Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bleecker, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bleecker, E. R.
(Chest. 2004;126:93S-95S.)
© 2004 American College of Chest Physicians

Similarities and Differences in Asthma and COPD*

The Dutch Hypothesis

Eugene R. Bleecker, MD, FCCP

* From the Center for Human Genomics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.

Correspondence to: Eugene R. Bleecker, MD, FCCP, Center for Human Genomics, Wake Forest University, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157; e-mail: ebleeck{at}wfubmc.edu

COPD represents an increasingly important chronic debilitating illness in the United States and worldwide.1 Approximately 16 million Americans have received a diagnosis of COPD, but this figure may represent a low estimate, since there is evidence of misclassification and underdiagnosis, with COPD remaining undiagnosed by a physician in as many as 30 million individuals. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey2 of 16,084 individuals who were > 17 years of age revealed that 25% of white male smokers had evidence of airway obstruction, as documented by an FEV1/FVC ratio of < 70%.3 Even more impressive was that COPD had not been previously diagnosed in 44% of those with an FEV1/FVC ratio of < 50% predicted. Mortality caused by COPD has increased, and this disease has become the fourth leading cause of death in the United States.45 COPD is the only disease among the top 10 causes of death that is increasing in frequency.67 It is anticipated that the prevalence of COPD will continue to increase through the year 2020 and beyond.

There are many factors responsible for the current level of misclassification or underdiagnosis and the apparent increasing prevalence of COPD. These include the following: the latency period between the initiation of cigarette smoking that causes COPD and the actual onset of this disease; the relatively small fraction of smokers who develop COPD; the physiologically and clinically silent nature of COPD during early stages of its development; and finally, the increasing longevity of the overall population due to improved survival from other medical causes that impact the prevalence of a disease that increases with age.

The most common signs and symptoms of COPD are dyspnea on exertion, often accompanied by cough with sputum production and wheezing.4 Many older individuals experience dyspnea on exertion because of deconditioning and obesity. Cough and sputum production is so common in smokers that it may be considered normal. Wheezing occurs frequently, but often is attributed to asthma or a viral respiratory tract infection, leading to a diagnosis of asthma.5 The clinically silent nature of early COPD and the indolent course of the disease allow patients to accommodate their growing disability with lifestyle changes. Therefore, most patients presenting to their health-care provider for symptoms related to their COPD have an FEV1 that is < 50% predicted. In the past, COPD has been defined in terms of irreversible airway obstruction that is progressive over time,8 but, more recently, the fact that patterns of COPD overlap with those of asthma has been recognized.9 In addition, acute and chronic reversibility of airflow obstruction has been recognized to occur in COPD patients. For example, in 1995 the American Thoracic Society stated "it may be impossible to differentiate patients with asthma whose airflow obstruction does not remit completely from persons with chronic bronchitis and emphysema with partially reversible airflow obstruction and bronchial hyperresponsiveness [BHR]."10 Numerous studies1112 have documented the presence of partial reversibility after short-term and long-term bronchodilator administration in patients with COPD. This partial reversibility contrasts with asthma, which traditionally is characterized by variable and reversible airflow obstruction. More recently, current asthma guidelines513 have emphasized that there may be a fixed or irreversible component to airway obstruction in some patients with asthma. Both asthma and COPD appear to share some clinical features. The use of phenotypic characteristics (eg, symptoms, allergy, and BHR) may be useful to differentiate disease characteristics, as well as helpful in understanding the similarities in the development and progression of both obstructive airways diseases. Figure 1 contrasts and compares some of the features of both of these disorders.14



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Characteristics of asthma and COPD.4514

 
There is increasing scientific and clinical evidence that asthma and COPD share many common origins (ie, epidemiologic characteristics and clinical manifestations), a theory that is known as the Dutch hypothesis. The Dutch hypothesis was first proposed in 1961 by Orie and coworkers.15 Their conclusions were based on a comparison of signs, laboratory findings, treatment responses, and natural history. The three components of this hypothesis are as follows: (1) various forms of obstructive lung disease (OLD) have overlapping clinical features, and defining the specific clinical phenotype with which to characterize obstructive airways disease (eg, symptoms, allergy, and BHR) was proposed by Orie and coworkers15; (2) one form of OLD (asthma) may evolve into another (COPD); and (3) the development of OLD is based on allergy (ie, inflammation) and BHR, and endogenous (host) factors determined by heredity (genes), but is modulated by exogenous (ie, environmental) factors (eg, allergens, infections, smoking, pollution, age, and airway geometry) [Fig 2 ].1516 While some concepts of the Dutch hypothesis have been controversial, none of the three components of the hypothesis have been conclusively disproven.15 A comprehensive review of the Dutch hypothesis will provide a useful platform on which to base future approaches in the assessment and therapy of asthma and COPD. This symposium will include a comprehensive discussion of the similarities and differences in the epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of asthma and COPD. These reviews will be complemented with an in-depth discussion of the therapeutic implications of these concepts.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Potential interactions between asthma and COPD.

 
The specific topics that are discussed include the following: the rationale for the Dutch hypothesis: allergy and airway hyperresponsiveness as genetic factors and their interaction with the environment in the development of asthma and COPD; genetics of asthma and COPD: similar results for different phenotypes; the relationship between asthma and COPD: lessons from transgenic mice; physiologic similarities and differences between COPD and asthma; therapeutic responses in asthma and COPD: bronchodilators; therapeutic responses in asthma and COPD: corticosteroids; and treatment implications on morbidity and mortality in COPD.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: BHR = bronchial hyperresponsiveness; OLD = obstructive lung disease


    References
 TOP
 References
 

  1. . National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (2000) Morbidity and mortality: 2000 chartbook on cardiovascular, lung, and blood diseases. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD:
  2. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital health statistics: plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–94. 1994,1-406 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA:
  3. Mannino, DM, Gagnon, RC, Petty, TL, et al Obstructive lung disease and low lung function in adults in the United States: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Arch Intern Med 2000;160,1683-1689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: NHLBI/WHO workshop report executive summary. 2001 National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD: NIH Publication No. 2701
  5. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. 2002 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD: NIH Publication No. 02–3659
  6. Mannino, DM, Brown, C, Giovino, GA Obstructive lung disease deaths in the United States from 1979 through 1993: an analysis using multiple-cause mortality data. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156,814-818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Mannino, DM COPD: epidemiology, prevalence, morbidity and mortality, and disease heterogeneity. Chest 2002;121(suppl),121S-126S
  8. American Thoracic Society. Chronic bronchitis, asthma, and pulmonary emphysema: a statement by the Committee on Diagnostic Standards for Nontuberculous Respiratory Diseases. Am Rev Respir Dis 1962;85,762-768[ISI]
  9. Burrows, B, Bloom, JW, Traver, GA, et al The course and prognosis of different forms of chronic airways obstruction in a sample from the general population. N Engl J Med 1987;317,1309-1314[Abstract]
  10. American Thoracic Society. Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152,S77-S121[Medline]
  11. Mahler, DA, Donohue, JF, Barbee, RA, et al Efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate in the treatment of COPD. Chest 1999;115,957-965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Donohue, JF, van Noord, JA, Bateman, ED, et al A 6-month, placebo-controlled study comparing lung function and health status changes in COPD patients treated with tiotropium or salmeterol. Chest 2002;122,47-55[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert panel report 2: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. 1997 National Institutes of Health. Bethesda MD: NIH Publication No. 97–4051
  14. Kerstjens, HAM, Brand, PLP, Hughes, MD, et al A comparison of bronchodilator therapy with or without inhaled corticosteroid therapy for obstructive airways disease: the Dutch Chronic Non-Specific Lung Disease Study Group. N Engl J Med 1992;327,1413-1419[Abstract]
  15. Orie, NGM, Sluiter, HJ, de Vries, K, et al The host factor in bronchitis. Orie, NGM Sluiter, HJ eds. Bronchitis 1961,43-59 Royal van Gorcum. Assen, the Netherlands:
  16. Silverman, EK, Palmer, LJ, Mosley, JD, et al Genomewide linkage analysis of quantitative spirometric phenotypes in severe early-onset chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Hum Genet 2002;70,1229-1239[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
Y.-C. Wang, J.-M. Lin, C.-Y. Li, L.-T. Lee, Y.-L. Guo, and F.-C. Sung
Prevalence and Risks of Chronic Airway Obstruction: A Population Cohort Study in Taiwan
Chest, March 1, 2007; 131(3): 705 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. B. Soriano, G. T. Visick, H. Muellerova, N. Payvandi, and A. L. Hansell
Patterns of Comorbidities in Newly Diagnosed COPD and Asthma in Primary Care
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2099 - 2107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
M. J. Walter and M. J. Holtzman
A Centennial History of Research on Asthma Pathogenesis
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., June 1, 2005; 32(6): 483 - 489.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bleecker, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bleecker, E. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS