|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Section of Respiratory Medicine Department of Medicine (Drs. Ionescu, Shale, and Nixon), Department of Geriatrics (Dr. Stone), Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering (Dr. Evans and Ms. Pettit),University of Wales College of Medicine Academic Centre, Llandough Hospital, Cardiff, and Vale NHS Hospital Trust. Penarth, South Glamorgan, UK.
Correspondence to: Dennis J. Shale, MD, Section of Respiratory Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine Academic Centre, Llandough Hospital Penarth, South Glamorgan, CF64 2XX, UK; e-mail: shaledj{at}cardiff.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: We hypothesized that some adult patients with a normal body mass index (BMI) have evidence of hidden fat-free mass (FFM) and bone mineral density (BMD) depletion that is linked to more severe disease.
Design: Fat mass (FM), FFM, and BMD were determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and by bioelectric impedance in 56 adults in clinically stable condition and 20 age-matched healthy subjects. FM index and FFM index (FFMI) [kilograms per meter squared] of the right arm, leg, and trunk (ratio to height squared) were calculated. Lung function, including the maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and sustained MIP (SMIP), physical activity, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and the number of exacerbations in the previous year were recorded.
Results: Patients had a lower total FFM than healthy subjects (p < 0.01), while FM was similar. Of the 56 patients, 30 patients had a normal BMI, of which 12 patients had a low FFM (hidden loss) by DXA. The right arm, leg, and trunk FFMI and BMD at hip sites were less in these patients than in those with a normal BMI and normal FFM (all p < 0.01). This group had a lower FEV1, SMIP, more frequent exacerbations, and greater circulating CRP (all p < 0.05).
Conclusions: In adults with CF, apparent or hidden loss of FFM, rather than weight loss, was related to overall disease severity. Hidden depletion of FFM was associated with increased loss of BMD and systemic inflammatory activity.
Key Words: body composition cystic fibrosis hidden loss of fat-free mass
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Accelerated short-term weight loss can occur with exacerbations of respiratory symptoms and is reversible with antibiotic treatment in some patients.4 With background nutritional depletion, such patients may be in a vicious circle of increasingly frequent exacerbations and weight loss, which is difficult to break with antibiotic treatment and nutritional interventions.5 6 7 We have previously reported that the response to antibiotic treatment is less in those adults with evident loss of fat-free mass (FFM).7 There is emerging evidence that body composition may be more important than body mass, with determination of FFM and bone thinning providing more information on systemic complications in CF.8 9 10 11 12 Preferential loss of FFM was reported in adults with CF compared with matched, healthy subjects without CF, with a lesser loss of fat mass (FM).13 Loss of FFM has also been shown to be associated with more severe lung disease, loss of inspiratory muscle function, and greater and more refractory systemic inflammation.7
We hypothesized that there should be a subgroup of adults with CF in whom FFM depletion may be hidden due to maintenance of body mass index (BMI) within normal limits and that FFM loss, either obvious or hidden, would be associated with a low bone mineral density (BMD), with the severity of lung disease and with greater systemic inflammation. To investigate this, we studied a group of unselected adults in clinically stable condition to determine the occurrence and distribution of hidden FFM loss and its relationship to indicators of disease severity.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Body Composition
Weight was determined with an electronic scale, height was measured barefoot with a stadiometer, and BMI was calculated.
Bioelectric Impedance
Leg-to-leg pressure contact bioelectric impedance (BI) measurements were obtained (Valhalla BIA; Valhalla Scientific; San Diego, CA) using a standard 50-kHz, 0.8-mA constant current. The subject stands barefoot on the scale, which has the electrodes incorporated at the level of the toes and heels. Individual FFM (kilograms) was derived from the linear equation relating the measured height squared/resistance to the reference FFM, while FM was calculated from the difference between weight and FFM.
Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry
BMD, FM, and FFM were determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using a QDR 2000+ absorptiometer (Hologic; Waltham, MA) with Enhanced Whole Body v5.70 software for body composition analysis. The measurements were recorded before a meal and after the subject emptied his or her bladder. Subjects were scanned in the supine position. The FFM of our healthy subjects was within the normal limits of the FFM of a healthy UK population of the same age and gender, though these data were generated from anthropometric measurements.14
Two groups of patients were defined according to FFM by DXA: (1) low FFM if less than the lower fifth percentile for the healthy subjects; (2) normal FFM if more than the lower fifth percentile for the healthy subjects. To determine preferential FFM loss, the FFM and FM were corrected for the height squared of the subject to give a FFM index (FFMI) and a FM index (FMI) [kilograms per meter squared] for the right arm, right leg, and trunk after subtraction of the bone mineral mass in each area.15
16
Lung Function
FEV1, FVC, and their ratio were determined by spirometry (Vitalograph Ltd; Alpha II; Buckingham, UK). The best of three recordings was reported. Total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), and RV/TLC were determined by helium dilution technique.17
Three groups of patients were defined according to the severity of the impairment of the lung function: severe impairment, FEV1 < 45% predicted; moderate impairment, FEV1 > 46% and < 65% predicted; and mild impairment, FEV1 > 65% predicted.18
Inspiratory Muscle Function
The maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and sustained MIP (SMIP) were measured with an electronic manometer and expressed in centimeters of water and pressure-time units, respectively.7
Physical Activity
Physical activity was assessed using a recall questionnaire for the month prior to the assessment when the patients were in clinically stable condition. An activity score was calculated and expressed in metabolic equivalents (METs) [1 MET = the energy expended by a person at rest].19
Exacerbations of Respiratory Symptoms and Circulating C-Reactive Protein
The number of exacerbations in the year prior to the assessment was obtained from the case notes. Serum concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP) was determined by in-house sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with goat and rabbit anti-human CRP and anti-rabbit IgG-alkaline phosphatase conjugate.20
Statistics
Data are presented as arithmetic or geometric means (log10 transformed nonnormally distributed data) and 95% CIs. Analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey test were used for comparison between groups to avoid multiple t tests. A Spearman rank correlation test and regression analysis were used to determine relationships between variables. Analysis of agreement between BI and DXA was made by determining the
coefficient and by calculation of the precision of the estimated limits of agreement.21
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
= 0.75) and FM (
= 0.82). Seven patients were attributed to different body composition groups for FFM and three patients for FM by the two methods (Table 3
). However, with the calculation of the precision of the estimated limits of agreement, we found a modest agreement between the two methods: the 95% CI for FFM was 6.2 to 3.8 kg for the lower limit of agreement and 5.6 to 7.9 kg for the upper limit of agreement. There was a good association between BMI and FFMI (r2 = 0.44, p < 0.001) and between BMI and FMI (r2 = 0.36, p < 0.001) for the whole patient group. Based on DXA assessment, 32 patients had a low FFM, 12 of whom had normal BMI (Table 4
, Fig 2
).
|
|
|
2 = 3.5, p = 0.06). The right arm, right leg, and trunk FFMIs were significantly less in patients with a normal BMI and a low FFM compared with those with a normal BMI and normal FFM (Fig 3 ). Both groups had BMD less than the healthy subjects at most sites (Table 2) . The mean total hip, trochanteric, intertrochanteric and femoral neck BMDs were less in those with a normal BMI and a low FFM compared with the group with normal BMI and normal FFM (all p < 0.01), though there was no difference for the spine L1 through L4 site (Fig 4 ).
|
|
Relationships Between Body Composition, Lung Function, and Inspiratory Muscle Function
Twenty-three patients had severe impairment, 11 patients had moderate impairment, and 22 patients had mild impairment of the lung function. The FEV1 was related to the BMI (r = 0.30, p = 0.02) and FFM (r = 0.44, p < 0.01). The BMD was reduced at all sites (p < 0.05) in patients with severe impairment compared to those with mild impairment of lung function.
Patients with a low FFM had lower mean FEV1 and SMIP values than those with a normal FFM, but there was no difference in the RV/TLC ratio or in MIP between the two groups (Table 5 ). Lung and inspiratory muscle function were not different between patients with a low BMI and those with normal BMI. In the 30 patients with a normal BMI, those with a low FFM (n = 12) had a lower FEV1 and SMIP and greater RV/TLC than those with a normal FFM, though no difference in MIP was found (Table 6 ). This difference was maintained when FFM was corrected for height. For the whole group of patients, SMIP was related to FEV1 (r = 0.62, p < 0.001), FFM (r = 0.60, p < 0.001), and regional FFMI of the trunk (r = 0.64, p < 0.001). MIP was related to FEV1 (r = 0.36, p < 0.05), FFM (r = 0.40, p < 0.01), and FFMI (r = 0.43, p < 0.01) but not to BMI (r = 0.30, p = 0.059).
|
|
In the year previous, the exacerbation rate was greater in the low FFM group than in the normal FFM group (Table 5) . No difference in the number of exacerbations was found between the low and normal BMI groups: mean, 43 exacerbations (95% CI, 2.6 to 5.9) vs 4.1 exacerbations (95% CI, 2.6 to 5.5). Within the group of patients with a normal BMI, those with a low FFM had a greater number of exacerbations than those with a normal FFM (Table 6) . The number of exacerbations was related to the FEV1 (r = - 0.54, p < 0.01) and to the concentration of CRP (r = 0.44, p < 0.01).
CRP concentrations were similar in patients with a low BMI and in those with a normal BMI: 7.6 µg/mL (95% CI, 3.2 to 15.9) vs 6.4 µg/mL (95% CI, 3.2 to 12.6), respectively. In the patients with a normal BMI, the CRP concentration was greater in patients with low FFM than in those with normal FFM (Table 6) . A modest association was found between the level of CRP and FEV1 (r2 = - 0.30, p < 0.01) and FFMI (r2 = 0.15, p < 0.01).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The loss of FFM with relative preservation of FM, total body mass, and BMI in some patients indicates a preferential loss of FFM. The BMI is routinely assessed in many CF centers, but the dissociation between BMI and FFM in some patients makes it an unreliable measure of body composition changes and disease severity, as demonstrated by the failure of a low or normal BMI status to show significant differentiating relationships with the impairment of pulmonary function, inspiratory muscle function,22 the rate of exacerbations, and circulating CRP in the same way as FFM. This interpretation is supported by the loss of FFM being related to pulmonary function rather than steatorrhea.23 We report a good agreement between DXA and BI in identifying most patients with a low FFM. Therefore, despite the potential errors in measuring body composition by BI, due to the water distribution in patients with CF, this can be used as a simpler and less costly method than DXA to identify patients at risk of more severe disease and poorer outcome. However, because of the modest agreement with the estimated limits of agreement method and the wide CI, it is unlikely that BI could be used to assess changes in FFM over time in individual patients, which agrees with other studies.24 25 Additionally, once such patients have been identified, DXA scanning would still need to assess the BMD, which was related to the loss of FFM. Reduced BMD is associated with increased morbidity, in addition to the lung disease itself.9 10
Use of total FFM in disease states needs cautious interpretation, as our patients with a low FFM were shorter than those with a normal FFM, which may indicate impaired growth in childhood and adolescence. However, after correcting for height squared, the separation was maintained between those with a low or normal FFM, suggesting that preferential loss of FFM occurred in addition to possible earlier growth failure. Height squared standardization for body habitus allowed us to determine regional differences in body composition and to compare patients and healthy subjects. The FFMI for the arm and leg in patients was less than for healthy subjects, while there was a relative preservation of the FMI at these sites. These regional changes in body composition suggest a generalized distribution of loss of FFM.
Our patients with a low FFM were less active than those with a normal FFM, which was likely to be due to various factors including progressive decline in pulmonary function. Reduced levels of physical activity may enhance a reduction of skeletal muscle mass and, therefore, FFM.26 This possibility is supported by our finding that severe impairment of lung function is associated with loss of FFM, which may be contributed to by disuse. Patients with a low FFM had greater impairment of inspiratory muscle function as assessed by the SMIP, a measure of single-breath inspiratory muscle work capacity between RV and TLC. The MIP, a measure of inspiratory muscle force generation, was well preserved, confirming our earlier finding that only SMIP was related to severe impairment of the lung function and a low FFM.22 The reduced SMIP may be due to a low trunk FFM, which includes inspiratory and accessory inspiratory muscles, a relationship emphasized by similar findings in patents with a hidden loss of FFM, which determines inspiratory muscle work capacity and endurance during a SMIP maneuver.
Loss of lung function is due to recurrent injury secondary to chronic infection and persistent local inflammation, which is accompanied by increased concentrations of circulating inflammatory mediators.7
20
27
28
The systemic inflammatory response in CF is essentially a persistent acute phase response and is associated with a continuous parallel catabolic response, which has its major effect on protein-rich tissues in the FFM compartment, such as skeletal muscle and bone connective tissue.28
29
30
These systemic responses are related to an energy imbalance through their contribution to the increased resting energy expenditure,31
32
which is increased further during exacerbations of pulmonary symptoms.4
33
The systemic inflammatory response is maximal during such exacerbations and remains greater during clinical stability in patients with a low FFM compared with those with a normal FFM.4
7
32
This suggests that a greater and persistent inflammatory-catabolic stress occurs in patients with a low FFM, which may confound the reversal of changes in body composition because of frequent exacerbations and a poorer response to antibiotic treatment.7
A direct effect of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-
may be mediated through the nuclear factor-
B transcription factor leading to a proteolytic myopathy with a sustained increased protein breakdown,34
a response found in inflammatory diseases other than CF.35
Hidden depletion of FFM occurred in 10 to 30% of patients with COPD, and was associated with systemic inflammation.36
37
38
In particular, both apparent and hidden depletion of skeletal muscle mass was associated with greater concentrations of circulating interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-
and their soluble receptors than in those with a normal skeletal muscle mass.36
This supports our findings and suggests common systemic processes may occur in both disorders where chronic pulmonary and systemic inflammation, lung destruction and impaired lung function, and altered body composition are prominent features.35
36
37
38
Our observations in patients in clinically stable condition indicate that changes in body composition including hidden depletion of FFM, rather than body mass, more closely relate to the overall severity of health impairment in adults with CF. This study shows that it is clinically relevant to determine body composition in adults with CF and to identify all patients with loss of FFM as an indicator of disease severity. It remains to be demonstrated if interventions such as segmental muscle training or anabolic treatment will maintain FFM, over long periods of time, improve skeletal muscle function at those sites and therefore maintain bone mass, and have an effect on other clinical indicators of disease severity.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the Cystic Fibrosis Trust (United Kingdom), the Astra Foundation (United Kingdom), the British Lung Foundation, and the British Thoracic Society.
Received for publication March 21, 2003. Accepted for publication July 29, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in cystic fibrosis. Thorax 1991;46,91-95[Abstract]
B. FASEB J 2001;15,1169-1180This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. de Vries, T. P. van Staa, M. S. G. M. Bracke, C. Cooper, H. G. M. Leufkens, and J-W. J. Lammers Severity of obstructive airway disease and risk of osteoporotic fracture Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2005; 25(5): 879 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Bolton, A. A. Ionescu, K. M. Shiels, R. J. Pettit, P. H. Edwards, M. D. Stone, L. S. Nixon, W. D. Evans, T. L. Griffiths, and D. J. Shale Associated Loss of Fat-free Mass and Bone Mineral Density in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2004; 170(12): 1286 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |