|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Pathology (Dr. Monaghan), Edinburgh University Medical School, Edinburgh, Scotland; Interstitial Lung Disease Unit (Dr. Wells and Prof. du Bois) and Departments of Radiology (Prof. Hansell) and Histopathology (Prof. Nicholson), Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; and Department of Pathology (Dr. Colby), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Correspondence to: Andrew G. Nicholson, DM, Department of Histopathology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney St, London SW3 6NP, UK; e-mail a.nicholson{at}rbh.nthames.nhs.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and results: Between 1984 and 2001, 64 patients undergoing investigation for CFA/IPF were identified in whom multiple biopsies were performed that showed either a pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) or nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). These cases were classified into three groups: concordant UIP-UIP (n = 25, 39.1%), discordant UIP-NSIP (n = 8,12.5%), and concordant NSIP-NSIP (n = 31, 48.4%). The discordant UIP group had survival, clinical, and physiologic features similar to those of the concordant UIP group, and prognosis in both concordant and discordant UIP groups was significantly worse than that of the concordant NSIP group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). The age of the concordant UIP group was higher than that of the concordant NSIP group, with the mean age of the discordant group being intermediate. There were no significant differences among the three groups in smoking history, duration of dyspnea, presence or absence of crackles, FVC, diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, or PaO2.
Conclusions: Patients with discordant UIP-NSIP results on multiple biopsies show clinical behavior similar to those with concordant UIP-UIP and should be regarded as having CFA/IPF in the correct clinical context, rather than "idiopathic NSIP" for the purposes of management. Multiple biopsies should be considered in all patients in order to improve the prognostic information provided by lung biopsy.
Key Words: concordance nonspecific interstitial pneumonia usual interstitial pneumonia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sixty-four cases were identified, which were then subclassified according to criteria proposed by Flaherty et al6 as "concordant UIP," where a pattern of UIP was present in all biopsies; "discordant UIP-NSIP," where a pattern of UIP was present in at least one biopsy, and a NSIP pattern in at least one biopsy (intrapatient histologic variability); and "concordant NSIP," where a pattern of NSIP was present in all biopsies. Six other patients underwent multiple biopsies in which NSIP or UIP was present in one biopsy, three showed UIPend-stage lung, two showed NSIPend-stage lung, and one showed a combination of UIP and respiratory bronchiolitis. These cases were not included in analysis due to the small size of the groups.
Clinical Data
Clinical data, including physical examination, duration of dyspnea prior to biopsy, age at biopsy, smoking history, imaging features, and follow-up information, were collected from either the patients notes or from general practitioners records. Patients were categorized as nonsmokers, current smokers, or ex-smokers (a minimum of one cigarette a day for a minimum of 1 year, stopping at least 6 months before presentation). Survival was assessed from the time of biopsy, and all patients were included in the survival analysis.
Pulmonary Function Tests
FVC and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) immediately prior to biopsy were expressed as percentages of values predicted from the subjects height, age, and gender. Lung volumes were measured using an Ohio water-seal spirometer (Ohio Instruments; Atlanta, GA). Measures of DLCO were made by the single-breath technique using a PK Morgan respirometer (PK Morgan; Chatham, Kent, UK). Serial trends in pulmonary function tests at follow-up were defined as improvement (a rise of > 15% in FVC or DLCO), decline (a fall of > 15% in FVC or DLCO), or stability (a change of < 15%).15
16
In addition, PaO2 was measured at the time of biopsy. In some patients, a complete set of parameters was not available; in these cases, the parameters that were available were used.
Statistical Analysis
Group comparisons were made using unpaired t tests (for normally distributed, continuous variables), Wilcoxon rank-sum tests (for nonnormally distributed variables), and
2 statistics or Fisher exact tests as appropriate (for comparisons of proportions). Group survival was compared using proportional hazards regression with adjustment for the severity of disease, as judged by DLCO levels, and patient age at the date of biopsy (STATA Data Analysis Software; Computing Resource Center; Santa Monica, CA).17
A p value of < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. Survival analysis was performed on those patients who underwent biopsy and were subsequently managed at our institution.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, despite the lower frequency in our series, survival data were strikingly similar, with discordant UIP-NSIP behaving in similar fashion to concordant UIP, while concordant NSIP had a significantly better prognosis in both series. Furthermore, Flaherty et al6 also demonstrated that NSIP was seen in a younger age group than patients with discordant UIP, and this group in turn was younger than those with concordant UIP. These data are strikingly mirrored in our own study. The reason for these age differences is not known, but it has been suggested that some patients with a histologic pattern of NSIP who present with the clinical features of CFA/IPF represent early disease, with these patients later acquiring UIP.6 An alternative is that such cases of NSIP reflects areas of relatively "inactive" disease in CFA/IPF,10 in that one of the cardinal features in distinguishing UIP from NSIP is the presence of fibroblastic foci, and the extent of fibroblastic foci reflects disease progression and therefore disease activity.18 As such, a disease with variable activity and inactivity within the parenchyma would therefore show concomitant variations in histologic pattern (between UIP and fibrotic NSIP), the identification of which would be at the whim of sampling.19 Indeed, it may well be that both explanations for this discordance are true, in that the activity of CFA/IPF may increase with disease progression and the characteristic features of UIP would therefore become more apparent. Interestingly, patients with discordant UIP showed a high early mortality in this series, and a reason for this is not apparent. We considered the possibility that some of these patients may have had an acute exacerbation of IPF as a terminal event,20 but this was excluded on clinical grounds.
The combined mortality data for concordant and discordant UIP mirror previous publications from other institutions.1 3 5 7 As reported previously in analyses of this cohort, treatment was standardized, consisting of either high-dose prednisolone initially with subsequent reduction to a low maintenance dose, or standard combination therapy (low-dose prednisolone in combination with an immunosuppressive agent)2 4 12 ; these treatment protocols have never been shown to differ in efficacy. The treated course was similar in discordant and concordant UIP.
Our study also emphasizes that the practice of performing multiple biopsies at different sites is preferable to single biopsies, as a pattern of UIP is not uniformly present throughout the involved lung parenchyma. A significant number of patients with CFA/IPF may otherwise be inappropriately investigated as a result of being classified as NSIP on the basis of a single biopsy. It also provides evidence that a histologic pattern of NSIP is consistent with the clinicopathologic entity of CFA/IPF, if all other clinical data are consistent with the diagnosis.
One initially surprising finding in our study is that patients with concordant NSIP had a 75% 5-year survival, which is higher than survival for NSIP previously documented at this institution (50% 5-year survival).4 However, the cohort in the current study reflects practice between 1984 and 2001, as only single biopsies were performed prior to 1984, while the prior study encompassed cases from 1978 to 1998 in which several cases of NSIP were from patients who only underwent single biopsies. As such, this earlier study may well reflect the bias of sampling error for UIP, as discussed previously. In addition, surgeons tend to be reluctant to perform biopsy from two sites in "high-risk" patients with advanced disease; therefore, more severe cases of fibrotic NSIP may have been excluded from the current study on this basis. It is also notable that nearly 50% of patients in this series had a diagnosis of concordant NSIP-NSIP, which is a high number of cases. We believe that this in part reflects the bias of referral to a tertiary center of patients with significant ground-glass attenuation on high-resolution CT, in whom NSIP was more likely to occur. The presence of prominent ground-glass attenuation on high-resolution CT, giving rise to greater diagnostic insecurity, may also have acted as a stimulus to undertake two biopsies, thus increasing the proportion of patients with NSIP in this cohort. Other possible explanations include pathologist interobserver variation and the simple fact that there must always be a highest figure in a range of reported prevalence figures.
In conclusion, this study shows a 12% incidence of discordant UIP-NSIP in biopsies performed at multiple sites as part of diagnostic workup of patients with suspected CFA/IPF. These patients show clinical behavior similar to those with concordant UIP on biopsy and should be regarded as having CFA/IPF rather than idiopathic NSIP for the purposes of management. Multiple biopsy sites should be considered in those patients requiring a surgical lung biopsy for investigation of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, provided they have sufficient lung function to tolerate the procedure, in order to improve prognostic information.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication November 15, 2002. Accepted for publication September 3, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. R. Young, L. M. Nogee, B. Barnett, R. J. Panos, T. V. Colby, and G. H. Deutsch Usual Interstitial Pneumonia in an Adolescent With ABCA3 Mutations Chest, July 1, 2008; 134(1): 192 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Noth and F. J. Martinez Recent Advances in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Chest, August 1, 2007; 132(2): 637 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hamada, S. Nagai, S. Tanaka, T. Handa, M. Shigematsu, T. Nagao, M. Mishima, M. Kitaichi, and T. Izumi Significance of Pulmonary Arterial Pressure and Diffusion Capacity of the Lung as Prognosticator in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Chest, March 1, 2007; 131(3): 650 - 656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O.J. Dempsey, K.M. Kerr, L. Gomersall, H. Remmen, and G.P. Currie Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an update QJM, October 1, 2006; 99(10): 643 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Katikireddy, G. Krishna, T. Keifer, W. Kuschner, and G. Rosen A 35-year-old man with Fever, dyspnea, and diffuse reticular opacities. Chest, February 1, 2006; 129(2): 482 - 487. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Martinez Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias: Usual Interstitial Pneumonia versus Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia. Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2006; 3(1): 81 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Kim, H. R. Collard, and T. E. King Jr. Classification and natural history of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2006; 3(4): 285 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Fishbein Diagnosis: To Biopsy or Not to Biopsy: Assessing the Role of Surgical Lung Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5_suppl_1): 520S - 525S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Date, Y. Tanimoto, K. Goto, I. Yamadori, M. Aoe, Y. Sano, and N. Shimizu A New Treatment Strategy for Advanced Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia*: Living-Donor Lobar Lung Transplantation Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1364 - 1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Halkos, A. A. Gal, F. Kerendi, D. L. Miller, and J. I. Miller Jr Role of Thoracic Surgeons in the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Interstitial Lung Disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 2172 - 2179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Nathan Lung Transplantation: Disease-Specific Considerations for Referral Chest, March 1, 2005; 127(3): 1006 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. U. Wells Histopathologic Diagnosis in Diffuse Lung Disease: An Ailing Gold Standard Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2004; 170(8): 828 - 829. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Keane Chemokine Profiling in Pulmonary Fibrosis: Ready for Prime Time? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2004; 170(5): 475 - 476. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |