of DS during the daytime study. At the end of each trial, throughout the night, an investigator entered the room to either add or remove the DS from the mask, which was left on the patient for the room air trial.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
600 mL, no change was noted in heart rate (59 ± 6 vs 62 ± 6 beats/min) or arterial pressure (systolic BP, 116 ± 12 vs 115 ± 9 mm Hg, respectively; diastolic BP, 63 ± 5 vs 61 ± 4 mm Hg, respectively). On the morning after the nocturnal sleep study, echocardiography showed no difference between control and DS breathing in either stroke volume index (34 ± 7 vs 33 ± 7 mL/m2, respectively) or cardiac index (1.9 ± 0.4 vs 1.9 ± 0.3 L/min/m2, respectively).
Effects of DS During Sleep:
Since one subject could not sleep during either room air or DS breathing, the nocturnal study data are reported for the remaining seven patients.
During the nocturnal study, subjects spent a mean duration of 122 ± 68 min breathing DS and 153 ± 63 min breathing room air. Of the total DS time, 100 ± 53 min was sleep time, and of the room air breathing time, 109 ± 59 min was sleep time.
Sleep Quality:
The average time to the return to sleep following each spontaneous or investigator-induced awakening was much shorter with DS than with control breathing (11 ± 6 vs 28 ± 9 min, respectively; p < 0.01) [Fig 4
]. Sleep stage distribution was not different with and without DS. Predominantly light sleep was present in both conditions, with stage 1 and 2 sleep occupying 70 to 75% of total sleep time. The arousal index decreased significantly with DS breathing compared to control breathing (21 ± 8 vs 30 ± 8 arousals per hour, respectively; p < 0.05) [Fig 4
]. Although all patients had a decrease in the arousal index, two patients had a very modest reduction. The persistence of arousals in one of these patients could be attributed to the emergence of obstructive hypopneas after the complete resolution of the central apneas with DS breathing. The other patient had a significant number of nonrespiratory arousals that persisted with DS despite the significant reduction in the number of his respiratory events.
|
SaO2 from maximum to minimum, 5.5 ± 0.9% vs 1.8 ± 0.4%, respectively; p < 0.01) [Fig 1
, 6
].
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studying CSA in patients with CHF allowed us to extend our previous observations about idiopathic CSA11 to the examination of the cardiovascular and respiratory effects of added DS in patients with abnormal cardiac function. We also extended our previous studies by examining the dose response of DS during wakefulness, which yielded the following useful information on the potential mechanisms for the beneficial effect of DS in these patients.
First, the addition of DS resulted in an increase in minute ventilation as a result of an increase in the VT without a change in the breathing frequency. This effect of DS on breathing pattern is consistent with other reports in the literature.18 19 Since there is no difference in the VT and frequency responses to 1,000 mL DS while breathing 100% O2 vs breathing room air,19 the high VT breathing patterns appear to be uniquely related to the DS itself. Normally, large breaths are an effective way to clear the DS and to facilitate the entering of fresh air into the lungs during the subsequent breath.20 The increase in VT without an associated increase in breathing frequency requires less respiratory muscle work21 and smaller respiratory muscle tension22 for a given level of VT than if breathing frequency also increased, as is the case with other ventilatory stimulants including inhaled CO2.18 19 20 If breaths are large enough during DS breathing, the FICO2 may actually be decreased if the DS is completely emptied with a large breath. In contrast, with exogenous CO2, large breaths are not able to further reduce the FICO2. Thus, while breathing with added DS, patients might subconsciously adopt large breaths to overcome the effect of DS in order to inhale less CO2. However, a potential adverse effect of this DS-induced increase in VT also could occur. Since our patients were likely to have pulmonary congestion secondary to their severe left heart failure, the deep breaths induced by DS would need to overcome more elastic recoil pressure and thereby increase the work of breathing. In other words, the large breaths observed with added DS serve a useful function if heart function is normal but may be maladaptive in patients with CHF when using DS for the deliberate elevation of PaCO2.
Second, the increase in DS was associated with a progressive increase in FICO2 and a progressive decrease in FIO2. However, there was no corresponding increase in PETCO2 or decrease in PETO2, even at the higher level of DS (ie, 400 and 600 mL) as would have been expected. This interesting finding was most consistent with an improvement in the matching of ventilation and perfusion. An improvement of the relationship of ventilation-perfusion (
/
) during DS breathing has been observed in unconscious patients who have received tracheostomies21
and in resting anesthetized dogs.23
In addition to its favorable effect on
/
matching,24
DS might also promote gas mixing by improving blood flow distribution and reducing the dispersion of the
/
distribution.23
25
The improvement in gas exchange with added DS minimized the adverse effect on oxygenation that would have been expected in response to the increased PETCO2. We actually found an increase in the mean and minimum SaO2 in the nocturnal study with DS breathing. Therefore, oxygenation in patients with CSA can be expected to benefit from DS breathing as a result of the elimination of central apnea and from the improvement in gas exchange despite an associated slight increase in PaCO2. Since hypoxia has been associated with augmented sympathetic nerve traffic and a carryover effect on arterial pressure,26 27 improvement in oxygenation has a potential beneficial effect on two important determinants of prognosis in patients with CHF.
Finally, DS breathing improved sleep quality by decreasing the number of arousals and by shortening the sleep latency following intervention-induced awakenings. The interaction between sleep instaility and breathing instability has been well-described.28 29 Frequent arousals and sleep fragmentation often follow recurrent apneas due to the chemical and mechanical stimuli.30 On the other hand, repeated arousals and rapid sleep-state fluctuation facilitate the occurrence of apneas and hypopneas by causing abrupt hyperventilation and consequent transient hypocapnia31 and by their direct effect on central neural oscillation.32 DS breathing may be able to break this cycle of instability by initially stabilizing the breathing pattern resulting in a secondary consolidation of the sleep state.
Added DS potentially could be associated with a number of adverse effects. First, DS breathing may increase ventilatory work and potentially may fatigue already compromised respiratory muscles. However, the VT in our patients during DS breathing was actually smaller than the postapneic VT following asphyxic stimulation during room air Cheyne-Stokes breathing (Fig 2) . The frequent arousals and the postapneic hyperpneas during CSA may cause equal or even more work of breathing than that associated with DS breathing. Nevertheless, since we did not make precise ventilatory measurements during periodic breathing while the patients were not using DS breathing, we cannot rule out the possibility of an increased workload with added DS.
Second, the elevation of PaCO2 by DS breathing could induce sympathetic excitation resulting in vasoconstriction, tachycardia, and an increase in myocardial contractility.33 DS-induced hyperventilation also causes the acceleration of heart rate due to the pulmonary vagal inflation reflex.34 This DS-induced cardiac stimulation might lead to poor long-term outcomes and morbidity. However, the increase in norepinephrine levels following the administration of exogenous CO2 in previous studies33 was associated with a greater increase in end-tidal CO2 (increase, 4 mm Hg) than was seen in our present study (increase, 1.8 mm Hg) and yielded no improvement in the arousal index.33 In the present study, DS resulted in a small increase in PETCO2, which essentially returned the PaCO2 to normal, eupneic levels and was unlikely to produce large changes in the circulation. In fact, CO2 usually produces multiple offsetting effects on the cardiovascular system. In addition to its excitatory effect on sympathetic neural activity, it also causes bradycardia and vasodilation by its direct action on the cardiac pacemaker and the vascular smooth muscle.35 36 Consequently, in healthy subjects, cardiac output and heart rate were predictably not affected by DS.18 In patients with CHF, we did not find any significant increase in either BP or heart rate with a DS of 600 mL during the daytime study. The night study did not show any increase in heart rate or number of ectopic beats with DS application. Although we did not measure BP or sympathetic activities during the nocturnal studies, we attribute the lack of acute negative cardiovascular effects in our nocturnal study to the improvement in apnea index, sleep quality, arousal index, and oxygen saturation.
The practical use of added DS in patients with CHF is associated with several positive and negative considerations. Compared to pharmacologic treatment, the DS is more physiologic. For example, acetazolamide is a respiratory stimulant that is effective in improving the breathing of patients with CSA.37 However, because it causes metabolic acidosis and has significant side effects, such as urinary frequency and paraesthesias, its usefulness is limited. Compared to exogenous CO2, DS breathing is a more convenient, natural, and safer means of providing CO2. Compared to CPAP, DS does not require the use of positive pressure in a tightly sealed mask, which can interfere with patient compliance. However, CPAP is able to improve left ventricular ejection fraction, which also could improve muscle strength independent of its effect on stabilizing the breathing pattern.38 Hence, DS may be easier to use but not necessarily superior to the use of CPAP. On the negative side, the long-term effect of the elevation of CO2 is unknown in terms of cardiovascular outcomes and patient compliance. Patients with CHF and CSA are very sensitive to wearing any device on their face. A more comfortable DS system would be needed to replace the present device. Taken together, the clinical significance of this study remains uncertain. The approach remains experimental, and it should not be used routinely in clinical practice before a series of careful, long-term, follow-up studies are conducted. A single night study makes cardiorespiratory parameters comparable between room air and DS. The multiple trials in a randomized order avoided any artificial effect. However, the effect of DS breathing on sleep and its architecture has to be further studied in a full night setting.
In summary, our study reported several important conclusions. First, added DS administered through a facemask is a practical modality with which to increase PETCO2 and to eliminate CSA in patients with CHF. Second, sleep quality improved with the stabilization of the breathing pattern. Third, no acute adverse cardiovascular effects were noted with DS administration. Long-term studies to determine the effect on cardiovascular outcomes and patient compliance are required before the DS device can be recommended for routine use in patients with CHF and CSA.
| Footnotes |
|---|
/
= ventilation-perfusion; VT = tidal volume This research was supported by the VA Research Service, by NIH grant R01 HL62561-02, and by the University of Wisconsin General Clinical Research Center.
Received for publication June 21, 2002. Accepted for publication November 11, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Agostoni, A. Apostolo, and R. K. Albert Mechanisms of Periodic Breathing During Exercise in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure Chest, January 1, 2008; 133(1): 197 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Arzt and T. D. Bradley Treatment of Sleep Apnea in Heart Failure Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2006; 173(12): 1300 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Johnson and D. C. Johnson Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure Worsens Central Apneas During Sleep Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2141 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |