|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Department of Internal Medicine (Drs. Shin, Kim, S.Y. Lee, and In), School of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea; Division of Information and Computer Science (Dr. S. Lee), Dankook University, Seoul, Korea; Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (Dr. Abbott), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; and Division of Epidemiology and Bioinformatics (Dr. Kimm), National Genome Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
Correspondence to: Sungim Lee, PhD, Division of Information and Computer Science, Dankook University, San 8, Hannam-Dong, Yongsan-Ku, Seoul, Korea, 140714; e-mail: silee{at}dankook.ac.kr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: The KHG study is an ongoing population-based study of Korean adults aged 40 to 69 years. The current report includes 8,140 men and women without a pulmonary disorder or obstructive lung disease. In this sample, undiagnosed airflow obstruction was defined on the basis of spirometric testing and in the absence of a medical history or a recognized pulmonary disorder. Respiratory symptoms included chronic cough, chronic phlegm, wheezing, and shortness of breath.
Results: Undiagnosed airflow obstruction was observed in 12.4% of the men (470 of 3,806 subjects) and in 3.5% of the women (152 of 4,334 subjects). In men, the age-adjusted prevalence of undiagnosed airflow obstruction increased consistently with increasing number of respiratory symptoms. In those who smoked, there was a 2.3-fold excess in its prevalence when three or more symptoms were present, as compared to when they were absent (27.4% vs 12.0%, p < 0.001). A 2.4-fold excess (20.6% vs 8.5%, p = 0.004) was observed in nonsmoking men, in whom respiratory symptoms were consistently less common than in those who smoked. Respiratory symptoms were unrelated to undiagnosed airflow obstruction in women smokers, although only 3.9% smoked cigarettes. In women who were nonsmokers, the prevalence of undiagnosed airflow obstruction increased from 2.3% in those without a respiratory symptom to 6.0% when three or more symptoms were present (p = 0.003).
Conclusions: Findings suggest that undiagnosed airflow obstruction is common in Korea with several respiratory symptoms. Whether respiratory symptoms with associations with undiagnosed airflow obstruction can be used to design early intervention strategies that prevent or delay the onset of COPD and its disabling consequences warrants further study.
Key Words: airflow obstruction epidemiology Korea respiratory symptoms
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study enrollment was based on knowledge about urban and rural differences in Korea, and on the most efficient method for recruiting representative samples of the Korean population. Since telephone use in Ansan is high, enrollment was based on random selection from directory listings that were made available from local telephone companies. In the Ansan sample, 2,523 men and 2,497 women agreed to participate in a baseline physical examination that included the routine assessment of anthropometry, BP, pulmonary function, ECG, lipid profiles, and other factors. In Ansung, sampling was based on both door-to-door and telephone solicitations within 5 randomly selected political regions from a total of 11 regions. Enrollment included 2,240 men and 2,780 women who underwent similar examinations as in Ansan. In both Ansan and Ansung, the age and sex distributions of those examined were comparable to those who were not examined. Although comparison of other characteristics is not possible, response rates are similar to other cohort studies.12131415
Spirometric Testing and Subjects
Spirometric testing was conducted by an experienced pulmonary technician through the use of a portable spirometer (Vmax-2130; SensorMedics; Yorba Linda, CA), according to criteria of the American Thoracic Society.16 Predicted FEV1 and FVC were obtained from the methods of Morris.17
Subjects with a pulmonary disorder (including asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis, and pulmonary tuberculosis) based on responses from a self-administered questionnaire were excluded. Moreover, subjects with chest radiographs showing fibrotic lesions suggestive of old healed tuberculosis were evaluated for current symptoms of tuberculosis by a pulmonary specialist and radiologist, and they were also excluded in this report. In addition, subjects with reduced FEV1 without apparent obstruction (FEV1 < 80% predicted and FEV1/FVC > 0.7) were also excluded because of a possibility of restrictive lung disease. Among the remaining sample, spirometric testing was completed in 8,140 subjects (3,806 men and 4,334 women).
Undiagnosed Airflow Obstruction and Respiratory Symptoms
In the absence of a medical history or a recognized pulmonary disorder, undiagnosed cases of airflow obstruction were identified as individuals with an FEV1 < 70% of total FVC. Such cases were considered undiagnosed since pulmonary limitations would not have been identified without spirometric testing. Subjects also received thorough questioning about respiratory symptoms by trained interviewers using collection instruments from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey.18 Items included questions on cough, chronic phlegm, wheezing, and shortness of breath following guidelines from the British Medical Research Council.19 Shortness of breath was further characterized as occurring at rest, walking at a usual pace, and walking uphill.
Statistical Methods
Respiratory symptoms are described separately for men and women and according to age and smoking status. Prevalence of undiagnosed airflow obstruction was also estimated within gender and smoking strata, and in subjects with and without a respiratory symptom. In the latter comparisons, prevalence and tests of significance were based on standard analysis of covariance procedures and logistic regression models after age adjustment.20 Prevalence of undiagnosed airflow obstruction was further assessed according to the increasing number of respiratory symptoms that characterized a study participant. All reported p values were based on two-sided levels of significance.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Figure 1 describes the prevalence of undiagnosed airflow obstruction for men and women across 10-year age groups by smoking status. In all instances, the prevalence of undiagnosed airflow obstruction increased significantly with age. In smoking men, the association between undiagnosed airflow obstruction and age was particularly strong, with prevalence increasing from 4.6% in those aged 40 to 49 years to > 40% in those aged 60 to 69 years. Although smoking appeared unrelated to undiagnosed airflow obstruction in the youngest men, smoking was associated with a twofold excess in undiagnosed airflow obstruction in men aged 60 to 69 years. Women who smoked cigarettes experienced similar rates of undiagnosed airflow obstruction with increasing age as nonsmoking men. For nonsmoking women, the prevalence of undiagnosed airflow obstruction increased modestly with age, while being consistently < 6% across all age strata.
|
|
|
Figure 2 further describes the age-adjusted relationship between the frequencies of undiagnosed airflow obstruction according to the increasing number of respiratory symptoms that characterized a study participant. Here, respiratory symptoms include chronic cough, chronic phlegm, wheezing, nocturnal shortness of breath, and shortness of breath. Subjects with three symptoms were pooled with those with four or more symptoms, since the latter group comprised a small fraction of the study sample. As seen in Figure 2, men who smoked cigarettes experienced a 2.3-fold excess in the prevalence of undiagnosed airflow obstruction when three or more symptoms were present, as compared to when they were absent (27.4% vs 12.0%). In the same comparison for nonsmoking men, there was a 2.4-fold excess in undiagnosed airflow obstruction (20.6% vs 8.5%). In smoking and nonsmoking women, while the prevalence of undiagnosed airflow obstruction seemed to increase with the number respiratory symptoms, the increases were modest compared to men. For smoking women, the association was not statistically significant.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An important feature of the current report is that emphasis is on undiagnosed airflow obstruction in the absence of a recognized pulmonary disorder or obstructive lung disease. As a result, findings may be especially relevant for the typical man or woman in a general clinical setting where pulmonary testing is rare. Whether the presence of the respiratory symptoms considered in this report can be used as a guideline for further follow-up or as a referral for pulmonary testing warrants consideration.
Since standard medical practice tends to include spirometric testing based on referral by a primary care physician or in the presence of overt pulmonary indications, the prevalence of undiagnosed airflow obstruction in a general population-based setting cannot be easily determined. For the current report, however, screening of unselected individuals without a medical history or the presence of a pulmonary disorder makes it possible to approximate the true prevalence of undiagnosed airflow obstruction in Korea. Screening was also based on a rigid protocol of spirometric testing. Others21 have observed that the detection of undiagnosed airflow obstruction can have an important role as an indicator of pulmonary function and general health.
Unfortunately, due to the use of different criteria for the diagnosis of airflow obstruction, it is difficult to make direct comparisons with other studies. Nevertheless, our findings are not unexpected based on observations that have been made elsewhere. For example, in a report22 from Spain, 14.3% of men and 3.9% of women aged 40 to 79 years had some form of obstructed airflow. In a general population-based sample in Britain, 9.9% were observed to have airflow obstruction, with 52% of the cases being undiagnosed.23 Airflow obstruction is also higher in men vs women.122232425262728 In white men and women aged
45 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 14.2% and 9.9% had obstructive airflow, respectively.21
Others122232425262728 describe an excess of respiratory symptoms in smokers vs nonsmokers. The excessive prevalence of undiagnosed airflow obstruction that was observed in our sample of Korean men vs women (12.2% vs 3.5%, respectively) could in large part be due to differences in the use of cigarettes. Women rarely smoked cigarettes (3.9%), while nearly half of the men smoked. More than 25% of US women smoke cigarettes.
Among the specific respiratory symptoms, difference in frequencies also occurs across ethnicities. In cohort studies from the Netherlands29 and Australia,10 the prevalence of wheezing (24% and 20%, respectively) and nocturnal shortness of breath (13% and 9%, respectively) were notably higher than in the KHG study. In contrast, shortness of breath while walking uphill was less prevalent in Australia (27%) than in the KHG cohort. Although wide variation in study methods could contribute to the diversity of findings between Korea and those described in westernized societies, ethnic differences could also be real. It is well established that differences in rates of cardiovascular disease exist between developed regions of Asia and the United States and Europe. As with cardiovascular disease, differences in pulmonary function between Asia and the West are equally important to identify, since it could lead to the discovery of factors (both genetic and environmental) that make some groups more resistant to the development of respiratory symptoms, including undiagnosed and more severe types of airflow obstruction.
Although smoking and age are generally associated with an increased prevalence of undiagnosed airflow obstruction, the presence of respiratory symptoms in cigarette smokers may be interpreted as the consequence of smoking cigarettes and not as a sign of airflow obstruction. Even in smokers, however, respiratory symptoms remain a meaningful and significant correlate of undiagnosed airflow obstruction. In contrast, respiratory symptoms in nonsmokers may be more meaningful in the absence of smoking as an explanatory factor, particularly in the vast majority of nonsmoking Korean women. Here, other factors that may be associated with undiagnosed airflow obstruction need to be identified. Even in nonsmoking men with three or more respiratory symptoms, 20% had undiagnosed airflow obstruction in the Korean sample. Whether combinations of respiratory symptoms can be used to identify individuals for further follow-up and possible pulmonary testing warrants consideration. Such individuals, who could be at an elevated risk for severe forms of COPD, may be the most suitable candidates for early intervention for the prevention of future disabilities.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by a grant (3486111-221) from the Korean National Institute of Health.
Received for publication January 23, 2004. Accepted for publication May 17, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
a, VS, Miravitlles, M, Gabriel, R, et al Geographic variations in prevalence and underdiagnosis of COPD. Chest 2000;118,981-989This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. C.-W. Lau, M. S.-M. Ip, C. K.-W. Lai, K.-L. Choo, K.-S. Tang, L. Y.-C. Yam, and M. Chan-Yeung Variability of the Prevalence of Undiagnosed Airflow Obstruction in Smokers Using Different Diagnostic Criteria Chest, January 1, 2008; 133(1): 42 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |