|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the School of Medicine (Dr. D.-W. Perng), National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; and the Department of Chest Medicine (Drs. Huang, Chen, Lee, and R.-P. Perng), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Correspondence to: Diahn-Warng Perng, MD, PhD, FCCP, Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 201, Section 2, Shih-Pai Rd, Taipei 11217, Taiwan; e-mail: dwperng{at}vghtpe.gov.tw
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: A total of 88 stable patients with smoking-related COPD were recruited into the study. All patients were steroid-free, and had been treated with theophylline, oral ß2-agonist agents, anticholinergic agents, and possibly mucolytic agents. Bronchodilator tests and sputum induction were performed to evaluate bronchodilator reversibility, and numbers of inflammatory cells and mediators (eg, interleukin [IL]-8, eotaxin, and regulated on activation, normal T cells expressed and secreted [RANTES]).
Results: Thirty-one of 48 patients (64.6%) who had bronchodilator reversibility, and 19 of 40 patients (47.5%) without bronchodilator reversibility had sputum eosinophilia (median, 8.0% and 7.0%, respectively). FEV1 showed a significant inverse correlation with the number of sputum neutrophils. The correlation coefficient for postbronchodilator FEV1 vs the percentage of neutrophils in patients with nonreversible COPD was higher than that in those with reversible COPD. The levels of IL-8 were closely associated with the percentage of neutrophils. The sputum concentrations of IL-8 and albumin were significantly higher in patients with nonreversible COPD than in those with reversible COPD. A significant inverse correlation was found between bronchodilator response (ie,
FEV1 and
FVC) and prebronchodilator FEV1.
Conclusions: Eosinophilic inflammation may play a substantial role in COPD, while neutrophils and IL-8 may have a great influence on nonreversible obstructive airways. The assessment of airway inflammation and bronchodilator responses can help the selection of specific therapies and the prediction of clinical outcomes for COPD patients.
Key Words: COPD eosinophils induced sputum neutrophils reversibility
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is well-documented that the majority of inflammatory cells in patients with obstructive airway diseases are eosinophils in patients with asthma23 and neutrophils in patients with COPD.456 However, it has been proposed that there is a significant degree of overlap between asthma and COPD, which is characterized by the predominance of neutrophils in patients with more severe forms of asthma and by increased counts and activation of eosinophils occurring in stable patients with COPD.789 Currently, corticosteroids are widely used for treatment and are the most effective antiinflammatory medications available for the treatment of asthma and COPD. Although corticosteroids can effectively modify eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthma patients, and their use correlates with an improvement in symptoms,10 the role for steroids in the treatment of COPD is still controversial.11 Some reports1213 have suggested that corticosteroids are effective especially for those cases of COPD with eosinophilic airway inflammation. Thus, the characteristics of inflammatory cells in the airways may become a useful guide to the treatment of COPD.
The airflow limitation in COPD is not fully reversible. It has been reported14 that the rate of decline in well-preserved FEV1 correlates negatively with bronchodilator responses in patients with COPD. The higher the initial reversibility, the longer the survival and the smaller the decline of FEV1.15 One study16 has suggested that bronchodilator response is associated with increased exhaled nitric oxide and sputum eosinophilia, indicating a relationship between inflammation and the reversibility of airflow limitation.
The extent of bronchial reversibility and the pattern of inflammation in the airways of COPD patients certainly influence the treatment options and affect the clinical outcome. The above information is thus required before the commencement of treatment. Accordingly, our objective was to survey the characteristics of airway inflammation in stable patients who do not receive steroids for the treatment of COPD and utilize regular medications. Interrelations among inflammatory cells, mediators, bronchodilator reversibility, and pulmonary function were analyzed.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
FEV1) or FVC (or
FVC) above the prebronchodilator baseline, 30 min after the inhalation of 400 µg salbutamol.17 Patients did not receive any medication for 24 h before undergoing the bronchodilator reversibility tests. The ethics committee of the hospital approved the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all of the subjects before the study commenced.
Sputum Induction and Processing
Sputum production was induced using 3%, 4%, and then 5% hypertonic saline solution after premedication with inhaled salbutamol (400 µg). The opaque and dense portions of induced sputum were selected. If enough of a sample was obtained (ie, four to five mucus plugs), we stopped the inhalation procedure. Samples were weighed to minimize the dilution effect that may influence the final results and were processed with 0.1% dithiothreitol, as described by Pin et al18 The supernatant from the cytospin procedure was stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain, and 400 nonsquamous cells were counted. A sample was considered to be adequate when the percentage of squamous cells was < 20%. The differential cell count was expressed as a percentage of the total cell count. The supernatant of the induced sputum samples was aspirated and frozen at 80°C until measurement of mediators.
Measurement of Interleukin-8, Eotaxin, Regulated on Activation, Normal T Cells Expressed and Secreted, and Albumin
Levels of interleukin (IL)-8, regulated on activation, normal T cells expressed and secreted (RANTES) [BioSource International; Camarillo, CA], and eotaxin (R&D Systems; Abingdon, UK) in supernatants were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay according to the instructions of the manufacturers. The lower limits of sensitivity were 1 to 3 pg/mL for IL-8, 3 pg/mL for RANTES, and 5 pg/mL for eotaxin. The assay results were corrected by quantified albumin in the supernatants. The albumin in supernatants of the induced sputum was measured. A standard curve with a concentration range of 10 to 2,000 µg/mL was obtained by the dilution of purified human serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline solution. One milliliter of phosphate-buffered saline solution (blank) or standard/sample was added to an equal amount of bromcresol green, and the reaction was allowed to proceed for 10 min. The absorbance rates were measured spectrophotometrically at 628 nm.
Statistical Analysis
Differences between groups were first analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Intergroup comparisons were assessed by a nonparametric method using the Mann-Whitney U test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to be significant. Associations among eosinophils, neutrophils, IL-8, albumin, FEV1, and bronchodilator response were measured using the Spearman rank correlation test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
FEV1 percent predicted and prebronchodilator FEV1 percent predicted (Fig 3
), and also between
FVC percent predicted and prebronchodilator FEV1 percent predicted (r = 0.41; p = 0.001).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The inflammatory cells that exist in COPD patients are heterogeneous. Neutrophils, eosinophils, mast cells, and CD8+ lymphocytes have been shown78161920 to play important roles in inflammatory processes in COPD patients. However, according to the percentage and cell numbers, neutrophils and eosinophils are the two major inflammatory cell types in the airways of COPD patients. Corticosteroids are currently the most popular antiinflammatory medications used in the treatment of obstructive airway diseases, although the effect of corticosteroids in the treatment of COPD remains uncertain. In a 3-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled biopsy study,20 the use of inhaled corticosteroids did not affect the numbers of neutrophils in COPD patients. This phenomenon also was observed in asthma patients with neutrophilic airway inflammation.21 On the contrary, corticosteroids are effective in the treatment of COPD patients with eosinophilic airway inflammation, not only reducing eosinophil numbers, but also improving clinical symptoms.1213 The response to corticosteroids in patients in whom COPD has been diagnosed might be greater in a subset of patients presenting with more eosinophils and higher levels of eosinophil cationic protein.22 Therefore, to categorize a distinct subgroup of COPD patients before the commencement of therapy is crucial.
Early in 1958, COPD was defined as a group of diseases with irreversible obstruction of the airways.23 Nearly half a century later, COPD turned out to be a not fully reversible airflow limitation that is associated with airway inflammation.1 Antiinflammatory therapy has thus emerged as a very important consideration in the management of COPD. A recent study24 demonstrated that the response to therapy with oral prednisolone appears not to have been a good predictor of the subsequent decline in FEV1 and the rate of deterioration in health status in a large group of patients with COPD. Regarding lung function, the FEV1 in COPD patients who have received inhaled corticosteroid treatment was higher than that in the placebo group by at least 70 mL at each time point in a 3-year study,25 although there was no statistical significance regarding differences among the rates of decline in FEV1. Similarly, Pauwels et al26 demonstrated that the median decline in the FEV1 after the use of a bronchodilator over the 3-year period was 140 mL in patients who had received inhaled budesonide and 180 mL in the placebo group. Moreover, therapy with inhaled corticosteroids improves airway reactivity and respiratory symptoms, and decreases the use of health-care services for respiratory problems.27 The use of inhaled steroids does not affect the long-term progressive deterioration in FEV1, but differences in lung function between treatment and placebo groups exist. Could some of these COPD patients represent a normal decline in lung function after an appropriate steroid treatment? What are the characteristics of these responders in terms of airway inflammation? Will they have characteristics similar to those in asthmatic patients? We need to investigate the effects of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD patients, and to determine the differences between the patients who benefit from this treatment and those who do not. Feasible sputum inflammation parameters may help to identify those patients who respond to selective therapy with inhaled corticosteroids from those who do not respond.
Neutrophils were inversely associated with the FEV1 percent predicted observed in our study. This is in agreement with the results of a previous report.8 We also found that these associations were more prominent in COPD patients without bronchodilator reversibility. Moreover, the levels of IL-8 and albumin were significantly higher in patients with nonreversible COPD, suggesting that neutrophilic inflammation plays a crucial role in nonreversible obstructive airways. It is difficult to know in stable COPD patients whether IL-8 plays a role as a chemoattractant for neutrophils or as a proinflammatory mediator that is released from neutrophils. However, this mediator was not correlated to FEV1 percent predicted. IL-8 may act as an indicator of the severity of neutrophilic inflammation rather than as an indicator of pulmonary function decline.
Eosinophilic airway inflammation accounted for a substantial proportion of the COPD cases observed in this study. It is unknown how these eosinophils are recruited into the airways. The chemoattractants for eosinophils, including eotaxin and RANTES, were not elevated in COPD patients compared to healthy control subjects. The mechanism of eosinophil influx into obstructive airways is thus unclear. One report28 has demonstrated that the degree of eosinophilic inflammation is related to early changes in lung function and smoking habits. The higher counts of eosinophils in induced sputum is associated with the higher number of pack-years and lower values for the midexpiratory phase of peak expiratory flow.28 The mean number of pack-years of smoking found in this study was about 47 pack-years, which is higher than that reported by Pizzichini et al.29 This may partially explain why the mean percentage of eosinophils in the sputum eosinophilia group is higher than that reported by Pizzichini et al29 (mean, 5.4%). On the other hand, could some of these patients have asthma (without apparent histories) that is contributing to the high degrees of eosinophilia found in our study? It is possible that some asthmatic patients develop COPD because of long-term exposure to cigarette smoke. This may constitute a major part of the overlap between asthma and COPD. However, it is difficult to differentiate between asthma and COPD only by clinical history, clinical manifestations, and spirometry findings. Thus, investigating the characteristics of airway inflammation and creating a practical guide to treatment may surpass the importance of making a specific diagnosis. A question that arises in this regard is how to define the severity of eosinophilic airway inflammation that may require and benefit from corticosteroid treatment. Further study is needed to address these issues.
The absence of short-term responses to bronchodilators suggests that airflow obstruction may be poorly reversible or fixed, a feature that distinguishes COPD from asthma. It should be noted that many patients with COPD have a bronchodilator response.30 In such patients, there is a clinical and functional improvement after therapy with inhaled corticosteroids that is similar to that observed in asthmatic patients.31 A recent study32 demonstrated that COPD patients who are responsive to bronchodilator therapy have a better clinical outcome (with regard to pulmonary function, dyspnea, and health-related quality of life) than those who are not responsive to bronchodilator therapy after 1 year of treatment with an inhaled bronchodilator. In addition, a higher reversibility of airflow obstruction has been proposed as a predictor of a slower decline in FEV1 and better survival.1415 Thus, bronchodilator reversibility may be a useful indicator not only for assessing the clinical effect of treatment but also for predicting clinical outcome and survival.
It has been suggested that the reversible component in COPD is due to the modifiability of vagal and sympathetic tone.30 The contribution of airway inflammation to bronchial reversibility is unclear. The changes in FEV1 or FVC after the inhalation of ß2-agonist agents were not correlated to concentrations of sputum eosinophils, neutrophils, and IL-8. It seems that the extent of the bronchodilator response in COPD patients was not related to airway inflammation, at least in this study. On the contrary, airway reversibility has been reported33 to be associated with the degree of blood eosinophilia. Gross et al34 showed that greater bronchodilator responses occur in COPD with prebronchodilator FEV1 values < 55% of predicted and are associated with cholinergic tone that is increased in proportion to the severity of airway obstruction. It is compatible with our finding that bronchodilator reversibility inversely correlated with prebronchodilator FEV1 values, suggesting that a substantial degree of reversibility may exist in patients with severe airway obstruction, which can be relieved by therapy with inhaled bronchodilators.
In summary, through the assessment of the characteristics of airway inflammation by sputum induction and the responses of airways to therapy with bronchodilators, we can provide more specific and useful therapies and can help to predict clinical outcomes for patients with COPD.
| Footnotes |
|---|
This work was supported by research grants from Taipei Veterans General Hospital (VGH93185). There is no potential conflict of interest involved in this study.
Received for publication September 18, 2003. Accepted for publication March 2, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. E. Shaw, M. A. Berry, B. Hargadon, S. McKenna, M. J. Shelley, R. H. Green, C. E. Brightling, A. J. Wardlaw, and I. D. Pavord Association Between Neutrophilic Airway Inflammation and Airflow Limitation in Adults With Asthma Chest, December 1, 2007; 132(6): 1871 - 1875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hizawa, H. Makita, Y. Nasuhara, T. Betsuyaku, Y. Itoh, K. Nagai, M. Hasegawa, and M. Nishimura {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor Genetic Polymorphisms and Short-term Bronchodilator Responses in Patients With COPD Chest, November 1, 2007; 132(5): 1485 - 1492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-W. Perng, K.-T. Chang, K.-C. Su, Y.-C. Wu, M.-T. Wu, W.-H. Hsu, C.-M. Tsai, and Y.-C. Lee Exposure of Airway Epithelium to Bile Acids Associated With Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms: A Relation to Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 Production and Fibroblast Proliferation Chest, November 1, 2007; 132(5): 1548 - 1556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Currie, P. Srivastava, and D. K. C. Lee Sputum Eosinophils and Bronchodilator Reversibility: COPD or Asthma? Chest, June 1, 2005; 127(6): 2292 - 2293. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |