Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shander, A.
Right arrow Articles by Spence, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shander, A.
Right arrow Articles by Spence, R.
(Chest. 2004;125:2369-2370.)
© 2004 American College of Chest Physicians

Blood and Starch in Cardiac Surgery*

Aryeh Shander, MD, FCCP; Tanuja Rijhwani, MBBS, MPH; David Moskowitz, MD and Richard Spence, MD

Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, Englewood, NJ St. Agnes Healthcare, Baltimore, MD

Correspondence to: Tanuja Rijhwani, MBBS, MPH, Director, Clinical Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, Englewood, NJ 07631; e-mail: tanuja.rijhwani{at}ehmc.com

To the Editor:

The recent article by Avorn et al (October 2003)1 purports to show an association between the use of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) and excessive postoperative bleeding after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). This article resurrects the unresolved controversy regarding the use of HES in cardiac surgery and the emerging concern of clinically significant bleeding. Several prospective randomized trials,23456789 observational studies,91011 and meta-analyses,1213 have investigated the suspected association between HES use and bleeding after CABG.

Most randomized studies on HES and bleeding have failed to show any clinically significant bleeding differences. The published retrospective studies showing an increased incidence of blood loss have received the most press but are inherently limited due to study design. Cope et al11 retrospectively reviewed the use of hetastarch infusion based on perioperative exposure to HES and transfusion requirements during the first 24 h postoperatively. The selection bias of this study favored those with hemodynamic compromise or those with greater severity of illness. The meta-analysis by Wilkes et al14 shows that the difference in pooled mean blood loss in the albumin group was 693 ± 350 mL compared with 789 ± 487 mL in the HES group, a difference of 96 mL only.

We believe that the article by Avorn et al1 fails to show an association between HES and postoperative bleeding, as cited in the majority of related studies. The title leads the reader to believe that hetastarch increases the risk of bleeding, but the authors did not report any single measure of bleeding. They did not account for the number of bleeding episodes nor did they use quantifiable measures, ie, chest tube drainage volume. Some of the study design limitations were that no clear definitions of nonsurgical bleeding or proper criteria for correction of microvascular bleeding were used. Measurement of hematocrit from the drainage fluid and collection of blood samples for baseline laboratory parameters indicative of blood loss would have been more reliable estimates of perioperative blood loss. These indicators should be considered as one of the primary outcome variables. Although transfusions may reflect bleeding, previous data1516 suggest that transfusing blood in cardiac surgery is behavioral rather than a response to blood loss. Re-operation (exploration for bleeding) in coronary bypass surgery cannot be used as a measure of drug-induced coagulopathy unless one completely excludes other causes for bleeding, ie, heparin-protamine activity, large-vessel bleeding, and overall patient coagulation status. Simple changes in preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit values would help clarify their claims, although even these are confounded by volume changes.

The patients selected in the study by Avorn et al1 were those who had received ≥ 3 U packed RBCs within 72 h after undergoing CABG procedure; all other CABG patients were control subjects. The higher comorbidity in the cases (HES group) may act as a confounder leading to higher transfusion rates as a result of lower transfusion thresholds for more severely ill patients.

The editorial accompanying this study recommends a change in practice without convincing evidence. Lack of sufficient data should not be replaced with personal interpretation of study results. This invariably can be misleading to the medical community.

References

  1. Avorn, J, Patel, M, Levin, R, et al (2003) Hetastarch and bleeding complications after coronary surgery. Chest 124,1437-1442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kasper, SM, Meinert, P, Kampe, S, et al Large-dose hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 does not increase blood loss and transfusion requirements in coronary artery bypass surgery compared with hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 at recommended doses. Anesthesiology 2003;99,42-47[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Haisch, G, Boldt, J, Krebs, C, et al Influence of a new hydroxyethylstarch preparation (HES 130/0.4) on coagulation in cardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2001;15,316-321[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Gallandat Huet, RC, Siemons, AW, Baus, D, et al A novel hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven) for effective perioperative plasma volume substitution in cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth 2000;47,1207-1215[Abstract]
  5. Munsch, CM, MacIntyre, E, Machin, SJ, et al Hydroxyethyl starch: an alternative to plasma for postoperative volume expansion after cardiac surgery. Br J Surg 1988;75,675-678[ISI][Medline]
  6. Palanzo, DA, Parr, GV, Bull, AP, et al Hetastarch as a prime for cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1982;34,680-683[Abstract]
  7. Sade, RM, Stroud, MR, Crawford, FA, Jr, et al A prospective randomized study of hydroxyethyl starch, albumin, and lactated Ringer’s solution as priming fluid for cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;89,713-722[Abstract]
  8. Kirklin, JK, Lell, WA, Kouchoukos, NT Hydroxyethyl starch versus albumin for colloid infusion following cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 1984;37,40-46[Abstract]
  9. Knutson, JE, Deering, JA, Hall, FW, et al Does intraoperative hetastarch administration increase blood loss and transfusion requirements after cardiac surgery? Anesth Analg 2000;90,801-807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Keyser, EJ, Latter, DA, Morin, JE, et al Pentastarch versus albumin in cardiopulmonary bypass prime: impact on blood loss. J Card Surg 1999;14,279-286[ISI][Medline]
  11. Cope, M, Jeffrey, T, Banks, B, et al Intraoperative hetastarch infusion impairs hemostasis after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63,78-82[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Strauss, R Review of the effects of hydroxyethyl starch on the blood coagulation system. Transfusion 1981;21,299-302[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  13. Wilkes, NJ, Woolf, RL, Powanda, MC, et al Hydroxyethyl starch in balanced electrolyte solution (Hextend): pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg 2002;94,538-544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Wilkes, MM, Navickis, RJ, Sibbald, WJ Albumin versus hydroxyethyl starch in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of postoperative bleeding. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72,527-533[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Goodnough, L, Johnston, M The variability of transfusion practice in coronary artery bypass surgery. JAMA 1991;265,86-90[Abstract]
  16. Stover, E, Siegel, LC, Body, SC, et al Institutional variability in red blood cell conservation practices for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Institutions of the MultiCenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2000;14,171-176[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shander, A.
Right arrow Articles by Spence, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shander, A.
Right arrow Articles by Spence, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS