|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Respiratory Service, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Correspondence to: Victoria Villena, MD, Servicio de Neumología, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Avda. de Córdoba s/n 28041, Madrid, Spain; e-mail: mvg01m{at}saludalia.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Setting: Tertiary care, university-affiliated hospital.
Subjects and methods: Seven hundred fifteen patients with pleural effusion were prospectively assessed from December 1991 to December 1997.
Interventions: The appearance of the fluid was assessed in a glass assay tube containing 10 mL of pleural fluid.
Results: The most common presentations were serous and blood tinged, with 80% of the fluids fitting into one of these categories. The most frequent cause of watery fluid was transudate, although most transudates were classified as serous effusions. There were 59 bloody and 656 nonbloody pleural fluids. The most common cause of bloody pleural effusion (BPE) was malignancy (47%). Fluid with a bloody appearance slightly increased the probability of malignancy in our series (odds ratio [OR], 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 2.94; p = 0.04). Nevertheless, only 11% of the neoplastic effusions were BPE. Other common causes of BPE were posttraumatic (12%) or parapneumonic (10%) pleural effusions. Tuberculosis and transudates were uncommon causes of BPE. Fluid that was bloody in appearance decreased the probability for both diseases (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.57; p = 0.003 and OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.95; p = 0.04, respectively).
Conclusions: Serous and blood tinged were the most common presentations of pleural fluid at thoracentesis. Almost half of BPEs were secondary to neoplasms, but only 11% of the neoplastic effusions were BPEs. Other common causes of BPE were parapneumonic and posttraumatic.
Key Words: bloody appearance malignant pleural effusion pleural effusion
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In 224 of the first 274 pleural fluids, interobserver agreement when classifying the pleural fluid into BPE and nonbloody pleural fluid was assessed. The
coefficient was 0.88. All patients were studied according to the same diagnostic algorithm.3
After completion of clinical evaluation, pleural effusions were classified into diagnostic groups based on explicit previously reported criteria4
:
Malignant:
Pleural effusions were malignant if there was either a cytologic or histologic diagnosis of neoplasm within the pleural space.
Paramalignant:
Pleural effusions were paramalignant when a histologic diagnosis of malignant tumor in another organ was established, the effusion did not meet the malignant criteria, and no other cause of pleural effusion was found.
Tuberculosis:
Pleural effusions were tuberculous if a positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture finding of pleural fluid or tissue and/or presence of granulomas in the pleural biopsy were found, in the absence of other pleural granulomatous diseases. This group also included 11 patients with high interferon-
levels in pleural fluid, favorable clinical course after tuberculous treatment, and either microbiological evidence of extrapleural tuberculosis or clinical picture suggestive of pleural tuberculosis.5
Parapneumonic:
Pleural effusions were parapneumonic in patients with cough, fever, and a radiographic pulmonary infiltrate that disappeared with antibiotic treatment. Empyema was defined as pus in the pleural space.
Transudate:
Pleural effusions were transudate if defined according to clinical and classic biochemical criteria.1
Other Benign Diseases:
Pleural effusions were other benign diseases if diagnosed on the basis of standard criteria.1
Undetermined or Mixed Causes:
Pleural effusions were undetermined or mixed causes whenever the etiology of the effusion was unknown or there were several potential causes of the pleural effusion.
Statistical Analysis
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to check the normal distribution of the data. The strength of the associations has been estimated as odds ratio (OR), and
2 test with the Yates correction or the Fisher exact test were used as appropriate. The Mann-Whitney test or the Student t test were used to compare the differences between continuous variables; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Interobserver agreement was measured by
coefficient.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Tuberculosis and transudates were uncommon causes of BPE. Fluid that was bloody in appearance decreased the probability for both diseases (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.57; p = 0.003 and OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.95; p = 0.04, respectively).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Most effusions from all the diagnostic groups were either serous or blood tinged. In the group of transudates, only 13%, with a lower concentration of proteins in pleural fluid, were classified as watery. A watery appearance was very suggestive of transudate, but most transudates were serous, and these can even look blood tinged, bloody, or turbid.
It has been suggested that the bloody presentation of an effusion increases the probability of malignancy of the pleural effusion. In our series, almost half of the patients with BPE had neoplasms. This ratio agrees with Lights personal experience,1 but would probably be different in a surgical setting, where traumatic etiologies of the pleural effusions would be more likely. Nevertheless, a wide variety of causes can produce BPE, and fluid that is bloody in appearance, even if only slightly, increases the probability of malignancy (OR, 1.73). However, BPE, rather than being a common feature of neoplastic effusions, constituted only 11% of the neoplastic pleural effusions in our series, 13.5% of the malignant effusions, and 24% of the pleural effusions due to mesothelioma.
Although the color of the fluid is a subjective characteristic, the interobserver agreement in our study was fairly good. The differences with some series might be partially explained by the fact that we assessed pleural fluid color in a transparent tube with 10 mL of pleural fluid; the color is usually darker when several hundred milliliters are accumulated.
BPE can also be due to benign diseases. Similar to Lights experience, the most frequent benign causes in our series were parapneumonic and posttraumatic pleural effusions.1 Coronary artery bypass graft surgery6 and postcardiac injury syndrome7 may frequently produce BPE. One of our patients with internal mammary artery graft surgery had BPE. Pulmonary embolism has been reported to contain a particularly high RBC count.8 In our series, five of eight patients (62%) had either blood-tinged effusions (n = 4; 50%) or BPE (n = 1; 12%). Other less common causes of BPE may be acute aortic dissection,9 thoracic vascular disruption, pancreatitis,10 benign asbestos pleural effusion,11 pseudochylothorax,12 endometriosis,13 lung transplantation,14 esophageal variceal sclerotherapy,15 right-sided endocarditis,16 sarcoidosis,17 hemagiomatosis,18 or intralobar pulmonary sequestration.19
In conclusion, serous and blood tinged were the most common presentations of pleural fluid at thoracentesis. Almost half of BPEs were secondary to neoplasms, but only 11% of the neoplastic effusions were BPE. Other common causes of BPE were parapneumonic and posttraumatic. The appearance of the fluid should not be overemphasized as a diagnostic test.
| Footnotes |
|---|
This study was supported in part by grants C03/011-RTIC from Instituto de Salud Carlos III.
This study has been partially presented at the SEPAR 2002 meeting in Gran Canaria Island, Spain, June 811, 2002.
Received for publication February 25, 2003. Accepted for publication July 30, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in 388 immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients for diagnosing pleural tuberculosis. Eur Respir J 1996;9,2635-2639[Abstract]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |