|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Division of Respiratory Diseases Studies (Drs. AkpinarElci and Elci), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV; and the Department of Respiratory Medicine (Dr. Odabasi), Izmir Chest Diseases and Surgery Training Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Correspondence to: Muge Akpinar-Elci, MD, NIOSH Division of Respiratory Diseases Studies, Field Studies Branch MS H-2800, 1095 Willowdale Rd, Morgantown, WV 26505; e-mail: mra8{at}cdc.gov
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: We collected questionnaire data from 128 florists, and investigated occupational history and respiratory, ocular, dermal, and nasal symptoms. We evaluated pulmonary function tests with spirometry and atopy by using the skin-prick test. Possible risk factors were analyzed by age-adjusted, smoking-adjusted, and gender-adjusted logistic regression models comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.
Results: The prevalence of work-related asthma-like symptoms was 14.1% (18 patients). We observed excess risk with a high work intensity (odds ratio [OR], 7.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 51.8) and long work duration (OR, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.2 to 21.6). Florists with work-related asthma-like symptoms were 5.9 times more likely (95% CI, 1.4 to 24.3) to have a positive skin test response to a flower mix allergen. We also observed an excess risk for work-related asthma-like symptoms among those with allergic rhinitis (OR, 13.2; 95% CI, 3.1 to 56.4) and conjunctivitis (OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 2.4 to 29.2).
Conclusion: The most prominent risk factors in florists were work intensity, work duration, and specific atopy.
Key Words: asthma atopy flower occupation work intensity
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the floral industry, there are various potential allergens. Case reports of occupational allergic dermatitis have been published frequently.345 There are only a few studies,3467 mostly case reports, on occupational respiratory diseases caused by flowers. There are also some studies8910 on the prevalence of occupational respiratory diseases in this industry, however, study groups included flower growers and greenhouse workers only. Respiratory symptoms are caused by various flowers, such as freesia, chrysanthemum, tulip, narcissus, babys breath, rose hip, sunflower, and mimosa.145611 One study12 reported asthma and allergy symptoms among rose production farmers in Turkey.
To our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate the prevalence of work-related asthma-like symptoms among florists working in floral shops. In a population-based cross-sectional study, we evaluated the prevalence of work-related asthma-like symptoms and sensitization to workplace allergens among florists in western Turkey.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
100 m2 were categorized as large shops, and they were compared with medium size (area, 51 to 99 m2) and small shops (area,
50 m2). Work intensity was calculated from the daily work hours multiplied by the work duration (hours x years). Florists were categorized into a low-work-intensity group (< 35), medium-work-intensity group (35 to 167), or high-work-intensity group (
168).
Atopy for the most common allergens in the region (ie, Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, and mold mix)14 and for a commonly used flower mix (ie, Aster chinensis, Chrysanthemum koreanum, Dahlia cultorum, Solidago virgaurea, and Chrysanthemum leucanthemum) were evaluated by skin-prick test (Stallergenes-Pasteur; Antony, France). We measured the largest wheal diameters 15 min after application. A wheal
5 mm larger than the control, from any of the four antigens, was considered to be atopy-positive.15 Work-site pulmonary function tests (ie, FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio, and peak expiratory flow) were collected from each florist with a spirometer (Micro Medical; Kent, UK) using methods that adhered to techniques recommended by the ATS.16 For predicted spirometry values, we used Knudson predictive equations.17 We selected the largest FVC and FEV1 values for evaluation.
Based on the ATS Division of Lung Diseases 78-item questionnaire, florists were asked in questions 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 whether they had any one of the following recurrent symptoms: nonproductive cough, dyspnea; chest tightness; or wheezing.13 By asking standard questions, we collected the following information: Did these symptoms begin and exist within the overall working period as a florist? Were symptoms related to work? Did symptoms improve when the person was away from work? We did not confirm the asthma diagnosis by using further clinical tools. Specific symptoms for conjunctivitis, rhinitis, and dermatitis also were asked.
Using a statistical software package (SPSS, version 11.01; SPSS; Chicago, IL), we evaluated occupational risk factors by age-adjusted, smoking-adjusted (in pack·years), and genderadjusted unconditional logistic regression models comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic florists. Humidity and temperature did not change the results, so we did not include these variables in the analysis. Florists who reported asthma-like symptoms that were not work-related (21 florists) also were excluded from logistic regression analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10 years. The distribution of florists by possible occupational risk factors is presented in Table 1
. All of the spirometry tests, including FEV1 (median, 87.4% predicted) and FEV1/FVC (median, 94.9% predicted) were within the normal ranges, and there was no significant relationship between FEV1 values and symptoms. Twenty-one florists reported symptoms that were consistent with asthma. The prevalence of work-related asthma-like symptoms among florists was 14.1% (18 florists; nonproductive cough, 7.8% [10 florists]; dyspnea, 7.8% [10 florists]; chest tightness 3.9% [5 florists], and wheezing 4.7% [6 florists]). The age, gender, and smoking distribution of those with work-related asthma-like symptoms did not differ from those without symptoms. We also observed 18 cases of conjunctivitis (14.1%), 17 cases of rhinitis (13.3%), and 29 cases of dermatitis (22.7%) among florists.
|
50 m2) was an important risk factor. We observed excess risk for work-related asthma-like symptoms among florists who had been working for > 10 years. Florists with positive allergen skin test responses to the flower mix were 5.9 times more likely to have work-related asthma-like symptoms. We also observed an excess risk of work-related asthma-like symptoms among workers with allergic conjunctivitis and rhinitis.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The European Farmers study18 reported a 3.2% asthma prevalence for crop farmers. However, analysis by specific crops showed a higher prevalence of asthma (5.1%) in flower and/or ornamental plant growers. Another study10 performed nonspecific bronchial provocation challenge tests and reported a nearly 8% prevalence of asthma in greenhouse flower and ornamental plant growers. We found a relatively high prevalence of work-related asthma-like symptoms in florists, possibly due to different working conditions between florists and flower growers. We did not observe any airways obstruction by spirometry. This may be explained by participants using asthma medications, however, we did not receive useful medication information from most of the study participants. Another plausible explanation for not seeing obstruction is that a single spirometry measurement is usually normal in asthma patients.
Turkish florists tend to start working at a very early age, commonly before adolescence. About half of the study population were smokers, which is similar to the overall smoking rate in Turkey.19 The age, gender, and smoking habits of the asthmatic florists were similar to those without asthma symptoms.
The most apparent risk factor for work-related asthma-like symptoms among florists was work intensity, which reflects occupational exposure. Few occupational asthma studies have addressed work intensity.2021 Finding a positive dose-response relationship between work intensity and work-related symptoms has supported the accuracy of our questionnaire-based asthma diagnosis. Work duration and workplace size also were associated with the risk of work-related asthma-like symptoms. We did not find any relationship between the one-time measurement of workplace temperature or humidity and work-related asthma. Another study10 concluded that the concentration of workplace air contaminants was not the primary determinant of sensitization to greenhouse allergens in flower growers.
Studies showed that atopy for high-molecular-weight agents is an important risk factor for work-related asthma.22 Goldberg et al8 reported that the incidence of positive skin-prick test responses to ornamental plants was 17 to 23% among the general population, but was 52% among flower growers. Monso et al10 reported a 21% prevalence of sensitization to cultivated flowers in greenhouse growers. We observed a 9.4% atopic reaction to the flower mix. We did not see any relationship between general allergens and occupational asthma in florists, however, flower mix allergy was an important risk factor for occupational asthma. Previous studies923 have found a high prevalence of rhinitis and conjunctivitis in greenhouse workers. In this study, allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis were associated with occupational asthma but not with allergic dermatitis, which may be explained by immunopathologic mechanisms.
The high participation rate from small and geographically scattered workshops is the main strength of this study. A limitation of this study is the absence of further diagnostic techniques. Financial limitations precluded their being carried out. Therefore, we could not prove a diagnosis of asthma among florists. We did not collect samples to measure exposure levels, however, we do not think that exposure differences would be a significant factor between workshops. Lack of a control group, cross-sectional design, and possible "healthy worker effect" are other limitations that readers should consider while interpreting our results.
In conclusion, this study identified important risks for work-related asthma-like symptoms among florists. It is known that a reduction in workplace allergen exposures would reduce the risk of work-related asthma. We related this risk to work intensity, work duration, workplace size, and atopy. Effective ventilation systems, adequately sized working areas, and informing workers about these risk factors also may help to solve the problem.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication August 26, 2003. Accepted for publication November 18, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. E. Mapp, P. Boschetto, P. Maestrelli, and L. M. Fabbri Occupational Asthma Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2005; 172(3): 280 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |