|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Pneumology and Allergy (Drs. Tong, Dai, Chen, Costabel, and Abdoh), Ruhrlandklinik, Medical Faculty, University of Essen, Essen, Germany; and General and Experimental Pathology (Dr. Guzman), Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany.
Correspondence to: Ulrich Costabel, MD, FCCP, Ruhrlandklinik, Tüschener Weg 40, 45239 Essen, Germany; e-mail: erj.costabel{at}t-online.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and other proinflammatory cytokines. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of POF on the production of TNF-
, interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and the soluble TNF receptors (sTNFRs) 1 and 2 from AMs in sarcoidosis, and we also compared them with those of dexamethasone (DEX). Methods: AMs from 14 patients with sarcoidosis were cultured for 24 h with RPMI medium alone or with LPS (100 ng/mL), and with POF at concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mmol/L, or with 0.1 mmol/L DEX. Cytokines in the culture supernatants were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Results: The results showed that POF induced a dose-dependent suppression of the spontaneous TNF-
release from AMs in sarcoidosis (p < 0.001), and that the spontaneous release of the other cytokines was unaffected by POF at all tested concentrations, but a trend for the inhibition of IL-10 production was found (p = 0.092). DEX inhibited the spontaneous release of TNF-
(p < 0.001), sTNFR2 (p < 0.05), IL-1ß (p < 0.05), and IL-10 (p < 0.01). POF also suppressed the LPS-stimulated production of these cytokines except for that of sTNFR1. Similar to POF, DEX inhibited the LPS-stimulated production of these cytokines, but not that of sTNFR1 and IL-1ß.
Conclusions: Compared with DEX, POF may improve therapeutic regimens in patients with sarcoidosis either by sparing or by replacing corticosteroids. However, the precise clinical value of POF in the treatment of sarcoidosis and other lung diseases will have to be determined in further clinical trials.
Key Words: alveolar macrophages cytokine production pentoxifylline sarcoidosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
activity of POF, its role in the inhibition of the production of other cytokines is still unclear and is sometimes controversial, with divergent effects observed depending on the experimental conditions.4
5
6
7
8
Sarcoidosis is a multiorgan disorder of unknown origin that is characterized in the affected organs by a T-lymphocyte-mononuclear phagocyte infiltration, granuloma formation, and distortion of the normal microarchitecture.10
In the course of the sarcoid alveolitis, an abundance of cytokines, soluble cytokine receptors, and soluble adhesion molecules that are capable of attracting and activating immune cells, and of inducing and maintaining granulomas are released by alveolar macrophages (AMs), T cells, and epithelial cells. AMs behave as versatile secretory cells, which release a great variety of cytokines in sarcoidosis patients, including TNF-
, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-15, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and transforming growth factor-ß.11
12
13
14
15
16
17
So far, there are no data regarding the effects of POF on the production of these cytokines from AMs in sarcoidosis, except for our previous report, which showed that POF inhibits the spontaneous production of TNF-
from AMs in sarcoidosis.3
In this study, we were interested in investigating further the effects of POF on the soluble TNF receptors (sTNFRs) 1 and 2, on the production of other cytokines, such as IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10, from AMs in sarcoidosis, and in comparison with the effects of dexamethasone (DEX), which is a member of the glucocorticoid group of potent immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory agents.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BAL Procedure
BAL was performed via a fiberoptic bronchoscope. Sterile isotonic saline solution was instilled into the right middle or left lingular lobe in 10 20-mL aliquots to a total volume of 200 mL, with immediate aspiration by gentle suction after the instillation of each aliquot. A volume of > 50% was retrieved. The recovered BAL fluid was filtered through two layers of sterile gauze and subsequently was centrifuged at 500g for 10 min at 4°C. The cells were counted in a hemocytometer. Cell viability was assessed by Trypan blue exclusion. Cell differentials were made on smears stained with May-Grünwald-Giemsa by counting 600 cells. Immunocytochemical staining was performed to obtain a CD4/CD8 count.
Cell Culture
AM cell cultures were performed as previously described.14
After three washings with phosphate-buffered saline solution, the BAL cells were resuspended to a final concentration of 1 x 106 cells/mL in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 200 U/mL penicillin, and 200 µg/mL streptomycin (Seromed; Biochrom KG; Berlin, Germany). The cell suspension was added at 1 x 106 cells per well to a 24-well plastic tissue culture plate (Falkon; Becton Dickinson; Franklin Lakes, NJ) and was incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere for 1 h to permit the adherence of AMs. The nonadherent cells were removed by three washes with culture medium. The purity of the adherent AMs was identified to be > 95% by morphology and nonspecific esterase staining. The purified AMs were incubated for an additional 24 h with 1 mL RPMI 1640 medium alone, with 1 mL RPMI 1640 medium and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [100 ng/mL; Sigma Chemical Co; St. Louis, MO], with 1 mL RPMI 1640 in the absence and presence of LPS (100 ng/mL) together with POF (Sigma) at concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mmol/L, or with 0.1 mmol/L DEX (Sigma). The culture supernatants of the AMs were harvested and centrifuged, then were stored in fractions at -80°C until analysis.
Assay for TNF-
, sTNFR1, sTNFR2, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10
The concentrations of TNF-
, sTNFR1, sTNFR2, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 in culture supernatants were quantified using commercially available human enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (Endogen, Inc, Woburn, MA; sTNFR1 and sTNFR2, HyCult Biotechnology, Uden, the Netherlands) with sensitivity of 5, 25, 25, 1, 1, 2, and 3 pg/mL, respectively. The concentrations of above-measured TNF-
, sTNFR1, sTNFR2, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 were expressed as picograms per milliliters per 106 AMs after correction for the proportion of AMs.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The figures show the median and the 25th to 75th percentiles as box-plot diagrams. Within each group, the data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks. A p value of < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
release. At a POF concentration of 0.1 mmol/L, the TNF-
release was 37% of the spontaneous production (p < 0.001), and a concentration of 1 mmol/L showed almost complete inhibition (Fig 1
, top, A; p < 0.001). The spontaneous production of the other cytokines was not significantly inhibited by POF at all tested concentrations, but a trend for the inhibition of IL-10 production was found (Fig 2
, top, A; p = 0.092). Similar to POF, DEX suppressed the spontaneous release of TNF-
(p < 0.001). In contrast to POF, DEX also reduced the spontaneous production of sTNFR2, IL-1ß, and IL-10 to 78%, 48%, and 54%, respectively, of the spontaneous production (Fig 3
, top, A; p < 0.05). No inhibitory effect of DEX on sTNFR1, IL-6, and IL-8 was seen.
|
|
|
|
, sTNFR2, IL-1ß, IL-6, and IL-8 production in a dose-dependent fashion (Fig 1
, bottom, B, and Fig 3
, bottom, B) [p < 0.05 or p < 0.001, respectively]. The LPS-stimulated release of IL-10 was inhibited by POF only at the highest dose (ie, 1 mmol/L) [Fig 2
, bottom, B; p < 0.001]. Similar to POF, DEX also reduced the production of LPS-stimulated cytokines except for that of IL-1ß (p < 0.001). POF and DEX showed no inhibition of LPS-stimulated sTNFR1 production.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
release from AMs in sarcoidosis, and that there was a trend for the inhibition of IL-10. DEX suppressed the spontaneous release of TNF-
, sTNFR2, IL-1ß, and IL-10 from AMs in sarcoidosis.
The rather selective inhibitory effect of POF on spontaneous TNF-
production from AMs in vitro in sarcoidosis, as shown in this study, is supported by the results of similar studies in vitro and in vivo. Previous studies4
5
have demonstrated that the production of IL-1ß, IL-6 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor from human monocytes/AMs was unaffected by POF, whereas TNF-
production was markedly suppressed by POF. A study of POF on endotoxemia in human volunteers or in OKT3-treated renal transplant recipients had shown an inhibitory effect of POF on TNF-
levels, whereas IL-6 and IL-8 were not affected.19
Bernard et al20
reported a selective inhibition of POF on TNF-
production by endothelial cells under LPS stimulation compared to that on IL-6. An in vivo study21
on the effects of continuous IV infusion of POF on serum levels of TNF-
, IL-6, and IL-8 in patients with septic shock showed a selective decrease of TNF-
, whereas the levels of the other two cytokines remained unaffected. The lowest effective concentration of POF in our in vitro study (0.01 mmol/L) is comparable to peak therapeutic plasma concentrations of 0.1 to 0.01 mmol/L.1
Other studies that investigated a comparable POF effect used higher concentrations than those required in vivo.5
A trend for the inhibition of spontaneous IL-10 production was seen in AMs from our results. Other studies also have demonstrated that the modulation of cytokine release induced by POF is not solely restricted to TNF. Bienvenu et al8
also reported that IL-10 was significantly inhibited by POF at a concentration of 0.1 mmol/L. Benbernou et al7
found that POF at appropriate concentrations induced a selective suppression of IL-2 and interferon-
, whereas at high concentrations (ie, 0.5 mmol/L) this drug could act as a suppressive agent of both T helper (Th) type 1-derived and Th2-derived cytokines. D'Hellencourt et al6
demonstrated that POF at a concentration of 1 mmol/L inhibited IL-10 production by LPS-stimulated whole-blood cell and PBMC culture, and also that POF induced a dose-dependent decrease in the TNF-
, TNF-ß, and IL-10 messenger RNA levels expressed by LPS-stimulated PBMCs. These findings are in disagreement with those of Rott et al22
who considered POF to be a selective suppressor of Th1-associated lymphokine production but not of Th2-associated lymphokine production.
The mechanism of action of POF on cytokine inhibition is rather complex. The classic inhibition of phosphodiesterase (PDE) that is induced by POF is probably a major explanation, but is not the only one. The PDE inhibition is responsible for an elevation of the intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate level, which has a key role in controlling the activation and proliferation of monocytes/macrophages and of T and B lymphocytes.23 Other mechanisms like modulation of calcium mobilization or interaction with adenosine receptors may be involved in the effects of POF and xanthine derivatives.24 25 Another study26 showed that the inhibitory effect of rolipram, a specific inhibitor of PDE IV, on TNF production is at least partially mediated by the endogenous production of IL-10. The presence of rolipram accelerated the IL-10 release by LPS-stimulated cells. Thus, different mediators secreted by the same cells are regulated by POF, probably using a distinct mechanism.
DEX, which is known for its multiple immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory activities, has been widely used in the treatment of allergic and inflammatory granulomatous diseases. It has been shown to inhibit the production and gene expression of many cytokines, which are known to induce inflammatory or immunologic responses.9
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
The molecular mechanism of the action of DEX is comparatively well-understood through its effect on the transcription factor nuclear factor-
B, which has been implicated in the activation of multiple cytokine genes. It has been demonstrated that DEX and POF inhibit TNF-
production at both the transcriptional and translational levels, with the effect of DEX being more pronounced at the translational level, but with POF inhibiting predominantly the transcription of the TNF-
gene.2
4
34
Although POF and DEX inhibit TNF-
production by distinctly different mechanisms, our results indicate that these drugs inhibit the production of the spontaneous TNF-
and other cytokines to a similar extent.
Shown by our in vitro studies of the LPS-stimulated cells and in line with those studies reported in the literature, POF not only inhibits TNF-
production, but also down-regulates other cytokines.4
5
6
7
8
9
22
Based on these results, POF has complex effects on the cytokine network. The cellular environment and the mechanisms that trigger cytokine production seem to greatly influence these effects.
In sarcoidosis, AMs, AM-derived TNF-
, and other cytokines play a crucial role in orchestrating inflammatory cell accumulation, granuloma formation, and the fibrogenesis of sarcoidosis. Accordingly, the results of our in vitro study may have important implications for the potential use of POF in the treatment of sarcoidosis, and also may explain in part the beneficial effect of POF on sarcoidosis patients what was observed in a 1997 open trial.35
Compared with DEX, POF has no severe side effects and, thus, has a broader therapeutic window.1
However, the full details of the mechanism of how POF may be a promising immunosuppressive agent for the treatment of sarcoidosis have not yet been elaborated.
In conclusion, the results of this in vitro study show that POF not only inhibits the spontaneous production of TNF-
from AMs, but also suppresses the LPS-stimulated production of TNF-
and other cytokines from AMs. Compared with DEX, POF shows similar effects in regard to the inhibition of spontaneous and LPS-stimulated cytokine production. POF may improve the therapeutic regimens for sarcoidosis either by sparing or by replacing corticosteroids. However, the precise clinical value of POF in the treatment of sarcoidosis and other lung diseases will have to be determined in further clinical trials.
| Footnotes |
|---|
This work was supported by Arbeitsgemeinschaft zur Förderung der Pneumologie an der Ruhrlandklinik and by FORUM (University of Bochum).
Received for publication December 18, 2002. Accepted for publication March 18, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production from human alveolar macrophages. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159,508-511
by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Immunology 1994;83,262-267[ISI][Medline]
, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, TNFß, and IL-10 by pentoxifylline. Int J Immunopharmacol 1996;18,739-748[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-mediated neuroblastoma cell differentiation: modulation of calcium mobilization but not cAMP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995;211,1006-1014[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
and IL-6 by endotoxin-stimulated macrophages. J Immunol 1995;155,4909-4916[Abstract]
and IL-1ß production in human peripheral blood mononuclear adherent cells by a glucocorticoid hormone. J Immunol 1988;140,1895-1902
production in murine mast cells: pentoxifylline or dexamethasone inhibits IgE-dependent production of TNF-
by distinct mechanisms. Cell Immunol 1996;171,140-146[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Lu, K. Fukuda, Y. Nakamura, K. Kimura, N. Kumagai, and T. Nishida Inhibitory Effect of Triptolide on Chemokine Expression Induced by Proinflammatory Cytokines in Human Corneal Fibroblasts Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 2346 - 2352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-i. Inoue, H. Takano, R. Yanagisawa, and M. Sakurai Anti-inflammatory Effect of Pentoxifylline Chest, July 1, 2004; 126(1): 321 - 321. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |