Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (52)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Micek, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kollef, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Micek, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kollef, M. H.
(Chest. 2004;125:1791-1799.)
© 2004 American College of Chest Physicians

A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Antibiotic Discontinuation Policy for Clinically Suspected Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia*

Scott T. Micek, PharmD; Suzanne Ward, RN; Victoria J. Fraser, MD and Marin H. Kollef, MD, FCCP

* From the Department of Pharmacy (Dr. Micek), Barnes-Jewish Hospital; and Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Division (Dr. Kollef), Division of Infectious Diseases (Dr. Fraser), and Department of Nursing (Ms. Ward), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

Correspondence to: Marin H. Kollef, MD, FCCP, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8052, 660 South Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110; e-mail: kollefm{at}msnotes.wustl.edu


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Objective: To evaluate an antibiotic discontinuation policy for clinically suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Setting: A medical ICU from a university-affiliated urban teaching hospital.

Patients: Between April 2002 and July 2003, 290 patients completed the clinical trial.

Interventions: Patients were assigned to have the duration of antibiotic treatment for VAP determined by an antibiotic discontinuation policy (discontinuation group) or their treating physician teams (conventional group).

Results: Severity of illness using APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II score (22.8 ± 9.0 vs 23.2 ± 9.4, p = 0.683) [mean ± SD] and the clinical pulmonary infection score (7.1 ± 0.9 vs 7.2 ± 0.9, p = 0.222) were similar for both patient groups. The duration of antibiotic treatment for VAP was statistically shorter among patients in the discontinuation group compared to patients in the conventional antibiotic management group (6.0 ± 4.9 days vs 8.0 ± 5.6 days, p = 0.001). The occurrence of a secondary episode of VAP was not statistically different between these two groups (17.3% vs 19.3%, p = 0.667). Hospital mortality (32.0% vs 37.1%, p = 0.357) and ICU length of stay (6.8 ± 6.1 days vs 7.0 ± 7.3 days, p = 0.798) were also statistically similar.

Conclusions: The application of an antibiotic discontinuation policy for clinically suspected VAP was associated with a decrease in the overall duration of antibiotic treatment. These findings suggest that shorter courses of empiric antibiotic therapy for patients treated for clinically suspected VAP can be safely achieved.

Key Words: clinical outcomes • critical care • hospital mortality • ICU • infection • risk factors • ventilator-associated pneumonia


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common hospital-acquired infection reported among patients receiving mechanical ventilation.12 According to data from the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System, patient days requiring mechanical ventilation account for approximately half of the total days spent in medical and surgical ICUs, and VAP occurs at a rate of 7.5 per 1,000 ventilator days in medical ICUs and 13.6 per 1,000 ventilator days in surgical ICUs.3 VAP isassociated with attributable costs in excess of $11,000 per episode and case fatality rates > 20% in most reported studies.4567 Increasingly, antibiotic-resistant bacteria are recognized as the pathogens associated with VAP.891011 This increase in antimicrobial resistance has resulted in greater treatment with inadequate antibiotic regimens that are associated with increased hospital mortality.1213 Therefore, clinicians working in ICUs are faced with the paradox of having to prescribe broader initial empiric antibiotic treatment to patients suspected of having VAP while trying to minimize further emergence of antibiotic resistance.

We previously demonstrated that a clinical guideline for the treatment of VAP statistically increased the administration of adequate antimicrobial treatment and reduced the overall duration of antibiotic administration compared to local historical data.14 To further generalize these results, a clinical trial was performed with two main goals. First, we wanted to determine the impact of a formalized antibiotic discontinuation policy on the duration of antibiotic treatment for clinically diagnosed VAP. Second, we sought to determine the safety of this antimicrobial discontinuation policy.


    Materials and Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study Location and Patients
The study was conducted at a university-affiliated urban teaching hospital: Barnes-Jewish Hospital (1,400 beds) in St. Louis, MO. During a 14-month period (April 2002 to July 2003), all patients admitted to the medical ICU (19 beds) were potentially eligible for this investigation. Patients were entered into the study if they were > 18 years old and received antibiotic treatment for VAP. Patients were excluded from participation if they were transferred to the medical ICU due to lack of available beds in one of the other hospital ICUs. The medical ICU is a closed unit where all patient medical care, including antibiotic utilization, is determined by a multidisciplinary team supervised by physicians who are board certified in critical care medicine. Routine antibiotic treatment of bacterial infections, including VAP, does not require infectious disease consultation. This study was approved by the Washington University School of Medicine Human Studies Committee.

Study Design and Data Collection
Patients were randomly assigned to have the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy for VAP determined using a formalized antibiotic discontinuation policy (discontinuation group) or according to the clinical judgment of the treating ICU physicians (conventional group). The main intervention or difference between the two study groups was that an investigator offered recommendations for patients in the discontinuation group during patient care rounds to discontinue antibiotics based on the policy described below.

One of the investigators made daily rounds in the medical ICUs to identify eligible patients with VAP and to record relevant data from medical records, bedside flow sheets, computerized bedside nursing stations (EMTEK Health Care Systems; Tempe, AZ), computerized radiographic reports, and reports of microbiologic studies (sputum Gram stains and sputum, blood, and pleural fluid cultures). Study patients were prospectively followed up from the initial diagnosis of VAP and start of empiric antibiotic treatment until they were discharged from the hospital or until death. All patients with a "high likelihood" of VAP were prospectively and independently reviewed by one of the investigators (M.H.K.), who confirmed the diagnosis based on predetermined criteria (see below). Patients could not be entered into the study more than once.

For all study patients, the following characteristics were prospectively recorded at the time of study entry: age, gender, race, primary reason for mechanical ventilation, ratio of PaO2 to fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2), severity of illness based on APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II scores,15 the clinical pulmonary infection score,16 the premorbid lifestyle score,17 the presence of COPD requiring treatment with inhaled bronchodilators or systemic corticosteroids, congestive heart failure requiring treatment with afterload reducing agents or inotropic agents, underlying malignancy, immunosuppression, and HIV-antibody status. Specific processes of medical care examined during the period of intensive care included the administration of corticosteroids, vasopressors, histamine type-2 receptor antagonists, sucralfate, proton-pump inhibitors, prior antibiotic therapy during the same hospitalization, reintubation, and tracheostomy. The main outcome evaluated was the duration of antibiotic treatment for VAP. Secondary outcomes evaluated included hospital mortality, lengths of ICU and hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and occurrence of a second episode of VAP during the same ICU stay.

VAP Antibiotic Discontinuation Policy
The need for initial empiric antibiotic treatment for suspected VAP was based on the clinical judgment of the treating physicians for both treatment groups. The VAP antibiotic discontinuation policy was developed based on our prior clinical experience.61214 The main goals of the policy were to allow the initial administration of adequate antimicrobial treatment for patients with clinically suspected VAP and to discontinue treatment when clinical evidence of infection had resolved. This was accomplished by recommending initial IV combination antimicrobial treatment for patients in both study groups with vancomycin, 1 g q12h, or linezolid, 600 mg q12h (for Gram-positive bacterial infection), and the combination of cefepime, 1 g q12h, and either ciprofloxacin, 400 mg q12h, or gentamicin, 5 mg/kg qd (for Gram-negative bacterial infection). The combinations of cefepime and ciprofloxacin or cefepime and gentamicin were selected because they provided adequate treatment for > 90% of Gram-negative bacterial isolates from patients with VAP based on the medical ICU-specific antibiogram. Additionally, all antibiotic administration was adjusted for patients with renal insufficiency to minimize iatrogenic toxicity.

Recommendations to discontinue empiric antibiotic treatment for VAP were only provided to physicians managing patients in the discontinuation group based on the following policy. This policy was implemented by one of the investigators (S.T.M. or M.H.K.) during weekdays. The antibiotic discontinuation policy was only implemented on weekends and holidays if one of the investigators was available in the hospital. Antibiotic treatment was to be discontinued if any one of the following conditions were identified: (1) noninfectious etiology for the infiltrates was identified not requiring antibiotics (eg, atelectasis, pulmonary edema); (2) signs and symptoms suggesting active infection had resolved (eg, temperature <= 38.3°C, circulating leukocyte count < 10,000/µL [10 x 109/L] or decreased by > 25% from the peak value, improvement or lack of progression on the chest radiograph, absence of purulent sputum, and a PaO2/FIO2 ratio > 250). All of these criteria had to be met for the antibiotic discontinuation recommendation to be made.

The antibiotic discontinuation policy was set up so that it could be overridden by any of the treating physicians. However, recommendations to stop antibiotic treatment were given if patients continued to meet criteria for antibiotic discontinuation. Routine VAP prevention measures were applied to all patients in the medical ICU. These included maintaining a semirecumbent body position, discontinuation of mechanical ventilation using an ICU-specific weaning protocol, avoidance of gastric distension by monitoring residual volumes following feedings, and routine inspection of ventilator circuits to remove condensate.18

Definitions
All definitions were selected prospectively as part of the original study design. APACHE II scores were calculated based on clinical data available from the first 24 h of ICU admission.15 Immunosuppression was defined as patients receiving corticosteroids, having a positive HIV antibody, having received chemotherapy within the past 45 days, having neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 1.0 x 109/L) resulting from the administration of chemotherapy, or recipients of an organ transplant (renal, liver, heart, or bone marrow) requiring immunosuppressive agents. The premorbid lifestyle score was used as previously defined17: 0 indicated that the patient was employed without restriction; 1 indicated that the patient was independent, fully ambulatory, not employed, or employed with restriction; 2 indicated that the patient had restricted activities, could live alone and get out of the house to do basic necessities, or had severely limited exercise ability; 3 indicated that the patient was housebound, could not get out of the house unassisted, could not live alone, or could not do heavy chores; and 4 indicated that the patient was bed-bound or chair-bound.

The diagnostic criteria for a high likelihood of VAP were modified from those established by the American College of Chest Physicians.19 This definition was applied to all patients enrolled in this study to identify those individuals who were begun on antibiotic therapy for clinically suspected VAP by their ICU physicians, but failed to meet more formal criteria for that diagnosis. VAP was prospectively defined as the occurrence of new and persistent radiographic infiltrates in conjunction with one of the following: positive pleural culture findings for the same organism as that recovered in the tracheal aspirate or sputum; radiographic cavitation; histopathologic evidence of pneumonia; or two of the following: fever, leukocytosis, and purulent tracheal aspirate or sputum. Persistence of an infiltrate was defined as having the infiltrate present radiographically for at least 72 h. Fever was defined as an increase in the core temperature of 1°C or higher and a core temperature > 38.3°C. Leukocytosis was defined as a 25% increase in the circulating leukocytes from the baseline admission value and a value > 10,000/µL (10 x 109/L). Tracheal aspirates were considered purulent if abundant neutrophils were present per high-power field using Gram stain (ie, > 25 neutrophils per high-power field). Additionally, when available, bronchoscopic BAL cultures with appropriate quantitative thresholds were employed to support the diagnosis of VAP. For all other patients, a tracheal aspirate culture specimen was obtained prior to the start of antibiotic treatment. A second episode of VAP was considered to have occurred if it was diagnosed at least 48 h after completion of the course of antibiotic treatment for the first episode of VAP, or if a different pathogen was identified in a lower airway culture obtained with BAL. Hospital mortality was defined as those patient deaths occurring during the initial hospital admission during which they were studied.

All patients were prospectively screened to exclude the following possible alternative causes for fever and radiographic chest densities. The presence of atelectasis was defined by the complete disappearance of radiographic densities within 48 h of evaluation. Congestive heart failure with pulmonary edema was defined by a suggestive hemodynamic profile on pulmonary artery catheterization or transesophageal Doppler ultrasound imaging (ie, increased pulmonary artery occlusion pressure or corrected flow time) and resolution of the pulmonary infiltrates following diuresis. Alveolar hemorrhage was defined by progressively bloodier return of BAL fluid and at least 20% hemosiderin-laden macrophages. Finally, pulmonary embolism was defined by the presence of at least two segmental or larger mismatched perfusion abnormalities on a ventilation-perfusion scan or suggestive radiographic findings on pulmonary angiography and spiral CT.

Adequate antimicrobial treatment was defined as the administration of an initial antimicrobial regimen with in vitro activity against the bacterial species associated with VAP.12 Patients without isolation of pathogenic microorganisms in their respiratory cultures were considered to be receiving adequate empiric antimicrobial treatment.

Statistical Analysis
Univariate analysis was used to compare variables for the two groups of interest. Comparisons were unpaired and all tests of significance were two tailed. Continuous variables were compared using Student t test for normally distributed variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for nonnormally distributed variables. The {chi}2 statistic or Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Correlation between variables was determined by using simple linear regression analysis. All values are presented as means and their SDs.


    Results
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients
A total of 290 consecutive patients treated with antibiotics for presumed VAP completed the clinical trial (Fig 1 ). The mean age of the patients was 59.9 ± 17.8 years (range, 19 to 97 years); 145 patients (50.0%) were men, and 145 patients (50.0%) were women. The mean APACHE II score of the entire study cohort was 23.0 ± 9.2 (range, 4 to 50), and the mean clinical pulmonary infection score for the study cohort was 7.1 ± 0.9 (range, 6 to 9). Patients in the two treatment groups were statistically similar in terms of their baseline characteristics at entry into the study and the medical care process of care variables examined (Tables 1, 2 ). The number of patients receiving the recommended initial antibiotic regimen for VAP was similar for the discontinuation group and the conventional group (81.3% vs 83.6%, p = 0.617). Treatment with a single recommended antibiotic directed against Gram-negative bacteria or failure to treat with a Gram-positive antibiotic accounted for all the lapses in meeting the antibiotic policy.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1.. Flow diagram for patients treated for VAP.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1.. Baseline Characteristics of Patients at Entry Into the Study*

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2.. Process of Care Variables*

 
Antimicrobial Utilization
The number of patients treated by their ICU physicians for VAP who met the "high-risk" criteria for VAP was 99 in the discontinuation group (66.0%), and 101 among the conventional treatment group (72.1%) [p = 0.259]. There was no difference between the two treatment groups in the number of patients having noninfectious etiologies for their pulmonary infiltrates identified (8.7% vs 6.4%, p = 0.472).

The initial administration of adequate antimicrobial treatment was statistically similar for both treatment groups (93.3% vs 93.6%, p = 0.935). Among those in the discontinuation group, 142 patients (94.7%) had at least one recommendation to discontinue antibiotics made to their treating physicians, and antibiotics were discontinued in 126 of these patients (88.7%) within 48 h of the recommendation. The overall duration of antibiotic treatment for VAP was statistically shorter in the discontinuation group compared to the conventional group (6.0 ± 4.9 days vs 8.0 ± 5.6 days, p = 0.001) [Fig 2 ]. Treatments with antibiotics directed against Gram-negative bacteria (5.8 ± 4.7 days vs 7.1 ± 5.1 days, p = 0.023) and antibiotics directed against Gram-positive bacteria (2.3 ± 3.2 vs 4.8 ± 4.4, p < 0.001) were statistically shorter for the discontinuation group. The duration of antibiotic therapy directed against anaerobic bacteria was similar for both treatment groups (1.2 ± 2.9 days vs 1.2 ± 2.5 days, p = 0.991). The duration of antibiotic treatment for VAP was statistically correlated with clinical pulmonary infection scores (r = 0.419; p < 0.001) [Fig 3 ].



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2.. Box plots for the days of antibiotic treatment for VAP in each study group. The boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, with the 50th percentile (solid lines) shown within the boxes. The 10th and 19th percentiles are shown as capped bars, with circles marking the 5th and 95th percentiles.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3.. Box plots for the days of antibiotic treatment for VAP according to clinical pulmonary infection scores. The boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, with the 50th percentile (solid lines) shown within the boxes. The 10th and 90th percentiles are shown as capped bars.

 
Pathogens
Table 3 describes the pathogens associated with clinically diagnosed VAP in both study groups. The reasons for inadequate antimicrobial treatment in the discontinuation group included failure to initially treat for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 3), failure to initially treat for Candida species or Aspergillus species (n = 4), Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to the prescribed Gram-negative antibiotics (n = 1), other Gram-negative bacteria (Enterobacter species, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) resistant to the prescribed Gram-negative antibiotics (n = 2). The reasons for inadequate antimicrobial treatment among the conventional group included failure to initially treat for methicillin-resistant S aureus (n = 4), Acinetobacter species resistant to the prescribed Gram-negative antibiotics (n = 1), other Gram-negative bacteria (Serratia marcescens) resistant to the prescribed Gram-negative antibiotics (n = 1), failure to initially treat for Aspergillus species (n = 2), and isolation of an initially untreated viral pathogen (herpes simplex virus) [n = 1].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3.. Pathogens Associated With Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia*

 
Twenty-six patients (17.3) in the discontinuation group acquired a second episode of VAP compared to 27 patients (19.3%) in the conventional group (p = 0.667). The second episode of VAP among patients in the discontinuation group was attributed to methicillin-resistant S aureus (n = 11), P aeruginosa (n = 7), Candida species or Aspergillus species (n = 4), and other Gram-negative bacterial species (n = 4). The second episode of VAP among the patients in the conventional group was attributed to methicillin-resistant S aureus (n = 13), P aeruginosa (n = 8), Candida species or Aspergillus species (n = 4), and other Gram-negative bacterial species (n = 2).

Outcomes
No statistically significant differences in hospital mortality, ICU or hospital lengths of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, or the total number of subsequently occurring hospital-acquired infections were found between the two study groups (Table 4 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4.. Clinical Outcome Measures*

 

    Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We demonstrated that an antibiotic discontinuation policy directed at the treatment of clinically suspected VAP was associated with the administration of statistically shorter durations of antibiotic therapy. On average, patients managed with the antibiotic discontinuation policy received 2 fewer days of antibiotic treatment compared to patients in the conventional group. No differences in hospital mortality or the durations of intensive care and hospitalization were observed between the two treatment groups. The occurrence of a second episode of VAP was also similar in both treatment groups. These data suggest that shorter courses of empiric antibiotic treatment can be safely prescribed to patients clinically suspected of having VAP based on their subsequent clinical evaluation.

Increasingly, clinicians practicing in the ICU environment are faced with competing concerns regarding their treatment decisions. The administration of adequate initial antibiotic therapy for VAP, and other potentially life-threatening infections, has been associated with statistically improved survival compared to antibiotic therapy that is found to be ineffective against the pathogen(s) associated with infection.612 Several studies2021 suggest that the administration of inadequate initial antibiotic therapy results in greater hospital mortality due to the temporal delays in achieving treatment with antibiotics to which the pathogens are susceptible. The increasing emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the ICU setting dictates that broad-spectrum antibiotics be administered initially in order to achieve adequate therapy.822 This is especially true for patients with risk factors for infection due to antibiotic-resistant bacteria (eg, prior antibiotic treatment during the same hospitalization, hospitalization for >= 5 days, admission from a nursing home or extended care facility, home wound, or infusion therapy).823 Local knowledge concerning the most common bacteria associated with infection and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns will also greatly assist clinicians in determining the optimal initial empiric antibiotic treatment for VAP and other hospital-acquired infections.24

Competing with the need to administer adequate initial antibiotic therapy is the necessity to prevent further antibiotic resistance. Therefore, clinicians will have to learn how to extend the treatment lives of the currently available antibiotic agents. One of the most effective methods for preventing the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria is the avoidance of unnecessary antibiotic use. Dennesen et al25 demonstrated that continuing adequate antibiotic therapy beyond 7 days for VAP increased airway colonization with potentially antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Other investigators have shown that efforts aimed at reducing the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy for VAP are associated with reductions in the subsequent emergence of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Singh et al16 found that limiting the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy to 3 days for patients with clinically suspected VAP and a clinical pulmonary infection score of <= 6 statistically reduced subsequent colonization or infection with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Similarly, Ibrahim et al14 demonstrated that the application of a clinical guideline for the treatment of VAP increased the initial administration of adequate antimicrobial treatment and decreased the overall duration of antibiotics with fewer secondary infections due to antibiotic-resistant organisms.

Recently, the results of a large randomized trial26 comparing 8 days of adequate antibiotic therapy for VAP to 15 days of treatment were reported. Despite similar efficacy, the longer course of antibiotic therapy was associated with statistically greater emergence of multiple-resistant bacteria. Given the compelling findings supporting the link between the duration of antibiotic therapy and the emergence of antibiotic resistance, how should clinicians working in the ICU environment proceed? Our study suggests that the development and implementation of local antibiotic discontinuation policies can be an effective strategy for reducing unnecessary antibiotic therapy for clinically suspected VAP. Locally developed guidelines and protocols have the greatest likelihood of success, especially if cooperation and support is gathered from all parties affected by the new treatment practices.27 Having concise criteria for the discontinuation of antibiotic treatment, along with targeted individual responsibility for reviewing these criteria during ICU rounds when most treatment decisions are made, likely accounted for the success of this program. Additionally, the closed design of the ICU and patient management directed by intensivist-led multidisciplinary teams probably facilitated adherence to the antibiotic discontinuation recommendations.

Our investigation has several important limitations. First, it was performed within a single ICU and the results may not be generalizable to other treatment settings. However, other studies141626 have shown that empiric antibiotic treatment for VAP can be reduced in duration without adverse consequences. This supports the potential successful implementation of similar antibiotic discontinuation policies in other institutions. Additionally, the urgency of the problem of antimicrobial resistance should encourage hospitals to adapt antibiotic practices aimed at providing both effective treatment and less pressure for resistance.28 Second, we relied on clinical diagnosis of VAP as established by the treating physicians. This was purposefully done to study a patient cohort that more closely reflects how clinical decision making and antibiotic prescription for VAP occurs in many "real-world" settings. Similar diagnostic criteria have been employed by other investigators to develop and investigate new empiric antibiotic treatment strategies for VAP.16 Available data suggest that most clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacteria in the ICU are obtained from respiratory secretions, and that increasingly antibiotic treatment is directed at those pathogens whether they are simple colonizers or truly associated with infection.9 Therefore, new practices aimed at improving antibiotic utilization for VAP should incorporate currently employed diagnostic approaches in order to be successful.

A third limitation of this study is that some of the patients with a second episode of VAP may represent initial treatment failures due to premature discontinuation of antibiotics. This seems unlikely given the similar occurrence of secondary episodes of VAP in both treatment groups. Additionally, the results of other randomized trials examining the use of shorter empiric courses of antibiotic therapy for VAP have failed to identify differences in secondary episodes of VAP linked to the duration of initial antibiotic treatment.1626 Moreover, the study by Dennesen et al25 suggests that more prolonged administration of antibiotics will result in the development of secondary respiratory infections due to antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Another limitation is that we only consistently implemented this policy during the workweek and not on weekends. This may have biased the results by reducing the magnitude of the observed intervention on the duration of antibiotic therapy. Finally, one of the investigators also served as a treating physician during approximately 20% of the study period. It is possible that this may have also introduced a bias in favor of the study intervention during that time period. Despite these limitations, we were able to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in the duration of antibiotic treatment for clinically diagnosed VAP. In summary, we showed that it is safe to discontinue antibiotics prescribed for clinically suspected VAP if someone is actively assessing the indication for antibiotic therapy and the patient response to treatment.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: APACHE = acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; FIO2 = fraction of inspired oxygen; VAP = ventilator-associated pneumonia

This investigation was supported in part by the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation and an unrestricted grant from Elan Pharmaceuticals.

Received for publication July 31, 2003. Accepted for publication September 28, 2003.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. George, DL (1995) Epidemiology of nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care unit patients. Clin Chest Med 16,29-44[ISI][Medline]
  2. Vincent, JL, Bihari, DJ, Suter, PM, et al The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe: results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. JAMA 1995;274,639-644[Abstract]
  3. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system report: data summary from January 1992-April 2000, issued June 2000. Am J Infect Control 2000;28,429-448[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Rello, J, Ollendorf, DA, Oster, G, et al Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large US database. Chest 2002;122,2115-2121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Warren, DK, Shukla, SJ, Olsen, MA, et al Outcome and attributable cost of ventilator-associated pneumonia among intensive care unit patients in a suburban medical center. Crit Care Med 2003;31,1312-1317[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  6. Kollef, MH, Silver, P, Murphy, DM, et al The effect of late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia in determining patients mortality. Chest 1995;108,1655-1662[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. American Thoracic Society. Hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults: diagnosis, assessment of severity, initial antimicrobial therapy, and preventive strategies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153,1711-1725[ISI][Medline]
  8. Trouillet, JL, Chastre, J, Vuagnat, A, et al Ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by potentially drug-resistant bacteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157,531-539[ISI][Medline]
  9. Neuhauser, MM, Weinstein, RA, Rydman, R, et al Antibiotic resistance among gram-negative bacilli in US intensive care units: implications for fluoroquinolone use. JAMA 2003;289,885-888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Garnacho-Montero, J, Ortiz-Leyba, C, Jimenez-Jimenez, FJ, et al Treatment of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with intravenous colistin: a comparison with imipenem-susceptible VAP. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36,1111-1118[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  11. Richards, MJ, Edwards, JR, Culver, DH, et al Nosocomial infections in medical intensive care units in the United States: National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Crit Care Med 1999;27,887-892[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  12. Kollef, MH, Sherman, G, Ward, S, et al Inadequate antimicrobial treatment of infections: a risk factor for hospital mortality among critically ill patients. Chest 1999;115,462-474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Alvarez-Lerma, F Modification of empiric antibiotic treatment in patients with pneumonia acquired in the intensive care unit: ICU-Acquired Pneumonia Study Group. Intensive Care Med 1996;22,387-394[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  14. Ibrahim, EH, Ward, S, Sherman, G, et al Experience with a clinical guideline for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med 2001;29,1109-1115[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  15. Knaus, WA, Draper, EA, Wagner, DP, et al APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13,818-829[ISI][Medline]
  16. Singh, N, Rogers, P, Atwood, CW, et al Short course empiric antibiotic therapy for pulmonary infiltrates in the intensive care unit: a proposed solution for indiscriminate antibiotic prescription. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162,505-511[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Menzies, R, Gibbons, W, Goldberg, P Determinants of weaning and survival among patients with COPD who require mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Chest 1989;95,398-405[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Zack, JE, Garrison, T, Trovillion, E, et al Effect of an education program aimed at reducing the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med 2002;30,2407-2412[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  19. Pingleton, SK, Fagon, JY, Leeper, KV, Jr Patient selection for clinical investigation of ventilator-associated pneumonia: criteria for evaluating diagnostic techniques. Chest 1992;102,553S-556S[Medline]
  20. Cosgrove, SE, Kaye, KS, Eliopoulous, GM, et al Health and economic outcomes of the emergence of third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Enterobacter species. Arch Intern Med 2002;162,185-190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Iregui, M, Ward, S, Sherman, G, et al Clinical importance of delays in the initiation of appropriate antibiotic treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 2002;122,262-268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kollef, MH Inadequate antimicrobial treatment: an important determinant of outcome for hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31,S131-S138
  23. Friedman, ND, Kaye, KS, Stout, JE, et al Health-care associated bloodstream infection in adults: a reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections. Ann Intern Med 2002;137,791-797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Rello, J, Sa-Borges, M, Correa, H, et al Variations in etiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia across four treatment sites: implications for antimicrobial prescribing practices. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160,608-613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Dennesen, PJW, van der Ven, AJ, Kessels, AGH, et al Resolution of infectious parameters after antimicrobial therapy in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163,1371-1375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Chastre, J, Wolff, M, Fagon, JY, et al Comparison of 8 vs 15 days of antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults JAMA 2003;290,2588-2598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Clemmer, TP, Spuhler, VJ, Berwick, DM, et al Cooperation: the foundation of improvement. Ann Intern Med 1998;128,1004-1009[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Goldmann, DA, Weinstein, RA, Wenzel, RP, et al Strategies to prevent and control the emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms in hospitals: a challenge to hospital leadership. JAMA 1996;275,234-240[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
The Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
A Randomized Trial of Diagnostic Techniques for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
N. Engl. J. Med., December 21, 2006; 355(25): 2619 - 2630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
S. M. Koenig and J. D. Truwit
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2006; 19(4): 637 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
L. Schallom, N. A. Metheny, J. Stewart, R. Schnelker, J. Ludwig, G. Sherman, and P. Taylor
Effect of Frequency of Manual Turning on Pneumonia
Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2005; 14(6): 476 - 478.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
C. MacDougall and R. E. Polk
Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Health Care Systems
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2005; 18(4): 638 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. Torres
Implementation of Guidelines on Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 1900 - 1802.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. H. Kollef and K. E. Kollef
Antibiotic Utilization and Outcomes for Patients With Clinically Suspected Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia and Negative Quantitative BAL Culture Results
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2706 - 2713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. H. Kollef and S. T. Micek
Staphylococcus Aureus Pneumonia: A "Superbug" Infection in Community and Hospital Settings
Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1093 - 1097.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. A. DeRyke, T. P. Lodise Jr., M. J. Rybak, and P. S. McKinnon
Epidemiology, Treatment, and Outcomes of Nosocomial Bacteremic Staphylococcus aureus Pneumonia
Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1414 - 1422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. Brun-Buisson, M. Fartoukh, E. Lechapt, S. Honore, J.-R. Zahar, C. Cerf, and B. Maitre
Contribution of Blinded, Protected Quantitative Specimens to the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 533 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
G. P. Patel and C. W. Crank
Gram-Negative Resistance in the Intensive Care Unit
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, April 1, 2005; 18(2): 91 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
S. E. Pass, M. M. Gearhart, and E. J. Young
Short-Course Antimicrobial Therapy for the Treatment of Pneumonia
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, February 1, 2005; 18(1): 18 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
S. A. Voils, K. S. Kim, and E. T. Wittbrodt
Recent Trends in the Management of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, February 1, 2005; 18(1): 53 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Infect. DiseasesHome page
Shorter Courses of Antibiotics for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia?
Journal Watch Infectious Diseases, June 28, 2004; 2004(628): 8 - 8.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (52)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Micek, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kollef, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Micek, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kollef, M. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS