|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Departments of Respiratory Medicine (Drs. Hiraki, Aoe, Eda, Maeda, and Takeyama) and Clinical Research (Drs. Murakami and Sugi), National Sanyo Hospital, Respiratory Disease Center, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Correspondence to: Keisuke Aoe, MD, PhD, Department of Respiratory Medicine and Clinical Research, National Sanyo Hospital, Respiratory Disease Center, 685 Higashi-kiwa, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-0241, Japan; e-mail: keisukeaoe{at}mtf.biglobe.ne.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients: We studied 55 patients with pleural effusions, 20 (36%) with tuberculous pleuritis and 35 (64%) with a nontuberculous etiology.
Measurement and results: Pleural fluid levels of adenosine deaminase, interferon (INF)-
, interleukin (IL)-12p40, IL-18, immunosuppressive acidic protein, and soluble IL-2 receptors were measured and were subjected to receiver operating characteristic analysis. INF-
had the greatest sensitivity and specificity for tuberculous pleuritis among the six biological markers studied.
Conclusion: The determination of INF-
levels in pleural fluid is the most informative in the diagnosis of tuberculous effusion.
Key Words: cytokine diagnosis pleural fluid tuberculous pleuritis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A variety of biological markers have been proposed to facilitate the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis, including increased pleural fluid concentrations of adenosine deaminase (ADA), interferon (INF)-
, interleukin (IL)-12p40, IL-18, immunosuppressive acidic protein (IAP), and soluble IL-2 receptors (sIL-2Rs).2
3
Previous reports2 3 have suggested that these biological markers are useful for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis. However, which of these six markers is most useful for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis has not been determined. To determine the marker with the greatest diagnostic significance, we performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis on these six markers.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Sample Collection and Determination of ADA, INF-
, IL-12, IL-18, IAP, and sIL-2R Levels
Each sample of pleural fluid was collected in a syringe during thoracentesis, which was performed with written informed consent, and was centrifuged at 2,000 revolutions per minute for 10 min. The supernatant was frozen at -80°C until assayed for markers. ADA and IAP activity were measured by autoanalyzer using commercially available kits. IL-18, INF-
, and sIL-2R was measured using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. IL-12p40 was measured using commercially available quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay kits.
Statistical Analysis
To compare the performances of markers, ROC curves were constructed.4
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pleural levels of a number of biological markers have been proposed as aids in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis, including those of ADA, INF-
, IL-12p40, IL-18, IAP, and sIL-2R, the levels of which are all significantly higher in tuberculous pleural effusions than in nontuberculous pleural effusions.2
3
However, the sensitivities of these markers have never been compared directly.
As shown in Figure 1
, ROC analysis demonstrated that INF-
is the most sensitive and specific indicator of tuberculous pleuritis among these six biological markers (area under the curve [AUC], 1.000). The next most sensitive was sIL-2R (AUC, 0.990), followed by ADA (AUC, 0.958), IL-18 (AUC, 0.949), IAP (AUC, 0.926), and IL-12p40 (AUC, 0.866). INF-
is produced by T lymphocytes in response to stimulation by specific antigens or nonspecific antigens, and is capable of modifying the response of other cells to the immune system.6
INF-
is known to activate macrophages so that they increase their bactericidal capacity against M tuberculosis. Therefore, INF-
levels in pleural fluid may reflect the stimulation of T lymphocytes by tuberculous antigens.
|
is the most sensitive and specific biological marker of tuberculous pleuritis among the six reported. The measurement of the INF-
levels at the onset of pleural effusion may facilitate the early diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis. INF-
should be measured routinely in patients who are strongly suspected of having TB, despite its relatively high cost compared with ADA assays. Further studies comparing these biological markers with polymerase chain reaction methods for detecting the DNA of M tuberculosis in pleural fluid are needed.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication June 10, 2003. Accepted for publication October 20, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in tuberculous pleural effusions. Chest 2003;123,740-744This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Gopi, S. M. Madhavan, S. K. Sharma, and S. A. Sahn Diagnosis and Treatment of Tuberculous Pleural Effusion in 2006 Chest, March 1, 2007; 131(3): 880 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Chen, W.-H. Hsu, C.-Y. Tu, Y.-H. Yu, K.-L. Chiu, L.-W. Hang, T.-C. Hsia, and C.-M. Shih Sonographic septation in lymphocyte-rich exudative pleural effusions: a useful diagnostic predictor for tuberculosis. J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2006; 25(7): 857 - 863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. A. Gupta, S. K. Chhabra, A. Hiraki, and K. Aoe Diagnosing Tubercular Pleural Effusions Chest, March 1, 2005; 127(3): 1078 - 1079. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |