|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Departments of Medicine (Ms. French and Dr. Irwin) and Psychiatry (Dr. Fletcher), University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Correspondence to: Richard S. Irwin, MD, FCCP, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA 01655; e-mail: IrwinR{at}ummhc.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Analysis of previously, prospectively collected data, but not previously analyzed or reported data, plus additional prospectively collected data to enrich the database to make meaningful gender comparisons.
Setting: Cough clinic in an academic, tertiary care medical center.
Participants: Subjects seeking medical attention complaining of cough of at least 8 weeks duration and a control group of smokers not complaining of cough.
Measurements: Assessment of chronic cough on HRQOL utilizing a valid and reliable cough-specific HRQOL instrument, the cough-specific quality-of-life questionnaire (CQLQ).
Interventions: All subjects completed the CQLQ prior to any contact with the cough specialist and medical intervention.
Results: In the original cohort of subjects, women (116 subjects) outnumbered the men (38 subject) by 3:1 (p < 0.0001). In the current study, total CQLQ scores for women were higher than for men (67.1 vs 59.7, respectively; p = 0.002). Women had higher scores than men in three of six subscales, as follows: physical complaints (21.6 vs 19.0, respectively; p = 0.004); psychosocial issues (14.7 vs 12.9, respectively; p = 0.002); and extreme physical complaints (8.9 vs 6.6, respectively; p < 0.001). Men and women had similar scores on the remaining subscales. Women scored significantly higher on 10 of the 28 items that make up the six subscales. The item that showed the greatest disparity and the most significant difference between women and men was wetting the pants (p < 0.001) as a result of chronic coughing.
Conclusions: Women with chronic cough were probably more inclined to seek medical attention than men because their HRQOL was more adversely affected and because they were more apt to suffer from physical complaints such as stress incontinence, which provoked psychosocial issues such as becoming embarrassed.
Key Words: chronic cough gender differences in chronic cough gender differences in cough and quality of life health-related quality of life quality of life
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 analysis, and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The 0.05 level of significance was used throughout. The CQLQ is a 28-item paper-and-pencil survey that was developed by the authors.2 It has been shown to have dimensionality consistent with a cough-specific quality-of-life (QOL) instrument. It has been shown to have six subscales with minimal overlap of items. The six subscales are as follows: physical complaints; psychosocial issues; functional abilities; emotional well-being; extreme physical complaints; and personal safety fears. It has been shown to be a valid and reliable method by which to assess the impact of chronic cough on QOL and the efficacy of cough therapies in patients with chronic cough. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale numbered 1 (strongly disagree), 2 (disagree), 3 (agree), and 4 (strongly agree). The highest possible total score, indicating the most adverse effects of cough on QOL, is 112. The lowest possible total score, indicating no adverse effects of cough, is 28.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CQLQ Scores for Women and Men in the Control Smoker Group
Mens total CQLQ scores were higher than those for women (32.86 ± 7.85 vs 40.44 ± 7.53, respectively; t29 = 2.47; p < 0.02). Men also scored higher than women on the following two subscales: physical complaints (10.18 ± 2.12 vs 14.33 ± 3.96, respectively; t9.9 = 2.97; p < 0.02); and emotional well-being (3.9 ± 1.54 vs 5.33 ± 1.41, respectively; t29 = 2.39; p < 0.03). Subscale scores were similar for men and women on the remaining subscales: psychosocial issues (6.77 ± 3.22 vs 8.11 ± 2.02, respectively; t29 = 1.15; p = 0.259 [not significant]); extreme physical complaints (4.63 ± 1.17 vs 4.55 ± 1.13, respectively; t29 = -0.18; p = 0.862 [not significant]); functional abilities (5.27 ± 0.63 vs 6.11 ± 1.53, respectively; t9.1 = 1.58; p = .147 [not significant]); and personal safety fears (4.5 ± 0.96 vs 4.6 ± 0.86, respectively; t29 = 0.45; p = 0.657 [not significant]).
Scores for the 28 individual items are summarized in Table 1 along with the respective item scores for chronic coughers to facilitate comparisons analyzed below. Women scored significantly higher than men in only one item score, wetting the pants (t29 = -2.485; p = 0.021). Men scored significantly higher than women on the following five items: family cannot tolerate it (t29 = 3.075; p = 0.005); hoarseness (t29 = 2.612; p = 0.014); hurts to breathe (t29 = 3.973; p < 0.0001); exhaustion (t29 = 2.361; p = 0.042); and want to be reassured that I do not have anything serious (t29 = 2.712; p = 0.011).
|
Comparison of CQLQ Scores for Women and Men in the Chronic Cougher Group
A comparison of total mean (± SE) CQLQ scores for women and men is shown in Figure 1
. Total CQLQ scores for women were significantly higher than for men (67.1 ± 1.3 vs 59.7 ± 1.8, respectively; p = 0.002). A comparison of the six subscale mean (± SE) CQLQ scores for women and men is shown in Figure 2
. Women had significantly higher scores than men on the following subscales: physical complaints (21.6 ± 0.5 vs 19.0 ± 0.7, respectively; p = 0.004); psychosocial issues (14.7 ± 0.3 vs 12.9 ± 0.4, respectively; p = 0.002); and extreme physical complaints (8.9 ± 0.26 vs 6.6 ± 0.26, respectively; p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the genders on the remaining subscales: functional abilities (11.2 ± 0.3 vs 10.4 ± 0.5, respectively; p = 0.210); emotional well-being (7.5 ± 0.17 vs 7.9 ± 0.26, respectively; p = 0.201); and personal safety fears (6.2 ± 0.18 vs 6.0 ± 0.25, respectively; p = 0.608).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our study involved an analysis of CQLQ data that included previously prospectively collected, but not previously analyzed or reported results,2 and additional CQLQ data that were prospectively collected to enrich our database to make meaningful gender comparisons. From this analysis, three important findings emerged.
First, our results in the nonenriched, original cohort of coughers have confirmed that more women than men seek medical care because of chronic cough. The 3:1 ratio of women to men in our study falls within the range of ratios of 1.2:17 to 3.6:18 that have been prospectively reported from around the globe9 10 11 12 over the past 20 years.
Second, the HRQOL of women with chronic cough who seek medical attention because of cough is more adversely affected than men. This finding is based on a comparison of the results of the total and subscale CQLQ scores in which women complaining of chronic cough scored significantly higher than men complaining of chronic cough in total (Fig 1) and on three subscales (Fig 2) . The results in our control group of smokers with cough who were not seeking medical attention because of cough supports this conclusion. In this control group, contrary to the results in chronic coughers, the cough-specific HRQOL of men was significantly more adversely affected than women. While men and women smokers scored similarly on four subscales, smoking men scored significantly higher than smoking women in total CQLQ scores and in two subscale scores. To our knowledge, these findings have not been previously reported. Nevertheless, we feel confident that these findings are real because they are based on data obtained with the CQLQ, a valid and reliable HRQOL instrument.2
Third, the HRQOL of women with chronic cough who seek medical attention is adversely affected in different ways than men. This finding is based on a comparison of the scores of the six subscales and individual items of the CQLQ (Fig 2 , 3) . Women scored significantly higher than men in the following categories: (1) physical complaints such as headache, ache all over, hurts to breathe, and exhaustion; (2) psychosocial issues such as family cannot tolerate it, embarrassed, and upset by response of others; and (3) extreme physical complaints such as sick to stomach, retching, and wetting pants. The greatest disparity, and the most significant difference in the scores of the individual items (ie, complaints) between women and men, was found in wetting pants (Fig 3) . To our knowledge, these findings also have not been previously reported. Nevertheless, we feel confident that they are real because they are based on data obtained with a valid and reliable cough-specific HRQOL instrument.2
To further validate that the gender differences in HRQOL in chronic coughers were due to their chronic cough and not to gender differences in general, we compared the CQLQ scores of chronic coughers with our control group of smokers who were not complaining of cough. By performing an ANOVA, we showed that the gender differences in HRQOL of women compared to men with chronic cough either were significantly different or significantly greater than the differences in HRQOL of women and men not complaining of cough. With respect to wetting the pants, our analysis has confirmed what has been known about urinary incontinence for years.13 14 15 16 Women in the general population (and in our cohort of smokers from the general population) are more likely to complain of urinary incontinence than men. And, chronic coughing makes this difference greater (ie, stress incontinence).
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Presented in part and published in abstract form at the annual meeting of the American Thoracic Society, May 20, 2001, in San Francisco, CA.
Received for publication June 24, 2003. Accepted for publication September 24, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Polley, N. Yaman, L. Heaney, C. Cardwell, E. Murtagh, J. Ramsey, J. MacMahon, R. W. Costello, and L. McGarvey Impact of Cough Across Different Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Comparison of Two Cough-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaires Chest, August 1, 2008; 134(2): 295 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Duarte, L. Terminella, J. T. Smith, A. C. Myers, G. Campbell, and S. Lick Restoration of Cough Reflex in Lung Transplant Recipients Chest, August 1, 2008; 134(2): 310 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Voll-Aanerud, T. M. L. Eagan, T. Wentzel-Larsen, A. Gulsvik, and P. S. Bakke Changes in Respiratory Symptoms and Health-Related Quality of Life Chest, June 1, 2007; 131(6): 1890 - 1897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Irwin Complications of Cough: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines Chest, January 1, 2006; 129(1_suppl): 54S - 58S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Pratter Cough and the Common Cold: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines Chest, January 1, 2006; 129(1_suppl): 72S - 74S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Irwin, W. B. Glomb, and A. B. Chang Habit Cough, Tic Cough, and Psychogenic Cough in Adult and Pediatric Populations: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines Chest, January 1, 2006; 129(1_suppl): 174S - 179S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-P. Boulet Future Directions in the Clinical Management of Cough: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines Chest, January 1, 2006; 129(1_suppl): 287S - 292S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. French, K. E. Fletcher, and R. S. Irwin A Comparison of Gender Differences in Health-Related Quality of Life in Acute and Chronic Coughers Chest, June 1, 2005; 127(6): 1991 - 1998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Mund, B. Christensson, R. Gronneberg, and K. Larsson Noneosinophilic CD4 Lymphocytic Airway Inflammation in Menopausal Women With Chronic Dry Cough Chest, May 1, 2005; 127(5): 1714 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |