|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the South Texas Veterans Health Care System (Dr. Anzueto), Audie L. Murphy Memorial Veterans Hospital Division, San Antonio, TX; and the Department of Medicine (Dr. Niederman), Winthrop University Hospital, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Mineola, NY.
Correspondence to: Antonio Anzueto, MD, Audie L. Murphy Memorial Veterans Hospital, Pulmonary Diseases Section (111E), 7400 Merton Minter Blvd, San Antonio, TX 78284; e-mail: ANZUETO{at}UTHSCSA.EDU
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: antiviral agents asthma COPD otitis media pleconaril rhinoviruses sinusitis viral respiratory infection
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Epidemiologic data vary, but most experts agree that annually in the United States, VRIs account for a minimum of approximately 20 million absences from work and 22 million absences from school.3 4 In 1998, there were an estimated 84 million ambulatory office visits for acute respiratory infections, 76 million of which (90%) were managed by primary care physicians.5 Depending on the survey conducted, schoolchildren average five to eight colds per year.3 4 6 The frequency of VRIs among children declines over time, although a higher incidence may be found among children who attend day-care centers.3 6 Adults average two to four colds per year, presumably because immunity develops against organisms associated with respiratory infections.3 6 7
The search for a "cure" for VRIs has been ongoing for centuries. In the United States each year, consumers seeking relief from cold symptoms spend $2 billion3 to $3 billion7 on selections from > 2,800 over-the-counter products, which include antihistamines, analgesics, antitussives, and anti-inflammatory agents that are marketed to treat cold symptoms.3 8
VRIs and their related sequelae are among the most frequent illnesses for which antimicrobial agents are prescribed in the United States.2 A viral etiology is suspected in more than half of all colds and URIs.2 Despite their lack of activity against viruses, antibiotics are the mainstay of therapy for VRIs in adults9 and children.10 These practices have contributed to the widespread emergence of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens.2
| Diagnosis of VRI |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A complete physical examination for VRI includes a thorough inspection of the pharynx, nasal cavity, ears, and sinuses. In patients who are symptomatic for VRI, an examination of the nasal cavity may reveal postnasal discharge and erythema around the nose and mucous membranes, although normal variations in color may make erythema difficult to distinguish. Proteinaceous exudates and increased mucus secretion may give the nasal mucous membranes a glassy appearance.11
Clinicians often treat patients with respiratory viruses empirically, owing to a lack of on-site laboratory testing capabilities for viruses. The serology assays require paired specimens and are not useful for timely diagnosis. Virus isolation performed with cell cultures is the "gold standard," but the sensitivity is variable.12 Furthermore, cultures take 3 to 7 days to yield results, require specific technical expertise, are labor-intensive, expensive, and have a high percentages of false-positive and false-negative results.2 The direct testing of patient specimens with simplified antigen assays has become more common and has been developed for detection of a variety of viruses. The development of molecular assays for the direct detection of viruses has been actively growing in recent years. The first commercial assays were based on hybridization with DNA probe technology to detect specific ribosomal RNA (Gen-Probe; San Diego, CA). This system uses single-stranded DNA probes to detect complementary ribosomal RNA sequences of the targeted virus. Application techniques such as direct antigen identification, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and ligase chain assays provide increased sensitivity because of the extensive amplification of the target nuclei assay that can be done. Commercial amplification systems for clinical laboratory use in viral detection have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. At present, however, the spectrum of validated assays is limited, and the performance of these assays is technically complex and requires well-trained and knowledgeable personnel. Although they are not readily available for clinical use, cultures, serology, and RT-PCR assays can be used to identify picornaviruses.12 More rapid techniques, including optimized microplate in situ cellular enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, are in development and have been used successfully to test for influenza viruses. These tests have been found to be as reliable as plaque-reduction assays for detecting the presence of influenza.13
Bacteria also may be the causative agents in infections of the pharynx, ears, and sinuses, and they typically present clinically as localized infections. Pharyngeal pain, dysphagia, and exudates in the pharynx raise suspicion of bacterial infection (in particular, with group A ß-hemolytic streptococcus), which is confirmed by rapid antigen detection tests and microbiological testing.1 11 A bright red, bulging, opaque tympanic membrane and the presence of fluid in the middle ear are characteristic findings in patients with otitis media.1 Bacterial sinusitis, which frequently presents with symptoms of URIs, is most often secondary to a viral infection and typically follows a cold or periods of allergic rhinitis.14
| Role of Picornaviruses in VRI |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| HRVs |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HRV Pathogenesis and Transmission
Following inoculation into the nasal cavity, HRVs are transported to the posterior nasopharynx, primarily by ciliated epithelial cells. In the nasopharynx, they gain entry into the host cell following attachment to intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)1, a rhinovirus receptor found in the nasal epithelium and adenoids. The resulting viral infection stimulates the parasympathetic nervous system and activates several inflammatory pathways. The host response to the virus is believed to be the major cause of cold symptoms.3
4
18
As the cold progresses, the virus moves more anteriorly in the nares.18
The prominent symptoms of rhinorrhea and nasal obstruction result from increased vascular permeability, with leakage of serum into the nasal mucosa and nasal secretions. Cold symptoms also are caused by neurogenic reflexes triggered by the infection.3
18
The inflammatory mediators interleukin (IL)-1
, IL-6, IL-8 have been found in the nasal secretions of symptomatic subjects and are responsible for symptoms.3
18
Although there is some controversy about the principal mode of transmission of HRV, direct contact appears to be the most efficient means of transmission.3 HRV infections also have been documented to be spread as large-particle and small-particle aerosols, but, regardless of the route of transmission, the initiation of infection occurs when contact is made between the virus and nasal mucosa.3 Typically, HRV transmission occurs in the home with a child attending day care or a school-age child as the most frequent introducer of the infection.1 3 15 Infection is spread from hand-to-hand contact with contaminated nasal secretions, usually from child to mother. Self-inoculation from eye-rubbing or nose-picking also spreads infection.2 18
Symptoms occur within 16 h of inoculation and peak from 24 to 48 h postinoculation.19 The virus can be recovered 24 h after nasal inoculation, and shedding peaks on days 2 to 3.19 Viral shedding persists after the resolution of symptoms, and the virus may be cultured from 10 to 20% of subjects 2 to 3 weeks after infection.3 Arruda and colleagues17 found the median duration of a cold caused by HRV to be 9.5 to 11 days. In certain populations such as the elderly, however, Nicholson and coworkers20 found the median duration to be 16 days. Sore throat is usually the first sign of infection. Other prominent symptoms initially experienced by patients are rhinorrhea and nasal congestion.17 Facial or sinus pressure, headache, and cough are also common. In adults, fever is uncommon, although low-grade fevers may occur. Nasal symptom severity is greatest on presentation (ie, 1 to 5 days after symptoms appear). Nonproductive cough can persist for a week, and it may be more protracted in smokers.2
| Complications of VRIs |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| VRIs in Children |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HRVs have an important role in precipitating asthma attacks. Johnston and colleagues21 reported that among children 9 to 11 years of age, common cold viruses were present in 80 to 85% of asthma exacerbations. HRVs were the most common viral pathogen in this group, being detected in 66% of the viral isolates. Other studies show that HRV infection (detected by RT-PCR or culture) is associated with high rates of wheezing and asthma-related emergency department or hospital admissions.15 These data suggest that HRV infection may promote asthma exacerbations and other lower respiratory tract disorders through the augmentation of local inflammatory processes. Picornaviruses in children with cystic fibrosis were detected by RT-PCR in 43% of nasopharyngeal specimens in epidemiologic studies reported by Collinson and colleagues.22 Decreases in airflow persisted for at least 3 weeks following the onset of URI. Pulmonary function testing measured decreases in FEV1 of 16.5% on days 1 through 4 after onset, and of 10.3% on days 21 through 24 after the onset of symptoms. Frequent colds resulted in additional deterioration of pulmonary function over time and predisposed infected patients to further pulmonary bacterial infections.
| VRIs in Adults |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In older studies2 15 that examined the relationship between viral exposure and lower respiratory tract disease, HRV infection was associated with 40 to 43% of the exacerbations experienced by patients with chronic bronchitis. Wiselka and colleagues23 reported that patients with chronic bronchitis appeared to be more susceptible to respiratory virus infections and recovered more slowly, compared with asthma patients.
The most common pathogen associated with asthma exacerbations is HRV.24
25
In a 2-year adult asthma study,26
colds were documented in 71% of exacerbations, and peak expiratory flow rates deteriorated during 27% of respiratory illnesses. In cases for which an infectious etiology was identified, HRV infections accounted for 57% of asthma exacerbations, and 23% of those infections were followed by peak expiratory flow rate deterioration (ie, a reduction of
50 L/min in mean peak expiratory flow rate).26
Outbreaks of HRV among elderly persons in the community and in nursing homes are important causes of respiratory illness. Nicholson and colleagues20 reported that chronic illness increased the likelihood of HRV-associated lower respiratory tract illness by 40% and that smoking increased the risk by 47%. In this study, almost six HRV infections were reported for every influenza infection, suggesting that the burden of HRVs in the elderly exceeds that of influenza. Those with underlying pulmonary disease including COPD had more prolonged and more severe illness than those without lung disease.
In a report by Wald and colleagues27 on HRV outbreaks among nursing home residents, 66% of the study population had lower respiratory tract symptoms and 52% developed new abnormalities on lung auscultation. Those persons with COPD had more prolonged and severe disease following HRV infection, with symptoms lasting for approximately 7.4 days.
Greenberg and colleagues28 reported that patients with COPD are more likely to develop significant lower respiratory tract symptoms from colds caused by viral respiratory pathogens. Longitudinal surveillance studies conducted to assess the impact of viral respiratory tract pathogens on morbidity and mortality in older adults with COPD showed similar rates of infection among control subjects and COPD cohorts; however, there was a twofold increase in acute respiratory tract illness among study subjects with underlying moderate-to-severe lung disease, suggesting that COPD patients may be more vulnerable to VRIs and may utilize more health-care resources.
URIs are occasionally accompanied by secondary bacterial infections of the sinuses (0.5 to 2.0% of cases),14 complicating the diagnosis between acute bacterial sinusitis and primary viral rhinosinusitis. HRV infections may cause inflammation and a subsequent cascade of host defense mechanisms in the paranasal sinuses.14 The actual pathogenic mechanisms by which viruses cause disease in the sinuses are unknown. Distinguishing bacterial, viral, or bacterial-viral sinusitis is clinically difficult,14 consequently sinusitis is most often treated empirically as a bacterial infection.29 Sinus puncture and aspiration for specimen collection are required to definitively determine pathogen etiology, but this procedure is not performed routinely in the primary care setting.14
| Management of VRIs |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Symptomatic Treatment of VRIs |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Antiviral Agents |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Intranasal interferon-
2 has prophylactic activity against natural HRV infections, but it has not been shown to have benefit in treatment. The side effects of nasal irritation and bleeding have limited its use.30
Early treatment with interferon in experimental HRV infection reduced viral titers and the frequency of middle ear pressure abnormalities. Peak symptoms were modestly altered. Combinations of intranasal antiviral and anti-inflammatory drugs are under investigation and may serve to reduce VRI complications that include sinusitis and otitis media.24
25
Viral Attachment/Binding
Ninety percent of HRVs use ICAM-1 to attach to the cell-surface receptor on the host cell to initiate infection. Soluble ICAM-1 binds to receptor binding sites on the virus, preventing viral attachment to ICAM-1 on the cell surface.31
Although soluble ICAM-1 has undergone several randomized clinical trials,33
the compound showed marginal efficacy, and development has been halted.
Viral Uncoating
Viral capsid-binding compounds block viral uncoating and attachment to host-cell receptors. For the 90% of HRVs that bind ICAM-1, these compounds change the spatial conformation of the virus and prevent attachment to ICAM-1.30
31
Several compounds that showed promising activity in experimental picornavirus infections have been studied, but they had significant limitations (eg, dosing, delivery, tolerance, solubility, bioavailability, and safety) for use in treating respiratory infections. Preclinical work continues on analogs of these agents.32
Pleconaril, or {3-[3,5-dimethyl-4-[(3-methyl-5-isoxazolyl)-propyl]-phenyl]-5-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazole}, is an orally bioavailable, antiviral agent for the treatment of picornaviral infections.30 34 In clinical trials, pleconaril demonstrated significant reductions in VRI symptom severity and duration for individuals with naturally occurring colds. Pleconaril is the first anti-picornavirus compound to be submitted for US Food and Drug Administration review.
In vitro, pleconaril integrates into the cavity or pockets of the viral capsid to inhibit viral capsid uncoating, thus blocking attachment to host-cell receptors and inhibiting viral replication (Fig 1 ).35 It has potent, broad-spectrum activity against HRVs and enteroviruses and is highly bioavailable by an oral route of administration.30 Oral administration studies31 in animals have demonstrated tissue penetration where viral replication was likely to occur, as well as tissue concentration levels several times higher than plasma concentrations.
|
|
36 h duration for entry into the study. Placebo or 400 mg pleconaril was administered three times daily for 7 days. Concomitant over-the-counter cold medications were allowed. The pleconaril treatment group experienced reductions in the median time to complete resolution of rhinorrhea, in the duration of other cold symptoms, in facial tissue use, and in facial disturbance. Reductions in the duration of cold medication use, in middle ear pressure, and in viral shedding also were observed. In pleconaril-treated patients who did not take concomitant cold medications, an even greater benefit was observed (6.5 days to resolution of cold symptoms, compared with 9.0 days for placebo; p = .033). Adverse event rates were similar for the two groups, except for nausea, which was slightly higher in the pleconaril treatment group (pleconaril group, 7%; placebo group, 3%; p = .003). In a recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial39 comparing pleconaril, 400 mg tid for 5 days, with placebo in 1,044 patients, HRV-positive patients who were treated with pleconaril showed similar reductions in symptoms as those seen in other studies, but symptom severity was lower in the pleconaril group each day, beginning on the first full day of dosing. Compared with placebo, there was a significant reduction in the median viral titers in nasal mucus on days 3 and 6 in the pleconaril-treated patients. Adverse event rates were similar between the pleconaril and placebo groups. Headache, diarrhea, and nausea were reported most commonly.39
RNA Inhibitors
Enviroxime was an antiviral agent with potent in vitro activity targeting viral replication inhibition of HRVs and enteroviruses through the inhibition of the 3A-coding region of viral RNA. Clinical development was halted on this agent because of intolerance to oral dosing and limited antiviral activity after intranasal administration to humans. Derivatives of this compound are currently under investigation.24
25
32
Viral Protein Synthesis
A virally encoded enzyme, 3C protease, cleaves viral proteins from precursor polyproteins and is essential for the viral replication and assembly of the virion. A number of low-molecular-weight drug candidates have been synthesized to inhibit the 3C protease and show promise of antiviral activity.24
25
The most advanced candidate is AG7088, which shows excellent in vitro activity against the picornaviruses and is well-tolerated.31
The intranasal compound is now being reformulated to optimize the active ingredient delivery to the nasal cavity. Phase II trials will begin in the near future.31
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients who are infected with viral and bacterial respiratory tract pathogens often present with similar symptoms. The determination of the etiologic agent in respiratory tract infections is important for the selection of an appropriate treatment regimen. Antimicrobial agents are extremely effective in eradicating susceptible bacterial pathogens, but the inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents for the treatment of viral infections has contributed to the widespread emergence of resistant organisms. Over-the-counter remedies provide limited symptomatic relief, and, until recently, few medications have been available to treat viral infections.
HRVs are common sources of VRIs and cause significant morbidity in patients with lower respiratory tract illnesses, particularly in the elderly and those with chronic illnesses and pulmonary disease. Pleconaril is a safe and effective antiviral agent for the treatment of adult VRIs caused by picornaviruses. It is one of the few antiviral therapies that have been well-tolerated, and it has demonstrated excellent antiviral activity and selectivity for the picornaviruses in pivotal clinical trials. Pleconaril may reduce the disease burden associated with VRI in patients with airway disease. Future studies should specifically assess the role of pleconaril in the prevention and treatment of VRIs in high-risk patients with chronic lung disease or asthma.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication December 28, 2001. Accepted for publication September 20, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D Kriesel and W. A Sibley The case for rhinoviruses in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2005; 11(1): 1 - 4. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. VanderMeer, Q. Sha, A. P. Lane, and R. P. Schleimer Innate Immunity of the Sinonasal Cavity: Expression of Messenger RNA for Complement Cascade Components and Toll-like Receptors Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, December 1, 2004; 130(12): 1374 - 1380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |