|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Divisions of Clinical Pharmacology (Drs. Jenkins, Szefler, Covar, and Spahn) and Allergy-Clinical Immunology (Dr. Gelfand), the Ira J. and Jacqueline Neimark Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology in Pediatrics, and the Department of Medicine (Dr. Cherniack), National Jewish Medical and Research Center and, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO.
Correspondence to: Joseph D. Spahn, MD, National Jewish Medical & Research Center, 1400 Jackson St (K-926), Denver, CO 80206
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 275 patients (125 children) with severe asthma who were admitted to a tertiary asthma referral center.
Methods: Demographics, lung function (ie, spirometry and body box plethysmography), glucocorticoid (GC) pharmacokinetic studies, and lymphocyte stimulation assays were performed on all patients.
Results:Children were as likely to require therapy with high-dose inhaled GCs and long-term therapy with oral GCs, and to have had a prior intubation, yet they had significantly less airflow limitation (mean [± SEM] FEV1, 74.0 ± 2.1% predicted vs 57.1 ± 1.8% predicted, respectively; p < 0.0001), less resistance to airflow (mean airway resistance, 140.3 ± 8.5% predicted vs 311 ± 18% predicted, respectively; p < 0.0001), and larger lung volumes (mean total lung capacity, 116.4 ± 1.6% predicted vs 105.3 ± 1.8% predicted, respectively; p < 0.0001) compared to adults. Children were more likely to be male and to display greater responsiveness to GCs in vitro. Lung function impairment was associated with asthma duration in children and in adults with onset of asthma in childhood, while there was no relationship between disease severity and asthma duration among those with adult-onset asthma. Despite significant differences in disease duration, patients with adult-onset asthma had equally compromised lung function compared to adults with long-standing asthma.
Conclusions: Children with severe asthma tended to be male, to have less severe airflow obstruction, and to display greater responsiveness to GCs in vitro compared to adults. Symptoms and episodic acute declines in lung function may precede chronic airflow limitation in this group of children. As such, it may be more relevant to follow the deterioration in lung function over time in children. Finally, disease severity in children and adults whose onset of asthma occurred in childhood was related to disease duration, but not in patients with onset of asthma in adulthood.
Key Words: adult-onset asthma childhood-onset asthma glucocorticoids National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines severe asthma
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10% have severe disease that is recalcitrant to the available treatment modalities.1
Severe asthma accounts for a significant proportion of the health-care costs associated with asthma. In addition, those persons with severe asthma are likely to experience the greatest morbidity, not only from their disease, but also from the medications used to treat their disease. There are large gaps in our knowledge pertaining to the clinical characteristics and natural history of severe asthma, as outlined in a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) workshop.1 The areas called on for further investigation by this panel included questions of whether the clinical characteristics of children with severe asthma differ from those of adults with severe asthma, and whether they differ between adults with severe asthma the onset of which occurred in childhood and those with asthma onset that occurred in adulthood. The purpose of this report was to describe the differences in the clinical characteristics of children vs adults with severe asthma. In addition, we determined whether there were differences in the clinical characteristics of adults with severe asthma with onset of asthma occurring in childhood vs those with onset occurring in adulthood.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1,000 µg/d inhaled GCs in an attempt to control their disease.1
Patients with vocal cord dysfunction, those with COPD associated with cigarette smoking in the past, and patients with lung diseases other than asthma were excluded from the study. Information collected included patient demographics such as age, sex, race, and history of asthma or atopy. Historical information included the following: age at the time of asthma diagnosis; history of intubation; age at first exposure to oral GCs; duration of long-term administration of oral GCs; and the dosage and type of inhaled and oral GCs. At the time of the evaluation, the patients were in their usual state of health, stable and not acutely ill with asthma. The data collected on hospital admission and during the hospitalization included assessments of lung function, GC pharmacokinetic and lymphocyte proliferation assays, a morning cortisol level, serum IgE levels, total eosinophil count, and the number of positive results of allergen prick skin tests. Pharmacokinetic studies (ie, with methylprednisolone or prednisone) were performed to rule out either poor absorption or rapid clearance as explanations for poor response to GC therapy. Lymphocyte stimulation assays were performed in the presence and absence of GCs. It is a functional assay, and provides information on in vitro response to GCs. As a rule, patients with GC-insensitive asthma require greater concentrations of GCs to suppress lymphocyte activation in vitro than do subjects with GC-responsive asthma.3
Lung Function Studies
Airway resistance (Raw), thoracic gas volume, vital capacity, total lung capacity (TLC), and residual volume (RV) were determined (MasterScreen Body Box; Erich Jaeger; Friedburg, Germany). In addition, flow-volume relationships were determined with the following parameters evaluated: FEV1; FVC; and FEV1/FVC ratio. Predicted values for spirometry were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study III of > 7,000 children and adults.4
The lung function measures were obtained prior to the administration of ß-agonist therapy, with at least 4 h after the administration of a short-acting ß-agonist agent and, when applicable, at least 12 h after the administration of a long-acting ß-agonist agent having elapsed prior to the test being performed.
Lymphocyte Stimulation Assay
Heparinized blood (21 mL) was obtained before 9:00 AM and prior to oral or inhaled GC administration. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by density gradient centrifugation and were suspended in a solution of RPMI medium/10% fetal calf serum at a density of 1 x 106 cells/mL. The PBMCs then were incubated with phytohemagglutinin at a final concentration of 5 µg/mL and with increasing concentrations of hydrocortisone and dexamethasone (range, 10-10 to 10-6 mol/L) for 72 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. Six hours before harvesting, the PBMCs were transferred to 96-well plates and were pulse-labeled with [3H]-thymidine at a final concentration of 1 µCi per well. The cells then were harvested, counted in a ß-scintillation counter, and the results were expressed as counts per minute of [3H]-thymidine incorporation. To quantitate GC responsiveness, values for the inhibitory concentration that results in 50% suppression of lymphocyte activation (IC50) were calculated. The IC50 is the concentration of GCs that is required to suppress phytohemagglutinin-induced lymphocyte proliferation by 50%.
Prednisone Pharmacokinetic Studies
Prednisone pharmacokinetic studies were performed based on previously published methods using a high-performance liquid chromatography method.5
After obtaining a predose blood sample, a dose of prednisone (40 mg/1.73 m2) was administered with blood drawn 2 h and 6 h postdose. Prednisolone clearance was calculated as previously described using the following equation: log prednisolone clearance = [2.66 + (6-h postdose prednisolone concentration)(- 0.00167)].
Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed using a statistical software package (JMP; SAS Institute; Cary, NC) and are presented as the mean ± SEM, unless otherwise specified. Comparative analysis of variance between individual groups was performed utilizing the Student t test. A test of proportions between groups was performed using the Pearson
2 test. Statistical significance was observed at p
0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
18 years old were considered to be children and represented 45% of the cohort. Of all the subjects studied, 78% had experienced the onset of their asthma in childhood. Seventy-nine percent were white, 19% were African-American, and 2% were other. The cohort had chronic, severe, persistent asthma, as defined by the need for therapy with long-term administration of oral GCs in 76% of the subjects, with a mean daily prednisone equivalent dose of 27.2 ± 3.0 mg for a mean duration of 4.0 ± 0.4 years. Therapy with high-dose inhaled GCs also was required, with a mean daily dose of 1,173 ± 47 µg. Twenty-six percent of the cohort had required at least one intubation for an acute severe asthma exacerbation.
Children With Severe Asthma Compared to Adults With Severe Asthma
Children (n = 125) differed from the adults (n = 150) in a number of parameters (Table 1
). First, although women accounted for the majority of adult asthma patients (68%), only 38% of the children with severe asthma were female. Second, a greater percentage of children were African-American compared to adults. Third, children had received a lower dose of oral GCs at hospital admission and required long-term therapy with oral GCs for a significantly shorter length of time. In addition, children displayed more rapid prednisolone clearance and were significantly more responsive to GCs in vitro compared to the adults. With regard to lung function, children with severe asthma had significantly less airflow limitation than the adults, as measured by FEV1 (percent predicted) and FEV1/FVC ratio. FEV1 values of
80% of predicted were noted in 41% of the children and in only 3% of the adults. In contrast, the FEV1 was
60% of predicted in the majority of adults, compared to only 28% of the children studied. Last, children had evidence for greater hyperinflation, as measured by TLC, and had evidence for a greater degree of airway closure, as measured by an elevated RV, while displaying less Raw.
|
|
|
In contrast to the associations noted between asthma duration and disease severity among asthma patients with onset of asthma in childhood, no associations between duration and severity, as measured by the need for intubation, oral GCs requirement, or impairment in lung function (FEV1: r = 0.03, p = 0.77; FEV1/FVC ratio: r = 0.17, p = 0.67; Raw: r = 0.14, p = 0.34) were found among the adults with onset of asthma in adulthood. Adults with onset of asthma in adulthood had compromised lung function whether they had asthma of short duration or long duration, suggesting that significant compromise in lung function occurred at or very soon after the initial diagnosis of asthma had been made.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of importance, children had less impaired lung function compared to the adults studied. As expected, the mean FEV1 of 57% predicted for the adults is within the NHLBI lung function guidelines for severe persistent asthma. In contrast, children had FEV1 values within the moderate persistent asthma range at 74.0% of predicted. Only 28% of the children studied would have been classified as having severe persistent asthma, while > 40% would have been classified as having mild persistent asthma based on the NHLBI lung function criteria. Bacharier et al9 performed spirometry in 195 children and compared FEV1 values to asthma severity based on symptoms. Children with mild persistent asthma based on symptoms had a mean FEV1 of 95.1% of predicted. Those with moderate persistent asthma had a mean FEV1 of 90.2% of predicted; while those with severe persistent asthma had a mean FEV1 of 83.8% of predicted. Fuhlbrigge et al,10 performed an analysis of lung function in > 3,000 children with asthma who were observed for up to 15 years and found > 90% of all FEV1 values to be > 80% of predicted.
The observation that children from our cohort had significantly less impaired lung function than their adult peers should not come as a surprise. Multiple cross-sectional and longitudinal studies11 12 13 have demonstrated a small annual decline in lung function among patients with asthma, with a decline of approximately 1% of predicted per year. We too observed a relationship between asthma duration and decline in lung function, but only in subjects whose disease onset had occurred in childhood. Despite higher mean FEV1 values among the children studied, they displayed a greater annual decline in FEV1 than their adult peers, with a loss of 1.8% of predicted per year, compared to the 0.4% predicted decline per year in the adults with asthma onset in childhood.
Together, the accumulated data in children with asthma indicate that lung function is likely to be less compromised compared to adults with asthma. As such, lung function criteria for assessing asthma severity may need to be adjusted upward for children. In addition, normal or near-normal lung function in a child with severe asthma is not, in and of itself, reassuring. Many children with life-threatening asthma episodes had FEV1 values on hospital admission of > 80% of predicted. Therefore, we suggest that in order to appropriately manage the conditions of children with severe asthma, the assessment of disease severity should first take into account the frequency and nature of the symptoms affecting quality of life, the need for aggressive anti-inflammatory therapy, and a history of life-threatening events. Ideally, lung function should be measured serially over time, with the understanding that the change in lung function over time may provide valuable information, especially since some children with severe asthma can achieve normal airflow levels.14
The second aim of this study was to identify the distinguishing clinical features among adults who experienced the onset of asthma either in childhood or adulthood. If disease duration is an important contributor to disease severity in all adults with asthma, then adults with childhood-onset asthma, who have the longest duration of asthma, should display the greatest impairment in lung function. This was not the case. No differences in any of the lung function measures were noted among the two groups of adults studied, regardless of disease duration. This suggests that these two subsets of asthma may indeed represent distinct forms of severe asthma, one that is slowly progressive over time, while the other appears to be associated with significant loss of lung function at, or very shortly after, the initial diagnosis is made. Burrows et al15 noted that patients with adult-onset asthma display a steep loss in lung function soon after the diagnosis is made, followed by relatively stable lung function thereafter. Thus, it appears that the duration of disease, albeit after an initial steep decline in lung function, in adult-onset asthma has less of an influence on disease severity, as measured by the impairment of lung function. The mechanisms involved in the apparent rapid decline in lung function among the adult-onset asthma patients are presently unknown. It is possible that some of these asthma patients may have had unrecognized asthma for years, with the diagnosis made only after a significant degree of lung function loss had occurred. Alternatively, adult-onset asthma may be associated with a greater degree of airway inflammation and/or more exuberant repair processes, resulting in rapid airway remodeling. Significant loss of elastic recoil, as recently described by Gelb et al,16 may also explain, at least in part, the significant reduction in airflow.
Several factors must be taken into consideration before one extrapolates these findings to asthma patients at large. First, this was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. As such, it is impossible to track disease progression within each patient over time. Second, one must take into account potential selection bias. The reasons for referral to a tertiary center are numerous and complex.17 18 These patients perhaps represented a more highly selected population of patients with severe asthma than the population of persons with severe asthma in general. Third, it could also be argued that some of the subjects in the cohort studied might not have had asthma. Although this study might be limited by its study design, and all of the findings may not be easily generalized, the data generated provide unique insights for the design of, and evaluation of longitudinal studies. Future studies should be designed to identify and characterize patients who are at greatest risk of severe asthma at disease onset as they may benefit from more aggressive therapy in an attempt to ameliorate the significant decline in lung function.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication January 9, 2003. Accepted for publication April 16, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Wenzel Severe Asthma in Adults Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2005; 172(2): 149 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Melen, S. Bruce, G. Doekes, M. Kabesch, T. Laitinen, R. Lauener, C. M. Lindgren, J. Riedler, A. Scheynius, M. van Hage-Hamsten, et al. Haplotypes of G Protein-coupled Receptor 154 Are Associated with Childhood Allergy and Asthma Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2005; 171(10): 1089 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Spahn, R. Cherniack, K. Paull, and E. W. Gelfand Is Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second the Best Measure of Severity in Childhood Asthma? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2004; 169(7): 784 - 786. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |