|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Departments of Medical Physics (Drs. Hasani and Agnew) and Thoracic Medicine (Mr. Toms and Dr. Dilworth), Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust and Royal Free and University College Medical School, London; and Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd. (Dr. Sarno and Mr. Harrison), Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.
Correspondence to: Amir Hasani, PhD, Department of Medical Physics, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, UK, NW3 2QG; e-mail: amer.alhasani{at}royalfree.nhs.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.
Setting: Outpatients of an urban-area university teaching hospital.
Patients: Thirty-four patients with COPD aged 40 to 75 years classified equally into two groups.
Intervention: Single (18 µg) daily dose of tiotropium inhalation capsules or of placebo for 21 days.
Methods: Six-hour tracheobronchial clearance of inhaled 99mTc-labeled polystyrene particles using a 48-h retention measurement to determine the "nontracheobronchial" deposition fraction.
Results: Test radioaerosol penetration into the lungs increased significantly (p < 0.003) as did FEV1 (p < 0.006) in the tiotropium-treated patients, but measured mucociliary clearance was not significantly changed despite the increased pathway length for clearance (mean ± SE area under the tracheobronchial retention curve changed from 442 ± 22 to 453 ± 20%/h). Smaller (nonsignificant) decreases of radioaerosol penetration and FEV1 occurred in the placebo group together with a small (nonsignificant) decrease in the area under the retention curve.
Conclusion: Twenty-one days of inhaled tiotropium, 18 µg/d, as a dry powder does not retard mucus clearance from the lungs.
Key Words: anticholinergic COPD mucociliary clearance radioaerosol tiotropium
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tiotropium is a quaternary ammonium structure that is derived from that of ipratropium.5 This compound is a once-daily inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator that exhibits long duration of action due to prolonged muscarinic receptor antagonism.67 Both single-dose and multiple-dose studies89 using 18 µg qd have confirmed a 24-h duration of action as assessed by spirometry. Studies10111213 on long-term effect of tiotropium have demonstrated maintenance of the bronchodilator benefits in patients with COPD.
Mucociliary clearance14 is a vital host defense mechanism of the airways that, together with cough,15 helps to keep the lungs clean even when exposed to a polluted environment. It is not clear what mechanisms regulate mucociliary clearance in response to airway stresses. However, data indicate that regulation of airway surface liquid by airway epithelia involves the reciprocal regulation of active Na+ absorption and Cl secretion.16 Clearance is affected by a variety of factors,17 including lung diseases and pharmacologic agents. Historical evidence has suggested the possibility of clearance impairment from anticholinergic drugs,1819 but this is not borne out by studies on newer compounds such as ipratropium and oxitropium bromide. These studies have agreed that there was no adverse effect on lung mucociliary clearance,2021 and there was either direct22 or indirect232425 possible evidence of stimulatory effect, which could be caused by changes in the volume of airway surface liquid.26 The purpose of the present study was to investigate what effects, if any, the administration of a long-acting anticholinergic compound such as tiotropium bromide may have on mucociliary clearance in patients with COPD.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Throughout the study, patients completed a daily diary card to record intake of rescue medication together with their morning and evening PEFR (Personal Best Peak Flow Meter; Healthscan Products; Cedar Grove, NJ) and the time of inhalation of the study drug. Compliance was assessed from diary cards and number of treatment capsules being used. In order to obtain a subjective assessment of any possible adverse events, patients were asked on all visits how they had been since the previous visit.
Patients were allowed to continue the use of inhaled steroids (maximum dose, 2,000 µg/d), oral steroids (up to the equivalent of prednisolone, 10 mg/d), xanthines, oral ß2-agonists, and long-acting inhaled bronchodilators if taken at a stable dosage for at least 6 weeks prior to the screening visit and throughout the study period. Short-acting ß2-agonists were allowed only as rescue medication. The use of antibiotics, ß-blockers, sodium cromoglycate, and nedocromil sodium were not allowed for at least 1 month prior to the screening visit and throughout the study period. The short-acting anticholinergic bronchodilator, ipratropium bromide, was discontinued from 24 h prior to baseline mucociliary clearance assessment until the end of the study. The use of short-acting ß2-agonists and the long-acting oral or inhaled ß2-agonists were discontinued from at least 6 h and 48 h respectively prior to mucociliary clearance assessments. The use of short- and long-acting theophylline preparations were discontinued from at least 24 h and 48 h, respectively, prior to mucociliary clearance assessments. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Royal Free Hospital, and all patients gave informed written consent.
Patients
We studied male and female patients between 40 years and 75 years of age with the diagnosis of COPD according to the definition of the American Thoracic Society.27 Patients were required to have relatively stable airway obstruction with FEV1
30% and
65% of predicted normal and FEV1
70% of FVC. Patients were also required to be smokers or ex-smokers with a history of > 10 pack-years; current smokers refrained from smoking for 1 h before and 6 h after radioaerosol inhalation. Patients with a history of bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, asthma, allergic rhinitis, or atopy, an elevated total eosinophil count, or a recent respiratory tract infection were excluded. Patients receiving regular daytime oxygen therapy or who had a significant disease other than COPD were also excluded.
Mucociliary Clearance
A noninvasive radioaerosol technique28 was used to provide objective measurements of lung mucociliary clearance before the first dose of treatment and immediately following the last dose of treatment. Using a spinning top generator, located within an airtight tank, polystyrene particles were generated at 5 µm diameter labeled firmly with the gamma-emitting radionuclide 99mTc.29 Patients wore a nose-clip and inhaled the radioactive aerosol particles through a mouthpiece, from a seated position, under strictly controlled conditions. Inhalation involved taking discrete breaths of 0.45 L from resting level of the lungs, followed by a 3-s breath-holding to enhance peripheral deposition of the radioaerosol particles by sedimentation within the lungs.30 Patients were not allowed to smoke for at least 1 h before radioaerosol administration, nor in the following 6 h.
Initial radioaerosol particle deposition in the lung and its subsequent clearance were measured by two scintillation detectors. The detectors were positioned, posteriorly and anteriorly to the chest, midway along the sternum.31 Gamma-radiation emitted by the inhaled particles, from most of both lungs, was measured by the collimated detectors and counts were recorded at 30-min intervals up to 6 h and then at 48 h. The residual background radioactivity in the lungs at 48 h (corrected for radioactive decay) was used to estimate alveolar deposition (AD), which was taken as the proportion of particles deposited in the nonciliated airways and therefore not available for mucociliary clearance.32 A tracheobronchial retention curve (also background and decay corrected) was generated by the subtraction of the alveolar deposition from the total lung burden.33 Tracheobronchial clearance was assessed by measuring the area under the curve for the entire 6-h observation period (AUC06).34
The initial distribution of radioaerosol particles within the lungs was expressed as a penetration index (PI), which is the ratio of the amount of radioaerosol particles in an outer to inner region of the lungs divided by the same ratio of krypton gas (81mKr).35 Data for PI measurement were acquired immediately after inhalation of radioaerosol particles, by using a large-field-of-view gamma camera.
During the 6-h observation period, patients were encouraged to avoid coughing, but in most instances they were unable to do so. Therefore, the patients were instructed to count the number of involuntary coughs and collect any sputum sample produced in a separate pot. The sputum samples were weighed, and the radioactive content of each was determined. This radioactive content was expressed as a percentage of the initial tracheobronchial deposition and added back to the retention curves at the appropriate times of expectoration to account for the effect of productive coughing on mucus transport.36
Lung Function
The lung function of each patient was assessed during the screening visit and on the two mucociliary clearance assessment visits before inhalation of the radioaerosol. FEV1, FVC, and PEFR were measured for each patient using a compact spirometer (Vitalograph; Buckingham, UK). For each lung function index, the highest of three technically acceptable measurements was recorded and expressed as a percentage of predicted normal value.37
Data Analysis
The data were not normally distributed, and statistical analysis was assessed using the nonparametric paired and unpaired Wilcoxon test. GB-STAT software (Dynamic Microsystems; Silver Spring, MD) was used for these analyses. Unless otherwise specified, data are presented as mean ± SE. The level of significance was taken as p
0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Mucociliary Clearance
AD was significantly increased (p < 0.008) in the group treated with tiotropium. The increase was observed in 14 of 17 patients. AD, although not significantly different, decreased in 11 of 17 patients in the placebo group (Fig 1
). Posttreatment AD was significantly increased (p < 0.025) in the tiotropium group compared to the placebo group. PI was changed in both groups in a similar manner to AD. PI was significantly increased (p < 0.003) in the tiotropium treatment group compared to the placebo group (Table 3
). Eleven of 17 patients showed an increased PI following treatment with tiotropium, compared to a decrease in 11 of 17 patients after receiving placebo.
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3 also gives data for tracheobronchial retention at 6 h (both corrected and uncorrected for productive cough), again showing no significant changes within either the tiotropium or the placebo group. A between-group comparison of the changes relative to baseline, however, suggested a significant (p < 0.05) difference between the mean increase of 6-h uncorrected tracheobronchial retention in the tiotropium group and the mean decrease in the placebo group. This finding was not supported by any significant between-group differences for 6-h cough-corrected tracheobronchial retention or for AUC06 (corrected or not corrected for cough). Figure 3 demonstrates a further analysis of the 6-h retention clearance data; this is expressed in terms of clearance (100% retention) terms rather than retention terms to facilitate comparison with the amount of clearance achieved (over the 6-h period) by productive cough. Because of the skewed distribution of the productive cough data (percentage of tracheobronchial deposition recovered in sputum produced over the 06 h period), this figure is presented in box-plot form and a nonparametric statistical test (the Mann-Whitney test) was used. The between-group difference tested this way is statistically significant (p < 0.05). When, however, the data are split into cough-corrected ("mucociliary") clearance changes and cough-clearance (activity measured in sputum) clearance terms, no statistically significant between-group changes were detected.
In view of the significant effect of tiotropium in changing radioaerosol deposition, changes in the retention and clearance measurements were evaluated in relationship to deposition distribution (AD) changes. No significant relationship was detectable for the AUC06 data or for the cough-corrected data. However, taking both tiotropium and placebo groups together, a significant linear regression relationship (p < 0.05) was foundfor uncorrected tracheobronchial retention changesbetween the 6-h retention changes and AD changes (Fig 5 ). No significant relationship was detected within either the tiotropium or the placebo group on its own.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The combined effectiveness of mucociliary clearance and cough in maintaining relatively adequate airway patency depends on a complexity of interacting factors. Important among these are the volume and composition of the airway surface liquid and the effectiveness of the driving forces available to propel the mucus component of this liquid toward the trachea. Given this complexity and the need for successful interaction between driving forces and the airway mucus, consideration of the long-term implications of new pharmacotherapies for the mucus transport system should contribute to achieving a comprehensive profile of the effects of a new drug. Not least among the issues to be considered should be the relative roles of cough and of mucociliary transport per se.
Cough plays an important role in patients with COPD by clearing the excess mucus they so often produce and which exceeds the capacity of mucociliary transport on its own to clear. In this study, the number of coughs at baseline in the group of patients subsequently treated with tiotropium was markedly higher than in the patient group subsequently receiving placebo treatment. This indicates that patients in the tiotropium group were likely relying more on cough to get rid of excess mucus than were the patients in the placebo group. Although we attempt to draw a distinction between "mucociliary clearance" and "clearance-by-cough" (Fig 3), the data we rely on for assessing the contribution of cough (based on sputum radioactivity over the 06 h observation period) are essentially a surrogate for the true contribution of cough. Many cough events can help to propel mucus proximally within the airways without necessarily leading to any expectorated radioactivity. Nevertheless, we believe measured sputum radioactivity provides a useful demonstration of demonstrable clearance by the cough mechanism and can indicate when reliance on cough as a clearance mechanism seems to play a major mucus transport role. Our data are, we believe, consistent with the possibility of tiotropium treatment producing a relative shift from cough to mucociliary action. There was an encouraging decrease in cough frequency (a mean 27 coughs per 6 h falling to 19, a decrease of 30%) in the tiotropium group, when compared to the increase in the placebo group (a mean 9 coughs per 6 h rising to 13, an increase of 44%). We might speculate that a diminution of cough frequency, however small, may reduce reliance on cough as a clearance mechanism, perhaps reducing damage to airway ciliated epithelium. However, a much larger study with groups more closely matched for cough frequency will be required to confirm or deny this contention.
Current recommendations favor the use of anticholinergic drugs as opposed to sympathomimetics in the maintenance therapy of patients with COPD.40 Some evidence supporting this comes from a study11 comparing (over a 6-month period) the relative effectiveness of tiotropium and salmeterol. Given the general ability of anticholinergic drugs to affect cellular secretions, what relevant evidence is available as to the effects of present-day anticholinergic bronchodilators on lung mucociliary defense? The data on the whole are encouraging. Studies with ipratropium on the clearance of secretions from the lungs of healthy subjects and patients with airways obstruction have shown no evidence of mucus retention or retardation of mucociliary clearance.2021222324 Similarly oxitropium has been reported to show no adverse effect on mucociliary clearance in patients with COPD.25 The present study extends this work by investigating the effect on mucociliary transport and cough of a long-acting anticholinergic tiotropium at a dosage appropriate to long-term therapy. A key factor to evaluate in analyzing our data on tiotropium is the relationship between test particle deposition and the subsequent time course of clearance. Any measure of the tracheobronchial clearance of deposited radioaerosol particles (AUC06 or retention at 6 h, for example) inevitably depends on the sites of initial particle deposition in the lungs.30 The pattern of initial deposition is affected by the physical properties of the aerosol particles, the mode of aerosol inhalation and the patency of the patients airways. In this study, the physical properties and mode of inhalation of the aerosol particles were kept closely similar between the two groups. Airway patency, however, as indicated by the lung function data, was distinctly increased after tiotropium treatment. This caused a significantly increased proportion of radioaerosol particles to be deposited in more peripheral airways as shown by the increases in PI and AD. This should have resulted post tiotropium treatment in a substantial slowing of measured tracheobronchial clearance because of the longer average transit path along the ciliated airways for the deposited radioaerosol to be transported to the trachea. The effect of this increased transit path will have been further amplified by the fact that clearance through individual peripheral airway units is much shorter than through more proximal units. It is however admittedly difficult to express the deposition-clearance relationship in quantitative terms. Nevertheless, Figure 5 gives, semiquantitatively, an indication of the average trend for measured clearance to increase with increased peripheral deposition of the radioaerosol particles. It suggests that an increase of AD from, for example, 33% to 38% might be associated with an increase in 6-h retention from 53 to 59%.
Our study confirms the prolonged bronchodilator effect of tiotropium. Because effective bronchodilation led to deeper penetration of the radioaerosol, we conclude that the transit pathway for (labeled) mucus was lengthened, strongly suggesting that tiotropium does not adversely affect mucus transport, and may marginally enhance mucociliary transport efficiency.
| Footnotes |
|---|
This study was supported through a grant from Boehringer Ingelheim (UK) Ltd.
Received for publication March 31, 2003. Accepted for publication January 8, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R G Barr, J Bourbeau, C A Camargo, and F S F Ram Tiotropium for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis Thorax, October 1, 2006; 61(10): 854 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Somand and T. L Remington Tiotropium: A Bronchodilator for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Ann. Pharmacother., September 1, 2005; 39(9): 1467 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |