|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Internal Medicine Department (Drs. Graudenz, Kalil, and Morato-Castro), and Department of Pathology (Dr. Saldiva), School of Medicine; and Department of Epidemiology (Dr. Latorre), School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Correspondence to: Gustavo S. Graudenz, MD, Rua Heitor Penteado 477, São Paulo, Brazil 05437000; e-mail: gustavog{at}usp.br
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study objectives: To analyze the effects of an intervention in a ventilation system with > 20 years of continuous use, and with a high rate of building-related respiratory complains.
Design: An epidemiologic study was done among individuals working in places with ventilation machinery and ducts with > 20 years of use, before and after intervention. Analysis of symptoms and logistic regression were performed to check the associations between air-conditioning intervention and reported symptoms.
Results: The air-conditioning intervention showed a protective effect on building-related worsening of respiratory symptoms (odds ratio, 0.132; 95% confidence interval, 0.030 to 0.575), naso-ocular symptoms (odds ratio, 0.231; 95% confidence interval, 0.058 to 0.915), and persistent cough (odds ratio, 0.071; 95% confidence interval, 0.014 to 0.356).
Conclusion: Intervention in high-risk occupational locations can be effective in improving perceived indoor air quality.
Key Words: air conditioning air pollution indoor intervention studies occupational health
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The epidemiologic survey was based on a self-administered questionnaire regarding atopy, smoking status, respiratory symptoms, diagnosis of previous asthma or rhinitis, and work relation of the respiratory symptoms. The questionnaire was a combination of two previously standardized questionnaires validated for Portuguese language: the American Thoracic Society Division of Lung Diseases 78 questionnaire,4 and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questionnaire.5 The questions about asthma symptoms were as follows: Did you have wheezing or whistling in your chest in the last 12 months when you did not have a flu? Have you ever had attacks of shortness of breath with wheezing? The core questions about nasal symptoms were as follows: In the past 6 months, have you had a problem with sneezing, or a runny or a blocked nose when you did not have a flu? In the past 6 months, has this nose problem been accompanied by itchy-watery eyes? The question about sinus symptoms was as follows: In the last 12 months, did you have sinusitis (purulent nasal discharge accompanied by sinus pain and fever)? The question about upper respiratory infection was as follows: How many flu-like episodes did you have in the last 12 months. The question about persistent cough was as follows: Do you have daily coughs for > 3 weeks every year? The question about where the symptoms were perceived was as follows: Where were the above symptoms more frequently evoked? The questionnaire was applied before and after the renovation of the air-conditioning system to the population of 23 subjects working in the studied place, and the occupational medical advice was to use antihistamines on an as-needed basis. Questions concerning sinusal and naso-ocular symptoms were considered as related to upper airways, whereas questions about wheezing and breathlessness were considered as related to the lower airways.
The renovation of the HVAC system (Hitachi; Tokyo, Japan) [self-type, 10 tons of refrigeration] consisted of exchanging the ventilation ducts, and cleaning and maintenance of the ventilation machinery. There was an internal rearrangement of the office desks and exchange of the carpets and coverings as well. The renovations were done simultaneously, and the office was reoccupied 3 months after the work was initiated. Reassessment of the symptoms was done in September of 2002 (spring in Brazil), 14 months after the initial survey, which was done in July of 2001 (winter in Brazil).
The control group was the population working in the same company, with the same office design, similar jobs, and with the same HVAC system but with < 2 years of continuous use, interrogated on the initial study. The population-reported symptoms before and after the air-conditioning renovation were compared using McNemar tests and after intervention and control using
2 tests. Univariate and multiple logistic regressions were used to analyze the effect of the air-conditioning renovation on naso-ocular, chest wheezing, sinus symptoms, persistent cough, and building-related worsening of self-stated symptoms.
The symptoms were the outcome variables, and the control variables were gender, age, accumulated work time, smoking habits, passive smoking, history of familiar atopy, previous medical diagnosis of asthma and rhinitis, and the ventilation system groups. The Hosmer and Lemeshow tests were used to evaluate the goodness of fit of the model.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Measuring the symptoms by a self-administered questionnaire is also a potential limitation of this study. The use of questionnaires in assessing indoor air quality is still largely used in most studies of sick-building syndrome because there is a wide range in the threshold of response in any population, and a wide spectrum of response to any given agent.2
This study is a follow-up to a previous study,6 in which a detailed evaluation on airborne fungi, mite, animal dander, and insect allergen exposure was performed. Although the aging of the ventilation system could lead to biological contamination,6 no significant biological or allergenic significant exposure was found.3 Considering that pollen exposure in São Paulo is clinically irrelevant,7 and the allergenic level found on the carpet was clinically insignificant, the allergenic exposure in this scenario was disregarded. The atopic individuals were considered a risk group for indoor air-related complaints. This apparent controversy is quite common in epidemiologic and occupational studies.8 9 We also found that places with ventilation systems with poor control of thermic parameters are at risk for work-related symptoms. Considering that atopic individuals have a decreased capacity to warm the inspired air,10 and the potential degranulation effect on mast cells of the cold and dry air,11 this could partially explain the atopy-related complaints in the absence of significant allergen exposure.
IAQ-related problems are complex and multifactorial, involving multiple indoor pollutants, such as endotoxins, volatile organic compounds, particulate mater, and other indoor and outdoor pollutants. In spite of the fact that they could influence the perceived quality of the indoor air, the routine investigation of all these factors is considered expensive and not elucidative.12
In the present study, the prevalence of most building-related symptoms decreased substantially after the renovation of the air conditioning, and the respiratory complaints dropped to control levels. Previously reported conservative intervention studies8 13 to improve IAQ failed to demonstrate significant improvements. Our results are in agreement with the concept that "cleanliness is next to healthiness,"14 specifically of the upper airways in this context.
IAQ is considered a major public health concern, and the efforts to produce cost-effective interventions are a current priority in occupational health. Controlled experiments on simulated work places and cohort studies in population samples living under artificial ventilation systems may bring further understanding of how to prevent and improve indoor air-related occupational health.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
This work was performed at University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
This work was partially supported by grants obtained from the following Brazilian institutions: Laboratório de Investigação Médica do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (Medical Investigation Laboratory of the Clinics Hospital of the School of Medicine of the University of São Paulo), Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São (São Paulo State Research Support Foundation), Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (National Research Council), and Programa de Nacional de Excelência (National Excellence Program).
Received for publication December 4, 2002. Accepted for publication May 20, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |