|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Veterans Affairs Western New York Health Care System (Dr. Grant), Buffalo, New NY; the School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (Drs. Kudalkar and Schünemann) and the School of Public Health and Allied Health Professions (Drs. Muti, McCann, Trevisan, and Freudenheim), University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Correspondence to: Brydon J.B. Grant, MD, FCCP, Veterans Affairs Medical Center (111-S), 3495 Bailey Ave, Buffalo, NY 14215; e-mail: grant{at}buffalo.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design and setting: A cross-sectional study was conducted of a random sample of the general population in western New York.
Participants: A total of 1,616 subjects of both genders who were aged 35 to 79 years and were free of respiratory disease.
Interventions: None.
Measurements: Pulmonary function was assessed from FEV1, FVC, height, body weight, total pack-years of smoking, smoking status, hemoglobin concentration, and hematologic indexes, eosinophil count, education, and blood levels of retinol, ß-cryptoxanthin, and vitamin E.
Results: We found a direct relation between RDW and the number of pack-years of smoking and smoking status, and an inverse relation between FEV1 and FVC with RDW, even when potentially confounding variables such as smoking were taken into account. When the variability of FEV1 due to smoking was used for comparison, an additional 27% of that variability in FEV1 was explained by variations in antioxidant vitamin levels, and another 24% by RDW.
Conclusions: The results confirmed our hypothesis that there is an inverse relation between RDW and pulmonary function, and raise the possibility that RDW may be a biomarker for as-yet unidentified nutrients that affect pulmonary function.
Key Words: antioxidants nutrition pulmonary function tests spirometry vitamins
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The RBC distribution width (RDW) is the coefficient of variation of mean RBC volume and may be influenced by nutritional factors. No clinical conditions have been associated with values that are below the normal range. The levels are usually normal or elevated. It is known, however, that an increased RDW is associated with nutritional deficiency (ie, iron, vitamin B12, and folic acid) and ethnicity.8 9 10
Measurements of nutritional status are complex and unreliable for some micronutrients. Because of the association between RDW and nutritional factors, one might consider RDW as a biomarker for nutritional status of vitamin B12, folic acid, and iron. These micronutrients play an important role in oxidative stress defense mechanisms,11
12
and oxidative stress is associated with impaired lung function.13
Prior studies also have suggested that RDW may be a marker for ethnic differences in biological susceptibility to alcohol abuse. Asians who abuse alcohol and who are thought to have an increased susceptibility to alcohol, as judged by an increase in liver enzyme levels, including
-glutamyl transpeptidase, also have an increased RDW compared to their European counterparts.14
Therefore, we hypothesized that RDW may be a biomarker for biological susceptibility of the lung to the effects of smoking, or it may be a biomarker for deficiency of certain nutritional factors that exert an effect on lung function.
To test these hypotheses, we analyzed the relation between RDW and lung function in a general population sample of 1,616 residents of western New York. To our knowledge, no studies to date have investigated the association between RDW and lung function.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Data Collection
A detailed self-administered socioeconomic and medical history questionnaire was given to all participants. A detailed account of education was taken, and a personal interview addressed lifestyle habits that included details on the duration and amount of smoking and the number of years since quitting smoking.
All anthropometric measurements were taken according to a standardized protocol. Blood samples for vitamin E, ß-cryptoxanthin, retinol, total vitamin C, hemoglobin concentration and its indexes, RDW, automated differential cell blood count, and spirometry were conducted in a manner that has been described in detail previously15 using the same prediction equations for FEV1 and FVC derived from values of healthy lifelong nonsmokers. To facilitate the comparison of the relative effects of the micronutrients, the absolute blood values of each micronutrient were divided by 1 SD of the micronutrient to obtain a dimensionless ratio.
Statistical Analysis
The relation of RDW to FEV1 and FVC were explored using multiple linear regression analysis, and were tested for linearity, collinearity, and interactions among the independent variables. Significance was accepted at the 0.05 level, and at the 0.1 level for interaction terms. Mean values and SD for all relevant variables were calculated.
The factors affecting RDW were examined using stratification and regression methods. The following covariates were considered because all have been demonstrated to affect RDW: age; gender; ethnicity; hemoglobin; usual alcohol intake over the past 12 months.8 9 16 17 In addition, we included smoking status, total number of pack-years of smoking, and body weight because of the adverse effects of smoking and body weight on folate status. We also included measurements of micronutrients that were shown to affect pulmonary function in our previous study.15
Initially, a multiple linear regression model that predicts FEV1 and FVC included the following covariates: total number of pack-years of smoking; present smoking status; blood eosinophil count; education; blood levels of vitamin E (corrected for triglycerides), serum ß-cryptoxanthin, and retinol; and weight.15 Both age and ethnicity are known to influence both RDW and pulmonary function. To avoid separate adjustments of RDW and pulmonary function with the same variables, we developed linear regression equations in which FEV1 and FVC were expressed in absolute units rather than as the predicted normal values adjusted for age, height, gender, and ethnicity that we had used previously.15 Serum vitamin C level was not included because it provided no additional explanatory power if serum vitamin E level was included as a covariate.15 To investigate the contribution of RDW and other hemoglobin indexes, each was added separately to the initial model. We then added RDW to the initial model along with potentially confounding variables.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Factors Affecting RDW
A multiple linear regression model was used to determine the factors affecting RDW. A log transformation of RDW was used to normalize the distribution of residuals. The effects of smoking on RDW were confirmed. Table 2
shows that age, hemoglobin concentration, ethnicity, weight, gender, total number of pack-years of smoking, and smoking status were significantly associated with RDW. Alcohol intake clearly did not attain statistical significance. None of the coefficients of known important micronutrients that affect pulmonary function (ie, blood levels of vitamin E, retinol, and ß-cryptoxanthin) achieved statistical significance.
|
|
|
|
To assess the relative contribution of the independent variables for predicting FEV1 and FVC, we used analysis of variance to determine the marginal increase in the mean sum of squares associated with that variable (or group of variables) when it is added to the rest of the model. We used the models shown in Table 5 but eliminated variables with p < 0.1. Of the potentially modifiable predictor variables (ie, smoking, RDW, micronutrients, eosinophil count, education, and weight) of FEV1, smoking (ie, total number of pack-years of smoking and smoking status) had the greatest influence (Fig 1 ). The variability due to RDW was 27% of that due to smoking, compared to 26% for eosinophil count, 24% for known micronutrient levels (ie, vitamin E, ß-cryptoxanthin, and retinol), 9% for educational grade, and 5% for weight. Of the potentially modifiable predictor variables of FVC, RDW had the greatest influence (Fig 2 ).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of the study show that the RDW is independently and negatively associated with lung function, after adjusting for known important confounding variables. Each of the confounders had independent associations with FEV1 and FVC. The confounders with a negative association included smoking,19 eosinophil count,20 and weight,21 and those with a positive association included education16 and blood levels of known antioxidants,22 which are in agreement with previously published studies.
Factors Affecting RDW
Our results are also similar to those of prior studies that have shown age-related and gender-related changes in the RDW.16
Ethnic variations in RDW also have been described. African Americans have higher RDW compared to their white counterparts.8
Individuals from south Asia who abuse alcohol to the same extent as Europeans have higher RDW.14
It is well-established that a low hemoglobin level is associated with an increase in RDW.9
23
In our study, we found a similar relation. An increased RDW also has been associated with alcohol abuse,10
but we found no significant relation with alcohol consumption. This result is in accordance with that of a previous study,17
in which only 29.8% of alcoholics showed high RDW values.
The other variables that were associated significantly with RDW in our study were total number of pack-years of smoking and body weight. Searches of electronic databases did not show any prior study examining these associations directly. However, reports that both smoking and high BMI are associated with suboptimal folate status might explain, at least in part, their relation to RDW.5 24 25 26
RDW and Pulmonary Function
It is unlikely that RDW per se has any direct effect on pulmonary function. The association that we have found is most likely due to RDW acting as a marker for some other biological process. There were no interaction effects between RDW and smoking, and, therefore, it seems unlikely that RDW is a measure of the biological susceptibility of the lung to the effects of smoking.
Since RDW is affected by ethnicity, it can be argued that the relation of RDW with lung function is related to ethnic factors. However, we adjusted for ethnicity, so it is unlikely to explain our findings. Furthermore, the relation between RDW and pulmonary function remained even when the data were restricted to whites only. The RDW is increased in individuals who have experienced an early deficiency of iron, folate, and vitamin B12, and is an overall marker of iron, folate, and vitamin B12 deficiency.9 10 27 In comparison, the importance of other nutrients such as iron, folate, and vitamin B12 on spirometry has not yet been examined directly. No blood levels of these nutrients were available in this population.
Since smoking is related to both nutrition and lung function, it could confound these associations. However, the relation between RDW and lung function remains strong in the never-smokers, therefore residual confounding by smoking is an unlikely explanation for this observation.
The strengths of this study are that detailed information on several important lifestyle factors related to pulmonary function were obtained and adjusted for in the analysis. This study is unique because there have been no prior studies examining the relation between RDW and lung function. Only one other study28 has shown a relation between RBC indexes (ie, MCHC) and spirometry. Although this observation is consistent with our results, since a low MCHC is associated with an increase in RDW, we were unable to find a relation between MCHC and spirometry values after adjusting for confounding variables.
Our study has some limitations. First, the number of current smokers was limited. Second, the cross-sectional nature of this study prevents us from drawing any conclusions about a cause-effect relation. Third, the study population was limited to residents of western New York. Fourth, we adjusted the RDW for all known factors that affect it but not for the nutrients (ie, iron, folate, and vitamin B12) since these data were unavailable.
Given these limitations, the results of our study appear to suggest that some other nutritional factors than those previously described may be important predictors of lung function. The variability in FEV1 due to RDW is 27% of that due to smoking, compared with 24% for the known micronutrients (ie, vitamin E, ß-cryptoxanthin, and retinol). Among the potentially modifiable predictor variables of FVC, RDW has the greatest influence. The nutritional factors related to RDW are most probably iron, folate, and/or vitamin B12. Whatever the factors are that relate RDW to lung function, the strength of association appears to be of a similar order of magnitude as that of the known micronutrients. An increase of 1 SD in RDW (about 1.06) is associated with a 54-mL decrease in FEV1. This decline in FEV1 is equivalent to the decline associated with 11 pack-years of smoking or 1.5 years of aging. Further studies that are needed to clarify the independent and interactive influences among these nutrients, ethnicity, and smoking on lung function in the general population.
In summary, we have reported the following two new findings: (1) smoking increases RDW; and (2) RDW is inversely related to lung function. The association between RDW and lung function appears to be independent of smoking, ethnicity, and levels of the known important micronutrients (ie, vitamin C, vitamin E, ß-cryptoxanthin, and retinol).15 The association may be related to nutritional factors that have not been reported previously, such as the levels of iron, vitamin B12, and/or folic acid.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication April 29, 2002. Accepted for publication January 29, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |