|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||

* From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, UMass Memorial Health Care, Worcester, MA.
Dr. Finger is currently at Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA.
Correspondence to: Brian P. OSullivan, Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, UMass Memorial Health Care, 55 Lake Ave, North, Worcester, MA 01655; e-mail: osullivb{at}ummhc.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Retrospective chart review. Records of patients who underwent nasopharyngoscopy between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 1999, were reviewed. Follow-up was obtained by office records and direct contact with the patients family and/or primary care physician.
Setting: Academic, tertiary care facility.
Results: Eighty-one children who underwent upper airway endoscopy to evaluate noisy breathing consistent with extrathoracic lesions were identified. One child had two evaluations separated by years for differing complaints, making a total of 82 procedures. Stridor was the chief complaint in three fourths of the children. Half of the children with stridor were found to have laryngomalacia. Long-term follow-up was available for 75 of 81 children, with median follow-up of 6 years (range, 1 to 13 years). No medical problems related to missed airway lesions developed in any infants initially evaluated using nasopharyngoscopy.
Conclusions: Nasopharyngoscopy without lower airway endoscopy can be used safely for the initial evaluation of noisy breathing in infants and children provided excellent follow-up is available.
Key Words: bronchoscopy laryngomalacia pediatrics stridor upper airway
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nasopharyngoscopy was performed at the discretion of the attending pulmonologist based on history and physical examination findings as outlined in Figure 1 . As this was a retrospective chart review, there were no a priori conditions for performing nasopharyngoscopy. In general, children with very minimal stridor who were thriving, children with a history strongly suggestive of foreign body aspiration, and children with symptoms of lower airway lesions (homophonous wheezes) did not have nasopharyngoscopy performed. Nasopharyngoscopy was performed on children with stridor audible at a distance, retractions, poor growth, weak or hoarse cry, or symptoms worsening over time. In addition, some children with respiratory sounds suggestive of a fixed airway lesion had nasopharyngoscopy performed to rule out an upper airway lesion.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The age at time of examination ranged from 2 days to 17 years (median, 5 months; mean, 26 months). Forty-nine of the 82 procedures were performed on children
6 months of age. Follow-up information was not available for six individuals, two of whom had definitive procedures (supraglottoplasty or tracheotomy with bronchoscopy) performed immediately following nasopharyngoscopy and two of whom had typical vocal cord dysfunction (psychogenic stridor), leaving only two patients with concern for other airway lesions not followed up. For the 76 procedures with follow-up information, median follow-up occurred 6 years after the initial procedure (range, 1 to 13 years).
The symptoms that led to nasopharyngoscopy and the findings of the procedure are listed in Table 1 . The most common chief complaint was stridor, which was present in 62 of 82 cases (76%). Laryngomalacia accounted for stridor in 31 of 62 cases (50%). A cause was found in all but 5 of the 16 children who had hoarseness or a weak cry as a presenting symptom. Hoarseness resolved in all five children who did not have a reason for their hoarseness identified by nasopharyngoscopy, and all of these children have been well with normal voice quality for several years.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some investigators recommend that FOB be performed in conjunction with nasopharyngoscopy when evaluating children with noisy breathing.12345 However, our findings support a two-tiered approach of nasopharyngoscopy first, to be followed by FOB if nasopharyngoscopy does not provide an explanation.
Our success with using nasopharyngoscopy and proceeding to bronchoscopy only in select cases is in part due to our patient selection. The major deciding factor was the infants ability to perform activities of daily living; ie, feeding, playing, interacting with adults, and growing at an acceptable rate. A child not succeeding in these areas was considered worrisome. The intensity of the stridor or other noise also played a role in decision making as did the combination of noise intensity and quality in relation to initial findings on nasopharyngoscopy. A "normal" nasopharyngoscopy finding does not warrant bronchoscopy if the stridor abates with extension of the neck and anterior movement of the mandible. However, normal nasopharyngoscopy in the presence of stridor not relieved by such maneuvers does warrant bronchoscopy.
Nasopharyngoscopy is state and operator dependent. It is possible that mild laryngomalacia or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related abnormalities were missed in the 14 children who had normal nasopharyngoscopy findings despite being symptomatic. Follow-up of the 11 children who did not go on to bronchoscopy has been excellent. All had mild-to-moderate symptoms at presentation and are well and asymptomatic years after the initial evaluation. No serious airway lesions were missed at initial evaluation. It is difficult to imagine how these children would have been better served by undergoing full FOB as infants.
Three groups have published experiences indicating that FOB is not always necessary when evaluating noisy breathing secondary to laryngomalacia.678 Although some patients with laryngomalacia had a secondary airway lesion, in most cases the second lesion (vocal fold paresis, laryngeal cyst, etc) could be diagnosed using nasopharyngoscopy. No complications were seen in those children with typical laryngomalacia who did not have full bronchoscopy. These authors conclude that routine bronchoscopy is not necessary as part of the evaluation of laryngomalacia.
Having used nasopharyngoscopy initially does not mean that FOB cannot be performed at a later date. However, nasopharyngoscopy obviates the need for fasting and IV catheters, it saves parents from extra time out of work, it avoids the risks of sedatives, anesthetic agents, laryngospasm, fever, and infection,910111213141516 and it is less expensive.
Application of our findings to other settings requires caution. Our catchment area is relatively small, and we have exceptionally close ties with the primary care physicians in our region. Thus, we are comfortable that we will be notified by families or primary care physicians if there is a change in a childs symptoms. This allows us to monitor a childs growth and the tempo of illness progression before performing invasive procedures. Endoscopists without these luxuries may feel the need to perform bronchoscopy earlier in the course of evaluation.
In conclusion, nasopharyngoscopy is a safe, effective means of evaluating children with noisy breathing. We did not miss any significant airway lesions when using nasopharyngoscopy as the initial tool for evaluating noisy breathing over a 10-year period. Our results indicate that important lesions of the lower airways are rare in children who have a reason for their noisy breathing identified by nasopharyngoscopy.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication May 13, 2003. Accepted for publication October 23, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Sivan, J. Ben-Ari, R. Soferman, and A. DeRowe Diagnosis of Laryngomalacia by Fiberoptic Endoscopy: Awake Compared With Anesthesia-Aided Technique. Chest, November 1, 2006; 130(5): 1412 - 1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |